God)"> El (God)

from Wikipedia Website
 

Ēl is a northwest Semitic word and name translated into English as either ’God’ or ’God’ or left untranslated as El, depending on the context.

In the Levant as a whole, El or Il was the supreme God, the father of mankind and all creatures. The word El was found at the top of a list of Gods as the Ancient of Gods or the Father of all Gods, in the ruins of the Royal Library of the Ebla civilization, in the archaeological site of Tell Mardikh in Syria dated to 2300 BC. He may have been a desert God at some point, as the myths say that he had two wives and built a sanctuary with them and his new children in the desert. El had fathered many Gods, but most important were Hadad, Yaw and Mot, each of whom has similar attributes to the Greco-Roman Gods Zeus, Ophion and Thanatos respectively. Ancient Greek mythographers identified El with Cronus (not Chronos).


Linguistic forms and meanings


Cognate forms are found throughout the Semitic languages with the exception of the ancient Ge’ez language of Ethiopia. Forms include Ugaritic ’il, pl. ’lm; Phoenician ’l pl. ’lm, Hebrew ’ēl, pl. ’⁏lîm; Aramaic ’l, Arabic Al; Akkadian ilu, pl. ilāti. The original meaning may have been ’strength, power’. In northwest Semitic usage ’l was both a generic word of any ’God’ and the special name or title of a particular God who was distinguished from other Gods as being the God, or even in our modern sense God. Ēl is listed at the head of many pantheons. El was the father God among the canaanites. But because the word sometimes refers to a God other than the great God Ēl it is often difficult to be certain whether Ēl followed by another name means the great God Ēl with a particular epithet applied or refers to another God entirely. For example, in the Ugaritic texts ’il mlk is understood to mean ’Ēl the King’ but ’il hd means ’the God Hadad’. We know this only from context.

In Ugaritic an alternate plural form meaning ’Gods’ is ’ilhm, equivalent to Hebrew ’elōhîm ’Gods’. But in Hebrew this word is also used for singular ’God’ or ’God’, is indeed by the most normal word for ’God’ or ’God’ in the singular (as well as for ’Gods’).

The stem ’l is found prominently in the earliest strata of east Semitic, northwest Semitic and south Semitic groups. Personal names including the stem ’l are found with similar patterns both in Amorite and South Arabic which indicates that probably already in Proto-Semitic ’l was both a generic term for ’God’ and the common name or title of a single particular ’God’ or ’God’.
 


Ēl in the Tanakh


The Hebrew form (אל) appears in Latin letters in Standard Hebrew transcription as El and in Tiberian Hebrew transcription as ʾĒl.

In the Tanakh ’elōhîm is the normal word for a God or the great God (or Gods). But the form ’ēl also appears, mostly in poetic passages and in the partiarchal narratives attributed to the P source according the documentary hypothesis. It occurs 217 times in the Masoretic text: 73 times in the Psalms and 55 times in the Book of Job, and otherwise mostly in poetic passages or passages written in elevated prose. It occasionally appears with the definite article as hā’Ēl ’the God’ (for example in 2 Samuel 22.31,33–48).

There are also places where ’ēl specifically refers to a foreign God as in Psalms 44.20;81.9 (Hebrew 44.21;81.10), in Deuteronomy 32.12 and in Malachi 2.11.

The theological position of the Tanakh is that the names Ēl, ’Ĕlōhîm when used in the singular to mean the supreme and active ’God’ refers to the same being as does Yahweh. All three refer to the one supreme God who is also the God of Israel, beside whom other supposed Gods are either non-existent or insignificant. Whether this was a longstanding belief or a relatively new one has long been the subject of inconclusive scholarly debate about the prehistory of the sources of the Tanakh and about the prehistory of Israelite religion. In the P strand Yahweh claims in Exodus 6.2–3:

I revealed myself to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as Ēl Shaddāi, but was not known to them by my name Yahweh.

