by Joan d'Arc
Ancient Sumerian texts indicate that the
Earth ("Tiamat") was struck by a large planet, which moved it into
its present orbit, and created the Moon and the Asteroid Belt. In
The Twelfth Planet
The Cosmic Code, Zecharia
Sitchin outlines this "celestial battle" as described in the
Babylonian text called
The planet "Marduk" (the Sumerian "Nibiru"), as it came into the
solar system on its clockwise elliptical course, struck Tiamat,
which was moving in its ordained counterclockwise orbit. One of
Marduk's satellites struck Tiamat first, followed by two more of
Marduk's moons. Then Marduk itself, an enormous planetary body,
struck Tiamat, smashing one half of the planet into pieces, which
became the Earth's Moon and the "Great Band" (Asteroid Belt).
The other half of the planet, which was
struck by a smaller moon of Marduk, was moved into a new orbit,
along with a chunk of material which became its moon. The new planet
was then called "KI," meaning "cleaved one." The Earth's original
moons were dispersed, many changing the direction of their orbits.
Sitchin has also written in
Encounters, the planet where God the creator resides is
referred to in the Bible as Olamin, the plural of Olam. The meaning
of "olam" in the ancient world was a measure of a really long time,
specifically related to the span of time between the periodic
disappearance and reappearance of the planet Marduk/Nibiru on its
vast 3,600 year elliptical orbit. The domain of Olamin was described
as a kingdom which encompasses many worlds.
According to Robert Temple, in The
the Dogon tribe of Mali call this planet "the egg of
the world," and they say it is the origin of all things. They say of
this planet that it is "the center of all things and without its
movement no other star could hold its course." They say it is made
of a heavy metallic compound called "sagala." The Sumerians also
wrote that this planetary "god," Nibiru, "remade our solar system
and remakes the Earth on its near passages."
According to the web site
http://xfacts.com, the 12th Planet's
periodic appearance and disappearance from Earth's view confirms the
assumption of its permanence in solar orbit. In this it acts like
many comets. The writers ask, why are our astronomers not aware of
the existence of this planet? Even an orbit half as long as that of
the comet Kohoutek (7,500 years) would take the 12th Planet about 6
times further away from us than Pluto. At this distance, the planet
would not be visible from Earth.
The ancient tale of Nibiru's Celestial Battle is actually
scientifically sophisticated, and current advances in astronomy have
recently corroborated certain aspects of the Sumerian cosmogony,
among them the following:
The March 16, 1999 announcement by
NASA at the 30th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in
Houston of the theory of the origin of Earth's Moon as a
catastrophic collision with a "Mars-size planet."
Hubble's recent discovery of 18 (at
last count) stars, and numerous Jupiter-size planets (last count
9) with highly elliptical orbits and retrograde
(counterclockwise) orbits. Such orbits are now understood to be
quite the norm in nearby solar systems, although they are
considered peculiar in our own.
The 1994 announcement by NASA of a
one-mile wide moon orbiting the 33-mile wide asteroid Ida, which
follows the expectation that if a planetary body in this solar
system exploded (or collided), the debris will be
gravitationally bound in orbits around a primary body.
The discovery of water, atmosphere
and perhaps previous life on Mars, the Moon and Europa.
Why there is a strange gravitational
"pull" on Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, which indicates
another body of significant size beyond it.
Planet X - Myth or
In an article entitled "A
History of Planet X - From the Present Day Search to the Seeding of
Life on Earth", Alan Alford writes that the
discovery of new planets in the last two hundred years owes more to
mathematics than to bigger telescopes. Mathematical irregularities
in the orbits of the outer planets, in particular, strange wobbles
and gravitational anomalies noted in the orbits of Uranus, Neptune
and Pluto, have prompted astronomers over the past hundred years to
search for a large planetary body in the outer solar system.
Based on mathematical evidence,
astronomers have been so sure of the reality of this planet that
they named it Planet X. The name stands for the tenth planet, as
well as the mathematical symbol for an unknown quantity.
