| 
			  
			
			 
 
			
			Notes
 
			  
			
			1. BANKING AND THE WORLD'S BIGGEST BUSINESS  
				
				
				Based on interviews with Drug Enforcement Administration sources. 
			The typical deviation from the price trend resulted from the 
			importation of several kilograms of high-grade number four (85 to 95 
			percent pure) heroin from Vietnam by individual returning soldiers, 
			who would attempt to start their own distribution chain. Such 
			incidents stood out because the novice distributor tended to dilute 
			the heroin too little  often distributing heroin at 30 percent 
			purity and above, rather than 5 percent purity, the normal dilution. 
			The free-lance pusher would therefore occasion an extraordinarily 
			large number of drug overdoses, enabling the authorities to spot him 
			quickly. 
				
				The 700 ton figure is also used by the most widely circulated 
			sources on the subject, e.g., Alfred McCoy et al., The Politics of 
			Heroin in Southeast Asia, (New York: Harper and Row, 1974). 
				
				
				The New York Times, January 20,1971, p. 1. 
				
				
				According to Drug Enforcement Administration estimates. 
				
				
				The $40 billion figure is almost certainly an exaggeration; it does 
			not count attrition of the marijuana crop because of Colombian or 
			U.S. government counteraction. Since Colombia is the primary 
			supplier of the American market, the likely figure is half that. 
				
				
				Euromoney (London), April, 1978.
				 
			
			2. FROM OPIUM TO DIRTY MONEY
 
				
				
				The $100 per pound initial price is slightly higher than most 
			estimates cited in studies which date back to 1971 or earlier. Since 
			the opium price is principally measured in terms of gold, it is fair 
			to assume a substantial increase since 1971 when gold went for $42 
			an ounce. The $100 figure is conservative, assuming that the raw opium price has doubled in 
			reflection of local inflation. But if the opium price has risen in 
			tandem with the gold price, the figure is much higher.
				
				Calculated on the basis of price markups as reported by law 
			enforcement sources in interviews with the authors. 
				
				The estimate was derived from the following calculations: At the 
			197172 peak of heroin production in the Golden Triangle, much of 
			which was intended for American soldiers in Vietnam, 21 refineries 
			were in operation; since then the number has declined. Assuming 
			that ten are still in operation, and that the annual output of each 
			is equivalent to the 3,000 
			kilograms of heroin seized in one major bust on record, then they 
			produce roughly 30,000 kilograms a year of heroin, derived from 
			about 300 tons of raw opium. 
				
				Richard Deacon, The Chinese Secret Service (New York: Ballantine 
			Books, 1976), p. 447. 
 
			
			3. HOW THE DRUG TRADE IS FINANCED  
				
				
				London Financial Times, April 24,1978. 
				
				
				Ibid. 
				
				A close examination of the price markup structure of the Golden 
			Triangle's primary wholesalers demonstrates that the increased 
			prices at various stages merely account for substantial additional 
			expenses, including the livelihoods of an inestimable number of Thai 
			and Burmese policemen and customs officials. The real profitability 
			 the enormous profits associated with the traffic  depends on the 
			process of cutting the pure heroin into "decks" of street quality 
			for sale in the West. The profits of the Hong Kong syndicates who 
			wholesale heroin are not accrued through the difference between 
			primary and secondary wholesale prices, but as a percentage of the 
			profits obtained through distribution of the drugs in the West. In 
			other words, the Hong Kong networks are directly represented in the 
			Western "organized crime" segment of Dope, Inc. and take their cut 
			in the form of a reflow of the retailing profits. Scattered bits of 
			evidence  the most prominent of which is the activities of the 
			expatriate Chinese community in Vancouver  indicate that this is, 
			in fact, how these syndicates operate. 
				
				The authors obtained briefings concerning  but were not able to see
			 classified dossiers on Tejapaibul and Sophonpanich in the 
			possession of the American, Malaysian, and Thai governments. As 
			noted below in the text, they are "cut-outs" for the Hong Kong and 
			Shanghai Banking Corporation. Tejapaibul, whose -bank handles most 
			of Thailand's chemical imports, developed the Golden Triangle's 
			major source of acetic anhydride, the chemical required to refine 
			opium into heroin, through a Hong Kong subsidiary of the Bangkok 
			Metropolitan Bank. 
				
				Certain aspects of the expatriate Chinese activity antedate the 
			British. The relationship between Ch'ao Chou Chinese merchants and 
			the Thai royal family, for example, dates back several centuries. 
			The predominance of Chinese compradors in the region, however, dates 
			to the turn of this century. 
				
				W. J. Cator, The Economic Position of the Chinese in the Netherlands 
			Indies, p. 97-98. 
				
				Victor Purcell, The Chinese in Malaya, p. 189. 
				
				
				William Skinner, Chinese Society in Thailand: An Analytical History,
			p.140. 
				
				International Currency Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 145. 
				
				
				M. A. Andreyev, Overseas Chinese Bourgeoisie  A Peking Tool 
			inSoutheast Asia (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1974), p. 30. 
				
				
				V. Thompson, R. Adloff, Minority Problems in Southeast Asia 
			(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1955), p. 13. 
 
			
			4. BRITAIN'S GOLD AND DIRTY DIAMOND OPERATIONS  
				
				
				Andreyev, Overseas Chinese Bourgeoisie, p. 120. In contrast to many 
			Soviet publications on the subject, the Andreyev book is a scholarly 
			monograph through nine-tenths of its extent, using quotations from 
			Western sources for most of its material. The propaganda factor is 
			comparatively small. Apart from the fact that it is a good survey of 
			Western literature on the subject, there is a special feature of 
			this short work that indicates its value to the investigator. The 
			work is a classical example of careful Soviet "surfacing" of their 
			on-the-ground intelligence reports, in such form as to make the 
			conclusions politically useful, without compromising their 
			operations. The clear intent of publication of the work is to put 
			some heat on Chinese intelligence operations in the Far Eastern 
			theater. The occasional "zingers" Andreyev includes, such as the 
			report of Chinese import of gold through the Golden Triangle, are 
			intended for a small professional audience in other intelligence 
			services. To the extent the authors were able to cross-check 
			Andreyev's facts with Western sources, they have checked out. 
			Therefore the authors believe that the Andreyev work is an 
			acceptable reference source. 
				
