From a lecture presented
Sir Laurence Gardner,
Kt St Gm, KCD
In essence we will be looking strictly at history, but history viewed from a
position thatís different from the norm. History is not the event, history
is the record of the event. History is written for all sorts of reasons, but
itís generally written by itís winners. And as with all things, the story of
yesterday as today, we are told what weíre supposed to know and we learn it
in the way that weíre supposed to learn it.
Itís written for political reasons itís written for reasons of vested
interests, they may be parliamentary or church interests or whatever. Well,
itís been a year since "Bloodline of the Holy Grail" was published. Those of
you who did hear my earlier talks will know that the book is about the
Messianic Bloodline, which descended from Jesus Christ to the present day.
It was concerned with, and IS concerned with, comparing the new Testament
Gospels, with the original first hand accounts of the period, whether they
be the Jewish records or the Roman chronicles as well. So this is the first
lesson to learn in history, that for the most part the people who knew more
about what they were talking about, were the people who were there at the
time, not those who decided to interpret it 1500 years later!
So, what we did in Bloodline, and the talks we did early on in this year,
was to just look at how the Christian Church had established itself. How it
had molded itself around a certain field of vested interest, most of which
was to suppress the female in the church establishment so that the Church
reigned supreme for so many 100ís of years, also in society as a whole. What
we find when we look at the original text of the era, is quite a different
story from what we know today. Doctrines such as Jesus was born of a virgin,
that he was the one and only son of God, such things as these do not feature
at all in the documents of the era.
The New Testament actually gives details of Jesusí descendant lineage from
King David of Israel, and this had lead to the one question that Iíve been
asked more than any other in the last year. And that is "O.K., this is an
important bloodline, this is a bloodline from Jesus. It has a big story to
tell in the western world, and in the middle eastern world, but WHY on earth
was it so special to begin with?". It canít be special simply because it
came from King David. It clearly isnít special because it came from Jesus,
because before that, it did come from King David. The new testament tells us
that it did.
History tells us that it did, and actually the Roman archives tell us that
it did, because it was they that purloined under edict from the Emperor to
collect all documentation concerning the messianic line in AD 70. Most of
these records are still held, they werenít destroyed as they were supposed
to be. So the question is simply, what was so important about the bloodline,
what made King David so important in the first place? And it was this trail
I was lead on. For in the next book, Iím probably about half way through it
now. Iím not going to start the story from the very beginning of it because,
what Iím here to talk to you today, is just that one aspect of it.
The Bible explains that the line that moved through the Old Testament to
King David was exceptionally important because it began with
Adam and Eve,
the first people. From whose third son, Seth, evolved a line which
progressed through to Noah. It relates to Abraham, who became the great
Patriarch of the Hebrew nation. It relates to Abraham who brought his family
out of Mesopotamia, into Canaan, and the descendants then moved into
whose descendants stayed there for awhile, then came back to the land of
Canaan, and so the story progresses.
And if we view it as weíre told it, itís in fact quite a fascinating saga,
but there is nothing anywhere in it to explain to us why this line was so
special. Quite the reverse in fact. The ancestors are portrayed really as a
sort of wandering nomadic band of territory seekers. Who appear to be of no
real significance whatever, apart from the fact that somebody decided to
write up their story. They bare no comparison to the great Pharaohs of Egypt
at the time. The only consolation lies in the fact that at the time of
Abraham, weíre told that these were Godís chosen people.
Thatís a contrary sort of situation, because according to the Scriptures
God who chose them, lead them through nothing but a whole series of
successions of famines and wars, hardships, and on the face of it, the line
not only doesnít look special, it doesnít actually look to have been too
bright either (laughing). So weíre faced with a couple of possibilities
here, either David was not from Abrahamís succession at all, or the story
weíve been presented with is quite corrupted from the original tale. The
version that we have, maybe just like the Christian story was adapted to
suit the Jewish faith, rather than to suit historical fact. So, in
consideration of this, I was reminded of exactly what had happened with my
previous book, with the New Testament story, the gospels that had been in
the public domain for centuries bare little relation to the first hand
accounts of the period.
The New Testament was concocted by the 4th century bishops, to support the
newly contrived Christian belief. What if the Jews had done exactly the same
with the Old Testament, contrived it to suit the Jewish belief? So in this
regard itís interesting to note that although the New Testament was put
together only 1600 years ago, the Old Testament, the one that tells the
stories from before, is actually 400 years younger than that. With what
little that we know, itís based on Hebrew texts from the 10th Century, just
a 150 years before William the Conqueror invaded England. So this is hardly
first hand accounts of anything. So, I had to get back to the old writings
once again, and this time weíre really looking at "old" writings. The
problem was that even if they proved to be available, the original Hebrew
text that were rehashed centuries later were themselves only written between
the 6th and the 1st century BC. So it wasnít actually likely, that even
"they" were going to be that authentic in their telling of history of
thousand and thousands of years before.
The first group of books for the Old Testament were written while the Jews
were held captive in Babylon in 6th century BC, in Mesopatamia. So, it was
apparent that Babylon in the 6th century BC were where the records will be
held that gave the writers the information from which to put together the
Old Testament. From the time of Abraham, back to Adam we have nineteen
generations in the Bible, and it will appear that the whole of the story of
those nineteen generations were all Mesopotamian. It was all Iraqi history.
The interesting thing that I found, was that when getting facts in old
Babylonian records, there was a great track of Southern Iraq bordering the
Persian gulf in a land that they called Sumer, which actually, in the old
documents, is referred to as "the eden", not the garden of eden, simply
the eden, and the Eden meant in the language of the day,
pasture land, a grazing
I found, when researching for "Bloodline of the Holy Grail", good sources of
information were from the texts that were not selected for the New
Testament, not the ones that are, but the ones that werenít. Why werenít
they, what did they say that we werenít supposed to know? Perhaps I thought,
the same might apply to the Old Testament, perhaps the Secret here is that
the books that were written down at the time of the Babylon records, but
were never put into print for our eyes in later times. So I looked for the
books that were there but were never included, it was pretty easy to find.
The Books of Enoch and, most books and text are available,
theyíre just not
in the bible. A further book which Iíd known about for some time, because I
found in Bloodline, was the book of Jasher. Another very important book, it
was so important that twice in the Old Testament our attention is drawn to
the great importance of the book of Jasher. Itís not there... Itís very
important but they missed it out! That book is still readily available
So there wasnít too many big secrets there... there are a few, it tells a
very good story about the time of the Israelites in Egypt and their return
with Moses to the land of Canaan and that part of the story, but it tells us
nothing at all of any consequence about the early line. The early, early
line from Adam or from wherever were going to go.
My attention was suddenly drawn, as I plowed through the Old Testament to
two other books. Which in speaking to people, not many people had ever heard
of before. They didnít even know they were in the Bible. It says in the book
of Numbers, "where for it is said in the book of the Wars of Jehovah".
