|
Audio
Letter #65
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is June 6, 1981, and
this is my AUDIO LETTER® No. 65.
Wednesday afternoon May 13 was a beautiful sunny afternoon in Rome.
At the Vatican thousands of people were gathered in St.
Peter’s Square. They were waiting for the regular Wednesday
afternoon audience by the man known to the world as Pope John Paul
II. Right on time he made his appearance. As usual, he was standing
in a special jeep-like vehicle, waving to the crowd as the vehicle
drove slowly around the Square. Inside the walls of the Vatican that
afternoon it was a scene of peace and cheer. It was as if the insane
rush of a troubled world had been locked outside for a few precious
moments. Filled with a sea of smiling faces, St. Peter’s Square
seemed immune from the presence of evil. Suddenly the illusion was
shattered.
There was the sound of gun fire, and the
man known as the Pope crumpled and fell. As the crowd looked on in
disbelief, the papal vehicle sped up and rushed out of St. Peter’s
Square. In a matter of moments the scene of tranquility had been
transformed into one of tragedy. Gone were all the smiles; and in
their place, tears. For days afterward people the world over were
asking just one question:
“Why would anyone shoot the Pope?”
My friends, the answer to that question
will never be revealed by the controlled major media. The Vatican
has become just one more battleground in the secret war now raging
world-wide. The stakes involve the fate of over 700,000,000 Roman
Catholics—one-sixth of the human race.
The man accused of the shooting reportedly said right away that he
had acted alone. As an excuse he said he was protesting against the
turmoil in Afghanistan and El Salvador. Then there were reports,
especially here in the United States, that perhaps he was tied in
with the Palestinians in some way. One story followed another in
rapid succession. Meanwhile the Italian police quickly found many
clues that the would-be assassin Mehmet Agca could not have acted
alone. All the evidence pointed clearly to a conspiracy. In Europe
conspiracies are known and recognized to be a fact of life and so
they are not pooh-poohed when they are discovered, but here in
America it is different. We’re treated like gullible children and
taught that the legal word “conspiracy” is a No-No. We must never
think that greedy, powerful men would ever work together to carry
out their plans. My friends, there’s a very good reason why we are
never allowed to think seriously about conspiracies.
The reason is that a very small elite
number of people are trying to control all the rest of us. There are
an awful lot of us, and only a few of them. The only way they can
corral us and herd us around like sheep is to keep us ignorant of
what they are doing. Keeping you ignorant is the very essence of
their power. That, my friends, is why plots and conspiracies of all
kinds are kept secret, and that’s why the biggest conspiracy of all
is the conspiracy of SILENCE. It’s a conspiracy to keep you and me
in the dark so that the forces of darkness can continue unhampered.
The one thing they fear most is the TRUTH, known and understood by
the people, because the Truth is the Sword of our Lord Jesus Christ.
My friends, I live to know the truth, to understand the truth, and
to speak the truth. I want to do my part so that the truth will
continue to have a life of its own throughout our universe. I
believe there is nothing more important than to look for the truth,
and keep an open mind to receive it, because without the Truth
people perish.
My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:
-
Topic #1-- THE POPE,
THE PRESIDENT, AND ASSASSINATION POLITICS
-
Topic #2-- THE
AFTERMATH OF THE SHUTTLE “COLUMBIA” DISASTER
-
Topic #3-- MOUNTING
WORLD CRISES AND “ACCIDENTAL” NUCLEAR WAR
Topic #1
--In August 1978 the Cardinals of the
Roman Catholic Church were called into conclave at the Vatican. Pope
Paul VI
had died earlier that month, and the Cardinals faced the task of
choosing his successor—a new pope. From all around the world the
Cardinals converged on Rome for the papal conclave. As they did so,
the news was filled with speculation about the presumed leading
candidates for the papacy. Many were convinced that the conclave
would be a long one; instead, it turned out to be one of the
shortest papal conclaves in history. Voting by the Cardinals began
on August 26, 1978, and that very same day there was white smoke
from the Vatican. The Catholic Church had a new pope.
Vatican watchers were astonished at the speed of the papal election.
They were even more astonished by the identity of the
new pope. He was not one of the acknowledged front runners but a
complete outsider to the Vatican power structure. The little known
Cardinal Luciani of Venice had become pope—Pope John Paul I. The
following day, August 27, 1978, I recorded my AUDIO LETTER No. 37.
In that report I gave a warning about the true significance of the
stunning surprise at the Vatican. The atheistic Bolsheviks, who have
lost their former power in Russia, will stop at nothing in their
frenzy to regain that power. To that end, the Bolsheviks were
launching a ruthless campaign to seize control of a tremendous
weapon, the Roman Catholic Church. The Bolshevik goal was, and still
is, to turn some 700,000,000 Catholics actively anti-Russian. For
the next few weeks there was no visible hint about the secret
conspiracy which I had reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 37. Instead,
Pope John Paul I quickly endeared himself to millions as the
“smiling Pope.” Then came the shock of September 28, 1978.