The identity of Yahweh with either Ēl in his aspect Shaddāi or with a God called Shaddāi is affirmed. Also affirmed is that the name Yahweh is a more recent revelation. One scholarly position is that the identification of Yahweh with Ēl is late, that Yahweh was earlier thought of as only one of many Gods and not normally identified with Ēl. In some places, especially in Psalm 29, Yahweh is clearly envisioned as a storm God, something not true of Ēl so far as we know. It is Yahweh who fights Leviathan in Isaiah 27.1; Psalm 74.14; Job 3.8;40.25, a deed attributed both to Ba’al/Hadad and ‘Anat in the Ugaritic texts, but not to Ēl. Such mythological motifs are variously seen as late survivals from a period when Yahweh held a place in theology comparable to that of Hadad at Ugarit; or as late henotheistic/monotheistic applications to Yahweh of deeds more commonly attributed to Hadad; or simply as examples of eclectic application of the same motifs and imagery to various different Gods.

 

Similarly it is argued inconclusively whether Ēl Shaddāi, Ēl ‘Ôlām, Ēl ‘Elyôn and so forth were originally understood as separate divinities. Albrecht Alt presented his theories on the original differences of such Gods in Der Gott der Väter in 1929. But others have argued that from patriarchal times these different names were indeed generally understood to refer to the same single great God Ēl. This is the position of Frank Moore Cross (1973). What is certain is that the form ’ēl does appear in Israelite names from every period including the name Yiśrā’ēl ’Israel’, meaning ’ēl strives’ or ’God strives’.

The apparent plural form ’Ēlîm or ’Ēlim ’Gods’ occurs only four times in the Tanakh. Psalm 29, understood as an enthronement psalm, begins:

A Psalm of David.
Ascribe to Yahweh, sons of Gods (bənê ’Ēlîm),
Ascribe to Yahweh, glory and strength

Psalm 89:6 (verse 7 in Hebrew) has:

For who in the skies compares to Yahweh,
who can be likened to Yahweh among the sons of Gods (bənê ’Ēlîm).

Traditionally bənê ’ēlîm has been interpreted as ’sons of the mighty’, ’mighty ones’, for, indeed ’ēl can mean ’mighty’, though such use may be metaphorical (compare the English expression God-awful). It is possible also that the expression ’ēlîm in both places descends from an archaic stock phrase in which ’lm was a singular form with the m-enclitic and therefore to be translated as ’sons of Ēl’. The m-enclitic appears elsewhere in the Tanakh and in other Semitic languages. Its meaning is unknown, possibly simply emphasis. It appears in similar contexts in Ugaritic texts where the expression bn ’il alternates with bn ’ilm, but both must mean ’sons of Ēl’. That phrase with m-enclictic also appears in Phoenician inscriptions as late as the 5th century BCE.

One of the other two occurrences in the Tanakh is in the "Song of Moses", Exodus 15.11a:

Who is like you among the Gods (’ēlim), Yahweh?

The final occurrence is in Daniel 11.35:

And the king will do according to his pleasure; and he will exalt himself and magnify himself over every God (’ēl), and against the God of Gods (’ēl ’ēlîm) he will speak outrageous things, and will prosper until the indignation is accomplished: for that which is decided will be done.

There are a few cases in the Tanakh where some think ’ēl referring to the great God Ēl is not equated with Yahweh. One is in Ezekiel 28.2 in the oracle against Tyre:

Son of man, say to the prince of Tyre: "Thus says the Lord Yahweh: ’Because your heart is proud and you have said: "I am ’ēl, in the seat of ’elōhîm (God or Gods), I am enthroned in the middle of the seas." Yet you are man and not ’ēl even though you have made your heart like the heart of ’elōhîm (’God’ or ’Gods’).’"

Here ’ēl might refer to a generic God, not necessarily the high God Ēl and if it does so refer, the King of Tyre is certainly not thinking specifically of Yahweh.

In Judges 9.46 we find ’Ēl Bərît ’God of the Covenant’, seemingly the same as the Ba‘al Bərît ’Lord of the Covenant’ whose worship has been condemned a few verses earlier. See Baal for a discussion of this passage.

Psalm 82.1 says:

’elōhîm (’God’) stands in the council of ’ēl
he judges among the judges.