Subsequently, in the book of Isaiah was read "seek yee out the Book of the
Lord". Nobody had even heard of these books, the
Wars of Jehovah, the Book
of the Lord. What on earth were they, did they exist? Well in fact, remnants
of them do exist. What transpired upon pursuing remnants of these books and
indeed the very substance of the Babylonian and Mesopotamian records
were put together for the Old Testament, was that the answer, to one
question became very clear indeed.
It is said enough many many times by many people, who on earth is it that
this God of the Hebrews who chose these people, led them their trails,
tribulations, floods and famines. Where from time to time was quite a
contrary personality, he appears to have done some pretty nice and merciful
things. There is a conflict there, a conflict of personalities, which has
never really ever been understood. Well looking at the old records, looking
at the remnants of these two books that were mentioned, we suddenly discover
why they werenít included in the Old Testament.
Because they make it absolutely and abundantly clear that there was a
distinct difference between the figures of Jehovah and the Lord. There were,
in fact, quite separate deities. The God referred to as Jehovah, turns out
to be a "Storm God", a god of wrath, a god of vengeance. The other
referred to, through the original text, as always The Lord. He was
different, he was a "Fertility God", a god of wisdom. So, we begin to see
from these texts, how the different personalities are answering the question
on how he is one thing on the one hand, and something quite different on the
Weíre detailing with two different characters here in terms of history
written down at the time. So, who was "the Lord", in fact, what was the word
he was called by at the time? In time, that would be turned into Lord, in
the English language. Well, the word in Hebrew was Adoni. In the old text,
he is always referred to, by the Hebrews, by the name Adoni.
The other god is referred to as Jehovah. The strange thing is that the name
Jehovah does not appear at all, once one begins to get back to the sort of
terms that were used in that millennium. Into the BC years, the further we
go back and we donít have to go back too far before the name
Jehovah disappears altogether. The name we begin to see, is the name that
referred to as the God figure in the book of Exodus. He calls him
Suddenly, Jehovah has disappeared, and we have this other person.
actually refers to and means "Lofty Mountain", maybe "Lord of the Mountain",
or "Ruler of the Mountain". Whatever the words... a Mountain God.
What about the name Jehovah, where does that come from? It came, as weíre
told in the Bible, in a quotation, it means "I Am, That I Am". That was a
statement said to be said to Moses, by God on the Mountain, "I Am That I
Am". That was when Moses actually asked him who he was. Now, that leads one
to wonder, because why would Moses have had to ask him who he was? It would
have been pretty clear that God was God, but Moses wasnít sure. He was
really saying, really saying (laughing), which one have I got here
(laughing)? So, not wishing to give the game away, he didnít really admit to
too much. He simply said "I Am That I Am" and anyone of us can say that it
means very little.
Jehovah is not a name at all, the name to Abraham and the people at the time
was El Shaddai. His opposition, the one that was called the Lord in the old
text, was called Adoni. Respectively, in the land of Canaan we find
identical stories coming up. They follow exactly the same pattern, they take
us through the same sequence of events, that tell the same sagas and they
are called Elyon and Baal. They mean exactly the same thing.
"Mountain Lord", and Baal means "Lord", means "Adoni". Two characters still,
the definitions of God and Lord has ended up in the Old Testament being
mixed together throughout, as if weíve got one character in this story...
and it turns out to be totally wrong. It is a complete concoction of two
completely different characters merged into one figure. Hence, the different
personalities. One was a vengeful god and people hater, the records are very
clear in this regard. The other, was a social god, a people supporter. They
each had wives, they each had sons and daughters.
The writings tell us that throughout the era, the Israelites endeavored to
support the Adoni, the Lord. All of the early stories tell of them trying to
support the Adoni, the Lord. And in every step and turn of the way, the
Jehovah, the storm god, retaliated with floods, and famines, and
destruction, and just about everything that could be put in the way of these
people, who were trying to follow the other God. Even at the very last, at
about 600 BC, the Bible explains that Jerusalem was overturned by invasion,
strictly at Jehovahís bidding. And Jews in their 10ís of 1000ís were taken
into captivity, simply because, and it is the only reason given for all of
that, the Israelites had erected a Temple to the Lord Baal. What we have is
vengeance once again.
Now itís during this time of captivity, that all of the decay in Babylon, as
the generations lived and died and the new ones grew up, that the Jews
finally decided that all of these generations of trials and torments, wasnít
really a great scene. Maybe, we should get on this other Gods side. So, it
was then and only then, suddenly we discover that Jehovah is taken on board
as the God. Itís at that time, it is said that he chose us to be his people.
This is only about 500 years or so before the time of Jesus Christ. So, the
true story of the Jews and Jehovah, and the chosen people is really quite
young. It doesnít go way way back to the times of Adam and
Eve, not even to
the times of Abraham. They were actually following a different God. So, the
Jews take Jehovah on board as their main God, they decide out of shear fear
for the peril of everything, that this is the God that theyíre now going to
follow. The Christians, then in a vague replication of that, eventually take
on the epitome of the same god. It doesnít call him Jehovah,
it simply calls
him God, which is pretty inspirational (laughing). And itís at that time,
that we suddenly find that Baal and Adoni and these other names disappear.
Theyíre not being followed anymore. What we now have, from that moment in
time, weíve now moved forward into the current common era, to faiths of
So, where does that leave us, it leaves us knowing that within a general
pantheon of Gods and Goddesses, of which many are named in the Bible, that
there were actually two predominant male god figures who in different
cultures have been called many different names. But, we know that by
whatever names these Gods are called, weíre dealing all the time with two
different characters. We canít mix up, in the old books, the name Jehovah
with the name Lord. If one now reads the Old Testament with that in mind,
not the English version, the Jewish translated version of the Old Testament,
then just supplements the names each time. We suddenly find, that every time
that something nasty happens its Jehovah, and every time something nice
happens itís this guy they call the Lord. Itís not the same fellow.
They had all of these names, but these names all mean the same thing, one
way or another. They mean, "ruler of a mountain" or "Lord". Do they actually
have names? Well, to find that out, we have to look back a little further
and again we have to stay in Babylon. Perhaps, more generally in
to follow the story back, because these same gods were followed from country
to country as the Adamite family progressed. We can find the first clue in
documents that were discovered in 1929, in Syria, and these documents
actually tell us that the two gods have their joint seat in Southern Iraq.
Weíre in the land that was then called Sumer. What did these people call the
same gods, can we find replications of the stories? So that we know weíre
actually talking about the same gods, and can we find the stories turning up
in exactly the same way, with the same gods?
They tell us that the God we know, and got to know as Jehovah, was called
Ilu-kur-gal. It means "Ruler of the Mountain". He was also called, as a sort
of abbreviation Enlil. He had a brother, and his brother had probably the
most important name we can find in the history of deities, because itís
really where the whole thing began. In English, his brothers name was Enki,
it means Archetype. A very important word. The text informs us that it was
Enlil that brought the flood, that it was Enlil that destroyed Babylon, that
it was Enlil who constantly opposed the education and enlightenment of
The Syrian text tells us that it was Enlil who obliterated the cities of
Sodom and Gomorrah in later times, on the Dead Sea, because it said they
were great centers of wisdom and learning. But what we get told is that it
was a den of debauchery. When in fact, one only has to look at how the
church is run today, to discover that anybody who thinks something different
to the dogma is running a den of debauchery, and you get called all sorts of
So, itís Enki we discover on the other hand that is doing the other stuff.