				Timothy Green, "Other World Markets," speech at the Gold Confer
			ence of the London Financial Times and Investors Chronicle, The 
			London Hilton, October 24,1972. 
				
				Paul Ferris, The City (London, 1951). 
				
				
				H. R. Reinhart, The Reporter, July 22,1952. 
				
				
				Andreyev, The Chinese Bourgeoisie, p. 120. 
				
				
				Reinhart, The Reporter. 
				
				This information is a byproduct of a U.S. Labor Party 
			counterintelligence investigation of the operations of the Israeli 
			intelligence agency, Mossad, for which Jarecki appears to be a 
			"bagman." The details were cross-checked with law enforcement 
			officials. 
				
				According to interviews with leading diamond traders in New York.
				
 
			
			5. HONG KONG: THE WORLD'S DRUG CAPITAL  
			  
			Virtually all published sources identify Hong Kong as the world's 
			center for transshipment of opiates from the Far East, and even as 
			the center for heroin refining. For the most part, these admissions 
			 
			encouraged by the local British authorities  are in error. In fact, 
			heroin is refined in the triborder area of the Golden Triangle 
			itself. Once in the compact form of heroin, the drug may be shipped 
			by air, through individual couriers using a multiplicity of 
			different routes.    
			It need not pass through Hong Kong at all, 
			although Hong Kong is possibly the most important of these various 
			routes, and may conduct significant refining operations. The British 
			admissions concerning refining and transshipment of opium and 
			heroin tend to distract the investigator from the more important 
			issue: that Hong Kong is the financial center for the Far East drug 
			trade, and hence the point of control for the Golden Triangle.
 The most recent American congressional investigation into Hong Kong, 
			in 1973, wrote:
 
				
				The British Crown Colony plays a major role in the trafficking 
			and refining of narcotics which originate in the "Golden Triangle": 
				 
					
						
						
						It serves as a major target for the production area
						
						The 
			criminal syndicates behind the Southeast Asian drug-traffic are based in Hong Kong
						
						It serves as the refining center 
			for "Golden Triangle" opium and morphine base
						
						It is a major 
			transshipment point for heroin coming into the
			U.S. and for transshipment to our 7th Army in Germany via The 
			Netherlands.  
				. . . It is estimated that 48 tons of opium are smoked in Hong Kong 
			annually and 4 tons of heroin are consumed. Local officials also 
			estimate that 4 to 10 tons of heroin is transshipped from Hong Kong 
			(primarily by body pack) to the United States annually, but accurate 
			information is lacking. Ten thousand dollars worth of heroin in Hong 
			Kong would retail for $50 to $60 million in the United States. 
 From reports we received in The Netherlands, it is also apparent 
			that heroin is being transported by air and ship to The Netherlands 
			from Hong Kong to supply the 7th Army in Germany. The potential for 
			growth of these shipments is unlimited. . . .
 
 Despite the recent steps to upgrade the enforcement effort, Hong 
			Kong will continue to act as a funnel for heroin destined for the 
			United States unless some fundamental changes take place.
 
 Smuggling into Hong Kong is almost impossible to control because:
 
					
					1) 
			it is a free port and the economy of the Crown Colony is dependent 
			upon its being easily accessible;  
					2) many drops are made outside of 
			the jurisdictional waters of the Crown Colony;  
					3) personnel are not 
			adequate; and  
					4) intelligence is lacking.
					 
				Since Hong Kong is a free port, there are no regularized customs 
			inspections. Also, most goods coming into Hong Kong are in sealed 
			containers. The Preventive Force, as a result, must rely primarily 
			on tips to conduct searches. The searches, however, are only of 
				vessels entering the harbor; not those leaving which could be 
				transmitting narcotics to the United States, The Netherlands, or 
			other points.
 A major obstacle, also, is the lack of cooperation from the People's 
			Republic of China. Many of the drops are made in Chinese waters 
			because the Chinese do not police their coasts for narcotics. We 
			were told that a Chinese vessel will ignore a trawler smuggling 
			narcotics. Moreover, since the British in Hong Kong are naturally 
			sensitive to their relations with the People's Republic, they 
			care-fully observe territorial waters and are careful to avoid 
			appearances that a crackdown on traffickers is a vendetta against 
			the Chinese. ...
 
 The British in Hong Kong are also reluctant to recognize the 
			severity of the problem evidenced by the increasing availability of 
			narcotics, and to, correspondingly, take action. For instance, most 
			officials we spoke with were "uptight" about the recent report of 
			the House Foreign Affairs Committee which concluded that the Hong 
			Kong Government has been lax.
   
				They also resented the fact that no 
			one had talked to them before filing the report. (Report by Hon. Lou 
			Frey, Jr., Hon. Peter N. Kyros, and Hon. James F. Hastings, Members 
			of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Concerning 
			Narcotic Enforcement Efforts in Hong Kong, Thailand, Burma, India, 
			Lebanon, Greece, Turkey, France, and The Netherlands; April 1973, 
			pp. 2-11 passim). 
 Like most such documents, this report is loaded with 
			inconsistencies, although it contains occasional useful pieces of 
			information. One such item concerns the Hong Kong police force's 
			most successful means of discovering illicit heroin, noting that 
			police "found drugs concealed in the rectums of 40 defendants 
			referred to them by the courts in one week."
 
 Also useful is the report that Hong Kong consumes 4 tons of heroin 
			and 48 tons of opium (medically equivalent to 4.8 tons of heroin 
			annually), from Hong Kong authorities. Taking this at the equivalent 
			of 8.8 tons of heroin consumption, the figure corroborates the 
			charge in this section that Hong Kong harbors one million drug 
			addicts in a 5 million population. At standard 5 percent purity for 
			street use, 1 kilogram of heroin will yield 150,000 "decks," or 
			single doses; 8.8 U.S. tons will yield roughly 1.2 million doses. A 
			serious addict requires more than one dose per day, so it Is hard to 
			estimate the precise number of addicts; but it is clear that the 
			British figures, probably conservative, are in the required range.
 
 The report that the PRC does not interfere with opiates 
			transshipment in its territorial waters speaks for itself, as does 
			the statement that Hong Kong serves as a base for the criminal 
			syndicates behind the Southeast Asian drug trade. However, the 
			failure of the Congressional investigators to cite police corruption 
			at any point as an obstacle to narcotics enforcement in Hong Kong 
			demonstrates how inadequate the effort was.
 
