by Michael E. Salla, Ph.D
from Exopolitics Website
A whistleblower has recently emerged alleging secret preparations are underway for a false flag operation to justify a military response to "alien invaders" by August 2007. The whistleblower claims that s/he was asked "to write up 'spin' and propaganda that would help win the country's leaders over to our new 'war effort'" against extraterrestrials.
The whistleblower posted his/her message at the 'Above Top Secret forum' and has generated immediate interest by many.
While the whistleblower's statement
appears plausible at first hand, there really is little need to
demonize extraterrestrials to justify a false flag operation if an
upped military response is desired by those in control of
extraterrestrial related information.
Anyone having studied Sam Keen's classic book Faces of the Enemy would recognize that cultural stereotyping has already been established for depicting extraterrestrials as the "new enemy" systematically violating the rights of human subjects, especially "blonde blue eyed American women". As a result of the decades of abduction research by Budd Hopkins, David Jacobs, Whitley Streiber, etc., the dominant cultural stereotype has already been created for a new enemy: the extraterrestrial performing invasive genetic experiments on humanity.
Even those depicting the abducting extraterrestrials as friendly, Richard Boylan, Steven Greer, John Mack (deceased), Leo Sprinkle, etc., have promoted their own stereotype of extraterrestrials creating a new or 'transformed' human species (homo alterios) that will replace the aggressive primitive race we know as homo sapiens. We can add to this mix of cultural stereotypes the work of UFO veterans such as Stanton Friedman, Richard Hall, Allen Hynek (deceased), etc., who all point to abduction research as credible and validated by empirical evidence.
This makes abduction research the
scientific benchmark for understanding extraterrestrial motivations
and activities. Consequently, the dominant public images of
extraterrestrials is shaped through the prism of the abduction
This would prevent intrusive
Congressional inquiries into what's been happening behind the scenes
in the military-corporate sector that is funded by a black budget
estimated to be well over a trillion dollars annually (see
The Black Budget Report).
Maintaining present black projects and funding is the overall
national security goal of those in control of extraterrestrial
information. Political disclosure of the extraterrestrial
presence will occur in a way that maintains the present
system of black projects associated with advanced extraterrestrial
technologies, secret national security laws repressing human
extraterrestrial encounters, and mind control programs.
The negative stereotypes for manipulating the public are already well entrenched. They are promoted by mainstream UFO researchers and those investigating the abduction phenomenon. If those in control of extraterrestrial information decide to up the ante in terms of a heightened military response to extraterrestrials, little more has to be done than point to the facts associated with the abduction phenomenon as the primary justification. An uninformed public and Congress will follow the recommendations of those accepting the abduction phenomenon as the primary modus of human extraterrestrial contact.
This ignores decades of research on a different category of human extraterrestrial encounter which is non-invasive and respectful of individual rights. Indeed such research points to human looking extraterrestrial extensively interacting with humanity and even living among us (see Extraterrestrials Among Us). Sadly, such research is routinely ignored or minimized by those promoting abduction research as the Rosetta Stone for understanding the extraterrestrial presence.
The foundation for developing a heightened national security response and/or new war effort towards extraterrestrials through false flag operations is already in place.