| 
			 
			  
			
			 
			 
			Audio 
			Letter #14  
			
			 
			Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is July 19, 1976, and 
			this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 14. What I am forced to tell you 
			about today is grave and urgent beyond description. I believe you 
			have a right and a need to know about it, and yet I already know 
			that in all likelihood you will not believe me when I tell you 
			because it is something no one wants to believe. I’ve wrestled with 
			this thing wondering how best to tell you what you must be told, but 
			all I can say is that it is absolutely true beyond any shadow of a 
			doubt. I stake my entire life and my reputation on this fact. If 
			there were any doubt at all about what I am about to reveal, I would 
			not reveal it.  
			
			 
			At this very moment the United States of America is teetering on the 
			precipice of a devastating nuclear surprise attack the 
			likes of which the world has never seen. If the detailed plans for 
			war that I have already told you about are carried out as 
			discussed especially in my monthly AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 6, 12, and 13, 
			this attack might not come for as much as another year or even more; 
			but that is a very big IF because the capability for this attack is 
			now in place, and it includes provisions for a Soviet double-cross 
			of their allies—the four Rockefeller Brothers, who now rule America 
			behind the scenes. Today I want to alert you to the terrible threat 
			we face by means of these topics: 
			
				- 
				
				Topic #1--  THE SOVIET 
				MISSILE CRISIS OF 1976  
				- 
				
				Topic #2--  HITLER’S 
				PATTERN FOR AMERICA’S BICENTENNIAL ERA   
				- 
				
				Topic #3--  THE PLANS 
				FOR AMERICA’S FUTURE UNDER OCCUPATION AND DICTATORSHIP 
				  
			 
			
			  
			
			Topic #1 
			
			  
			
			--It was a sleepy Sunday morning in 
			Hawaii nearly 35 years ago when WORLD WAR II came to America. Much 
			of the Pacific fleet of the United States Navy was peacefully at 
			anchor suspecting nothing, while President Franklin D. Roosevelt and 
			his closest advisors far away in Washington, D.C. waited anxiously 
			for the attack to occur as planned. At 7:55 A.M. on that peaceful 
			Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, more than 100 Japanese aircraft 
			suddenly appeared in the skies over the Island of Oahu, Hawaii. All 
			attempts to warn the Navy of the impending attack had been thwarted 
			or delayed, and the bottled up American fleet was torn to shreds as 
			a result of the complete surprise that resulted. F.D.R. and his 
			closest advisors had made sure that no aircraft carriers were caught 
			in the raid because these would be indispensable in the retaliation 
			to come against Japan. Instead, the sacrifice was limited to 
			battleships, destroyers, cruisers, and several thousand American 
			Servicemen’s lives.  
			
			  
			
			Soon the news of the crushing disaster 
			that had befallen the United States Navy flashed across a stunned 
			and unbelieving America, and the words “Pearl Harbor” from that day 
			have been a synonym for surprise attack of the most catastrophic 
			variety. It should also bring to mind high treason and intrigue, 
			because while most Americans were trying to recover from the shock 
			and horror of the Pearl Harbor attack, F.D.R. and his Rockefeller 
			bosses were congratulating themselves on the success of the 
			operation. The United States would now be drawn into the war against 
			Hitler, enabling a Rockefeller take-over of the formerly British oil 
			concessions in Saudi Arabia; yet President Roosevelt would be making 
			good on his campaign promises not to send American boys away to die 
			in a foreign war. Instead, he had arranged to get us into war by 
			allowing several thousand American boys to die in a rigged attack on 
			American territory—Pearl Harbor! His renowned “Day of Infamy” speech 
			then galvanized the nation overnight into a fighting mood. The 
			obstacle of American isolationist sentiment had been flattened, and 
			the United States was AT WAR.  
			
			 
			Today we are once again at the mercy of an imminent Pearl 
			Harbor-type attack. As before, we are being given no warning 
			whatever that this is the case aside from the general level of 
			tensions here and abroad. But this time it has been planned to be 
			far worse because this time the plan is not for America to win the 
			war but to lose it.  
			
			 
			Two months ago in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12 I first revealed the 
			existence of the supersecret “Nuclear Safe Zone”—a swath across 
			roughly the upper half of the continental United States between the 
			latitudes of 40 and 50 degrees north. According to secret agreements 
			between the Rockefeller Brothers and their Soviet allies, this Zone 
			is supposed to be spared from the all-out thermonuclear war that is 
			planned to engulf the southern half of the United States in NUCLEAR 
			WAR ONE.  
			This arrangement has three (3) purposes: 
			
				- 
				
				First, as I revealed two months ago, 
				it provides a zone within which the Rockefeller Brothers and 
				their closest collaborators expect to ride out the coming 
				NUCLEAR WAR ONE in safety and comfort  
				- 
				
				Second, much of the industrial base 
				and agricultural breadbasket of America will be preserved for 
				exploitation after the war  
				- 
				
				A third factor, which I did not 
				mention before, has to do with the high altitude jet stream 
				which goes clear around the earth.  
			 