This could mean that God, that is Yahweh, judges along with many other Gods as one of the council of the high God Ēl. However it can also mean that God, that is Yahweh, stands in the divine council (generally known as the Council of Ēl), as Ēl judging among the other members of the Council. The following verses in which God condemns those to whom he say were he had previousl named angels and sons of the Most High suggest God is here indeed Ēl judging the lesser Gods.

An archaic phrase appears in Isaiah 14.13, kôkkəbê ’ēl ’stars of God’, referring to the circumpolar stars that never set, possibly especially to the seven stars of Ursa Major. The phrase also occurs in the Pyrgi Inscription as hkkbm ’l (preceded by the definite article h and followed by the m-enclitic). Two other apparent fossilized expressions are arzê-’ēl ’cedars of God’ (generally translated something like ’mighty cedars’, ’goodly cedars’) in Psalm 80.10 (in Hebrew verse 11) and kəharrê-’ēl ’mountains of God’ (generally translated something like ’great mountains’, ’mighty mountains’) in Psalm 36.7 (in Hebrew verse 6).

For the reference in some texts of Deuteronomy 32.8 to 70 sons of God corresponding to the 70 sons of Ēl in the Ugaritic texts see ’Elyôn.
 


Ēl in Christian theology


According to patristic tradition, El was the first Hebrew name of God. Dante Alighieri in his De vulgari eloquentia suggests that the name was the first sound emitted by Adam: While the first utterance of humans after birth is a cry of pain, Dante assumed that Adam could only have made an exclamation of joy, which at the same time was addressing his creator. In the Divina commedia, however, Dante contradicts this by saying that God was called I in the language of Adam, and only named El in later Hebrew, but already before the confusion of tongues (Paradiso, 24.134).
 


Ēl among the Amorites


Amorite inscriptions from Zinčirli refer to numerous Gods, sometimes by name, sometimes by title, especially by such titles as ilabrat ’God of the people’(?), il abīka ’God of your father’, il abīni ’God of our father’ and so forth. Various family Gods are recorded, divine names listed as belong to a particular family or clan, sometimes by title and sometimes by name, including the name Il ’God’. In Amorite personal names the most common divine elements are Il (’God’), Hadad/Adad, and Dagan. It is likely that Il is also very often the God called in Akkadian texts Amurru or Il Amurru.


Ēl in Ugarit and among the Canaanites


For the Canaanites, El or Il was the supreme God, the father of mankind and all creatures. He may have been a desert God at some point as the myths say that he had two wives and built a sanctuary with them and his new children in the desert. El had fathered many Gods, but most important were Hadad, Yaw and Mot, each share similar attributes to the Roman-Greco Gods: Zeus, Poseidon and Hades respectively.

Three pantheon lists found at Ugarit begin with the four Gods ’il-’ib (which according to Cross [1973; p. 14] is the name of a generic kind of deity, perhaps the divine ancestor of the people), Ēl, Dagnu (that is Dagon), and Ba’l Ṣapān (that is the God Haddu or Hadad). Though Ugarit had a large temple dedicated to Dagon and another to Hadad, there was no temple dedicated to Ēl.

Ēl is called again and again Tôru ‘Ēl ’Bull Ēl’ or ’the bull God’. He is bātnyu binwāti ’Creator of creatures’, ’abū banī ’ili ’father of the Gods’, and ‘abū ‘adami ’father of man’. He is qāniyunu ‘ôlam creator eternal (the epithet ‘ôlam appearing in Hebrew form in the Hebrew name of God ’ēl ‘ôlam ’God Eternal’ in Genesis 21.23). He is ḥātikuka your patriarch. Ēl is the grey-bearded ancient one, full of wisdom, malku ’king’, ’abū šamīma ’father of years’, ’ēl gibbōr ’Ēl the warrior’. He is also named lṭpn of unknown meaning, variously rendered as Latpan, Latipan, or Lutpani.