 There is nothing in the published literature concerning the 
			financial relationships between the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank and 
			the Chinese syndicates; information had to be obtained from 
			interviews with knowledgeable area sources, and compared to studies 
			of financial market mechanisms.
 
 
				
					
					
					Andreyev, The Chinese Bourgeoisie, pp. 146-147. 
					
					
					Ibid. 
					
					Financial Times, July 4,1977, p. 24. 
					
					
					Ibid. 
					
					Ibid., p. 19. 
					
					Ibid.  
			  
			
			6. THE PEKING CONNECTION  
				
				Following Kissinger's 1972 trip to Peking, American public and 
			private literature both have played down the "Peking Connection," to 
			the point of ridiculing existing and current evidence of People's 
			Republic of China involvement in the trade. However, an examination 
			of these sources does not reveal a single piece of evidence that the 
			PRC role has stopped. 
 The current "standard reference work" on the Far East traffic is The 
			Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, by Alfred W. McCoy, with 
			Cathleen 
			B. Read and Leonard P. Adams II (New York: Harper and Row, 1972). In 
			dismissing the claims of former Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous 
			Drugs chief Harry Anslinger, McCoy quotes an unnamed BNDD agent who 
			dismisses Anslinger's accusations against Peking, saying that the 
			People's Republic of China has no role whatsoever in the opium 
			trade, and that Anslinger's accusations are substantiated by nothing 
			more than Taiwanese propaganda. McCoy cites no other evidence, and 
			merely brushes the issue aside.
 
 In fact, McCoy and his co-authors went so far out on a limb that 
			even sympathetic experts were forced to correct them. In a review 
			published in the Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars in September 
			1973; Peter Dale Scott wrote:
 
					
					"McCoy quotes U.S. narcotics officials today to ridicule the 1950s 
			claims by then-U.S. Narcotics Commissioner Anslinger (and his government) about Communist China's 'twenty-year plan to finance 
			political activities and spread addiction' in the United States. But 
			McCoy subscribes to the equally dubious 'Turkey hypothesis' which 
			replaced Anslinger's in the 1960s; namely, that all of the U.S. 
			plague of heroin produced in the laboratories of Marseilles could be 
			attributed to opium grown in the Middle East. McCoy even claims that, 
						
						Throughout the 1960s ... the U.S. Bureau of Narcotics paid almost no 
			attention to Asia, there were few seizures of Asian heroin and 
			little awareness of the colony's growing role in the international 
			traffic. It was not until American GIs serving in Vietnam began 
			using . . . heroin refined in the Golden Triangle region that any 
			attention was focused on the Asian heroin trade, (pp. 223-24) 
						 
					"That is an important claim," reviewer Scott continued, "and it is 
					quite false. In 1960, as he knows, the United States officially 
			listed Hong Kong as the first of the 'principal sources' of the 
			diacetylmorphine (heroin) seized in the United States; and the 
			Federal Bureau of Narcotics showed its concern by opening a branch 
			office in Hong Kong in 1963. Anslinger himself, while transmitting 
			KMT (Kuomintang, or Taiwanese  ed.) propaganda about a Red Chinese 
			opium conspiracy, proved himself to be well-informed about the 
			world-wide significance of the Northern Thailand traffic, even to 
			such details as the roles played by a Macao financial syndicate, and 
			a Bangkok official of the Soong Bank of Canton."  
				Peter Dale Scott's 
			references are to Harry J. Anslinger, "The Opium of the People's 
			Government," in U.S. Congress, House, Soviet Total War, 85th 
			Congress, House Document No. 227, pp. 759-61.The accuracy or 
			inaccuracy of Harry Anslinger's presentation is not what is in 
			question at the moment. Rather, it is a simple point of fact that 
			McCoy and his co-authors have no facts whatever to indicate that the 
			PRC is not involved in the drugs traffic; and furthermore, that 
			their treatment of U.S. authorities who presented facts implicating 
			the PRC is wildly inaccurate.    
				As the Scott review demonstrated, that 
			is a matter of the published record. Experts on the Southeast Asian 
			theater at the time McCoy wrote simply doubt the author's integrity. 
			McCoy had available to him a mass of documentary evidence showing 
			that roughly half of the Golden Triangle growing area lay within the 
			confines of Communist China's Yunnan province. He also had available 
			a substantial portion of corroborating facts contained in this 
			report. McCoy simply chose to ignore this evidence, or, more 
			accurately, to attempt to refute it with unsubstantiated assertions. 
				   
				According to individuals who knew McCoy when he was a regular in the 
			anti-Vietnam War movement, McCoy was in close friendly contact with 
			North Vietnamese legations in Western Europe at the time of writing 
			of The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, and intended his 
			efforts to undermine the American war effort. In that context he 
			deliberately excised references to PRC opium trafficking. Since the 
			PRC and North Vietnam have come to blows over the status of the 
			expatriate Chinese comprador community in the latter country, it may 
			be that McCoy's political judgment, rather than North Vietnamese 
			views, were faulty on this subject. McCoy's book cannot be taken 
			seriously as far as the PR C issue is concerned. McCoy, 
			incidentally, does mention that expatriate Chinese syndicates are 
			the main traffickers in the Far East, and that Hong Kong is the main 
			transshipment center. 
 Typical of public sources is a Congressional investigation of 1973 
			which reported:
 
					
					"There is no indication that the People's Republic of China is a 
			source of illegal narcotics coming to or through Hong Kong. A former 
			American missionary in China, now with SARDA (Society for Aid and 
			Rehabilitation of Drug Addicts  ed.), said that since 1965 not 
			one addict from China has appeared in Hong Kong. Prior to 1965 they 
			arrived in droves. Arrests and seizures also evidence no Red Chinese 
			involvement whatsoever in narcotics traffic in Hong Kong. 
 "It was interesting to note the reaction of the Government officials 
			regarding the 'Chinese connection.' They thought that such 
			statements were 'rubbish and either made out of ignorance or by 
			individuals seeking political gain.' To say they were emphatic would 
			be an understatement.
 
 "When the Communists came into power in 1949 in China, they imposed 
			the death penalty on anyone producing or consuming opiates. Users 
			were sentenced to long terms, which included building a road toward 
			Siberia. This was, in effect, a death penalty. Their success and 
			continuing interest in purging addiction from their society has 
			removed China as a major source of narcotics."
 