He, despite this wrath and vengeance of the brother figure, is granting the
Sumerians access to the "Tree of Knowledge" and to the "Tree of Life". He
sets up the escape strategy during the great flood. He passed over the time
honored "Tablets of Destiny" and the "Tablets of Scientific Law", the
bedrock of the early mystery schools. So, this establishes a scene, it is
somewhere for us begin. What we know is that history, isnít always history
as we perceive it. We have to get back to the oldest records and generally
it doesnít matter what century. When we look at the original story, written
down by the people closest to the event, it is different and probably stands
more chance of being correct. Without being a time traveler with a video
recorder, we canít prove anything, but we can trust their writings, better
than we can trust the 10th Century Interpretation of them.
The early mystery schools, and it becomes very very apparent that outside of
pure historical records, that the ancient mystery schools of Egypt, Mesapotamia, &
Canaan hold more of the secrets that we had to get and come
to grips with. As far as I could determine, and Iím looking for a route to a speciality in the bloodline here, it seems very, very, apparent that
everything that we had read in the text at that point, that whenever one was
talking about this particular bloodline, the bloodline that came down to
David, and eventually to Jesus. It had something rather strange and rather
different about itís dietary structure, there was clearly a line being built
up. A line being purposefully contrived for some reason or purpose,
And itís diet was different. There were bodily supplements being used, that
the words meant nothing in the text. I havenít got a clue what they are. And
so, I was talking about this with someone about this, and she said fear not,
because you will very soon meet the people who might have some of the
answers. Well, I thought, thatís pretty good (laughing). And I thought she
was going to take me into the dinning room and introduce me to somebody
(laughing), but it wasnít quite like that. Within a week and a half of
getting back to Britain, low and behold quite out of the blue, contact was
Iím affiliated, for those of you who donít know too much about me, to an
organization called the "European Council of Princes". Itís a constitutional
body who comprises 33 sovereign houses. And it really operates as a sort of
Parliamentary buffer, between dictates and what people will or will not be
subjected to. I was approached simply because of that, nothing to do with my
new book, by an organization that Iíd never heard of before. Considering all
my years of involvement, Iíd never heard of them, and they were called "The
Imperial Court of the Dragon Sovereignty". The only thing that I knew about
them, was that they had existed a few 100 years ago and I knew that they
were said to be in Hungary.
What I discovered, was that they were still very operative now, and are
still centered in Hungary. Their story, however, is much much older and this
became so intriguing. Those of you who are reading books about ancient law,
mystery schools, freemasonry, and all this sort of thing, will know about
"Hermetic Schools". The early schools in ancient Egypt from the time of 1450
BC, and we know then, that there were scientific academies, that had
apparently great secrets. What weíre not told, is that the mystery schools,
were actually schools founded by the priests of Ra in about 2200 BC. And the
senior of these mystery schools, was called "The Sovereign Court of the
Dragon". We actually have here, the oldest single scientific mystery school
in the world.
What were the earliest aims and ambitions of the orders? See here they said,
this is what we were set up to do, and this comes from 2000 BC to perpetuate
and advance the scientific strength of the Royal Family. Now, weíre looking
here, apparently, at the Royal Family in Egypt. But once one gets into the
genealogy, we can find that that same family, was the family of the great
Kings in Iraq. So, there we are.
The picture begins to emerge, yes there is something special here. Thereís
something so special here that they set up Royal Courts and
Orders, to look
after the formulation of this family. Nothing was said to me then about
diets, or bodily supplements, or things like this from Iraq. But, the thing
is beginning to emerge into a picture. Suddenly, this line that was so
important that for 2000 years after Christ, and for 2000 years before
Christ, for 4000 years this same order has been operative. And its aims and
ambitions, are the same today as they were then, to support and perpetuate
the Royal Bloodline.
The Kings, of the early successions of Kings, who became
the Pharaohs of
Egypt and the Kings of Israel, and the High Kings of Judea
the Kings of Mesopotamia! We then look for traditions, and we find the
anointing ceremonies were identical. For Kings, upon coronation, were
anointed with the fat of the Sacred Dragon, the Crocodile.
Referred to, in
Egypt, as the holy mesa. From which derived the Hebrew word "to anoint". And
the early Kings of the period, were always called Dragons, or
Messiahs. Thatís where Messiah comes from, it comes from the ancient holy
crocodile. So, when one talks about Jesus the Messiah, we actually have a
lot of anomaly there. Because heís not "THE" Messiah,
heís one of a whole
succession of Messiahís. These are pretty important people, that have been
looked after by a Court of High Priests, people looking after the Bloodline.
In times of battle, we are told that different Kingdoms are brought together
to form an overall army. They appointed a head Dragon, a
head Messiah, the
King of Kings, and the name in Celtic terms became, "Pen Dragon". So, weíre
beginning to see the names creeping in here, of all the stuff we know about
in Arthurian Lore, and the Royal Kingdoms. This started way way back. Weíre
suddenly in 2000 BC. Weíre now going to move back into 3000 and 4000 BC,
when we find these same titles being used: Dragons &
Messiahs, all the time.
One of the things I learnt from the Order, was actually the root of the word
Kingship. Not many of us think about it, do we? Kings are Kings, Queens are
Queens, and it doesnít mean a lot, thatís what they are. The name goes back
to the very, very, earliest time. The records show that the central "G"
the word Kingship, or the G on the end of King, is just a latterly western
addition, for the sake of making it easier to say, for the sake of another
word. Because the word Kingship is absolutely identical with the word
Kinship. It means, blood relative. A King is a blood relative and thatís all
it means. In itís original form, however, itís spelt differently. We havenít
got Kingship or Kinship we have "CAINSHIP". And the first
King of the Dragon
Messianic succession is recorded in the documents of the order, from 2200
BC, to be the "Biblical Cain". Well, he isnít actually terribly important in
the story is he? Apart from killing his brother Able and disappearing from
sight, he turns out to be the founder of the greatest Sovereign line in
We can now begin to see the anomaly in the Book of Genesis. The line from
Seth, the third son of Adam and Eve, turned out not to be the important
person in this aspect at all. The important person is the guy that gets
shunned and pushed aside, the first son of Eve. Whose name weíre told is
Cain, in fact the records tell us that he was "The Cain", "The King". He was
the first earthly High King of an area called Kish, which sits pretty near
Babylon in Iraq. So, two more things suddenly come to light, The more you
start looking the more it begins to leap out from pages, just as it did with
the New Testament stuff. Because the stories that we know, that weíre taught
in our school rooms and our pulpits are about Cain and Able, The two sons of
Adam and Eve, and Cain slew Able.