			
			Should the Soviets find it necessary to 
			back up their so-called “clean bombs”, which I revealed last month, 
			with the older dirty bombs, they don’t want radioactive fallout from 
			America to drift around the earth and land on the Soviet Union. More 
			than 95% of the Soviet Union lies north of the 40th parallel of 
			latitude; so by agreeing with the Rockefeller Brothers to strike 
			America only below that latitude except for a small strike against 
			Alaska, the Soviets have avoided the danger of having much 
			radioactive dust from America circle the globe to land on their own 
			country. But the Soviets are very eager to break free of the 
			Rockefeller control under which they have functioned for so long, 
			and they are preparing a double-cross.  
			
			 
			As I reported last month in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 13, the Safe 
			Zone agreement has been violated by the placement of an atomic bomb 
			at Seal Harbor, Maine, to blast the summer homes of Nelson and David 
			Rockefeller off the map. But that, I am sorry to report, is only the 
			beginning of the “Pearl Harbor” the Soviets have prepared for us. 
			The Soviet double-cross of the Rockefeller Brothers is to be 
			thorough and complete, and it will include several more violations 
			of the Nuclear Safe Zone—an acceptable price in Soviet eyes for 
			breaking free of the Rockefellers and into the position of absolute 
			world supremacy themselves.  
			
			 
			While the United States has focused its missile development on 
			long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles, the Soviet Union has 
			never forgotten the potentialities of shorter range missiles, which 
			are easier to design and build. That’s what the Cuban Missile Crisis 
			of October 1962 was all about. The Soviets, not wishing to depend on 
			their long-range missiles, had installed much shorter-range missiles 
			in Cuba able to reach many American cities from the vulnerable 
			south; and when President John F. Kennedy spoiled the 
			Rockefeller-Soviet plans by forcing Nikita Khrushchev to remove 
			them, they did not abandon this idea. Instead, J.F.K. was removed 
			from the scene himself; and his replacement, Rockefeller puppet 
			President Lyndon B. Johnson, handed the Soviets a new site for the 
			implacement of medium-range missiles to threaten the United States 
			from the south. This was done by turning over the huge United 
			States-built MacKenzie Airfield to the newly independent Marxist 
			republic of Guyana. The Americans pulled out, MacKenzie Airfield was 
			re-named the Temehri Airfield, and this new air base, the largest in 
			Central and South America, was then fortified by ringing it with 
			nuclear missiles aimed at the Panama Canal and cities in the 
			southern half of the United States. And as l have been reporting for 
			over two years—without any Government investigation of my charges 
			whatsoever—the missiles in Guyana are at operational readiness 
			today, threatening the United States and the Panama Canal.  
			
			 
			But that’s not all, my friends. Five years ago, in 1971, there was 
			another Soviet missile crisis, this time involving both Canada and 
			the United States; and I am here revealing it for the very first 
			time. The Soviet Missile Crisis of 1971 began with an accidental 
			discovery by some divers off Vancouver Island, Canada. A Vancouver 
			fishing trawler had sunk in the area and divers were sent down to 
			locate it. While they were looking, they came across something 
			unbelievable—a missile anchored to the bottom. It was attached by 
			heavy chains to four concrete blocks, each estimated to weigh five 
			tons. The blocks in turn were anchored to the bottom by extra heavy 
			anchors of Soviet design. The divers reported their unexpected find 
			immediately, and the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) went 
			into action. The Canadian ship H.C.M.S. Resogoushe plus two 
			mine-layers and a torpedo boat were dispatched and immediately 
			covered the area. By coincidence, this chance discovery occurred 
			just as the Soviet Navy was launching its own operation to recover 
			that very missile. Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko had just 
			arrived to visit Vancouver for a hush-hush Foreign Ministers 
			Conference ostensibly. Strangely, he arrived aboard the Soviet ship 
			SUROV, a heavy cruiser of the Cresta class.  
			
			  
			
			But Gromyko explained that away by 
			saying that he had just been inspecting the Soviet fleet which was 
			on maneuvers—but that was just a cover story. A Soviet oceanographic 
			research ship doing underwater experiments on guided missiles near 
			Sakhalin had reached the conclusion that six guided missiles, which 
			had been placed strategically on the seabed around the North 
			American continent years before would now have to be recovered and 
			removed at once. These had been planted on the orders of Khrushchev 
			after his defeat by President Kennedy in the Cuban Missile Crisis, 
			and for years they had been lurking undetected. But now they would 
			have to be removed because the Soviet experiments at Sakhalin had 
			revealed that the metals used in the missiles were proving unstable 
			and had started disintegrating rapidly in the salt water. The 
			situation was very serious, not only because the missiles were no 
			longer dependable as weapons but also because corrosion of the 
			warheads could have led to leakage of radioactive materials or even 
			under certain conditions, uncontrolled explosions. This was the real 
			reason for Gromyko’s strange visit to Vancouver aboard the heavy 
			cruiser SUROV in 1971.  
			