				The report says further, "All officials acknowledged the fact that 
			most of the opium or morphine base coming into Hong Kong comes from 
			eitherBangkok or the Gulf of Siam." (Report by Hon. Lou Frey, Jr., 
			Hon. Peter
			N. Kyros, and Hon. James F. Hastings, members of the Committee of 
			Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Concerning Narcotic Enforcement 
			Efforts in Hong Kong, Thailand, Burma, India, Lebanon, Greece, 
			Turkey, France, and The Netherlands; April 1973, p. 4). 
 These claims are worth examining one by one.
 
				First, the Report does not seek to determine whether opium coming
			into Hong Kong from Bangkok is, in fact, of Red Chinese origin. 
			According to our expert sources, the main PRC transshipment route
			southwards, through the Golden Triangle, to Bangkok. 
			Second,, whether or not the "former missionary" source cited is 
			accurate, the appearance or nonappearance of drug addicts from the
			PRC mainland is utterly irrelevant to the issue of PRC involvement 
			in the
			wholesale drug traffic. Moreover, the citation of 1965 as the 
			end-point of 
			PRC traffic is suspicious, since the hardest evidence of all  Chou 
			Enlai's recorded boasts on the subject  dates from that year.
 
 Third, the authority cited by the Congressional delegation is the 
			Hong Kong Government itself. The integrity of the Hong Kong 
			authorities maybe judged from material presented in Section 5 of 
			this report. The utter ingenuousness of the Congressional document 
			cited, however, may be gauged from its enthusiasm for the Hong Kong 
			police: "We were impressed by the desire of the Service to do a job. 
			Their frustration was also apparent. They'll give it 100 percent, 
			but no matter how much they try or how good a job they do it's 
			just too big for them" (p. 10).
 
 Two years after the publication of this document, the Independent 
			Commission Against Corruption in Hong Kong made its official 
			estimate of a $1 billion annual rate of police bribery in the 
			colony.
 
 The most complete British work on the subject, Richard Deacon's The 
			Chinese Secret Service (New York: Ballantine Books, 1976) merely 
			ignores the issue, and defends PRC motivations!
   
				He argues,  
					
					"If opium 
			could be introduced into a country that did not wish it in peacetime 
			by a so-called civilized Western Power, with the connivance of its 
			Government, how can the British adopt an outraged critical tone 
			towards China for copying her own tactics, not by having opium 
			forcibly imported this time, but by exporting the stuff to try to 
			check such a war as that in Vietnam, which threatened to go on 
			indefinitely. . . . Can one blame China, however intrinsically 
			disgusting the tactic may be, for manipu-lating an 'opium war in 
			reverse'?" (p. 441).  
				Deacon does admit, "Many nations and many 
			individuals are in the drug game solely for sordid commercial gain. 
			It is essentially an international problem, but that should not 
			blind one to the fact that only in the hands of the Chinese 
			Communists has it been used almost solely as a subversive weapon 
			and for financing, by an opium war in reverse, a great many of their 
			espionage operations.''
 After 1972, American officials accepted the official line that China 
			had ceased to be an exporter of opiates, although they never liked 
			it. A case in point was Gen. Lewis W. Walt, a retired Marine Corps 
			officer who became the chief investigator for a set of hearings on 
			"World Drug Traffic and Its Impact on U.S. Security" (see note 27 
			below). On September 14, 1972, Walt states, "The official U.S. 
			position today is thatwe have no evidence that opium or opiates are 
			coming out of Communist China."
   
				 However, a specialist familiar with 
			the intelligence reports that made up the raw material of Gen. 
			Walt's briefing to the Subcommittee, said,  
					
					"It is highly significant 
			that he used the word evidence, rather than information. That is an 
			intentional dodge. He is playing a word game: evidence is a legal 
			term, and may exclude information. Had he used the word information, 
			he would have had to explain away a couple of hundred reports coming 
			in at the time."  
				Walt continued,  
					
					"There can be no question that 
			large quantities of opium were coming out of China in the 1950s and 
			early 1960s. . . . The Director of British customs at Hong Kong also 
			told us that they had no evidence that opiates were coming out of 
			China. On the other hand, he informed us frankly that they were not 
			looking for evidence  that, for political reasons, they do not 
			search ships or cargo coming out of mainland China. An identical 
			situation prevails in Portuguese Macao.''  
 
				
				
				Heikal, Mohammed Hassanein, The Cairo Documents (Garden City, N.Y.: 
			Doubleday and Company, 1973), pp. 306-307. 
				
				The significance of the investment, which occasioned widespread commentary in the Western press, is not so much the novelty of the 
			joint-venture format, but the surfacing of longstanding business 
			relationships between Jardine's and the PRC. 
				
				London Financial Times, July 4,1977, p. 20. 
				
				
				Interviews with law enforcement officers. Law enforcement 
			authorities suspect, but have never proven, that the Shaw Brothers' 
			international film distribution network also conduits narcotics. 
				
				
				Deacon, Chinese Secret Service, pp. 437-438. 
				
				
				In 1949, according to recently released American diplomatic cables, 
			the newly formed PRC was happy to permit Britain to retain control 
			over Hong Kong for the same reason. 
				
				Management Magazine (South Africa), December 1975. The Rennie and 
			Matheson families' relations go back much further than the recent 
			merger of business operations. They are intermarried through the 
			Ogilvie family, which is itself intermarried with the current 
			British royal family. The Rennies are core members of the British 
			establishment in South Africa. For example, relative Julian Ogilvie 
			Thompson is a member of Anglo-American Corporation's three-man 
			operating committee (see Section 4 for details on Anglo-American's 
			role in dirty money operations). The Rennies show up prominently in 
			British diplomatic and military posts throughout Africa and Asia, 
			e.g., Sir John Shaw Rennie was Governor and Commander in Chief of 
			Mauritius (1962-68), and Sir Gilbert McCall Rennie was Governor and 
			Commander in Chief of Northern Rhodesia in 1952. 
				
				The Economist, September 2,1978. 
				
				
				The authors benefited from an unpublished letter, "Jardine's 
			Octopusin Southern Africa; Rennie's Consolidated Holdings," by David 
			Cherry of the Africa staff of Executive Intelligence Review. 
				