After a mere 33 days we were told that
Pope John Paul I had died, suddenly and unexpectedly, and the man
who succeeded him 2-1/2 weeks later was another surprise. He was the
first non-Italian pope in 455 years and the first Slavic pope ever.
He was from bitterly anti-Soviet Poland, and his reputation was that
of a man who stands up to the Soviets. On October 16, 1978, the
former Cardinal Wojtyla of Poland became known as Pope John Paul II.
The Bolshevik intrigues and maneuvering in the Vatican continued
right on track. By late 1978 more and more of the pronouncements
issued in the name of Pope John Paul II were anti-Soviet in tone.
The public signs of rapid change in the Vatican were dramatic.
Meanwhile behind closed doors, the forces at work were far more
sinister and revolutionary than most people could ever imagine. I
reported on these developments in AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 39, 41, and 42.
The Vatican, my friends, had become the setting for assassination
politics in the spiritual warfare between East and West. It had
begun with the surprise election of Cardinal Luciani as Pope John
Paul I in August 1978. He had been thrust into the papacy by forces
of which he was not even aware—Bolshevik forces. They intended to
use him for transitional purposes to begin the anti-Soviet
transformation of the Church, but he had turned out to be hard to
manipulate into saying and doing what the Bolsheviks wanted, so the
Bolshevik agents in the Vatican cut short the interim papacy of Pope
John Paul I by assassinating him.
When the next pope was selected, the Bolsheviks made certain that
his image was made to order for their purposes. When Cardinal
Wojtyla of Poland became Pope John Paul II, it was only his image
that the Bolsheviks wanted. The man himself was strong-minded and
independent. He also had plans for restructuring the Vatican in ways
that the Bolsheviks could not afford. To make sure that Pope John
Paul II never carried out those plans, the Bolsheviks once again
resorted to assassination.
The preparations had been made far ahead of time, and they were
carried out without a hitch. In mid November 1978, Pope John Paul
II, the most visible pope in history, virtually dropped out of sight
for a while. As I reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 41, he was being
poisoned, and on November 20, 1978, he succumbed. Immediately he was
replaced by a “Bolshevik look-alike”, an actor; and the very next
day the Vatican announced that the Pope had re-appointed all of the
top officials in the Vatican hierarchy known as the Curia. The
Vatican restructuring, which had been planned by the late real Pope
John Paul II, was snuffed out. The Bolshevik actor-Pope then
proceeded to make maximum use of the anti-Russian image of the man
he had replaced. Doing exactly as he was told, he was stoking up
bitter feelings toward Russia in heavily Catholic Eastern Europe;
and most of all these bitter feelings were being encouraged in
Poland, the most heavily Catholic of all.
In AUDIO LETTER No. 42 I was able to make public where all this was
intended to lead. The Bolsheviks were trying to make Poland explode
against Russia in an uprising to be known as the “Pope’s
Revolution.” It was to be triggered during a papal visit to Poland
in May 1979. The actor-Pope himself was to provide the spark for
revolution in a way which he himself was not being told. At a
critical emotional moment during his coming trip to Poland, the
actor-Pope was to be assassinated. When I made the details of the
plan public in AUDIO LETTER No. 42, the momentum toward a Pope’s
Revolution was building fast; but if there is one thing the Russians
do not intend to allow, it is a Bolshevik revolution in Poland.
Having learned of the “Pope’s Revolution” plan, the Kremlin directed
Poland’s leaders to take all possible steps to minimize the risk.
Poland even announced that foreign journalists entering Poland to
cover the Pope’s visit would have to pay very high fees for the
privilege. Meanwhile Russian Intelligence operatives went to work to
undo the plan altogether.
In AUDIO LETTER No. 46 I reported that Russia had finally succeeded
in stopping the “Pope’s Revolution” plot. In early May 1979 the
Bolshevik actor-Pope was eliminated and replaced by a Russian actor,
another “double.” Immediately the Vatican announced that it would
agree to a one-month delay in the papal visit to Poland, as
requested by the Polish government. In that way, a crucial emotional
stimulus for revolution was eliminated. As I detailed in AUDIO
LETTER No. 42, the original timing of the papal visit for St.
Stanislaus Day had been essential to the plot. With the threat of
revolution averted, Poland then dropped its earlier demands for high
fees by visiting journalists. A month later the Russian actor-Pope
known to the world as Pope John Paul II visited Poland without
mishap.
The Bolshevik plan for a “Pope’s Revolution” in Poland two years ago
was thwarted by the Russians, but the Bolsheviks never give up in
their agitation for revolution and war. Soon they were at work on
Poland through another avenue, the so-called “Solidarity” labor
movement, and at the same time the Bolsheviks have never given up on
their dream of seizing control of the Roman Catholic Church.