			 
			The Soviet Navy in reality was invading the territorial waters of 
			Canada to recover a malfunctioning weapon, the Underwater Missile; 
			but due to the accidental discovery of the missile by the Canadian 
			divers, Gromyko’s mission was foiled. He stayed there for three days 
			aboard the ship and then was aghast to see the Soviet missile go 
			past him on a barge on the way to dockside. Gromyko immediately 
			canceled his appearance in Vancouver and sailed for home without 
			delay. The missile itself was rushed by special airplane immediately 
			to a secret location in the United States for study and analysis.
			 
			
			 
			The Vancouver discovery also triggered an intensive search of all 
			the American and Canadian coasts by specially equipped 
			surface and underwater vessels. This search turned up three moresuch 
			missiles—one off the coast of California and Oregon; 
			another just south of San Rosario, Baja, California; and thethird 
			one off the coast of Maine just east of a rocky island 
			there. Two additional underwater missiles were known to exist as 
			well. One was believed to be somewhere in the arc from Cuba to 
			Pensacola, Florida; the other was thought to be in the Caribbean 
			Islands aimed at the Panama Canal. These last two were never found 
			by the United States Navy, but the pattern of activity of the Soviet 
			Navy indicated that they were successfully recovered by the Soviets. 
			The Soviets had been poised to mount a recovery operation for all 
			six missiles, but were prevented from making any such attempt 
			because of the intensive United States Navy search.  
			
			 
			Each of the four missiles which were recovered by the joint 
			Canadian-American effort was examined and its targets determined. It 
			turned out that each missile was fitted with multiple warheads. The 
			one discovered by the divers off Vancouver had six targets—the Royal 
			Canadian Naval Base on Vancouver Island, the Port of Vancouver, the 
			Port of Seattle, and three Boeing aircraft plants in Seattle, 
			Everett, and Blaine. The missile found off the coast of Oregon and 
			California had its multiple warheads targeted on five centers in the 
			San Francisco Bay area. The San Rosario missile was targeted on the 
			United States Naval Base at San Diego and on the City of Los 
			Angeles. As for the missile found in the waters off the coast of 
			Maine, its targets were Boston, the Submarine Base in Connecticut, 
			the Brooklyn Navy Yard, and the New York Harbor.  
			
			  
			
			The missile which was apparently 
			retrieved by the Soviets in the Cuba-Pensacola area was assumed to 
			have been aimed at strategic coastal targets in the Southeast. And 
			so ended the Soviet Missile Crisis of 1971. In some respects it was 
			even more dangerous than the Cuban Missile Crisis nine years earlier 
			because the underwater missiles off our shores were already 
			operational, whereas those in Cuba were stopped just short of 
			operational status. But you’ve never heard a word about the Soviet 
			Missile Crisis of 1971. This is because that would not have squared 
			well with our official policy of so-called detente with the Soviet 
			Union. The Rockefeller agents in our government knew all about the 
			missiles, and had a ticklish job keeping the lid on after the 
			accidental discovery by the Vancouver divers brought NORAD and the 
			United States Navy into the picture.  
			
			 
			All’s well that ends well, or so it seems; but this just wasn’t the 
			end of the Soviet Missile Crisis. On February 11, 1971, the same 
			year in which the Soviet Missile Crisis occurred, 63 nations signed 
			a treaty prohibiting installation of nuclear weapons on the seabed 
			beyond any nation’s 12-mile Coastal Zone. On top of that, the United 
			States over the past dozen years has laid down a grid of electronic 
			sensing wires and cables on the ocean floor all along both our 
			Pacific and Atlantic coasts making the seabed look like a giant 
			spider web. These detection nets called “Sosus” for the Atlantic and 
			“Caesar” for the Pacific are tied into computers which enable any 
			submarine passing over them, American or foreign, to be detected, 
			located, and even identified in a very short time. So, what could 
			happen?  
			
			 
			My friends, the Maginot line did not protect the French from 
			invasion in World War II—the Germans went right over it. In the same 
			way, the Rockefeller Brothers have enabled the Soviets to go over 
			our underwater detection nets as if they did not exist! When 
			President Richard M. Nixon arrived in Moscow on May 22, 1972 for 
			summer talks with the Kremlin, he had more to discuss than the 
			highly publicized SALT talks. A key agreement arrived at then 
			established joint oceanographic projects with the Soviets, and since 
			that time Soviet oceanographic vessels have been in and out of our 
			territorial waters continuously! For approximately two years these 
			vessels operate in a totally innocent-appearing fashion while 
			actually gathering information on optimum placement sites for a new 
			fleet of underwater missiles along our shores. 
			