				
				Peking's influence on the international gold market has been the 
			subject of considerable commentary in the financial press; during 
			1977 the Bank of China suddenly released about 80 tons of gold onto 
			the international markets, a move which commentators believed 
			depressed the gold price. What commentators were then at a loss to 
			explain is how the PRC, which runs a chronic balance-of-trade 
			deficit, was able to obtain the gold in advance of selling it off. 
			Peking's role in the gold-related aspect of opium financing provide 
			some explanation. 
				
				International Currency Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 146. 
				
				
				Harry J. Anslinger, The Murderers (New York: Farrar, Straus, and 
			Cudahy,1961). 
				
				"World Drug Traffic and Its Impact on U.S. Security," Hearings 
			before the Subcommittee to Investigate the Administration of the 
			Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws of the 
			Committe on the Judiciary, United States Senate; 92nd Congress, 
			Second Session; Part 3, The International Connection; September 
			13,15,1972, p. 101. 
				
				Haikal, Cairo Documents. 
				
				Anslinger, Murderers. 
				
				Harold Chang, "U.S. Sanction Threat to HK Over Drugs," SouthChina 
			Morning Post, August 18,1977. 
				
				Isvestia, February 17, 1978 (article by Bandura based on an article 
			inthe Japanese weekly, Shukan Bunshun, by N. Otiai). 
				
				According to interviews with Far Eastern and Soviet specialists, 
				the figure Liternatura cited was "laundered" through a series of 
			different Soviet conduits and publications during the 1960s, in a 
			form typical of Soviet "surfacing" of hard intelligence for more 
			general consumption. This particular report is taken much more 
			seriously by Western specialists, than, for example, Soviet claims 
			that the PRC at one point had 35,000 tons per year annual opium 
			production  enough dope to keep the entire U.S. population addicted.
				
				
				Reported in the Indonesian journal Buana Minggu, December 12, 1972. 
			Many similar reports came through during the same period, including 
			the following item from Indonesia as reported in the December29, 
			1970 issue of Foreign Broadcast Information Service Daily Report:
				Djakarta  The weekly CHAS has signaled the possibility that 
			Adjitorop, former Brigadier General Suharjo, and other elements of 
			remnants of the G-30-S/PKI who lived in communist China, the Soviet 
			Union, or other communist countries, continue to operate in 
			Indonesia. According to CHAS, they often come to Singapore using 
			foreign passports and fake names and disguised, because of 
			Singapore's proximity to Indonesia.
 
 In view of the great risk of capture by Indonesia state agencies, 
			these elements use Singapore for their subversion against Indonesia. 
			The attempts to crush the Indonesian republic by remnants of the 
			G-30-S/PKI also depend on assistance from and subversion by the 
			above states.
			This was the observation of a correspondent of the weekly CHAS who 
			recently visited Singapore, North Sumatra, Riau, and West 
			Kalimantan. 
			According to CHAS, Indonesia is one of the targets for subversion by 
			communist China in fighting the Soviet Union and its allies, and in 
			the struggle between the communists and the West.
 
 To attain their purpose, all sides employ all kinds of methods to 
			mobilize local forces, which in the current new order oppose and 
			undermine the Indonesian republican government overtly and covertly. 
			Among these forces are remnants of the G-30-S PKI and groups which 
			are defending the political principles of the old order.
 
 In launching its subversion, communist China conspicuously combines 
			trade activities with the dissemination of communist ideology and 
			instigation to rebel against the Indonesian government, CHAS 
			concluded.
				
				U.S. intelligence agencies had the same problem with the Ch'ao 
			Chou element in the Chinese Communist Intelligence Service that 
			Japanese interpreters had with American radio dispatches during 
			World War II; American military forces employed Sioux and other 
			Indians for certain classified radio transmissions, for which the 
			Japanese had no interpreters. The entire American government had, 
			during the early 1970s, only two employees capable of translating 
			the Ch'ao Chou dialect. How extensive this network is, therefore, 
			remains a matter of mystery. One disturbing feature of the New York 
			City incident is that the Ch'ao Chou contact had with him the 
			business card of the local Ch'ao Chou fraternal association in New 
			York's Chinatown (See Note 3, Section 3). Virtually the only published source indicating the Ch'ao Chou 
			operation is John Le Carre's The Honourable Schoolboy (New York: 
			Alfred A. Knopf, 1977). Its leading character is Drake Ko, 
			supposedly a Hong Kong kingpin of narcotics traffic with an Order of 
			the British Empire and a brother in the Chinese Politburo. "They'd 
			come up from Swatow, the two of them," a Le Carre character remarks 
			of Ko and his brother. "They were boat people, Chiu Chow." Le 
			Carre's novel, according to highly informed sources, is a straight 
			roman a clef from the files of British intelligence; most of the 
			individual characters are scarcely disguised real figures in the Far 
			East drug traffic and mercenary scene. The book's apparent intent, 
			to portray fictionally the replacement of British intelligence-power 
			in the Far East by the CIA's, is patent nonsense. The interesting 
			question is how Le Carre became so well-informed; his 
			acknowledgements are to British intelligence and police sources.
				
				Daniel Insor, Thailand: A Political, Social, and Economic Analysis, 
			(London: 1965), p. 135. 
				
				A. Doak Barnett, Communist China and Asia (New York: 1960), p. 186.
				
				
				The Chinese Bourgeoisie, p. 67. 
				
				
				Ibid., p. 154. 
				
				Ibid., p. 120. 
				
				Ibid. 
				
				Statement of Gen. Lewis W. Walt, before the Subcommittee to 
			Investigate Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other 
			Internal Security Laws of the Committee of the Judiciary, Hearings 
			on "World Drug Traffic and its Impact on U.S. Security," Part 4, 
			September 14, 1978, p. 160. "Communist guerrillas in Thailand are in 
			control of an important stretch of opium-growing land on the Laos 
			frontier," Walt testified. "The most serious insurgency is the White 
			Flag Communist Party. . . it is Peking which has armed the 
			insurgents and trained their leader, and supports them with a 
			China-based radio operation. Over the past year, the White Flag 
			Communist insurgency has grown to the point where it absorbs up to 
			80 percent of the counterinsurgency efforts of the Rangoon 
			government. All the armed groups in Burma, pro-communist or 
			anti-communist, have been involved in the drug trade. . . .The area 
			that 
			the Communists control is estimated at 25 percent of Burma's total 
			(opium) production. Burma produces 400 tons of opium a year." 
				The authors cross-checked Walt's testimony with U.S. Foreign Service 
			officers and found the above statement to be accurate. 
				