For the past two years the Catholic Church has been moving quietly
in the opposite direction to that desired by the Bolsheviks. The man
known as Pope John Paul II has initiated overtures toward eventual
reunification of the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.
If that were to happen in the present circumstances, it would be an
unmitigated disaster for the Bolsheviks. Catholics in the West and
Russian Orthodox believers in the East would consider themselves
“spiritual brothers” instead of enemies. Worse yet for the
Bolsheviks, a papal visit to Russia has been in the works very
quietly in the Vatican. The Bolsheviks are determined to prevent
that from happening; and, as usual, the Bolsheviks turned to one of
their favorite political techniques—assassination.
Early last month the Russian actor-Pope
celebrated a special mass for new Swiss Guards. As if in a
premonition, he warned them that they might be faced with giving
their lives in their role as his protectors. A scant week later,
inside the walls of the Vatican, he was cut down by the bullets of a
professional killer. This time he survived; but as I said before, my
friends, the Bolsheviks never give up. My friends, we are once again
plunging into an era of assassination politics. For Americans, the
shooting in the Vatican on May 13 created a sense of deja vu. We had
seen it all before as recently as six weeks earlier right here in
our own land. It all looked horribly familiar—and no wonder. The
Satanic forces responsible for the shooting of the actor-Pope are
the same ones who were behind the shooting of the President. These
dark forces, as I have said many times, are the Bolsheviks. Having
lost control of Russia, they now have a stranglehold on America’s
government instead.
When news of the Pope’s shooting reached Washington, reporters asked
for reactions from the White House. The resulting national
television news reports that evening were very strange. We were
shown only a “still photograph” of the President with the alleged
quote: “I will pray for him.” By contrast, we were then shown the
Vice-President talking with reporters on the White House lawn about
the tragedy in Rome. We saw and heard seemingly heartfelt words of
anguish at such brutal and senseless violence. It was the
Vice-President, not the President, whom we saw expressing the
feelings most Americans wanted to hear.
This is just one example, my friends, of a subtle but important
pattern in our news these days. A sophisticated program of
psychological conditioning is now under way directed at you and me.
It is a disarming soft-sell, but it is also using powerful
subliminal techniques to insure success. It’s a program to build up
the George Bush image in our minds while letting the Ronald Reagan
image slowly recede. We’re being prepared to accept it easily when
the so-called Reagan era comes to an abrupt end soon!
What’s happening now is a preliminary phase in the plan which I
first reported just after the election last November 1980. In AUDIO
LETTER No. 60 I gave a warning that we would soon be told that the
President had met with, quote: “an unfortunate accident, or a sudden
fatal illness.” Then we would see a change in the policies of the
White House built around the image of George Bush.
Just over two months ago on March 30 this plan of the Bolsheviks
here almost succeeded on the first attempt. Outside the Washington
Hilton Hotel the entity President Reagan was led into an ambush,
about which I will have more to say in a few moments. It was
intended to cut down the President on the spot, just as several
others were cut down. The assassination attempt did not succeed in
that goal, but it was a partial success even so, because from that
day onward the image of George Bush has been shining brighter and
brighter in the public eye.
First, the period of hospital confinement of the President was
exploited. It was an opportunity to show off a restrained,
statesmanlike image on the part of the Vice-President. This
image-building began immediately during the first hours after the
shooting. First, the entity known as General Alexander Haig rushed
into the White House briefing room and seized the podium. His voice
quivering with intensity, he announced, “I am in charge here.” It
was a virtuoso performance, an act calculated perfectly to create
headlines, furrowed brows, and a source of jokes for comedians.
Stories of a power tug of war between Haig and Bush automatically
focused attention on the Vice-President in a favorable light. In
contrast to the Haig outburst, the Bush entity acted humble and
deferential. News reports said Bush refused even to sit in the
President’s seat in Cabinet meetings.
The Bush image grew as a model of
judgment and restraint. As the President recovered, public opinion
polls were taken to judge what effect the shooting had on people.
They found a dramatic rise in people’s favorable rating of the
President; but for the Vice-President the improvement was
astronomical—from 31% to 69% favorable in just a few weeks,
according to NBC. As I say these words, the subtle image-making is
continuing. On Memorial Day almost two weeks ago it was not the
President we saw in news reports laying a wreath at the Tomb of the
Unknown, but the Vice-President. And that same evening the entity
Bush popped up again. Millions tuned into a Bob Hope Special that
evening, and the closing act was none other than the Vice-President.
It was prime time exposure of the supposedly non-political kind that
is most valuable of all in politics. Those who are building the
image of George Bush before us by way of news guidelines are setting
us up for things to come. What happened last March 30 outside the
Washington Hilton was a warning, and we should not ignore it. It all
began that day when the entity President Reagan emerged from the
special VIP exit of the Hilton. The VIP exit is around the corner
from the rest of the hotel.