			 
			By the time the joint Army-Navy teams monitoring the underwater nets 
			had become accustomed to the Soviet oceanographic ships as a routine 
			non-threatening presence in our waters, the Soviets were ready to 
			act. Under cover of oceanographic operations, the Soviets began 
			planting underwater missiles along our shores once again, plus 
			several strategically located atomic bombs. And as if they needed 
			it, the Soviets have also slipped in through a loophole in the 1971 
			treaty, which superficially seems to ban such weaponry in our 
			coastal waters. Most if not all of these weapons have been planted 
			inside our 12-mile territorial limit, whereas the treaty only 
			forbids such things beyond that limit. This is a chilling echo of 
			President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s promises to avoid a foreign war 
			before World War II, only to help rig an attack on our own 
			territory.  
			
			  
			
			But the Soviets, having been given the 
			oceanographic cover they needed in order to get the bombs and 
			missiles into our coastal waters, have already double-crossed their 
			Rockefeller allies. Not only have the Rockefeller Brothers 
			themselves been marked for destruction, as signaled by the bomb at 
			Seal Harbor, Maine, but their precious Nuclear Safe Zone has already 
			been breached by the Soviets in at least three other places where 
			missiles have been placed contrary to their agreement with the 
			Rockefellers. The Soviets, like the Rockefeller Brothers themselves, 
			are now going “for broke”—they are trying to arrange in every way 
			they can to break the back of any conceivable retaliational 
			resistance by the United States in the coming war. It is still in 
			the Soviet interest to minimize warfare within the Nuclear Safe 
			Zone, but specific targets will be attacked within this Zone 
			whenever the Soviets consider it necessary to achieve their goal of 
			total victory and total world domination over the United States.
			 
			
			 
			I can now reveal that the coastal waters of the United 
			States—including Alaska, Hawaii, and the Panama Canal Zone—now 
			contain at least ten (10) multiple warhead, short-range, 
			underwater-launch missiles of a new advanced design. In addition, at 
			least four (4) atomic bombs have been strategically placed in harbor 
			areas. Here is the situation as it now stands according to my own 
			latest Intelligence sources: 
			
				
				First, the four bombs. One is 
				the bomb I was able to reveal last month which is placed at Seal 
				Harbor, Maine, to destroy the summer homes of David and Nelson 
				Rockefeller. The second is planted in the Potomac River 
				near the United States Naval Ordnance Station at Indian Head, 
				Maryland. The third is in the Mississippi River upstream 
				from New Orleans in the vicinity of Bonnet Carre Spillway and 
				Floodway. And the fourth atomic bomb has been planted in 
				the Port of Valdez, Alaska, which is the southern terminus of 
				the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline. By rendering the port of Valdez 
				useless, of course, the Pipeline will be put out of action, 
				since oil tankers are supposed to carry the oil from the 
				Pipeline delivery point at Valdez to destinations in the lower 
				United States.  
			 
			
			As for the short-range multiple warhead 
			Soviet missiles which once again infest our coastal waters, three 
			violate the Nuclear Safe Zone. One is in Boston Harbor; the second 
			is in Long Island Sound about midway between New York City and the 
			Submarine Base at New London, Connecticut; and the third is in the 
			Seattle-Vancouver area situated between Victoria, British Columbia, 
			on the north and the Port Angeles or Sequim, Washington, area on the 
			south. 
			
			 
			Outside the Nuclear Safe Zone, missile No. 4 is in Chesapeake Bay 
			east of Washington, D.C. No. 5 is located just off shore from 
			Pensacola, Florida. A 6th missile has been planted in Galveston Bay, 
			Texas. A 7th lies just off shore of San Diego, California; while 
			missile No. 8 is deep inside San Pablo Bay near San Francisco. The 
			9th missile is located in the Atlantic Ocean near the north entrance 
			to the Panama Canal. And finally, missile No. 10 with tragic irony 
			is poised in the Pacific Ocean near the entrance to Pearl Harbor, 
			Hawaii. The exact location of the Pearl Harbor missile is: Longitude 
			157 degrees, 58 minutes, 58 seconds; latitude 21 degrees, 18 
			minutes, 28 seconds. All the Navy needs to do is to look and do it 
			now before the Soviets have time to sneak in and move it, and 
			they’ll find this missile. I respectfully urge—no, I demand—that the 
			Joint Chiefs of Staff immediately take such actions as are required 
			to remove the deadly missiles which now menace the United States and 
			Vancouver, Canada from our own territorial waters. The things I have 
			just revealed are true, my friends, and I urge you to add your 
			challenge to mine. I stand ready to cooperate fully with the Joint 
			Chiefs of Staff in the new larger Soviet missile crisis we are now 
			in.  
			
			 
			Will the Joint Chiefs act? If they do not do so and soon, then they 
			themselves will have violated their oath to protect and safeguard 
			our Constitution, our Nation, our lives, and the lives of 
			generations to come. 
			