				Apparently, the relatively small city of Swatow was the center of an 
			extraordinary pre-revolution network of mainland financial links with 
			expatriates that was maintained intact after the PRC was 
			established. The remittance agencies, based in Swatow, Amoy, and 
			Canton, had 1,000 branches throughout Southeast Asia as of 1950. 
			After the revolution, the PRC government transformed them into an 
			intelligence operation, employing the agents of the remittance 
			companies abroad for intelligence-gathering purposes. Once the 
			external financial operations of Peking's state banks got off the 
			ground, however, the remittance companies were merged into the new 
			apparatus. 
				
				Andreyev, The Chinese Bourgeoisie, p. 111. 
				
				
				Ibid., p. 117. Much of this is of a directly political nature. 
			"Mention must also be made," the Soviet author says, "of the large 
			contribution made by overseas Chinese businessmen towards financing 
			the operation of PRC representatives in Southeast Asian countries 
			(Burma and  until recently  Cambodia and Indonesia). Although in 
			the given case these large contributions are spent in the countries 
			concerned, they are neither more nor less than a clandestine form of 
			sending foreign exchange to the PRC. In some cases local Chinese 
			businessmen helped to finance the propaganda campaigns of the PRC 
			embassies, the current expenses of embassies and missions and even 
			the implementation of the economic aid agreements signed by the PRC. 
			For example, the building of four factories in Cambodia under an 
			economic aid agreement signed with the PRC was financed by local 
			pro-Peking businessmen." However, Andreyev's data, the most current 
			available, drop off at the critical period; no figures are available 
			for the joint venture investments. The more recent picture was 
			filled out through interviews with American and Southeast Asian 
			specialists on PRC external finances.  
			  
			
			7. T HE ROYAL INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS  
				
				
				John Flint, Cecil Rhodes (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1974).
				
				
				U.S. State Department, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1949, 
			Vol. VII: "The Far East: China." 
				
				Christopher Thorne, "Chatham House, Whitehall, and Far Eastern 
			Issues: 1941-45," International Affairs, January, 1978. The authors 
			were compelled to rely on this summary rather than the original 
			documents of the Royal Institute itself. However, the Thorne article 
			is by a member of the RIIA, and published in the RIIA's own journal, 
			and may be considered an authoritative representation of the RIIA's 
			views
			concerning its own history. The 1977 release of RIIA papers was, 
			unfortunately, selective.    
				Thorne notes,    
					
					
					"The preparation of this 
			article was greatly facilitated by a grant given to the Royal 
			Institute of International Affairs by the Leverhulme Trust, which 
			enabled the Institute to put its archives in an order more readily 
			accessible to researchers. With the exception of papers dealing with 
			the internal affairs of the Institute, those archives more than 
			thirty years old are now open to bona fide research workers." 
					   
				The RIIA, of course, decides who is or is not bona fide.
				
				
				State Department, Foreign Relations, pp. 1289-92. 
				
				
				Chou En-lai represented the CP in its "United Front" in Chungking 
			with the Kuomintang during these years. 
				
				Thome, "Chatham House," p. 20
				
				
				Peter Vladimirov, Vladimirov Diaries, (Doubleday & Co.: 1976).
				
				
				Thome, "Chatham House," pp. 4-5.
				
				
				Ibid. 
				
				The ties of Ronning and Endicott to China go back very far and have 
			served as a crucial contact between British policy and the PRC. 
			Endicott was born of missionary parents in China in 1899, and worked 
			there as a Methodist minister for many years. By the time of the 
			1927 Shanghai massacre of communists by the KMT, Endicott admitted 
			in a discussion that he was already working as an advisor to Chiang 
			Kai-shek. In the early 1940s Endicott underwent a "Damascus Road" 
			transformation to Marxism and became a supporter of the CCP. He 
			became close to Chou En-lai during this time. Following his return 
			to Canada, Endicott formed a newsletter which reported on the PRC 
			and was a founding member of the Norman Bethune College at York 
			University, working closely with Chester Ronning. Ronning, also born in China of missionary parents, was in the Royal 
			Canadian Air Force Intelligence during World War II. With the end of 
			the War, Ronning became a Canadian foreign officer in China, during 
			which time he developed close relations with CCP leaders, especially 
			Chou Enlai, and current PRC Foreign Minister Huang Hua. Ronning 
			argued strongly for Western recognition of the PRC after 1949, as did 
			the leaders of the Far East Group of the RIIA, and was recognized as 
			a friend by PRC leaders. Ronning served as translator for Huang Hua, 
			who was the official spokesman for the PRC in the aftermath of the 
			Communist victory. When China began diplomatic openings to the West 
			in the early 1970s, Canada was one of the first countries chosen for 
			normalization. Ronning's friend Huang Hua was the PRC's first 
			ambassador to Canada.
 Investigations have shown that both Paul Lin and Endicott maintain 
			extensive ties to Canadian Maoist organizations, and through them, 
			to international terrorist organizations. Ronning is known by 
			professional intelligence officers to play a higher "coordinating" 
			role at the government level of terrorist deployment; Endicott and 
			Lin handle the
			"field work" with the Maoists. (The information here is derived from 
			team interviews with Endicott himself and associates of Paul Lin.)
				
				Thome, "Chatham House," p. 27.
				
				
				State Department, Foreign Relations, pp. 1289-92. 
				
				
				Ibid. 
				
				Christopher Wren, New York Herald Tribune, January 16,1948. 
				
				
				State Department, Foreign Relations, pp. 1289-92. 
				
				
				U.S. Senate, Committee on the Judiciary, 82nd Congress, First 
			Session, Subcommittee on Internal Security, Hearings on the 
			Institute for Pacific Relations, Part I. 
				
				State Department, Foreign Relations, pp. 331-332. 
				
				
				U.S. Senate, Hearings on the Institute for Pacific Relations, Part 
			I. 
				
				Ibid.  
			  
			8. CANADA: NORTH AMERICA'S HONG KONG 
			  
			Most of the source material from this section came from analysis of 
			bank and corporate annual reports and Who's Who entries; a simple 
			cross-correlation of such information produced an unbroken trail of 
			dope and dirty money from the Far East, through Canada, into the 
			United States. The business, legal, and accounting relations noted 
			here are all a matter of public record. 
			  
			In addition, the authors 
			interviewed several former and serving Canadian and American law 
			enforcement officers, who have had Walter Lockhart Gordon and his 
			Canadian "China Lobby" under scrutiny for years.  
				