The hotel itself is many stories high,
but the VIP entrance is set into a stone wall only about 15 feet
high. At the top of the wall is a handrail with a walkway and trees
behind it. In other words, the VIP exit from the Hilton comes out
under a small park-like area. The exit itself is unmarked except for
a concrete canopy extending out to the curving driveway. A good
photograph of the scene appeared on page 30 of People magazine for
April 13, 1981. My friends, the whole idea behind the Hilton’s VIP
entrance is to provide security for important visitors. The natural
and prudent thing from the security standpoint would have been to
park the presidential limousine directly opposite the door at the
end of the short canopy. That way there would have been only a few
short steps from the door to the limousine. And that is how things
are done by highly trained security forces. But, my friends,
everything was done differently on March 30. Someone had arranged
for the President to walk into a classic ambush. The limousine was
not parked at the curb next to the VIP exit.
Instead, it was parked at least 20 feet farther away to the left as
the presidential party walked outside. The car was parked
opposite a rounded corner in the stone wall, which curves away from
the street. Back around that corner waiting to see the
President stood the press and various onlookers, including allegedly
John Hinckley, Jr.; and just behind and above them
there were the numerous windows and balconies of the hotel itself. I
have been informed by certain professionals whose
business is the protection of VIPs that the pattern in all this is
unmistakable. The President walked into the perfect setup for
assassination—a cross fire.
As he approached the limousine, the
President became an easy target from two directions at once—one
direction was the sidewalk above the overhanging canopy of the VIP
exit, the other direction was from behind and above the press and
onlookers, which included John Hinckley. In AUDIO LETTER No. 63 I
quoted an early NBC television news report by Judy Woodruff. She had
been with the presidential party inside the hotel and had walked out
the exit. She had not rounded the corner to the area where Hinckley
and the cameras were waiting, so she could not have seen Hinckley.
That’s clear both from her own eyewitness account on NBC and from
replays of the video tapes; yet she said, quote: “I noticed there
were some shots fired from an overhanging, from a sidewalk that was
above where the President’s car was.” If you will look at the
photograph in People magazine, which I mentioned earlier, you’ll see
very clearly the area that Judy Woodruff was describing. It’s not
the area where Hinckley was.
As for Hinckley himself, we are supposed to believe he did it all by
himself. Always it’s a “lone assassin”, always he’s portrayed as “a
nut”, and always there’s a note left behind conveniently by the
otherwise nutty assailant to avoid loose ends. We are also supposed
to believe that Hinckley squeezed off six (6) shots in only two (2)
seconds and hit four (4) targets in that time. We’re not supposed to
think about the fact that every time a pistol is fired, even a small
caliber pistol, it kicks. It deflects upward, spoiling the aim
briefly.
If that were not enough, we’re supposed to forget about the
bystander who jumped on Hinckley as soon as he started firing.
Alfred Antonucci, a carpenter’s union official from Cleveland, had
arrived too late for the President’s speech, so he waited outside
for a glimpse of the President. He was standing right next to
Hinckley. On April 13 Antonucci was interviewed on ABC’s “Good
Morning, America” by David Hartman. Hartman mentioned the alleged
six shots by Hinckley, and Antonucci said, quote: “Well, let me say
this. He fired the first shot; and whether it was the second, the
split second of the second, I was on top of him to break the aim.”
Then on May 1 the New York Daily News published an interview of
Antonucci.
Antonucci is quoted as saying, quote:
“I hit him on the back of the neck
as hard as I could; and his gun, which he held with two hands
aimed right at Reagan, came down. He kept shooting with one
hand. I was told later by high authorities that four of the six
shots hit the sidewalk.”
My friends, we saw for ourselves on
television the scuffle to subdue Hinckley as soon as he started
shooting. Mr. Antonucci’s story fits perfectly with what we saw
ourselves, but we’re supposed to ignore what we saw and just believe
the official story that Hinckley fired six very accurate shots. Now,
suppose we do a little simple counting. On TV we saw four (4) men
wounded—that’s at least four bullets. Four (4) bullets also hit the
sidewalk, thanks to Mr. Antonucci; that brings the total to at least
eight, and from other reports at least two more bullets hit the
limousine. That’s a total of at least 10 bullets that we know of.
Hinckley’s revolver, my friends, was only a six-shooter.
Those who plotted the assassination attempt on March 30 are pulling
all kinds of strings to cover up the truth. A perfect example of
this was Time magazine for April 13, 1981. The lies began with the
cover itself. It’s a painting, not a photograph, depicting the
moment of the President’s wounding. It shows the President viewed
across the roof of the limousine—left arm raised, grimacing in pain.
It is accurate except for one thing. You will see what is wrong with
the Time cover if you will compare it with the photograph I
mentioned in People magazine.
On the cover of Time the stone wall is drawn as if it were a tall
building. There’s no hint of the overhanging sidewalk from which
NBC’s Judy Woodruff said shots were fired.