			 
			Topic #2--I comment often about the covert alliance that exists 
			between the Corporate Socialists headed by the four Rockefeller 
			Brothers in America, and the Communist bosses of the Soviet Union. 
			It is essential that this relationship be understood even though the 
			day is fast approaching when the Soviets plan to end it by means of 
			a double-cross. But it is also important to grasp the fact that the 
			Rockefellers are not themselves Communists. To them, Communism is 
			just a very convenient and powerful tool, a stepping stone to power. 
			They don’t themselves subscribe to any rigid ideology, Communist or 
			otherwise. Their only real doctrine is that of domination and 
			control along with destruction of everything and anyone they cannot 
			control. In this they bear a striking resemblance to just one man, 
			Adolf Hitler. What we have today is a blend of emerging fascism, 
			which is a combination of State Control with Monopolistic Capitalism 
			and Socialism of the Marxist variety all wrapped up in American 
			packaging and sold to us by means of Rockefeller public relations 
			propaganda.  
			
			  
			
			Our would-be Dictators realize full well 
			that if they were to dress up in combat fatigues, get up on a high 
			balcony and rant and rave about the need for the state to control 
			our lives totally, we would all recognize them right away for what 
			they are—and their schemes would fail. Instead, they wear nice 
			business suits, use cleverly worded phrases that seem to say exactly 
			what we want to hear, and make sure that they smile a great deal. 
			And instead of swaying great crowds in a public square from a high 
			balcony, they can now cajole and mislead whole nations from the 
			matchless high balcony of television. In monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 1, 
			June 1975, I mentioned the role played by the Rockefeller empire in 
			providing the support Adolf Hitler needed in order to rise to power 
			in Germany.  
			
			  
			
			They supported him, watched him, and 
			learned from him. In the late 1920’s the Rockefellers had succeeded 
			in wrestling control of the German dye and drug cartel, I. G. Farben 
			Industry, AG, away from the British. This, plus an ongoing rivalry 
			between Britain and the Rockefellers over oil, led the British to 
			institute boycott tactics preventing the Rockefeller Standard Oil 
			interests from exploiting the vast Saudi Arabian oil concessions 
			which the Rockefellers had pried loose from the British during World 
			War I. The Rockefeller solution: Confront Britain with a threat 
			great enough to break Britain’s Saudi Arabian oil boycott.  
			
			 
			When 22-year-old Nelson Rockefeller returned from his 
			around-the-world honeymoon trip in 1930, he convinced his father, 
			John D. Rockefeller, Jr., that the solution to their problems lay in 
			one Adolf Hitler. Not many Germans really took Hitler seriously in 
			1930, but the Rockefellers did. Having observed Hitler at close 
			range, they were convinced that Hitler could serve the Rockefeller 
			purpose well. Hitler was obviously bent on conquest and war; so 
			providing the support he needed to achieve power would produce a 
			very real menace to Britain in due course—just the right medicine to 
			cure Britain of her Saudi Arabian boycott against the Rockefeller 
			oil interests. Hitler was especially attractive for Rockefeller 
			purposes for one additional reason beyond his sheer aggressiveness. 
			His earlier failure and imprisonment had taught Hitler a very 
			important lesson which the Rockefellers themselves had also learned 
			decades before; namely, that successful revolutions are best carried 
			out with, and not against, the full power of a nation’s government. 
			In other words, Hitler had concluded that the best way to achieve 
			his goals would be to first acquire control of the government 
			through means which were legal, at least in appearance, and then to 
			carry out the revolutionary changes he desired.  
			
			  
			
			Therefore, by supporting Hitler and 
			watching to see how he went about the details of his take-over and 
			revolution, the Rockefellers stood to learn valuable lessons for 
			their own use later on. This was a very nice bonus for the 
			Rockefellers, so support for Hitler through covert channels began 
			immediately; and from 1930 onward, Hitler’s star rose rapidly. The 
			same time, the Rockefellers had to make sure that they would be in a 
			position to check Hitler’s advance when he had served his 
			purpose—which was to frighten the British government into 
			surrendering control over Saudi Arabia. In other words, a balance of 
			power had to be maintained so that Hitler would not get out of 
			control. For this reason and as well as others, Rockefeller support 
			for Hitler was counterbalanced by support also for the man who, as 
			president, would have the job of getting America into the war to 
			stop Hitler—Franklin Delano Roosevelt! FDR had staged a political 
			comeback from his crippling attack of polio several years before, 
			but it was about from 1930 onward that FDR’s political star rose 
			rapidly on the national scene paralleling the rise of Hitler in 
			Germany. Throughout their period on the world stage, the careers of 
			Hitler and FDR paralleled one another. Both came to power early in 
			1933, and both proposed sweeping changes in rapid fashion that 
			differed widely from their campaign pledges.  
			