				
				An egregious example of British intelligence activity in Canada 
			is the formation of the British Newfoundland Corporation (Brinco) in 
			the early1950s. This project was planned by Winston Churchill, the 
			Rothschilds, and Newfoundland's Premier Joseph "Joey" Smallwood, a 
			Master Scottish Mason.    
				According to Virginia Cowles's book on the Rothschilds (1973):
				 
					
						
						
						In 1951 shortly after Winston Churchill had become Prime Minister 
			for the second time, he received Mr. Smallwood, the Premier of 
			Newfoundland. Smallwood unfolded plans for a vast development scheme 
			in Labrador and Newfoundland. To carry it out British capital was 
			needed on a truly mammoth scale. . . . When the consortium of firms 
			was formed (Churchill) was delighted that N. M. Rothschild & Sons 
			should head it. 
 Participation in the founding of Brinco included the leading firms 
			involved in Dope, Inc., including Morgan, Grenfell, Kleinwort and 
			Sons, Rio Tinto Zinc, Anglo-American Corp., and Prudential. Cowles 
			adds, "Brinco's terms of reference were breathtaking: the 
			exploratory right to
			sixty thousand square miles in Newfoundland and Labrador, an area 
			larger than England and Wales. . . ."
 
				In Smallwood's autobiography (New American Library, 1973), he 
			identified himself:  
					
						
						
						"In 1967 (I) enjoyed immensely the distinction 
			of being installed in office (as Master Mason) by the Grand Master 
			Mason (Scottish Constitution) Lord Bruce, who came from Scotland 
			especially for the purpose. So I met the direct descendant of King 
			Robert the Bruce. Proud? Oh, yes." 
				Brinco's board of directors today includes Mark Turner, the chairman 
			of Rio Tinto Zinc, former member of the RIIA Council; Edmund de 
			Rothschild, the president of N. M. Rothschild and Sons; and Sam 
			Harris, the New York lawyer who is a director of Rio Tinto Zinc and 
			whose law firm represents RTZ as well as the Kaplan Foundation, a 
			funder of environmentalist groups. In court papers filed by the 
			Westinghouse Corporation, Harris was named a conspirator in a plan to 
			raise artificially the price of the world's uranium 800 percent 
			during the 1970s. 
				
				This piece of information was an incidental product of a Labor Party 
				counter surveillance operation against a number of individuals 
			associated with the top management of Drexel Burnham Lambert. 
				  
				
				A. J. Colin, Pro-Consul in Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1964). 
				 
			  
			
			9. ALL IN THE FAMILY: THE REAL SYNDICATE  
				
				
				The cult of Isis was developed in ancient Egypt no later than the 
			Third Dynasty of the Old Kingdom, approximately 2780 B.C., and 
			represents one of the earliest formal articulations of the entropic 
			and backward ideology of mother-worship. As known to the Priesthood 
			of the Temple of Isis  true believers themselves  the Isis cult 
			formalizes the elements of a capability for social control, 
			exploitation, and destruction of creative free will in subject 
			populations.    
				The elements include: 
					
						
						
						Use of various schizophrenia-inducing drugs; 
						
						
						Use of repetitive, heteronomic sounds to supplement the effect of 
			psychotropic drugs, and to create a societal aesthetic that endorses 
			and encourages use of the drugs; 
						
						Creation of synthetic cults based on the original reactionary Isis 
			myth, but specific to the psychological profile of the population 
			which the priesthood has targeted for subversion; 
						
						Enforcement of a political-economic model antagonistic to general 
			human progress, and containing targeted populations within non
			creative, manual slave-labor projects (e.g., pyramid-building). 
						 
				This combination of Pharaonic cult capabilities was taken as a model 
			for further refinement in this century by the British Secret 
			Intelligence Service's Tavistock Institute in London  an 
			institution which launched the "counterculture" in the United States 
			and Europe, based on the very
			drugs, mescaline and hashish, the Ancient Priesthood had employed 
			(see Part IV). 
				
				Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope (New York: Macmillan Co., 
			1974),
			p. 131. The "Circle of Initiates" formation was explicitly modeled 
			after the ancient Isis Priesthood. 
				
				R. S. Clymer, The Book of Rosicruciae (1947), Vol. II, p. 106.
				
				
				See Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., "Is Jimmy Carter Truly a Christian?," 
			New Solidarity, Vol. IX, No. 64, October 13,1978. 
				
				Cited in Nesta H. Webster, Secret 
				Societies and Subversive Movements (London: Boswell Printing and Publishing Co., 1924), p. 
			115. 
				
				Their father, the 7th Earl of Elgin, was famous for his theft of the 
			"Elgin Marbles" from Greece, smuggling them to the British Museum.
				
				
				Dictionary of National Biography (London: Oxford University Press, 
			1968), Vol. III.p. 104ff. 
				
				Jean de Villiershad was the Master of the Knights of St. John of 
			Jerusalem from 1285-93, when the preparations for the slaughter of 
			the Knights Templar were undertaken. Philippe Villiers de l'Isle 
			Adam was the Grand Master of the Knights of St. John in France from 
			1521-22, and was the first Grand Master in Malta from 1530-34. Today 
			Sir Charles Villiers, who was the managing director of J. Henry 
			Schroder Wagg from 1960-68, is the chairman of the British Steel 
			Corp. Sir John Michael Villiers, a Knight of St. John, was the 
			Queen's Harbour Master Malta from 1952-54, and Lieutenant-Governor 
			of Jersey, an offshore banking center, from 1964-69. 
				
				By his own testimony in various writings, Lord Russell was in 
			periodic contact with the Communist Chinese regime and Premier Chou 
			in particular after 1949. 
				
				For example, Rudolf Hess and Professor-General Karl Haushofer, 
			ghost-writer of Mein Kampf; Alfred Rosenberg, Nazi Minister of 
			Foreign Services; Max Amann, Editor in Chief of Nazi Publications; 
			Hans Frank, Nazi Governor-General of Occupied Poland during World 
			War II; and
			several members of the Wittelsbach family (the Bavarian royal 
			family) who sponsored much of Adolf Hitler's career. Hitler himself 
			was an associate of the society, known as a "Visiting Brother."
				