My friends, we’re living today in an “Alice in Wonderland” world.
We’re supposed to believe three impossible things before breakfast,
if that is what the controlled major media report to us. Only those
who are determined to search for the truth will be able to see it in
the days ahead.
Topic #2
--On Tuesday evening April 28 millions
of Americans tuned in their TV sets to watch the entity President
Reagan address Congress. The speech was to build support for the
Administration’s Budget, but most people were interested for a
different reason. It was the first speech by the President since the
assassination attempt nearly a month earlier. Many people were too
absorbed in the dramatic re-appearance of a wounded president to pay
much attention to anything else. No one cared very much that the
space shuttle “Columbia” supposedly arrived back in Florida that
day, nor did many people give a second thought to the fact that it
was a full week overdue. After all, as far as the public was
concerned, the Columbia was a great success. We had seen it for
ourselves on television. Based on one space shuttle flight, we are
being told on all sides that we are once again on top in space.
We are told that now we are five, ten
years ahead of those poor dumb Russians. It would be nice if all
those things were true, but unfortunately they are not true. In
AUDIO LETTER No. 62 I was able to make public ahead of time the real
mission of the Columbia, which was Military! I described the plan
for us to see the Columbia lift off from Florida, but to see a
different shuttle, the “Enterprise”, land two days later in
California. Meanwhile the Columbia was to have carried out a secret
military mission unseen by you. The deception built into the
original flight plan was bad enough; but as it turned out, the
flight of the Columbia ended very quickly in DISASTER; and you and I
were supposed to believe otherwise. The secret disaster of the space
shuttle Columbia and the television hoax which we were shown to hide
it were events of great importance. That is why I devoted my entire
AUDIO LETTER No. 64 to giving you the details. The space shuttle
“Columbia” is no more!
The shuttle which we saw landing at Edwards Air Force Base in
California was the training shuttle “Enterprise.” It had simply been
relabeled with the name “Columbia” on its side. When the shuttle
landed in California on April 14 we were initially told that it
would be flown to Florida just a few days later; but as the days
went by, the shuttle just stayed there. NASA cooked up one excuse
after another to explain away the delays to the public.
Meanwhile, frantic meetings were going on involving key joint
military and NASA personnel. Things had not gone according to plan,
and they were not sure what to do. One faction insisted that NASA
should go ahead according to the original plan. That plan called for
a switch in shuttles between California and Florida. On Day One a
modified “747” would take off from Edwards Air Force Base,
California, with the shuttle “Enterprise” riding piggyback. News
cameras would be on hand to record the take-off.
The Enterprise would then be flown to its home base at White Sands,
New Mexico. Meanwhile the public would be told that the “747” with
the shuttle had made an over-night stopover. Then on Day Two another
modified “747” carrying a different shuttle would take off from
White Sands and fly to Florida. Once again reporters would be on
hand to watch the landing at Cape Canaveral. The new shuttle, of
course, would have the name “Columbia” on the side just as the
Enterprise does. In that way the training shuttle Enterprise was to
be returned to home base and a fresh orbital-rated shuttle sent to
Florida. The switch would be made without the public suspecting a
thing. In meetings behind closed doors about the situation, others
protested that it would be foolish to go ahead as originally planned
without more information. It was obvious that somehow the Russians
had destroyed the Columbia, but the question was:
“How?”
The military shuttle planning group
agreed that they needed the answer to that question, otherwise there
would be no way to devise countermeasures to give the next shuttle
flight a better chance. Finally it was agreed all around that the
first urgent need was to buy time, so NASA spokesmen were told to
give the press a series of stalling stories about the post-flight
shuttle procedures in California. Meanwhile every available avenue
of Intelligence world-wide was pressed to come up with an answer to
that crucial question:
“What happened to the space shuttle
Columbia?”
Day by day we saw brief news reports
about the post-flight checkout of the space shuttle at Edwards Air
Force Base. The shuttle was lifted onto the back of the “747” but
the take-off kept being pushed back one day after another. The
military shuttle planning group was drawing a blank from their
Intelligence sweep about the Columbia. The shuttle stayed on the
ground in California a week longer than originally planned, and
still no answer came about the Columbia. NASA ran out of excuses for
further stalling without raising unwelcome questions. The secret
shuttle planning team was still in no position to prepare for a
second orbital mission, and yet appearances have to be maintained.
The United States Government is crowing loudly about the supposed
stunning success of the shuttle because it is the only hope left for
America in space. The space shuttle is the only program other than
Defense which has been given increased funding by the so-called
Reagan Administration.