Actually, when you look at the bible, and all the other texts of that period
there are not two sons of Adam and Eve at all. They are both sons of
only Able turns out to be a son of Adam. Even the book of Genesis explains
to us that Eve said "I have gotten me a man from the Lord", who was
Lord, the Lord was Enki. If we now begin to look at old Jewish literature
again, we discover that there is nothing outside of our pulpit teachings
that tells us that Adam was the father of Cain. We, suddenly learn that
Enki was the father of Cain.
We have a situation that begins to repeat the Jesus type of experience.
actually have an original son of a God !!! We can then look at the other
jargon of the era. With the way that the story gets told to us, we are told
that, Cain was a tiller of the ground. Did the original text say that, that
he was a tiller of the ground? Well, not quite, what they actually say, is
that Cain had dominion over the "Earth" (laughing). Well, itís not quite the
same is it? In fact, the bible translating seems to have continually had a
problem in translating the effective word for "Earth". They translated it to
ground, to clay, to soil, to dust, into all sorts of things. Except, what
they should have translated it to "The Earth", not that earth, "The Earth". Everytime the word is mentioned to be translated, they are referring to "The
Earth". Even in the case of Adam and Eve, the translators get it wrong. The
Bible says "Male and Female, he created them and he called them Adam". The
older records use the term Adama, which means "of Earth". It did not mean
they were made of dirt or clay or dust. It says, exactly as the Hebrew Bible
says, clearly for us to understand, they were of "The Earth". They were
So, weíre suddenly discovering there is a bit of a difference here between
the gods and the earthlings. And we know that earthlings, if somethingís not
called that, itís not quite like the average person. Because thereís lots of
other people around, and theyíre not called earthlings, there is a
difference. See, here are people that for some reason they are, not just
gods, theyíre not just ordinary people either. There is a hell of a lot, and
people here have probably read
Sitchin and others, there has been a lot
written about the sort of genetic engineering that went on at that time.
About how characters of that era may have ended up being called Adam and
Eve, or whatever. Or clinically cloned in some regard. Iím not actually
going to dwell on that tonight, itís a part of my book. And I actually go
much more fully into it than Sitchin and others. What I really want to do,
is cut to the chase and get onto the story of the Bloodline. So, we need to
take that as read, that the "Adam & Eve" figures were the first of
something. We know they were the first of something, it tells us they were.
The Sumerian records itself tells us that they were the first of something
which they called the "Branches". And the word branches, the word for
Branches is clones. Spelt just like it is today, it means branches. So,
Adamís not the first man on earth. Heís the first kind of a specifically
devised strain of being. And his surrogate mother is actually named in the
records of Iraq, and sheís called Ninkhursag. It means "Lady of Life", and
"Lady of the Embryo".
She was the surrogate mother, mother of Adam, and we find Adam actually
recorded by the name Adam, Adama, various forms of the name as the very,
very first King. So, we find that the bloodline is now beginning to have a
little more significance. Theyíre not just wandering nomads, picking fruit
on the trees and things. Weíre building up a Kingly line here right from the
start. It was because of Ninkhursag, the "Lady of Life", that
Eve or Ava was
subsequently given the same name by the Hebrews. "Lady of Life", it said in
the text that Eve actually means "life", so thatís where the title comes
from. It comes from the Goddess who was the "Lady of Life".
When, in fact, we know that Cain got into an argument with Jehovah, this is
the way the story goes. Over allegiance problems, venerations, there was a
dispute over who should offer venerations to Jehovah, and who shouldnít. It
was not Cainís prerogative to offer venerations to Jehovah,
because he was
the son of Jehovahís brother. It then tells us that
the Lord placed a mark
about Cain, to save him from his enemies, a seven fold vengeance. But who
was the Lord? The Lord was not Jehovah, The Lord
was his brother Enki.
So, we find, in fact, what the "Dragon Court" has recorded for all time.
Something called the first grants of arms in sovereign, when Lord Enki
granted his son the Grail. The mark of Cain. What is the mark of
Cain? It is
the most simple of all sovereign devices. It is simply, and the early Hebrew
records tell us this, the Mesopotamian records tell us this, and they all
tell us the same symbol. It is very simply an upright red cross within a
circle. A very familiar image. A red cross in a circle, itís called
Why was it called the Grail, because we know the Grail to be something else?
The Grail is a Chalice or a bloodline, or whatever we spoke about in our
previous talks. Well, itís rather odd because this emblem, although its a
cross within a circle, is defined as the "Dew Cup". The "Cup of the Waters".
This is rather interesting, because when one gets into grail lore in
medieval times, we always have "Ladies of the Waters", "Ladies of the
Fountains". Waterís terribly important here in this early sovereign history.
The "Mark of Cain" is the "Dew Cup", the "Cup of the Waters", which in the
roman language was called Rosecruxious, Rose Dew,
Cruxious Cup, Rosecruxions,
from whence comes Roseicruxions, the dew cup.
An upright red cross, even today the "Dragon Court" uses the same symbol, a
little more advanced, a little more pretty, but itís the identical emblem to
what they had then. So, Cain is now King. Cain has a grant of arms. What do
we do to perpetuate his bloodline? What do we do to make his successors even
more special? We now have to marry him back into the godly line. He marries
a woman, the records tell us, called Luluwa.
The bible doesnít give us this name. It tells us about his offspring, but it
doesnít give us her name, as some records do, Luluwa. It names his son in
the bible, Enoch. Other records, name his son Atun. The Sumerian records
tell us that Atun was the successor of Cain. Thatís the reason why heís not
mentioned in the bible, only, Enoch. Atun was the successor.
Atun was the
next High King of Kish. So, weíre now beginning not only a royal bloodline,
but weíre beginning to see the very first kingly dynasty on earth. Kings,
earthly Adamas, highly bred people, meant to be leaders among human kind. We
keep seeing them being referred to as the fruit and the branches of the
vine. But there is something even more strange here, because Eve is also
called the "Lady of the Rib" as well. We kept getting told how
was taken from his side, and she was made from his "Rib". Well, thatís an
odd one, because the "Lady of Life" in Sumerian, the word "Lady of Life" was
Ninti. There is nothing in the ancient records that tells us anything about
Adamsí "Rib", or anything of this sort of stuff.
So, we now have Enki and Enlil, and we discover that this Ninkhursag lady
their sister. And theyíre both married to the same sister. It is the rule of
matriarchal Kingship, as applied at the time. The same rule that,
subsequently, got made the rule on earth. Kings married their first, second
cousins, and it seems to suddenly have become apparent that this is being
done to perpetuate something quite specific in the bloodline. Those who have
read books about ancient Sumer and the gods at the time, will know that the
great pantheon of the era were called the Anunnaki. These were the gods at
the time. In Canan they called them, "Eloheim". In fact, the "Court of the Elohim", the "Court of the Anunnaki" and the "Grand Assembly",
mentioned in the bible. It was looking at Psalm 82, we discover Jehovah
actually making an appearance in "Court" before the other gods, and trying
to claim supremacy. So, even the bible tells us that he wasnít the only one.