The mysterious Ugaritic text "Shachar and Shalim" tells how (perhaps near the beginning of all things) Ēl came to shores of the sea and saw two woman who bobbed up and down. Ēl was sexually aroused and took the two with him, killed a bird by throwing a staff at it and roasted it over a fire. He asked the women to tell him when the bird is fully cooked, and to then address him either as husband or as father, for he would thenceforward behave to them as they call him. They salute him as husband. He lies with them and they gave birth to Shachar ’Dawn’ and Shalim ’Dusk’. Again Ēl lies with his wives and the wives give birth to the gracious Gods, cleavers of the sea, children of the sea. The names of these wives are not explicitly provided, but some confusing rubrics at the beginning of the account mention the Goddess Athirat who is otherwise Ēl’s chief wife and the Goddess Rahmay ’Merciful’, otherwise unknown.

In the Ugaritic Ba‘al cycle Ēl is introduced dwelling on (or in) Mount Lel (Lel possibly meaning ’Night’) at the fountains of the two rivers at the spring of the two deeps. He dwells in a tent according to some interpretations of the text which may explain why he had no temple in Ugarit. As to the rivers and the spring of the two deeps, these might refer real streams, or to the mythological sources of the salt water ocean and the fresh water souces under the earth, or to the waters above the heavens and the waters beneath the earth.

In the episode of the "Palace of Ba‘al", the God Ba‘al/Hadad invites the "70 sons of Athirat" to a feast in his new palace. Presumably these sons have been fathered on Athirat by Ēl in following passages they seem be the Gods (’ilm) in general or at least a large portion of them. The only sons of Ēl named individually in the Ugaritic texts are Yamm ’Sea’, Mot ’Death’, and ‘Ashtar, who may be the chief and leader of most of the sons of Ēl. Ba‘al/Hadad is a few times called Ēl’s son rather than the son of Dagan as he is normally called, probably because Ēl is in the position of a clan-father to all the Gods.

The fragmentary text RS 24.258 describes a banquet to which Ēl invites the other Gods and then disgraces himself by becoming outrageously drunk and passing out after confronting an otherwise unknown Hubbay, "he with the horns and tail". The text ends with an incanation for the cure of some disease, possibly hangover.


Ēl in the greater Levant


A proto-Sinaitic mine inscription from Mount Sinai reads ’ld‘lm understood to be vocalized as ’il dū ‘ôlmi, ’Ēl Eternal’ or ’God Eternal’.

The Egyptian God Ptah is given the title dū gitti ’Lord of Gath’ in a prism from Lachish which has on its opposite face the name of Amenhotep II (c. 1435–1420 BCE) The title dū gitti is also found in Serābitṭ text 353. Cross (1973, p. 19) points out that Ptah is ofen called the lord (or one) of eternity and thinks it may be this identification of Ēl with Ptah that lead to the epithet ’olam ’eternal’ being applied to Ēl so early and so consistently. (However in the Ugaritic texts Ptah is seemingly identified instead with the craftsman God Kothar-wa-Khasis.)

A Phoenician inscribed amulet of the 7th century BCE from Arslan Tash may refer to Ēl. Rosenthal (1969, p. 658) translated the text:

An eternal bond has been established for us. Ashshur has established (it) for us, and all the divine beings and the majority of the group of all the holy ones, through the bond of heaven and earth for ever, ...

However the text is translated by Cross (1973, p. 17):

The Eternal One (‘Olam) has made a covenant oath with us,
Asherah has made (a pact) with us.
And all the sons of El,
And the great council of all the Holy Ones.
With oaths of Heaven and Ancient Earth.

In some inscriptions the name ’Ēl qōne ’arṣ ’Ēl creator of Earth’ appears, even including a late inscription at Leptis Magna in Tripolitania dating to 100s (KAI. 129). In Hittite texts the expression becomes the single name Ilkunirsa, this Ilkunirsa appearing as the husband of Asherdu (Asherah) and father of 77 or 88 sons.

In an Hurrian hymn to Ēl (published in Ugaritica V, text RS 24.278) he is called ’il brt and ’il dn which Cross (p. 39) takes as ’Ēl of the covenant’ and ’Ēl the judge’ respectively.

See Ba‘al Hammon for the possiblity that Ēl was identical with Ba‘al Hammon who was worshipped as the supreme God in Carthage.