			  
			
			Both exercised unprecedented power 
			during their terms in office, and both died in April 1945 less than 
			three weeks apart as the war in Europe was ending. The dual role of 
			the Rockefellers throughout can be illustrated, for example, by the 
			actions of Nelson Rockefeller. In 1935 he became a Director of the 
			Creole Petroleum Company in Venezuela, a subsidiary of 
			Rockefeller-owned Standard Oil of New Jersey. Creole was the 
			principal avenue through which the Nazi war machine was provided 
			with the essential fuel without which war could not have been waged; 
			and for seven years, 1937 through 1943, Creole Petroleum shipped 90% 
			of its Venezuelan oil production to Germany in Nazi tankers, only a 
			token 10% going to the United States. In this way the Rockefeller 
			empire—increasingly dominated by Nelson, David, Laurance, and John 
			D. III—provided Hitler with over 65-million barrels of oil each year 
			from the Venezuelan oil fields alone well into the World War II.
			 
			
			 
			In 1940, Nelson resigned his directorship of Creole Petroleum to 
			become Coordinator of InterAmerican affairs by appointment of 
			Rockefeller puppet president FDR. As Coordinator, Nelson was 
			supposedly feverishly at work to combat the Nazi menace in this 
			hemisphere, the very menace that was being sustained by oil provided 
			by his Creole Petroleum Company! Through Hitler, the Rockefellers 
			did at last bring Great Britain to her knees, and a great deal was 
			learned from the plan Hitler followed that is being followed again 
			today by the four Rockefeller Brothers. Hitler had two very 
			important rules for exercising power. One was to use the masses by 
			means of effective propaganda, leading them to accept and do things 
			which they normally would not. The other rule was to make sure that 
			any lies were big lies, so big that no one could believe they were 
			lies, coming from their leader.  
			
			 
			Those same principles are being used today in updated and very 
			smooth ways by the Rockefeller Brothers and their agents. Hitler’s 
			rise to power was made possible by an era of inflation, shortages, 
			and then depression. The same conditions are being brought about 
			deliberately here in America in order to help achieve the same end 
			result—revolution and dictatorship! While Hitler was in prison, he 
			began writing “Mein Kampf”, which means “my struggle.” In it and in 
			his speeches, Hitler made it clear what he would do if he ever 
			acquired the power to do it. In a similar vein, we can read “The 
			American Rich” published in 1930 by Rockefeller advisor Hoffman 
			Nickerson; “The New Federalism” by Nelson Rockefeller; “The Emerging 
			Constitution” published in 1974 by Rexford Tugwell quietly revealing 
			a dictatorial new Constitution, which was written to match a secret 
			outline provided by Nelson Rockefeller himself; or the Bicentennial 
			Declaration advertisements published nation-wide in 1975 by John D. 
			Rockefeller III’s National Committee for the Bicentennial Era. The 
			last item could have been titled: A Bicentennial Manifesto, since a 
			manifesto is nothing more than a public declaration of intentions, 
			motives, or views; but everyone now knows that the Communist 
			Manifesto of a century ago was no joke, so that word was avoided.
			 
			
			 
			But keep in mind what Hitler said in January 1941, quote:  
			
				
				“It is nonsense for the rest of the 
				world to pretend today that I did not reveal this program until 
				1933, or 1935, or 1937. Instead of listening to foolish chatter, 
				these gentlemen would have been wiser to read what I have 
				written and re-written thousands of times. No human being has 
				declared or recorded what he wanted more often than I.” 
			 
			
			If the four Rockefeller Brothers are 
			allowed to succeed in their diabolical plans, they, too, will be in 
			a position to indict us in practically the same words.  
			
			 
			Hitler directed much of his appeal to the new generation. Young 
			people had grown up in an abnormal time, lacking normal roots and 
			values, and who were therefore more vulnerable to being misled and 
			used. Introduction of the 18-year old vote, regardless of its actual 
			effect, was intended for a similar purpose here in America. Hitler 
			pursued a ‘policy of legality’ strictly as a tactic in his campaign 
			to take control of the German government. In every respect Hitler 
			was challenging the authority of the State under the Weimar 
			Constitution, yet he camouflaged this challenge by using 
			fair-sounding words.  
			
			 
			The same thing is happening once again here today. The words we hear 
			in the presidential campaign—for example, such as: “A new world 
			framework for peace”, “governmental reorganization”, 
			“interdependence.” But the meaning of these words involve World 
			government, surrender of United States sovereignty, and suspension 
			or replacement of the United States CONSTITUTION! “But why”, you may 
			ask, “do they bother to leave any clues at all like this if they’re 
			trying to be devious? Why don’t they just lie outright?” The answer 
			is simply that it is harder to lie convincingly than to tell the 
			truth; and if one starts telling actual lies, it becomes harder and 
			harder over a period of time to keep track of what has been said 
			before, and eventually one makes mistakes which can be detected. So 
			instead they tell a little bit of truth but always in such a way 
			that you won’t understand it unless you are very alert.  
			