Cain was important, we discover, because he was actually the son, not of
Adam and Eve, but of Enki and Eve. We actually have here, if we use the word
they use, the word clone, the branch. We have the second stage in the
cloning fertilization process. We have now not only a partly contrived Eve,
who was 50% "Anunnaki", we now have Eve and
Enki who is wholly
a son thatís turns out to be, according to the records, at least "3/4 Anunnaki", the other man who is very much approaching a god figure himself.
The records actually say that Cainís blood was so advanced, that his brother
Abelís blood was earthbound by comparison. Thatís what the records say!!!
His blood was so advanced. What does our Bible say? Cain rose up against
Able, and spilled his blood on the ground (laughing). It actually comes from
the translation of "rose up", Cain rose so high above Able weíre told. So,
weíre told he rose up against Able and spilled his blood on the ground. This
is not what the records say at all. There is no story anywhere, outside of
our bible teaching, that indicates that, whatsoever.
So, weíre moving into sovereign history. We have a bloodline that is being
contrived, itís being contrived for leadership among men. In a very special
way, the gods at the time, are actually trying to implant, whatever it is
that they have thatís so special, into this nuclear race here, the new
leaders, the "Cains", the "Kings". So, we can now progress our story to what
now becomes, and this is something in the records in the
Dragon Court, the
very, very first grant of "Royal Arms" in sovereign history. The grant of
arms, which denoted the messianic bloodline for all time. Today as then. The
Sumerians refer to this insignia as the Gra-al, familiar isnít it,
when you put it together, "The Holy Grail", The bible calls it the "Mark of
Cain". The mark has been portrayed to us, by the church, as if it was some
sort of a curse. The Lord thrust the mark upon Cain, but why did he do it?
It said, he did it to save him being killed by his enemies. At that moment
in time, weíre supposed to believe that Cain had killed Able, and apart from
his mother thereís nobody else on earth anyway. But, Cain has a mark on his
head to protect him from his enemies ............... "What Enemies???"
In latterly times, the Holy Grail is often referred to as the vine, the vine
of grapes. The word keeps coming up. These people are Cains, these people
are clones! Now, today we use the word cloning in quite a different form,
but it almost means the same thing. Special, contrived to be of a particular
kind. KLONE in the old spelling. So, by virtue of this contrived breeding,
what we have is a specifically modeled succession beginning to buildup in
history. A succession which judging by their military prose, judging by
their political influence, judging by their leadership of the great
assemblies, seem to have had a much more heightened awareness to it all.
The Bible is filled with poetic symbolism. Jezebel translates not as the
name of an adulteress, but "pile of dung" in Old Hebrew.
In terms of culture, wisdom and general intuition there is no doubt that
these people were advanced. "His blood was so advanced that he rose above his
brother", this seems to be the story throughout generations. The senior
people in this line are really beginning to look quite special, and this is
the line that is finally going to end up with King David and eventually with
Jesus. It was recognized at the time however, that there was more to it than
just producing a line and dealing with its diet and itís general health.
What they do seem to know about, and they make a very deep thing about it.
They donít call it the same thing, but it would be what we call today DNA.
And they record, very, very specifically, that the important gene, that
moved through from generation to generation was strictly a female gene. The
DNA structure that gives the ability to Kingship,
comes through the mother,
always. The best that latterly Judaism managed to do, to hang onto this
tradition, was to claim that being a Jew was something that happened, that
was due to your mother. It didnít matter too much if your father wasnít a
Jew. If your motherís a Jew, youíre a Jew.
This was set up in the Kingly line, the mother had to be part of the Kingly
line, if the son was to succeed as a King. So, at whatever stage the King
was, whether it was Cain or if it was his son Atun, or whoever following,
that they were always married back into a princely line that was pretty much
strictly and wholly "Anunnaki". Not Adamaís and earthlings at all, but
straight back into the godly race. So, in fact every time, the line got
stronger and stronger and stronger. Through kingship it was maintained, that
"Cainship" was inherited through the mother.
So, we can now begin to see why it was, just like it was with the New
Testament, history gets contrived in a different way: because just like
Roman Church, built up a religion, which was to keep women out of positions
of authority, out of the Church. The Jews had early done exactly the same
thing. They had built up a male dominated religion, and they had lost all
traits of its real importance, of this Kingly inheritance that comes through
the women, in the early days.
We discover, getting back to my original findings, about the possibilities
of something dietary going on here. From this point, from the time Cain's
son Etana, we suddenly discover something called the "Plant of Life". These
people are being fed from the "Plant of Life". Itís from the "Plant of
Life", that this word Branches and Vines keeps getting mentioned from which
we get the quote. The "Plant of Life" is the root of this, this is whatís
going to turn out to be what was so special about the bloodline.
Why was it then that the Jews decided to knock that on the head, and to
forget it, and to tell us a tale about wandering? Territory seeking nomads,
when what they had to tell was the greatest story in the whole of history.
Being born, of "Earthlings", from the "gods". Weíre told that the line came
from Seth, the line came down to Noah, the line came down to
happened I wonder, along the way, what happened to change the course of
events? What happened in "Jewish Law" or in Jewish custom to make them have
to knock this early part of history on the head?
There had to be a reason for it. They wouldnít have done it to get rid of
something important. They would have done it to get rid of something that
was a problem to them. "Something", must have happened, maybe, "something"
happened around the time of Noah. Itís actually quite surprising, how often
when you come up with an idea like that, and you think that this is the era
weíre looking at, this is the era of Noah. So, what happened then to make
them make this change? Was there "something"? Is there "something" in the
bible. And we actually find that there is.
What happened that at the time of Noah? Jehovah, who theyíd taken onboard to
worship, wholly and solely, some centuries later, apparently said to the
sons of Noah, "the life blood of the flesh thereof ye shall not eat, the
blood ye shall not eat". This edict becomes expressly important to "Jewish
Law" and the Jewish way of life. Why does Jehovah suddenly become, in that
moment in time, obsessed with what to us seems to us like the intaking of
blood in some form or other? Whatís the problem here? Itís a customary
Jewish practice now, to hang meant for bloodletting, before cooking and
consuming it. Whatís odd, is that in the Christian religion,
In the Christian religion, in contrast, itís actually customary to take, in
what we know of as the Mass, which takes us through a ritual of
to be drinking blood. We drink blood from a chalice. Why a chalice??? This
is "Grail Lore" coming into play. This is the old cup of the Jew, the "Holy
Waters". Jews canít and will not eat blood, if theyíre observing the faith.
The Christians pretend to, the blood, the messianic line, this is my blood,
the blood of Jesus, the drinking of the wine. So, could it be, one wonders,
that this Christian tradition was actually more right than the Jewish
tradition in terms of old law. Maybe, the Christian tradition of pretending
to drink blood is a throw back, a real throw back, to some really ancient
custom. Before the days of Noah. Could that be?