Ēl according to Sanchuniathon


In the euhemeristic account of Sanchuniathon Ēl (rendered Elus or called by his standard Greek counterpart Cronus) is not the creator God or first God. Ēl is rather the son of Sky and Earth. Sky and Earth are themselves children of ‘Elyôn ’Most High’. Ēl is brother to the God Bethel, to Dagon, and to an unknown God equated with the Greek Atlas, and to the Goddesses Aphrodite/’Ashtart, Rhea (presumably Asherah, and Dione (equated with Ba’alat Gebal. Ēl is father of Persephone who dies (presumably an otherwise unknown Semitic Goddess of the dead) and of Athene (presumably the Goddess ‘Anat). Sky and Earth have separated from one another in hostility, but Sky insists on continuing to force himself on Earth and attempts to destroy the children born of such unions until at last Ēl, son of Sky and Earth, with the advice of the God Thoth and Ēl’s daughter Athene attacks his father Sky with a sickle and spear of iron and drives him off for ever. So he and his allies the Eloim gain Sky’s kingdom. In a later passage it is explained that Ēl castrated Sky. But one of Sky’s concubines who was given to Ēl’s brother Dagon was already pregnant by Sky and the son who is born of this union, called by Sanchuniathon Demarûs or Zeus, but once called by him Adodus, is obviously Hadad, the Ba‘al of the Ugaritic texts who now becomes an ally of his grandfather Sky and begins to make war on Ēl.

Ēl has three wives, his sisters or half-sisters Aphrodite/Astarte (‘Ashtart), Rhea (presumably Asherah, and Dione (identified by Sanchuniathon with Ba‘alat Gebal the tutelary Goddess of Byblos, a city which Sanchuniathon says that Ēl founded.

Unfortunately Eusebius of Caesarea, through whom Sanchuniathon is preserved, is not interested in setting the work forth completely or in order. But we are told that Ēl slew his own son Sadidus (a name that some commentators think might be a corrupton of Shaddai, one of the epithets of the Biblical Ēl) and that Ēl also beheaded one of his daughters. Later, perhaps referring to this same death of Sadidus we are told:

But on the occurrence of a pestilence and mortality Cronus offers his only begotten son as a whole burnt-offering to his father Sky and circumcises himself, compelling his allies also to do the same.

A fuller account of the sacrifice appears later:

It was a custom of the ancients in great crises of danger for the rulers of a city or nation, in order to avert the common ruin, to give up the most beloved of their children for sacrifice as a ransom to the avenging daemons; and those who were thus given up were sacrificed with mystic rites. Cronus then, whom the Phoenicians call Elus, who was king of the country and subsequently, after his decease, was deified as the star Saturn, had by a nymph of the country named Anobret an only begotten son, whom they on this account called Iedud, the only begotten being still so called among the Phoenicians; and when very great dangers from war had beset the country, he arrayed his son in royal apparel, and prepared an altar, and sacrificed him.

The account also relates that Thoth:

... also devised for Cronus as insignia of royalty four eyes in front and behind ... but two of them quietly closed, and upon his shoulders four wings, two as spread for flying, and two as folded. And the symbol meant that Cronus could see when asleep, and sleep while waking: and similarly in the case of the wings, that he flew while at rest, and was at rest when flying. But to each of the other Gods he gave two wings upon the shoulders, as meaning that they accompanied Cronus in his flight. And to Cronus himself again he gave two wings upon his head, one representing the all-ruling mind, and one sensation.

This is the form under which Ēl/Cronus appears on coins from Byblos from the reign of Antiochus IV (175–164 BCE) four spread wings and two folded wings, leaning on a staff. Such images continued to appear on coins until after the time of Augustus.


Ēl and Poseidon


A bilingual inscription from Palmyra (KAI. 11, p. 43) dated to the 1st century equates Ēl-Creator-of-the-Earth with the Greek God Poseidon. Going back to the 9th century BCE the bilingual inscription at Karatepe in the Taurus Mountains equates Ēl-Creator-of-the-Earth to Luwian hieroglyphs read as da-a-ś, this being the Luwian form of the name of the Babylonian water God Ea, lord of the abyss of water under the earth. (This inscription lists Ēl in second place in the local pantheon, following Ba‘al Shamim and preceding the Eternal Sun.