			 
			Hitler realized that his ‘policy of legality’ could only lead to 
			success in one way; that was to gain access to the position of 
			Chancellor and use the emergency powers of the president under the 
			Weimar Constitution. This was true because try as he might, Hitler 
			was never able to achieve majority popular support for himself or 
			his Nazi Party. And today, our would-be Dictator, Nelson 
			Rockefeller, who has also been frustrated in his attempts to gain 
			majority popular support nationally, is also trying to position 
			himself to seize control by means of emergency presidential powers. 
			David Rockefeller’s agent Jimmy Carter meanwhile, whose build-up has 
			been used to impress Ford with Rockefeller power, also stands ready 
			in case Nelson’s illness should overcome him.  
			
			 
			In 1936 Hitler said, quote:  
			
				
				“It is not enough to overthrow the 
				old State, but that the new State must previously have been 
				built up and be practically ready to one’s hand. In 1933 it was 
				no longer a question of overthrowing a state by an act of 
				violence; meanwhile the new state had been built up, and all 
				that there remained to do was to destroy the last remnants of 
				the old state—and that took but a few hours.” 
			 
			
			So it is that the Rockefeller Brothers 
			are rapidly getting the governmental machinery into place which is 
			to go into full operation under their dictatorial new Constitution 
			for the, quote: “NEW” STATES OF AMERICA.”  
			
			 
			Shortly before Hitler became Chancellor in 1933, he said to then 
			Chancellor Bruning, quote: “Herr Chancellor, if the German nation 
			once empowers the National Socialist movement to introduce a 
			constitution other than that which we have today, then you cannot 
			stop it.” On September 12, 1975, Nelson Rockefeller displayed 
			exactly the same thinking, during a news conference in Dallas, 
			Texas, in response to criticisms leveled at him as our appointed 
			Vice-President by a columnist; Rockefeller’s answer was, quote: 
			“Well, he’s got one, so there’s nothing he can do about it.” On 
			August 9, 1974, our last elected president, Richard Nixon, became 
			the first in American history to resign, hounded out of office by 
			means of the Watergate scandal. Listen now to the following words 
			taken from a conspirator’s diary, and I quote:  
			
				
				“For him alone, winter seems to have 
				arrived. He is being secretly undermined and is already 
				completely isolated. He is anxiously looking for collaborators. 
				Our mice are busily at work gnawing through the last supports of 
				his position.” 
			 
			
			Those words could have been written 
			about Watergate with complete accuracy, but they were not. They were 
			written by Hitler’s propaganda chief, Paul Joseph Goebbels, 12 days 
			before Chancellor Bruning was forced to resign on May 30, 1932. 
			Bruning was succeeded by an interim chancellor more to Hitler’s 
			liking, Franz von Papen; and Hitler himself replaced von Papen on 
			January 30, 1933, when Hitler was appointed Chancellor by aging 
			President von Hindenburg under the provisions of the Weimar 
			Constitution. It was this weakness in the Weimar Constitution—the 
			fact that the Chancellor was appointed, not elected, that enabled 
			Hitler to succeed in his plan to take control of Germany by ‘legal’ 
			means despite his lack of majority popular support!  
			
			 
			This lesson was not lost on Nelson Rockefeller, who introduced 
			exactly the same weakness into the United States Constitution for 
			his own benefit by means of the 25th Amendment! The 25th Amendment 
			was proposed a scant three weeks after the assassination of 
			President John F. Kennedy by Nelson Rockefeller’s water boy, Birch 
			Bayh, almost as if it had been ready and waiting!  
			
			 
			Immediately after becoming Chancellor, Hitler forced new elections. 
			His election campaign promised nothing at all, but instead simply 
			ran down the failures of the past. Hitler said simply, “Give us four 
			years.” Meanwhile he assured his supporters that these would 
			actually be the last elections to be expected for 10, perhaps even a 
			hundred years. Terrorism and lawlessness mushroomed during the 
			campaign, culminating in the Reichstag fire just a few days before 
			the elections. This pretext was used to suspend individual liberties 
			as guaranteed by the Weimar Constitution, enabling the Nazis to take 
			any actions they pleased against their political opponents. 
			Following the election and the suppression of all effective 
			opposition, Hitler forced the passage of the infamous enabling law, 
			the foundation of Hitler’s dictatorship. This gave the Chancellor 
			the right to make laws without the cooperation of the Reichstag for 
			a period of four years. Now, after it was too late, it became clear 
			what Hitler had meant in his campaign theme, “Just give us four 
			years.”  
			