Well, as it turns out it is. It is exactly that. The other interesting
thing, is that we discover that every time, what we might think of as blood
drinking or blood eating as referred to in the early days, in the deity
stories, the sign that always gets presented to us is the red cross in the
circle. Now, crosses in circles mean a lot of things. But, red crosses in
circles were always tied up with this particular ritual, the "Cup of the
Water", the "Rosicrucians". However, itís always a cup, itís always a
chalice thatís involved. And from Bloodline of the Holy Grail, what we
learnt through our investigations, was that the "Chalice" was the ultimate,
ultimate, symbol of the female.
One can go back 3000, 4000 BC, and find the female symbol is a cup or a
"Chalice". In itís simplest form, it is simply a red circle with a red cross
in it. Could it be, that this blood that weíre talking about, that caused
suddenly such a problem? That is linked to the fact that Kingship is only
obtainable, through the gene of the female, had something to do with
menstrual blood? Is this the important factor here? Well, thatís a bit hard
to take when you think about it first off. But, the more you look, the more
you find,. And you only have to look at the "Dragon Court"
2200BC, and you find yes, this is exactly what weíre looking at.
Weíre looking at early stages of bodily supplements, weíre looking at stages
before the drug companies came in. Weíre looking at times before alchemy.
Weíre simply looking at things that could be done with natural products. We
begin to find an old ritual in Egypt, in Canaan, in
Babylon, in Mesopotamia,
& Sumer. The same ritual. Itís called the "Ritual of the Star Fire". Star
Fire is the ritual, which weíre told began with Enkiís sister Ninkhursag.
Ninkhursag was the "Lady of the Embryo", was the "Lady of Life".
The Lady who we are told fed her offspring with her Star Fire.
at a ritual of menstrual blood. This is stunning stuff, because it seems a
little unsavory, doesnít it, to start with (laughing)? I started to ask a
few friends of mine, and people who I knew who were doctors and scientists.
And I said, can you tell me what some of these medicines, that we take today
are made of? Can you, actually, tell me what the ingredients are for this or
for this? And they told me a few of these things, and suddenly, "Star Fire"
seemed a pretty good bet. It was not so frightening after all. We are
actually in the habit of taking some very, very, strange stuff, without
knowing it, because it looks like a little white pill.
The divine Star Fire, suddenly, the more you look for it, the more you find
it. And everytime you find it you find the circle with the red cross. The
Cup of the Dew, the Cup of the Holy Waters, the cup that overflows. We keep
finding as well, the importance of the female line. We find all sorts of
strange words being used. But, all the time weíre talking about genes,
genetic construction, & DNA. They tell us that
Enkersake, the "Lady of Life"
was also known in Egypt as "Isis", the great mother. The model for the
virgin mother with the child, the child Horus. "Isis", is the great mother.
"Isis", is the woman of the gene. "Isis" is
Enkersake. "Isis", is the "Lady
of Gene", "Isis" ... "Genesis". The Greeks called it
Genisis. It was
originally a split word. And in the earliest versions, that I can find, it
is "Gene Isis". The word for in the beginning, in Jewish, was quite
different. The bible begins with it. Itís not Genesis, itís quite a
different word. So, before looking for this "Star Fire" practice in detail,
which we shall, we must now remind ourselves that it was actually Jehovah,
Enlil, that gave the instruction that blood must not be taken. And he gave
it to Noah, and the sons of Noah, who were members of this Kingly line.
It was Jehovah that gave them this edict, it was not his brother
fathered this line. It would appear that for a good while, they actually
didnít take too much notice at all. If, Jehovah didnít like it, he could
bring a flood or something. But, they didnít actually have to obey. It
wasnít till much "Later", that they decided to obey this guy all the time.
The "Star Fire" practice seemed to continue for quite a long time. And it is
this, that begins to make the line important. Noah, Abraham, and the others.
These were all products of "Clone" and "Star Fire". Kings of very, very,
high repute, in a line not from Seth, but from Cain.
Why? Now, we can understand why we have a contrived line from Seth, and not
the line from Cain. Because, of contriving a line down from Seth, down to
Noah, we got rid of it being Cainship. "Star Fire"-ship, we knocked it out
of the ball game completely. Because, all of a sudden, we were taking blood.
But if this was an edict from Jehovah, then probably, it wasnít for their
benefit. "Star Fire", was called the "Great Lunar Essence of the Goddess".
Actually, even in everyday modern environments, I discovered, now this "Star
Fire" stuff is pretty potent. I decided to ask some friends of mine, at a
hospital, what was really here? Is this important stuff? They said if it was
food, it is the most potent life force on earth. And clearly, we know that.
Because it happened, because of bringing life onto earth.
Producers of Star Fire, the goddesses who held themselves in this position,
for this particular function of the Kingly Line were designated the "Flow-ers".
Which is exactly where our English name flower comes from. And, the flower
was always the "Lily". And, the "Lily", was the key to the name of just
about everybody in that line. What, actually, I asked my doctor friends, was
really so special about "Star Fire"? Whatís so special about this food that
is not used, & ends up being menstrual blood. It holds, they said, the
greatest of all bodily secretions from certain glands. The pineal gland, the
pituitary gland. Certain parts of our brain functions, that gives us
specific levels of awareness and intellect. All of the things that the
kingly line needed. What was actually happening, was that instead of them
relying solely on their own glandular productions, of secretions and
hormones, they were being fed with an enhancement for this. Just like we
take other bodily supplements today, but they were taking them at a very,
very, advanced level. Because this was not earthly stuff, this was, "Anunnaki".
"Star Fire", straight from the Goddesses.
What we suddenly find, is that because of the impact that this has on glands
like the pineal, weíre not only feeding the body more substances like
serotonin and melatonin. Weíre actually causing the glands within those
kingly people, themselves, to begin to produce more of these hormones. They
are punching this stuff out like crazy! And, they are living for "Very,
Very, Long Times". All of a sudden, the great ages of this patriarchal line
in the Bible, begin to not look so strange, after all.
Because, when one looks at the historical records of exactly the same
family, these same numbers of years keep appearing. They lived for 100ís of
years and it was said, that this was exactly, because of this practice.
There is no secret. Actually, it hadnít occurred to me before, but when one
studies the importance of glands like the pineal and meletonone, even today
we know that there are within these secretions keys to anti-aging. They have
anti-aging properties. Well, they were actually using this, and they were
"really making good use" of it. They were making sure that the Kings lived
for a very, very long time.
The interesting thing is that once one steps outside of this line, and looks
at parallel families, these ages arenít there at all. Their ages are as
normal as anybody elseís. The great ages in the line, continue way past
Noah, for a few generations. And, not until we get to the time of Abraham,
and beyond that, suddenly the life patterns begin to change in the line. The
ages begin to become more normal. Isaac lived for 110 years, and weíre
gradually coming down the tree. And, soon to the people living 70 years and
80 years, pretty ordinary sort of life spans. So, what we can judge by this,
that we have actually hit it on the head, that itís around Abrahamís time,
not Noahís time that they became to take notice of "thou shalt not take the
They were beginning to pull off of it. So, we have a situation, that we have
a line now coming down. And, it supposedly goes from Abraham down to
but actually it is ceasing to become very special. So, why is it still
special when it gets to David? Well, perhaps it went somewhere else and then
came back. And, it actually did! It transpires that from exactly that strain
from Noah, before the time of Abraham, the line had already branched out. To
become the early Kings and Pharaohs of Egypt. When one looks at their life
spans again, they seem to go on for a very, very long time. In fact, some of
them go on for so long that there are no records of deaths. And, certainly
no evidence of any tombs. Goodness knows what happened to them, they simply
Vampires in the Bible ?