On June 17, 1982, a NASA press release from Ames Research
Center officially recognized the possibility of "some kind of
mystery object" beyond the outermost planets. Various press releases
around this time confirmed that scientists were indeed looking for
the infamous Planet X. For instance, Astronomy magazine published an
article in December of 1981 entitled "Search for the Tenth Planet,"
and another article in October of 1982 entitled "Searching for a
In addition, Newsweek covered the story of Planet X on June 28, 1982
in an article entitled "Does the Sun Have a Dark Companion?" This
article implied that the tenth planet actually orbits a two sun
(binary star) system, but we cannot see the other sun because it is
a "dark" star.
The article stated:
"A 'dark companion' could produce
the unseen force that seems to tug at Uranus and Neptune,
speeding them up at one point in their orbits and holding them
back as they pass... the best bet is a dark star orbiting at
least 50 billion miles beyond Pluto... It is most likely either
a brown dwarf, or a neutron star. Others suggest it is a tenth
planet... since a companion star would tug at the other planets,
not just Uranus and Neptune."
The Washington Post covered the story of
Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery
Heavenly Body Discovered." This story reported that the Infrared
Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) detected heat from an object about
fifty billion miles away. A report of an interview with chief
scientist Gerry Neugebauer from Jet Propulsion Laboratories appeared
in the story.
The article stated:
"A heavenly body possibly as large
as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that
it would be part of this solar system has been found in the
direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope
aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite... 'All I can
tell you is that we don't know what it is,' said Gerry Neugebauer, chief IRAS scientist."
The Post article went on to explain that
this mysterious object has never been seen by optical telescopes on
Earth or in space, but its infrared heat signature was detected
twice by IRAS as it scanned the northern sky between January and
November of 1983. The second infrared observation of the body, which
is so cold it casts no light, noted that the body appeared not to
have moved in six months.
This suggested that the object is not a
comet, since it probably would have moved. The article also
explained that the infrared telescope aboard IRAS, which is able to
detect very cold objects, calculated that the heavenly body was so
cold that its temperature is about 459 F below zero.
Astronomers suggested it was a "giant gaseous planet, as large as
Jupiter," and is so close that "it would be the nearest heavenly
body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto."
This would make it
part of our solar system. The article explained that there had been
some speculation that the object "might be moving toward Earth."
However, Cal Tech's Neugebauer was careful to "douse that idea with
as much cold water as I can." He pronounced with certainty that this
object "is not incoming mail."
The US News World Report on September 10, 1984 published an article
called "Planet X - Is it Really Out There?" This article had the
following to say about Planet X:
"Shrouded from the sun's light,
mysteriously tugging at the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, is an
unseen force that astronomers suspect may be Planet X - a 10th
resident of the Earth's celestial neighborhood. Last year, the
infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS), circling in a polar
orbit 560 miles from the Earth, detected heat from an object
about 50 billion miles away that is now the subject of intense
The article went on to say that
scientists are hopeful that the Pioneer 10 and 11 space probes will
locate the object, which they noted was possibly a "brown dwarf," a
protostar that never got hot enough to become a star. Others
astronomers, however, argue that the object is a "dark, gaseous mass
that is slowly evolving into a planet."
The article quoted Neugebauer as stating:
"If we can show that our solar system is
still creating planets, we'll know that it's happening around other
Contrary to this information, according to
the ancient Sumerian
texts, our solar system is not still creating planets, and this
planet has been with us all along. It would appear that the media
spin being put on Planet X is a clear attempt to call it something
else besides "incoming mail."
The media was quiet on the subject of Planet X for the next few
an article by R. Harrington in The Astronomical
Journal dated October 1988 supplied the details of continuing
mathematical modeling of this planet. The article suggested the
mysterious planet was three to four times the size of Earth, and its
position was three times further from the Sun than Pluto.
Mathematical modeling also suggested that Planet X had an extreme
elliptical orbit of 30 degrees.
A NASA/ARC press release published in Newsweek on July 13, 1987
disclosed that "an eccentric 10th planet may - or may not - be
orbiting the Sun." The article stated that NASA research scientist
John Anderson "has a hunch Planet X is out there, though nowhere
near the other nine."
The article concluded,
"if he is right, two of the most
intriguing puzzles of space science might be solved: what caused
mysterious irregularities in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune
during the 19th Century? And what killed off the dinosaurs 26
million years ago."