			 
			Hitler’s enabling law gave him the power to rule by fiat, which is 
			the power of dictatorship. To enact a law as Dictator without the 
			concurrence of the Reichstag, the Chancellor had only to write a law 
			and publish it, and in exactly the same way the President of the 
			United States can, and does, make law without any action by Congress 
			in the form of “EXECUTIVE ORDERS.” These ‘laws’ signed by the 
			President himself, become law simply by being published in the 
			“FEDERAL REGISTER.” Since March 1933, we have been technically in a 
			continuous condition of ‘National Emergency’, and many governmental 
			powers have been usurped by American presidents under this condition 
			over the past 43 years. But every time a major new phase is entered, 
			there is a fresh declaration of National Emergency. In monthly AUDIO 
			LETTER No. 10 four months ago, I alerted you to the fact that plans 
			are now progressing rapidly toward implementing Executive Order 
			11490 signed by President Nixon nearly seven years ago to provide in 
			detail for a total government take-over of all activities in a 
			‘declared Emergency’. 
			
			 
			And on June 11, 1976, just last month, President Ford signed a new 
			Executive Order 11921 very quietly, which updates the older 
			Executive Order and shifts the emphasis heavily in the direction of 
			post-attack conditions as we near the outbreak of war! It places 
			heavy emphasis on procedures relating to nuclear,  biological, 
			and chemical hazards of the sort introduced into our environment by 
			the planned war. It provides for the establishment, not the 
			preservation, of an economy for the nation. It provides for sweeping 
			controls on that all important resource, WATER, which is to be 
			controlled and allocated by the 
			federal government. This is the outcome of the little noticed 
			“National Commission on Water Quality” which was started by Nelson 
			Rockefeller at the same time as his better known “Commission on 
			Critical Choices.”  
			
			 
			My friends, write to your Congressman and demand that he send you a 
			copy of the FEDERAL REGISTER for June 15, 1976, and read for 
			yourself the 44 pages of detailed provisions for the “National 
			Emergency” which is planned for all of us. If possible, this will be 
			brought into play in the wake of oil shortages and other disruptions 
			generated in the wake of a Mid East war! But the thrust of Executive 
			Order 11921 just signed by Ford has to do with the aftermath of 
			nuclear attack. The pattern, my friends, is unmistakable. After 
			Hitler achieved power, he progressively consolidated it by 
			eliminating opposition political parties, ending independent local 
			government and replacing it with agents of his federal government, 
			enforcing his will by means of a Secret Police and spies, disposing 
			of troublesome elements by means of Concentration Camps, and using 
			Germany as a springboard for war to conquer other nations as well.
			 
			
			 
			If the Rockefeller Brothers succeed in their plans, the United 
			States of America will soon witness a replay of Hitlerism, brought 
			up to date and made more repressive and horrible than ever by those 
			who used Hitler for their own purposes. Topic #3--If NUCLEAR WAR ONE 
			is permitted to take place as planned on American soil, perhaps you 
			will survive it. Many will not, but some will; but if you do 
			survive, what sort of future do you and your trusting children have 
			to look forward to? My friends, whether or not the Rockefellers are 
			double-crossed by their Soviet allies, the aftermath of NUCLEAR WAR 
			ONE promises to be slavery for you and all your loved ones.  
			
			  
			
			If the Rockefeller Brothers somehow find 
			a way to prevent a double-cross by the Soviets, then the war will 
			proceed as planned for the benefit of the Rockefellers. Half of 
			America’s population will be consumed in nuclear blasts a thousand 
			times hotter than the ovens of Hitler. Those who are left will be 
			given the task of rebuilding America along the patterns dictated by 
			the Rockefeller Brothers—a once free people reduced to slave labor, 
			shipped like cattle to one area to rebuild a bombed-out power dam, 
			to another area to work in uranium mines, to still another area to 
			work the agricultural lands owned by the huge agri-businesses owned 
			by the Rockefellers and their collaborators.  
			
			 
			If the Rockefellers are double-crossed, the death toll during the 
			war itself may be even higher but the results afterward will be no 
			different. Instead of living under a Rockefeller dictatorship, we 
			will exist under Soviet occupation whose characteristics will be 
			practically the same. And so, my friends, the choice between the 
			Rockefeller Brothers and their Soviet allies is no choice at all.
			 
			
			 
			If these things are allowed to come to pass and the final link in 
			the chain reaction that is to begin with general war in the 
			Middle East, then the life that will be left to us and our little 
			ones will not be worth living. That is why for my part I would 
			rather speak the truth now in the hope that we may yet turn to a 
			third choice, the saving of our free country from war and 
			dictatorship while it can still be done. The lesson of history is 
			that this cannot be done; that like countless peoples before 
			us, we will refuse to see the truth, believe it, and act on it in 
			time to save ourselves. That is how most Germans reacted to 
			Adolf Hitler in the early 1930’s, and that is how most Americans are 
			still behaving today.  
			
			 
			But 200 years ago a small band of very wise men defied the rules of 
			history and created a government that freed men as no government had 
			done in 5000 years, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. And you and I can 
			redeem this priceless heritage. We, too, can and must defy history 
			in the same way by saving the unique heritage that is ours.  
			
			 
			Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may 
			God bless each and every one of you. 
  
			
			
			   |