Flowers and Flowers, the Plant of Life.... the Flower, it was said was a
"Lily", who gave us the nectar of supreme excellence. Which the Greeks
called later "Soma", and "Soma" is related to life, to longevity. So, why
"Dragons"? We know that the "Messiah" was a "Dragon". We know that the
crocodile was the root of "Dragon". We know that the "Dragon", was founded
in 2200 BC. We know that the word "Dragon" and "Pen Dragons", actually comes
from way back about 3800 BC. Why isnít the Symbol a Dragon? Why is the
symbol this red cross? When, in actual fact, one discovers it is a "Dragon".
The "Red Cross", the "Dew Cup" is a "Dragon".
The Circle it transpires is a
serpent, clutching his own tail. Creating everlasting, the unity.
So, suddenly the "Dragon" is linked with the "Dew Cup", is linked with the
"Holy Grail". And is why, the Grail Kings were still called in the middle
ages, "Pen Dragons". The symbol was the same, as one progresses through
history, and follows the "Red Cross" symbol. It gradually emerges that this
is actually a "Dragon". It was always a "Dragon". And the "Dragon" was
called "Draco". "Draco the Dragon". It was the emblem of the Egyptian
Pharaohs. In Qumran, in the time of Jesus, it was Bistea Neptunis. The great
sea serpent of the "Merovingians", of the
Fisher Kings in France, and it is
the emblem of most of the Royal families today. Somewhere on their coats of
Arms, the "Dragon", "Draco". "Draco" is identical, as a "Dragon" was a
serpent because there is little relation between these fire breathing
dragons that we see in nursery rhymes. The "Dragon" was originally more like
a crocodile. It was a four legged rather large snouted serpent. "Serpent"
and "Dragon" were absolutely identical. And, it didnít really matter which
word was used, it meant the same thing. The "Dragon", the "Holy Crocodile",
the "Mesa", the "Messiah".
The word serpent is used many many times in the bible. It starts off with
the story of Adam and Eve, and the serpent in the "Garden". "Dragon" in the
"Garden".... Everytime we see the word "Serpent" in the bible, when we look
back at the original Hebrew writings to see what it was translated from, it
was translated from something like Nhsh. The word meant to decipher, it
meant to find, to meant to find out. It had nothing whatever to do with
snakes. The "Dragon" was always "thee", who held the knowledge. He, whom
from which one found out. He, whom could divine. And, that is the root of
why we call gods and deities, "Divine".
Because, they held the roots of the serpent. They had the knowledge. They
had the knowing. They were the Kings. And the "Serpent of the Garden", we
are told was Enki. Serpents, from that time on, until today, are always,
always associated with wisdom and knowledge. Theyíre not evil. Theyíve never
been evil in any law, except Christian and latter day Jewish law. They were
wisdom. They were healing. They were knowledge. Itís interesting to
discover, once one starts to look, how often serpents and
dragons appear in
mottos of healing institutions today. The American Medical Associationís
emblem, is actually the "Plant of Life", the "Tree". The "Staff" with a
winding "Serpent" around it. Once one looks a little further into that, it
gets more interesting to see that there are more complex medical devices
using serpents. The one that we actually know, perhaps, is the "Winged
Producers of Hermes", with the two coiling serpents around it. This,
actually, is not just the emblem of medical associations world wide today.
It was, actually, one of the earliest symbols of the early "Dragon Court".
It was the emblem of the Essene therapeutic centre at Qumram, at the time of
Jesus. And the records tell us exactly what it is.
The records tell us that the "Staff", that stands centrally is the spinal
column. The nervous system is the coiling serpents that go around it. The
two wings at the top, are the ventricles of the brain, left and right. And,
that little spot in between is the pineal gland. The gland, the wings, the
top of the stem, are referred to in the oldest, oldest, of law, are called
the "Swan". This was the order of the "Swan", that great "Grail Knights"
belong to. And, it is still a flourishing knightly order today. It is a
Knightly order for those still partaking of the equivalent, in todayís
terms, of "Star Fire".
I donít have to tell you too much about things like Pineal glands, and
things like that, but for the benefit of a few who might not have read to
much. The gland is small, itís tiny. It sits between the two left and right
sides of the brain, it doesnít form part of the brain matter, but itís part
of it, itís central. itís called the third eye sometimes. What it does, is
to produce the hormones, the secretion that gives many of the qualities that
weíre, actually & purposely, fed back into this bloodline. Melatonine
produces serotonin, all important for longevity. All important for
intuition. Important for awareness. Important for just about every aspect of
supreme and superior leadership. They were called, even then, people of
"Swan". They were also "Serpents", they were also "Dragons", they were
called "Kings of the Gra-il", & "Grail Dew Cup". And itís why this mythology
creeps on, even to modern times. We can get into the middle ages, we can get
into Arthurian Lore. All the time we have "Chalices", we have "Ladies of the
Fountain", "Ladies of the Waters". We have "Dragons", we have "Pen Dragons".
All of these names crop up. And, these names exist in one form or another,
going back for 5000 years.
In the days of
ancient Sumer, we can find records. And, there are 10ís of
1000s of records from that era now available, that have been translated in
the last 50 years. They actually explain that the priests of Anu, who was
the father of "Enki and Enlil", the priests of Anu perfected and elaborated,
medical science of living substances. And, it tells us that the most
important of these, for the treatment of just about anything, was menstrual
"Star Fire" from the "Anunnaki"
goddess. They called it the "Gold of the
Gods". It was used as medicine, but it was fed daily and regularly to the
kings of the succession. In Egypt and Mediterranean times, we discover that
the ritual progresses. This is beyond the days of "Anunnaki" now.
"Star Fire", becomes a priestly activity. There are bred, for the purpose
within the temples, virgin priestesses. Who exist only for the purpose for
producing this "Star Fire". And, they are called "Scarlet Women". They are
granted always the names of "Lily", and the other names, the temple names,
just as it used to be in Sumer. But, theyíre now earthly priestesses, and
were very highly bred, specifically for the purpose. The red of the cross
now becomes given a name, and the red of the cross is called "Ritu". Not an
Egyptian name, it was an Asian name. But, it was called "Ritu". "Ritu" was
the "Gold of the Gods". "Ritu" is the word from which we actually get red,
and ritual and indeed root. And, red "Ritu", was defined as "Red Gold of the
Golden Star Fire". So, suddenly weíre beginning to get something new
Weíre beginning to get the words Red and Gold tied up together. They donít
mean the same thing at all. But, now Red is now Gold, and Gold is now Red.