The reference to killing off the
dinosaurs seems to indicate that something more is known about this
planet than NASA is letting on. Is this in fact a reference to the
planet Nibiru of ancient infamy, the planet which, according to
ancient sources, did in fact strike the Earth (Tiamat) in ancient
times, and gave us a moon for a thank you? Regardless of what NASA
really knows, silence is golden, and, for the most part, mum was the
word on the issue of Planet X during the 1990s. Instead, scientific
journals began to debunk the issue of a tenth solar system planet.
In the 1990s, news stories began to dwell on "runaway planets" and
"rebel planets" discovered in other solar systems. The issue of
Planet X has now become entirely befuddled with recent discoveries
of 18 nearby stars with Jupiter-class planets orbiting them (last
count as of October, 1999). (see
astron.berkeley.edu) Locating any
new developments regarding a tenth solar system planet is akin to
finding a needle in a haystack, since it's difficult to know which
"new planet" they are talking about.
For instance, an October 23, 1996 AP article entitled "New rebel
planet found outside the solar system," disclosed the following:
A new planet that breaks all the
rules about how and where planets form has been identified in
orbit of a twin star about 70 light years from Earth in a
constellation commonly known as the Northern Cross. The new
planet has a roller coaster like orbit that swoops down close to
its central star and then swings far out into frigid fringes,
following a strange egg-shaped orbit that is unlike that of any
other known planet.
Thus, the issue of Planet X became lost
in the information shuffle. Due to the Hubble space probe, many
distant galaxies, stars, planets and brown dwarfs are suddenly being
discovered all at once. This situation affords NASA the opportunity
to attempt to avoid the societal chaos that will surely ensue once
everybody realizes that a sizable planet somewhere out there is
actually destined to circle our own sun in the next couple of years
(2003 according to one web site).
After all, who would bother to go
to work, go to school, pay their bills, play the stock market, be a
loyal, taxpaying John and Jane "Doe," if they thought the end of
civilization was near?
Planet X - The
Contrary to what happens in Hollywood movies, where the government
comes clean about comets (actually, in
Deep Impact they waited
almost a year after official knowledge to announce it to the
public), wouldn't it rather make sense that such an announcement
would not be made public, at least too far in advance of D-day?
Tom van Flandern of the U.S. Naval
Observatory, who was quoted in the 1982 Newsweek article, admits
that a tenth planet is possible, but argues that it would have to be
so huge that it should have been observed by now. We must admit that
there is a serious possibility that more details regarding Planet X
are in fact known, but we are not being informed. Is there a major
cover-up of Planet X?
This possibility was actually discussed in an article in the CCNet
Digest on May 18, 1998 entitled "The Secrets of Asteroid Peril,
British Media Smells a Rat." This article claimed that a report in
the London Daily Mail accused US astronomers of trying to cover up
scientific data until NASA has a chance to look at the information.
The report indicated that "earth-shattering" information, such as
the discovery of incoming comets or asteroids, has been ordered to
go through NASA first.
The Daily Mail report of May 15, 1998
entitled "Delayed Impact, or the Secrets of Asteroid Peril," stated
"If a giant asteroid is hurtling in the general direction of our
planet, we will be the last to know about it. For astronomers have
decided that the news would be too earth shattering for ordinary
mortals to handle, and would likely cause widespread panic. In a
week that sees the release of the film Deep Impact, a fictional
account of just such a catastrophe, astronomers funded by the
American space agency NASA have now agreed to keep asteroid and
comet discoveries to themselves for 48 hours while more detailed
calculations are made. The findings would then go to NASA, which
would wait another 24 hours before going public."
A Los Angeles AP article on May 19, 1998 also reported on this 72
hour delay rule imposed by NASA on announcements to the public of
asteroids or comets by astronomers. The report indicated that these
measures were undertaken to avoid the "doomsday alert" which
occurred in March of 1998 with regard to an asteroid which was due
to collide with Earth in 2028, and which was "soon found to be a
These new procedures, the article
stated, are "not an attempt to hide anything but to make sure the
information is accurate." How can we be sure that if the information
is found to be accurate, NASA will not (a) find it to be a
"mistake," or (b) withhold the message for a longer period of time?
X Marks the
In February, 1999, J.B. Murray presented a paper to the Royal
Astronomical Society entitled "Arguments for the Presence of a
Distant Large Undiscovered Solar System Planet." Murray's paper explored various explanations for what he called a
"non-random clustering of long-period comets," which his research
concluded are "aligned along a great circle inclined to both the
elliptic and the Galactic plane."