Before the shuttle Enterprise left California aboard its “747”, the
shuttle planning group had to make a decision: Should they, or
should they not, make the planned switch between shuttles at White
Sands. There are three more orbital-rated shuttles at White Sands,
and a specific mission has been planned for each one. One of the
planners summed up the dilemma in the words, and I quote:
“How can we send an orbital bird to
the Cape? STS-2, 3, and 4 may require major modifications in
order to get past the Russians. We won’t know what those
modifications are until we get the missing feed-back on STS-1. I
say send the Enterprise. We can keep it sub-orbital by faking an
abort—shut down one engine before press-to-MECO and let
Enterprise return to Kennedy. That will keep Enterprise out of
danger from Ivan. It will also keep the ball rolling while
giving us more time to set up a successful orbital shot.”
Someone else asked:
“What about the public relations
impact? One thing we don’t need is to abort a mission this early
in the program.”
The reply was:
“Would you rather lose another
orbital bird to Ivan? Besides, if we do it right, we could end
up with even more public support. You know what I mean—the idea
that the shuttle is safe even if something does go wrong, and so
on.”
There was a long silence, followed by
more discussion, but finally the suggestion was adopted. On Monday
April 27 the “747” bearing the shuttle Enterprise took off from
Edwards Air Force Base, California. The following day we saw the
same shuttle, the training shuttle Enterprise, landing in Florida.
There was no switch.
The secret shuttle planners are still feeling their way. The plan
could be changed, but as of now it will be the training shuttle
Enterprise that rolls out to the launch pad at Cape Canaveral later
this summer. It will look just like the Columbia did before its
April launch, mated to a giant fuel tank and huge solid-rocket
boosters.
NASA is presently shooting for the very early launch date of
September 30, 1981. According to the present plan the launch is to
proceed smoothly for the first few minutes. Unlike the Columbia, the
Enterprise will not veer north toward the kind of orbit forbidden by
Russia. Then, one engine will shut down prematurely. It will be
earlier in the flight than the point at which contact with Columbia
was lost last April. Then, as we are still watching on television,
the Enterprise will return for its alleged “emergency” landing at
Kennedy. By now the Enterprise has made so many computerized
landings that NASA has confidence that the landing will be made
safely.
There will be an uproar about the aborted space flight, but it will
not last long. Aided by the controlled major media, NASA will
convince most Americans that the safe outcome of the supposed
“emergency” is what counts. It will be said that this just proves
how reliable the shuttle really is. By staging an aborted shuttle
mission this fall of 1981, the joint military and NASA shuttle team
will be buying time. They will not he expected to launch another
mission until early 1982. By then they are hoping to have learned
what they must do to get past the Russians into space.
Topic #3
--When news of the presidential
assassination attempt here in Washington flashed around the world
last March 30, it triggered an old concern in many minds. America
was caught in a vulnerable moment. Would some other country try to
take advantage in some way? Most of all, would Russia decide to
invade Poland? At that time headlines were telling us that an
invasion might be imminent. As it turned out then, our worries were
unfounded. Russia had made no move toward Poland; instead, they were
in the process of cooling down the latest “Solidarity” labor crisis.
Likewise other nations around the world generally acted with
restraint following news of the shooting—that is, all the world’s
nations except one. The lone exception was Israel. The timing could
not have been more precise, my friends, if it had been planned in
advance. As the first shocking bulletins of the shooting flashed
across America, Israeli war planes were starting their engines. As
White House spokesmen were gathering to brief the press, Israeli
fighter bombers were gathering over Lebanon.
Through the afternoon and evening we Americans huddled around our
television sets for the latest word from George Washington
University Hospital. Meanwhile Lebanese villagers were huddling in
basements and bombed-out shelters as Israeli missiles and bombs
exploded all around them. On the BBC World Service and other
short-wave radio news reports around the world, the sudden new
Israeli raids on Lebanon that day were big news. Not so here in
America. News of the presidential shooting and its aftermath drowned
out everything else. It was not until Syrian troops began making
moves in response to the Israeli raids that Lebanon began to enter
our consciousness here. Day by day the Israelis and Syrians lashed
out at one another more and more, directly and through surrogates in
Lebanon.
On April 28 Israeli jets shot down two Syrian helicopters over
Lebanon. It was big news overseas. Here in the United States though
it was overshadowed by the presidential speech to Congress that
evening. It was not until the following day, April 29, that the
Lebanon crisis received top billing in America’s controlled major
media. The Syrians had moved Russian SAM-6 anti-aircraft missiles
into the Bekaa valley of Lebanon. This was Syria’s answer to
Israel’s downing of two of her helicopters the day before over Zahle.
Thus the Middle East missile crisis was born. Another mounting
crisis is the growing feud between the United States and Japan.
Lately it seems as if Washington can’t do anything right towards the
Japanese. On the morning of April 10, 1981, the first attempt to
launch the space shuttle “Columbia” took place at Cape Canaveral. It
ended in failure due to a computer problem, but it was the top story
that day here in America. It all but drowned out the news story that
was No. 1 that day in Japan.