And, the "Red" is the "Gold of the Gods". And, the "Ritu" practice becomes
the ritual. Once, moving into this realm, of learning that ritual comes from
the collecting of the "Ritu, the Star Fire", we begin to find a whole
sequence of events that lead to many of the words that we have today. One of
the first things that we see, is that Red is also synonymous with Black. Iím
not quire sure why, but whenever Black is mentioned it means the same as
Red. And, whenever Red is mentioned, it means the same as Black.
Even in India, the goddess "Kali" is said to be both red and black. And,
still is in various traditions. And "Kalimath", who was the original model
for the Indian goddess "Kali". "Kalimath" was the sister of "Luluwa",
wife of "Cain". "Kalimath" was strictly "Anunnaki". And, "Kalimath",
told was Black. "Kalimath", we are told was Red. "Kalimath", we are told was
a scarlet woman and "Kalimath" becomes not too strangely, "Kali" the goddess
of times and season and periods and cycles.
In the early days, therefore, weíre looking at "something" that is going to
evolve into an area. A specific area, of what we later became to call
alchemy. Itís not the whole of alchemy, its just a little part of it. But,
we can now see where itís going. We now see that weíre dealing with a
natural substance, that eventually has to become a purposely contrived drug,
for want of a better word, "something else". Because actually, this
stuff was not going to be around forever, which it wasnít.
What does Star Fire do? It produces hormonal secretions. Who were the people
who knew about these secretions? They were the people who knew the "secret-tions".
Thatís where the word "Secret" comes from. It comes from the early priests,
the "Temples of the Dragon Courts", who kept the Secret. The secretions, and
this was one of the key secrets really of the early mystery schools, was the
upholding of the upholding of the "Star Fire" ritual. It is one of the
secrets that Freemasonry says has been lost.
They know thereís a secret somewhere back in ancient Egypt and
theyíre not quite sure what it is. Well, this is one of the secrets. The
secret of the secretion ritual. Are there any other words we wonder
(laughing). There actually are, in fact, thereís no end to them once you
start looking. We can suddenly find that this English language of ours, that
we thought came from bits of Latin and bits of Greek. And, of course does,
but where did they come from?
They came from ancient Egypt and ancient Summer, and, all of these other
countries. And, the words just keep piling in, not just rituals, secret, but
other words as well. Coal... coal is black. Coal comes from Bath-Kol. Who
was Bath-Kol? Bath-Kol was what the Jews called Kali.... Kali, Coal...
Coal.. black. The women, who were the scarlet women, the priestesses, were
said to be the women of the voice. They were actually producing the wisdom
of tomorrow. They had the voice, they produced the "Star Fire". The womb was
therefore the utterer of the word, the utterer, the uterus.
It goes on and on, in fact, you would not believe how many words come out of
this stuff. Scarlet women. We all know what they are, donít we? Or, at least
we thought we did until just now (laughing). The Greeks called the scarlet
women, these great priestesses of the "Star Fire". Which actually, got
shortened, by medieval French, into the word "Harlot". The Germans, as did
other Saxton countries, had a word "Hores". Who was actually turned into
"Whores". All the same things, and every one of those words translated back
to the same thing "dearly beloved one" (laughing).... There is no connection
whatever, and really, the good dictionary, still tells us this. If, we take
a look, there is no, not even the slightest vestige of similarity between
the word "Whore" and "Harlot", and say, prostitutes. They are not linked in
any way. All words tell us what they mean. And, the words mean, "Dear
Beloved One". "Scarlet Women", sacred priestesses of the "Star Fire".
So, when did it go? When did we suddenly forget all this stuff? Why was it
so important. And why did we, just have people who bleed their meat and
werenít of much consequence really, until later days. It actually happened
when their latter day descendants, whether in the Jewish traditions or in
the Christian tradition, decided to actually start forging history. Not just
translating it, but interpreting it to suit the vested interest of the
moment. The one thing in the Jewish faith, as in the Christian faith, that
was absolutely predominant was that anything of importance, with the female
had to go. Got to go... this is male stuff now. So, it gets lost. Not
because itís necessary, has to go because suddenly history has become
Religion. Not just religion, but a faith of fear. A religion based on
venerating a guy who will bring floods and famine and destruction, if you
donít do as youíre told, or so they thought. The "Rosicrucians" the "Dew
Cup", the mark of the later "Rosicrucians", is all based upon the "Star Fire
Ritual". It is why the Christian church without knowing it, takes us through
a ceremony that it doesnít understand when it pretends to drink blood from
the "Chalice" (laughing). There are all sorts of names, it was "Nectars of
the Gods". It was "Gold of the Gods". It was also called, the
Now weíre moving into areas that we begin to understand. The ways of the
light, following the light, we suddenly look at the Essene
records, and the records from the Dead Sea Scrolls, and whatever, and suddenly, weíre into a
whole new scheme of operations. Which is, pursuing the route to the light.
The light when we look back into the old records, actually was the "Star
Fire". The "Star Fire", is about the acquisition of ability to have special
knowledge and wisdom. This is the light, this is the "Star Fire", this is
the roots of it. And, this has gone, it has been taken away. We are looking
for it. The light, it is said, exists in everybody. You simply have to be
awakened. There are various ways of awakening it. But, the natural way, we
are told, in the oldest records that I can find, is simply by will. Self
will is the route to the light. A thought free consciousness. A plane of
pure being. And, they called this plain of pure being "the Plane of Sharon".
It was, actually, this very concept of being, being through the "Star Fire",
being "I am that I am", that became the problem for Jehovah, when the edit
against blood was issued.
Even after Adam was said to have taken from the tree and eaten the fruit,
God in the bible, says look here guys. The man has become one of us. Those
are the words nearly. Behold actually... behold.... (laughing). Thatís the
sort of stuff God said, behold. He has become one of us, he has taken from
the "Plant of Life". He has taken the "Star Fire" He has taken the fruit.
The teachings of the early "Dragons", were very, very, specific about being
or self completeness. It was the key to everything that the succession was
built up on. Itís actually not too far adrift from what you guys are about
today. Youíre doing it though a very different means. But, in actual fact,
what you are doing, through the kind of training you are going through, the
type of processes that you put your own minds through, you are actually in
your own way creating higher productions of these hormones. Pineal
secretions, which are enabling you to move into the higher realms than would
be normal, in terms of cultural thinking. Behold, said Jehovah,
the man is
one of us. This is an interesting quote, and I think weíll have a little
break after this, just to get ourselves comfortable. But, this quotation
comes from 2200 BC, and itís not too far adrift from the sorts of things
weíre talking about here, today.
Nothing, itís said, is achieved by wanting. Nothing is achieved by
relinquishing responsibility to a "higher authority". Belief is an act of
the living, for to be alive is to be in belief. Belief is believing, "WILL
IS THE ULTIMATE MEDIUM OF THE SELF". This is at the roots of the knowledge,
itís said, this is the route to the personal God. Because, the personal God
is within, and the Self is God, the absolute consciousness, "I am that I