His paper examined the possibility that
this non-random clustering was due to "orbital perturbations by an
undiscovered object orbiting within the... distances of 30,000 to
50,000 au from the Sun." Murray's mathematical modeling predicted
that the object would have a retrograde orbit inclined at 120
In an October 16, 1999 Economist article entitled "X Marks the
Spot," Drs. Murray and Matese, after looking at the orbits of
approximately 300 long-period comets, have separately concluded that
too many of them are coming from the same regions of space. They
suggest that the galaxy's "tidal wobble" is "being modulated by the
gravity of something big within the Oort Cloud itself."
The new object must be very faint, these astronomers suggest, or it
would have been spotted. This means it's not a star. They predict
that the object is three times the size of Jupiter. They also
suggest that the object is not a "proper planet," because, take
"its orbit appears to run in the opposite direction from those
of the nine known planets."
This is another factoid we can add to
the above "anomalous" findings regarding the existence of
As the Enuma elish tells us, the
planet Marduk entered the solar system on its "clockwise, elliptical
orbit," and struck the Earth, which was moving in its "ordained
counterclockwise orbit." So the planet we are looking for will have
an orbit which runs in the opposite direction from those of the nine
known planets in our solar system. (Chalk another one up for
According to the above Economist article, the orbit of this object
also appears to be so unstable that it is unlikely that it could
have maintained this orbit for the 4.5 billion year history of the
solar system. Therefore, these astronomers suggest, it is more
likely that the object is an extra-solar body that was captured by
our sun's gravity only "recently," in astronomical terms.
(Otherwise, it would have wreaked
virtual havoc throughout the history of the solar system. Of course,
we are presuming that our neck of the galactic woods is serene
because we've been left here in peace to "evolve" for so long that
Planet X would have to be a relative newcomer to fit into this
In any case, these astronomers predict
we should be detecting Planet X soon, even if we have to wait for
the next generation of infra-red space telescopes.
It's interesting to note that many of the newly discovered
extra-solar planets recently discovered have extremely "eccentric"
orbits. It is suggested in "New Discoveries, A Planetary Mystery" that circular orbits may actually not be the rule in nearby solar
systems. Nine of the extra-solar objects recently discovered travel
in unusually elliptical orbits, "several of them plunging in
relatively close to their stars and then swinging far out again."
Several of these planets may be three times as massive as Jupiter,
and one is estimated at eleven times the mass of Jupiter.
What these new discoveries are teaching us is that our own solar
system may be very unlike others. Even considering our catastrophic
past, we may inhabit a relatively peaceful end of the cosmos, as far
as galaxies go. As Dr. Geoffrey Marcy explains, powerful
gravitational forces exerted over smaller planets by huge planets or
passing stars are capable of upsetting their orbits.
Likewise, two or more huge planets
orbiting in close proximity can generate a "gravitational slingshot"
effect, which could fling one of the objects off on an elongated
orbit into the inner planetary system, while the other could at the
same time fly off in the other direction, perhaps escaping into
interstellar space. In another possible scenario, the planet's own
star (sun) could be part of a binary star system, locked in a
Although this discussion is being avoided in what little news there
is on Planet X, the existence of a mysterious outer solar system
planet suggests that we could be living in a two star solar system.
What distant gravitational body is causing this planet to make such
an enormous wayward loop? One thing is sure, such a companion star
would be very capable of exerting a catastrophic influence on the
orbits of the outer solar system planets.
As Dr. Marcy writes:
"We are realizing that most of the
Jupiter-like planets far from their stars tool around in
elliptical orbits, not circular orbits, which are the rule in
our solar system."
Why our largest planets remain in
circular orbits is, therefore, a mystery. As Dr. Marcy notes:
"Jupiter sized bodies plunging
toward and away from their stars are likely to sweep aside
smaller worlds, sending them crashing into their star or flying
out of orbit into interstellar space. Current technology is
incapable of detecting Earth-size planets around other stars,
but they almost certainly could not exist near their star's
warmth in a system so unsettled by large planets in wrecking
A huge planet on an elliptical orbit
would probably scatter or destroy smaller planets as it crosses
their paths time and again. As Dr. Marcy writes,
"if our Jupiter were in an eccentric
orbit, the Earth and Mars would likely be gravitationally
scattered out of the solar system."