The previous day, an American submarine had sunk a small Japanese
freighter, supposedly by ramming it. Then the submarine had left the
scene without making any attempt to rescue survivors. Worse yet, the
United States had not even admitted the incident to Japanese
authorities until 36 hours later. In the weeks that have passed
since the incident took place, the episode has raised more and more
questions in Japanese minds. The United States Navy issued a report
about it which differs drastically from the testimony of the 13
Japanese survivors. The Navy report even puts the location of the
collision 3-1/2 miles away from where it actually happened. The
Japanese want to know WHY.
To this and many other puzzling questions about the incident, the
Japanese are demanding answers, but they are not getting those
answers. The supposedly accidental sinking of the Japanese freighter
was only the opening gun in the Washington-Tokyo feud. Since then
Japan has been rocked by one shock after another at the hands of the
United States. American naval vessels have sailed through Japanese
fishing fleets, cutting fishing nets to ribbons. Suddenly there are
revelations that American ships with nuclear weapons aboard have
been using Japanese ports regularly in secret. Secretary of State
Haig canceled a visit to Japan. Even the visit of Prime Minister
Suzuki to Washington recently backfired on him. He agreed to
language in a joint communique that led to accusations in Japan that
Suzuki was making a secret military alliance with the United States.
The irony of it all is that Suzuki’s troubles are due to the fact
that he is resisting any such military alliance.
The Bolsheviks here in America want Japan to re-arm, to become the
policeman of the Western Pacific. Suzuki’s predecessor, Prime
Minister Ohira, was ready to go along with America’s Bolsheviks
despite stern warnings from Russia not to. Then Ohira died suddenly
a year ago, and Suzuki replaced him. Suzuki does not want to re-arm
Japan, and so America’s Bolsheviks want him out of office. Japan has
endured all kinds of shocks in recent months, but they all have one
common denominator. They all have involved loss of face for Japan as
a whole and especially for Prime Minister Suzuki.
In Asia, loss of face is a very serious matter. By using it as a
political weapon, America’s Bolsheviks believe they can bring down
the Suzuki government. Whoever follows Suzuki will have to talk
“peace” for domestic consumption, but he will have to prepare for
war if he is to get along with Washington. Elsewhere in Asia, Red
China and Vietnam have supposedly recently engaged in very heavy
border fighting with many casualties. Meanwhile the so-called Reagan
Administration is preparing to declare openly that it will sell
America’s most sophisticated weapons to Red China. The United States
Government, my friends, has gone insane from the cancer of
Bolshevism, and is leading America from folly to greater folly. In
Europe, too, there is turmoil at the hands of Bolshevik agents.
The government of Italy has just been
brought down in a tremendous scandal involving a massive conspiracy
of many of the country’s leading citizens. In West Germany,
Chancellor Helmut Schmidt is under fire from forces who want to undo
the balance he has struck between East and West. And in France the
Bolsheviks won a tremendous victory in the election last month.
Until now, France has enjoyed a special relationship with Russia as
well as with the West. The relationship has been one of trust built
up laboriously beginning with the late President Charles de Gaulle;
but the new French president, Mitterrand, is working as fast as
possible to change that. Mitterrand will try to bring France into
the anti-Russian camp, headed by the Bolsheviks here in America.
My friends, crises large and small are multiplying all around us,
and by and large they are not accidental. They are part of the
deliberate war build-up strategy of the Bolsheviks here, which I
made public in AUDIO LETTER No. 63. By turning the world into a
caldron of crises, they are setting the stage for NUCLEAR WAR ONE.
The whole world is becoming like the uneasy Balkans just before
World War I.
World War I was set off seemingly by accident by the assassination
of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria by a terrorist. Today, we are once
again in the era of terrorism, assassination, and turmoil. Like
World War I, NUCLEAR WAR ONE will erupt suddenly from an unexpected
spark, seemingly by accident. But World War I was brought about
deliberately, my friends, and the same will be true of NUCLEAR WAR
ONE. All of this is not lost on the new rulers of Russia. Russia’s
rulers are convinced that it is only a matter of time until all-out
war breaks out between the United States and Russia, so the Russians
are continuing to whittle away at America’s ability to damage
Russia.
When the space shuttle “Columbia” took off on its ill-fated flight
last April 12, a fleet of special airplanes were aloft to help track
it. The United States was depending heavily on its fleet of advanced
range instrumentation aircraft. These are flying radar and
communication stations known as “Droop Snoots” for their huge
bulbous nose. This special airplane is a modified military Boeing
707 designated EC-135N. When they are not involved in space shots,
the EC-135N’s also have many other uses, including the tracking of
Russian satellites. There are only a few EC-135N’s, so they are all
important. When the space shuttle “Columbia” took off last April,
there were only eight of them.
