rense.com

Is Popular Mechanics
Hiding 911 NYC Engine
In Street Photo?

By Jon Carlson
carlson.jon@att.net
3-7-5
 
In reviewing crash footage taken by an ABC news crew, Corley was able to track the trajectory of the fragments he studied--including a section of the landing gear and part of an engine--as they tore through the South Tower, exited from the building's north side and fell from the sky.
FROM: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=3&c=y
Just to help PM here is a photo of the engine part that fell into the NYC street:
Best way to identify a damaged engine portion is to identify undamaged parts on it.
LIKE:
From: http://www.aeromat.fr/frameset_global.htm Click on 'Products' & look for photo CFM56-3 LPT Shaft
LIKE:
From: http://www.b737.org.uk/powerplant.htm (Very top of website page also offers a view of the Pentagon engine. However, without the missing Pentagon Citgo videos it is impossible to identify positively the Pentagon attack
aircraft.)
Fuel nozzles were also CFM56 but the WTC picture is crystal clear: No Boeing 767-200 struck the South Tower on 9/11. Would somebody tell Popular Mechanics?
FOR THOSE CURIOUS ABOUT THE LANDING GEAR ASSEMBLY:
Count the number of grooves in the tire: then go to
http://www.b737.org.uk/landinggear.htm and look at the tires in the landing gear photo. You be the judge.
THE FINAL WORD is from http://www.b737.org.uk/powerplant.htm
The original choice of (Boeing 737-100) powerplant was the Pratt & Whitney JT8D-1, but before the first order had been finalized the JT8D-7 was used for commonality with the 727.
The sole powerplant for all 737's after the -200 is the CFM-56.