Therefore, our very existence, he
writes, is dependent upon both Jupiter and Earth being in mutually
stable and circular orbits. Lucky for us, we have no big bullies, no
freewheeling wrecking balls, in our solar system. Or do we?
Enter Planet X
Interestingly, astronomer Tom Van Flandern wonders if Planet X has
actually exploded. In his book, Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New
Comets, Van Flandern wonders if this planet was responsible for
disruption to the moons of Neptune. In his 1995 paper entitled
"Origins of Trans-Neptunian Asteroids," Van Flandern notes that a
new asteroid belt has been discovered beyond Neptune, suggesting
that Planet X may have exploded. (On the other hand, why wouldn't
this be the result of one of Planet X's fly-bys?)
In his book The Phoenix Solution, Alan Alford asks, if Planet X has
exploded, why do the Mesopotamian texts imply that it was seen by
the Sumerians during the 4th-3rd millennia BC? Alford suggests that
the planet Nibiru was not actually seen, and is a "metaphysical"
planet. He believes that the descent and ascent of the Egyptian
'gods' was metaphysical, and that the Egyptian religion was "an
exploded planet cult."
The story of Osiris was based on this
exploded planet; the deity Osiris had been mythologically
"dismembered" and his body distributed among the other gods in the
solar system. The resurrection of Osiris [continued in the Jesus
myth] was based on his metaphysical journey to the stars, which
restored the exploded planets to their primeval and pristine form;
essentially a metaphysical trip back to "The First Time."
Alford charges that Sitchin has misinterpreted the gods as
interplanetary astronauts, and that Planet X actually did not come
into the Earth vicinity, but was essentially a "play" or
metaphysical replay of an even more ancient event. He also tries to
incorrectly establish a Darwinian evolutionary trajectory that
implies human evolution was "quickened" by this explosion of
planets. This is in fact an anti-Darwinian thesis.
More importantly at this juncture, do I understand correctly that
what IRAS spotted in 1983 was a metaphysical planet? So that means
that what NASA officials mistook as a heavenly body in the direction
of the constellation Orion, which they claimed was possibly as large
as Jupiter, and close enough to Earth to be part of this solar
system, was a mythological planet?
And so the mysterious heavenly orb which
mathematicians now predict may be three times the size of Jupiter,
with a highly elliptical orbit that runs opposite the other nine
planets in the solar system, and a retrograde orbit inclined at 120
degrees, is just the replay of an ancient event in the solar system?
As the famous line in Oliver Stone's JFK goes, "people, we're
through the looking glass here."
In his paper entitled "Hubble's New Runaway Planet,"
Richard Hoagland explains the forgotten 19th Century scientific
hyperdimensional physics. These theories were initially
proposed over a hundred years ago by various scientists, and were
updated in this Century by Faraday and Maxwell. In a nutshell, what
hyperdimensional physics tells us is that three dimensional physical
phenomena, perhaps including human consciousness itself, are
dependent upon higher dimensional realities for their existence.
Hyper-D physics hypothesizes that the basic laws of the
three-dimensional world are united in four dimensional space, but
merely "look different because of the resulting crumpled geometry of
3-D reality." This is a major break with Newtonian laws of "action
at a distance." Instead it proposes that such "forces" are a "direct
result of objects moving through 3-D space geometry... distorted by
the intruding geometry of 4-D space."
In essence, the laws of nature
become simpler in higher dimensions because of the effect of
geometric spatial distortions in the 3-D world.
The implications stemming from this model - the dynamic hyperspace
foundations of reality - completely demolish our current view of
reality. For, according to Hoagland's research, the "tail wags the
Hyper-D physics is the only model that can explain how the
planets are completely capable of exerting a determinant influence
on the Sun and on each other through their disproportionate ratio of
total solar system angular momentum.