The Space Shuttle Program is an indispensable key to the current war
plans of the Bolsheviks here, and the EC-135N’s are crucial to the
Shuttle Program. On May 6, 1981, an EC-135N nicknamed the “Boss Hog”
took off from its base at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. It
headed east on what was to be a routine training flight. As the
modified “707” flew eastward, it was heading for an unexpected
rendezvous. Hovering high over the rolling hills of western
Maryland, a lone Cosmosphere was waiting for the Boss Hog. At 10:51
A.M. Eastern Time the pilot of the jet radioed the words “Flight
level 290” to flight controllers on the ground. The plane was at
29,000 feet. Moments later the Cosmosphere fired its Charged
Particle Beam weapon downward at the jet plane passing miles below
it. The beam blasted a hole through the top of the fuselage and
another out through the bottom.
Explosive decompression emptied the
cabin of its air. The blast also set off a secondary explosion of
some kind, turning the jet into a ball of flames. At the same time
control cables through the tail were destroyed, and the jet turned
violently nose down. Instead of gliding to a crash many miles away,
the ruined airplane dropped like a rock, almost straight down. Radar
traffic controllers were startled to see the plane disappear
suddenly from their screens. It was all over before they even knew
anything had happened. On the ground, eye witnesses heard a
boom-boom-boom, and moments later a giant ball of fire came
screaming downward out of the clouds. For 10 more minutes small
pieces of debris from the plane kept settling earthward for miles
around.
In any air disaster as violent as this one, the investigation
usually extends over a period of months—but not this time, my
friends. On Friday May 29, just over three weeks after the crash,
the Air Force quietly announced that its investigation was already
over. They knew what had blown their radar plane out of the air, but
they also declared that for the time being the results will not be
made public.
While the Air Force was still reeling from the crash of the EC-135N,
it became the Navy’s turn. Once again Russia’s target was a highly
sophisticated electronic warfare jet. The plane involved was an
EA-6B Prowler based on the nuclear supercarrier USS Nimitz.
On the night of Tuesday May 26, the Nimitz was engaged in
night-landing exercises just off the East Coast. Carrier landings
are always dangerous, and night landings especially so; but the
EA-6B has a special advantage. It is equipped with an Automatic
Carrier Landing System to permit safe landings even in conditions of
zero visibility. Partly as a result, the Prowlers are known as some
of the safest of all carrier aircraft; but on that night of May 26
one of Russia’s new Jumbo Cosmospheres was hovering high above the
Nimitz. It was one of the two which I described in AUDIO LETTER No.
64 armed with a Neutron Particle Beam. As an EA-6B approached the
Nimitz to land, the Cosmosphere waited. At a critical moment of the
final approach, the Cosmosphere fired. The invisible neutron beam
instantly killed the crew of three and temporarily deranged the
airplane’s electronic systems. Being suddenly without guidance, the
jet veered to the right and crashed into a deck full of airplanes.
The toll: 14 dead, 48 injured, and 20 aircraft destroyed or damaged.
It was the Navy’s worst flight-deck disaster since 1953.
Day by day, my friends, the stakes are steadily increasing.
The closer we get to all-out war, the more incidents like this we
will see; yet, somehow, we seem oblivious to the real cause. Our
leaders are telling us that we have to act “tough” to keep the
peace. Meanwhile our supposedly “tough” actions are leading to the
exact opposite of peace—NUCLEAR WAR ONE!
LAST MINUTE SUMMARY
Now it’s time for my Last Minute Summary. My friends, these days we
hear constantly about something called National Security. What does
that mean to you? Can there be any such thing as National Security
without National Survival? If not, then our national security hangs
by a thread, because our national survival is in dire jeopardy. Our
leaders keep telling us that the threat to our security is Russia.
Then, while we are not looking, they turn right around and taunt the
Russian Bear. I have a last minute report to pass on to you in this
very vein. As you know, the supercarrier Nimitz entered port only
very briefly after the fiery crash of the EA-6B. It entered port on
May 28 and left again just two days later, May 30. The official
story was that it was heading for the Caribbean for continued
exercises.
I must now report to you that the Nimitz was ordered to the north,
not to the south. In a drastic departure from normal procedure, an
American carrier group has been ordered into the Norwegian and
Barents Seas, right on the doorstep of Russia. This deployment is
expected to be brief, but it is very dangerous. It is an insane act
of bravado by the Bolsheviks here, like walking up to a bully and
knocking the chip off his shoulder. Probably the Nimitz will get
away with it, this time; but one of these days we will cross that
invisible line in the dust—and the world will be at war!
My friends, what is called National Security today is a lie. The
more we spend on national security, the less secure we become. True
security can be built only on the foundation of mutual trust and
mutual respect, and those things in turn can be built only on the
TRUTH. Those who secretly control America’s destiny today cannot
stand the truth. They are the enemies of our Lord Jesus Christ, and
as He said long ago: They were liars from the beginning.
We must seek the Truth, cherish the Truth, and pass on the Truth to
others. Only in that way can we break free of the Satanic power that
now grips America.
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
|