Poseidon is known to have been worshipped in Beirut, his image appearing on coins from that city. Poseidon of Beirut was also worshipped at Delos where there was an association of merchants, shipmasters and warehousmen called the Poseidoniastae of Berytus founded in 110 or 109 BCE. Three of the four chapels at its headquarters on the hill northwest of the Sacred Lake were dedicated to Poseidon, the Tyche of the city equated with Astarte (that is ‘Ashtart), and to Eshmun.

Also at Delos that association of Tyrians, though mostly devoted to Heracles-Melqart, elected a member to bear a crown every year when sacrifices to Poseidon took place. A banker name Philostratus donated two altars, one to Palaistine Aphrodite Urania (‘Ashtart) and one to Poseidon "of Ascalon".

Though Sanchuniathon distinguises Poseidon from his Elus/Cronus, this might be a splitting off of a particular aspect of Ēl in an euhemeristic account. Identification of an aspect of Ēl with Poseidon rather than with Cronus might have been felt to better fit with Hellenistic religious practice, if indeed this Phoenician Poseidon really is Ēl who dwells at the source of the two deeps in Ugaritic texts. More information is needed to be certain.


Ēl in Proto-Sinaitic, Phoenician, Aramaic, and Hittite texts


A proto-Sinaitic mine inscription from Mount Sinai reads ’ld‘lm understood to be vocalized as ’il dū ‘ôlmi, ’Ēl Eternal’ or ’God Eternal’.

The Egyptian God Ptah is given the title dū gitti ’Lord of Gath’ in a prism from Lachish which has on its opposite face the name of Amenhotep II (c. 1435–1420 BCE) The title dū gitti is also found in Serābitṭ text 353. Cross (1973, p. 19) points out that Ptah is often called the lord (or one) of eternity and thinks it may be this identification of Ēl with Ptah that lead to the epithet ’olam ’eternal’ being applied to Ēl so early and so consistently. (However in the Ugaritic texts Ptah is seemingly identified instead with the craftsman God Kothar-wa-Khasis.)

A Phoenician inscribed amulet of the 7th century BCE from Arslan Tash may refer to Ēl. Rosenthal (1969, p. 658) translated the text:

An eternal bond has been established for us. Ashshur has established (it) for us, and all the divine beings and the majority of the group of all the holy ones, through the bond of heaven and earth for ever, ...

However the text is translated by Cross (1973, p. 17):

The Eternal One (‘Olam) has made a covenant oath with us,
Asherah has made (a pact) with us.
And all the sons of El,
And the great council of all the Holy Ones.
With oaths of Heaven and Ancient Earth.

In some inscriptions the name ’Ēl qōne ’arṣ ’Ēl creator of Earth’ appears, even including a late inscription at Leptis Magna in Tripolitania dating to 2nd century (KAI. 129). In Hittite texts the expression becomes the single name Ilkunirsa, this Ilkunirsa appearing as the husband of Asherdu (Asherah) and father of 77 or 88 sons.

In an Hurrian hymn to Ēl (published in Ugaritica V, text RS 24.278) he is called ’il brt and ’il dn which Cross (p. 39) takes as ’Ēl of the covenant’ and ’Ēl the judge’ respectively.

See Ba‘al Hammon for the possiblity that Ēl was identical with Ba‘al Hammon who was worshipped as the supreme God in Carthage. Muslim scholars contend that El should be pronounced ’AL’ since the first letter of El is Alef which is pronounced A always, unless if the hidden vocal after it is E like in when hebrew Elohim means Gods or a God. Muslem scholars contend also that the second letter could be pronounced double L, and that all semetic civilizations never wrote vocals and then the A after L is also not pronounced, Also the H in Allah is not written at the end of words in Arabic and Hebrew. They contend thus that the word EL found in Antiquity as far as Ebla civilization ( destroyed in 2300 BC) is actually non other than Allah when pronounced according to the tradition of Semetic languages as explained. They bring a proof that the mail sent by Muhammad to Caesar and other kings had the word Allah written as AL only. Such letters are available to view on the internet.