				
				The connection is visible in the 1866 founding of the "Masonic 
			Rosicrucian Society" whose leaders, Mathers, Wescott, and Woodman, 
			also formed the Isis-Urania Temple of the Hermetic Students of the 
			Golden Dawn in 1886. The Golden Dawn group, by 1890, included the 
			mystic poet, William Butier Yeats, former Secretary of the 
			Theosophist Society. Aleister Crowley was the order's historian 
			during the period of Yeats's association with it. 
				
				The LSD cult was a creation of the Royal Institute of International 
			Affairs and its psychological warfare arm, the Tavistock Institute 
			(see Part IV). During the late 1960s  at the height of the 
			"counterculture" and
			"hippy movement" in the United States  the Director of the RIIA, 
			Andrew Schonfield, was a member of the Tavistock Institute's 
			Governing Council. In 1967, during Schonfield's tenure at RIIA and 
			Tavistock, Tavistock's leading Staff Psychologist, R. D. Laing, 
			published his book, The Politics of Experience, which advocated 
			schizophrenia ("madness isthe only sanity") and drug use. Laing 
			writes:  
					
						
						
						I want you to taste and smell me, want to be palpable, to get under 
			your skin, to be an itch in your brain and in your guts that you 
			can't scratch out and that you can't allay, that will corrupt and 
			destroy you and drive you mad.  
				During the 1960s, the Tavistock Institute received large grants from 
			the Ford Foundation, the British Center for Environmental Studies, 
			the British Defense Ministry, Harvard University, and at least 
			£22,797 from the Social Science Research Council, of which 
			Schonfield was chairman at the time. 
				
				See Robert Cohen and L. Wolfe, "Karl Haushofer's Mein Kampf," New 
			Solidarity, Vol. IX, No. 45, August 7,1978. 
				
				Cited in John Flint, Cecil Rhodes, p. 27. 
				
				
				Martin Fido, Rudyard Kipling (New York: Viking Press, 1974). 
				
				
				Ibid., p. 35. 
				
				See Harbans Rai Bachchan, W. B. Yeats and Occultism (Delhi: Motilal 
			Banarsidass, 1965). 
				
				See Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., "Hitler: Runaway British Agent," New 
			Solidarity, Vol. VIII, No. 87, January 10,1978. 
				
				Tennyson in 1820 had been a member of the "Cambridge Apostles" which 
			initiated the Metaphysical Society in 1868-69. Other members of the 
			Metaphysical Society included H. W. Ackland, the Duke of Argyle, 
			Alexander Campbell Fraser, William Gladstone, Shadworth Hodgson, and 
			Walter Bagehot. This group included prominent members of the Society 
			for Psychical Research, Mind magazine, and the Fabian Society.
				
				
				Verse 8 of the Choric Song of the poem. 
				
				
				History of the Times, Vol. IV: 1912-1920 (New York: Macmillan Co., 
			1952), p. 244. The relevant section reads:  
					
						
						
						On Jan. 19, 1917, Milner left London at the head of an Allied 
			mission which, during three weeks in Petrograd, laid down a suitable 
			scheme for keeping the Russian forces supplied with Western 
			munitions. . . . It was widely believed at the time that the 
			February Revolution (installing Kerensky  ed.) was hatched at the 
			British Embassy. 
				
				After the destruction of the Knights Templar in the 14th century, 
			the Knights of St. John appropriated the Templars' Red Cross symbol 
			into their own iconography.    
				According to Ferdinand Lundberg, America's 60 Families (New York: 
			Vanguard Press, 1937), p. 146ff:  
					
						
						
						The Russian Mission of the Red Cross was headed by Col. William 
			Boyce Thompson and Col. Raymond Robbins . . . (who) used the Red 
			Cross to forward the war aims of Wall Street in a way unsuspected 
			by the American people. The purely political function of the Red 
			Cross is not generally appreciated even today. 
 . . . Thompson and Robbins, according to their own statements, 
			functioned in Russia as a political arm of the War Department. Their 
			crowning achievement was the purchase of enough delegates to the 
			All-Russian Democratic Congress (to support Kerensky  ed.). The 
			cost of seducing this congress was $1,000,000.
 
				Winston Churchill's wife, Clementine, a Commander of the Order of 
			St. John, served as the Chairman of the Red Cross Aid to Russia Fund 
			from 1939-46. The same uses of the "Red Cross" cover for 
			intelligence operations is implicit in the fact that a direct 
			descendant of King Robert Bruce of Scotland, David Bruce, was the 
			Chief Representative of the American Red Cross in Britain in 1940, 
			and one year later, in 1941, became head of Office of Strategic 
			Services (OSS) Operations in the European Theatre; the same David 
			Bruce, during the Nixon Administration years, was selected by 
			Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to be Chief of the U.S. Mission 
			to the People's Republic of China from 1973-74, and then became U.S. 
			Ambassador to NATO from 1974-76. 
				
				For example, in his April 1938 Annual Report to the Shareholders 
			of Rio Tinto, chairman Geddes noted that:  
					
						
						
						Our company has received recently a great deal of attention in the 
			press of many countries. Propagandists possessed of 
						lively imaginations but devoid of respect for accuracy have told the 
			world of our doings. In result a lot of nonsense has been published, 
			evidently designed to suggest that your Board is composed of violent 
			fascists actively participating on the side of General Franco. I 
			read the other day an article in which it was stated as a fact that 
			we had sent in a year 300,000 tons of copper to Germany and 65,000 
			tons to Italy to pay for supplies from those two countries to 
			General Franco. . . . This is just rubbish. ... I have seen it 
			stated in the press that we . . . your Board . . . "gave" . . . help 
			to General Franco's cause. It depends on your meaning of the verb 
			"to give."  
				Significantly, in 1923's Annual Report by then-Chairman Lord Alfred 
			Milner, it was stated that "The constantly increasing burden of 
			taxation, especially in Spain, where the (republican  ed.) 
			government is evidently convinced that it can never kill the goose 
			that lays golden 
			eggs. ..." (See David Avery, Not On Queen Victoria's Birthday: The 
			Story of the Rio Tinto Mines, London, 1973, pp. 371ff.) 
 Auckland Geddes' grandfather had been the Hudson's Bay Company's 
			official agent in Scotland. His second nephew, Anthony, was a member 
			of the Governing Council of the Royal Institute of International 
			Affairs in 1949, alongside Sir Mark Turner, Rio Tinto's current 
			chairman. The same Anthony is a director of the Midland Bank.
 
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			  |