Suffice to say, according to Hoagland,
we are simply entering once again, after 13,000 years (which
incidentally is equal to the Mayan "Baktun" cycle) "a phase of this
recurring, grand solar system cycle of renewed hyperdimensional
restructuring of reality." And, as Hoagland notes, this may even be
due to the presence of a particularly enormous solar system body
which has just recently come into view, thanks to the Hubble
As Hoagland notes, something strange is indeed happening in the
solar system. One of the effects is that the official Cesium Atomic
Clock has had to be adjusted by over 20 seconds in the last two
decades; approximately a full second every six months. The official
atomic clock is supposedly theoretically stable to plus or minus one
second in a million years. To Hoagland, this suggests that a
progressive phase-shift is occurring between the Earth's rotation
and the atomic-level constants that govern the quantum standards of
the atomic clock.
The growing difference between dynamic time and atomic time is
compelling evidence of large scale changes in the hyperspatial
physics of the solar system. It is possible, Hoagland explains, that hyperspatial stresses are due to the progressive orbital movement of
as-yet undiscovered outer planets, which are causing increasing
scalar potential changes across the entire solar system at the
The reason the clocks are changing,
however, is because the Earth's rotation is changing. It is
essentially slowing down due to changing phase relationships between
undiscovered outer planets in the outer solar system! There can be
no doubt that something is out there! And this something is quite
capable of "making and remaking" the Earth, including seriously
affecting the orbital rotation time of the planet.
It's also interesting to note in this regard that if orbital
revolution is directly related to the passage of "time,"
affect the aging process of the life forms on the planet?
presence of Marduk/Planet X be a possible explanation for the longer
ages of the Old Testament patriarchs?
Also, does "making and
remaking the Earth" refer to a higher vibrational consciousness
referred to as 4th dimensional consciousness?
Is there then a
relationship between the end of the
Mayan Baktun cycle and the
coming of Planet X?
In any case, these bizarre "new age" concepts
seem to be making more and more scientific sense.
Such a distant and large solar system body will also have a huge
effect on total solar hyperdimensional energy generation, Hoagland
notes. He explains, unknown "worlds," or planets, can produce
long-term cyclical changes in solar output lasting thousands of
years [i.e. a "World Age"?]. In fact, such a geometrical
relationship has already been established between the changing
positions of Jupiter and Saturn relative to each other.
Hoagland wonders, if the known changes
in solar output are due to hyperdimensional effects of the largest
known planets, what might be the effect of the magnitude of "aether
stress" produced by these newfound planets, which have angular
momentum contributions hundreds of times greater? He notes that the
long-term cyclic increase in solar energy created by those cyclic
phasings could measure as much as several percent above current
solar output. Needless to say, this could trigger profound climatic
changes on Earth.
In short, the idea that advanced extraterrestrial space travelers
could apply hyperdimensional technology to engineer orbital
catastrophic management projects is actually within the realm of
possibility. After all, we must consider the type of technology that
would be important to an intelligent civilization living on what
constitutes a runaway wrecking ball.
Might the technology of such a
society be based on the altruistic behavior of running ahead and
moving objects out of its path, and running back to tidy up the
bowling alley afterward?
Might the technology also be based on
placing and replacing the genetic stock of life forms on planets on
Even more far-fetched, could
hyperdimensional technology use light and sound vibrational levers
to lift the Earth globe right out of the 3rd dimension in order to
avoid a head-on collision with the oncoming planet?
Could this be a
hint as to the meaning behind the message: "makes and remakes the
Earth on its near passage?"
In light of information regarding hyperspace reality, it appears we
have come full circle. Human knowledge has a way of biting itself on
the ass. For, as the pioneering work of 19th Century physicists
"The existence of unseen hyperspatial realities, through
information transfer between dimensions, are the literal 'foundation
substrate' maintaining the reality of everything in this dimension."
In assimilating this information into our world view, we have to
realize that our science is missing large areas of information with
regard to geometric interplanetary relationships in our solar
system's cosmic dance, and the peculiar physics of a shared outer
solar system planet or twin sun scenario, and the connection this
might have on both Earth's climate and rotation, and also, as
strange as it may sound, on space-time reality and human
How much meaning can we, in our modern secular world view, place on
the distant effects of interplanetary hyperspace gematria? In our
blindness to important scientific discoveries of only a hundred
years ago, there is no context to explain these compelling
synchronicities. Conceptually speaking, we have nowhere to put this
But we need to become aware that a Glass
Bead Game of enormous importance is beginning to take shape, and all
hands are needed on deck to decipher the mathematical codes of this
information. We are being spoken to in a forgotten ancient language,
and we've got to wake up fast to the meaning of the message.