The troublesome concept of the Hidden
Hand or the Elders of Zion is superfluous and unnecessary.
"The latest controversy to involve
the Arab World concerns a TV program A Rider without a Horse
that started airing on Wednesday, Nov. 5th, the first day of the
holy month of Ramadan on several Arab satellite channels. The
source of the controversy is that the program is partly based on
"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", the old forgery
originating in Tsarist Russia", writes Qais S. Saleh, a business
consultant from Ramallah on the excellent website
Saleh condemns the broadcast and
warns the Palestinians and the Arabs to stay away from the bad
old wolf of anti-Semitism, or, as he put it, "the trend of
importation of anti-Semitic bigotry".
Saleh’s view coincides with that of Michael Hoffman. Hoffman
thinks Arabs have no need to import anti-Semitic arguments from the
old and far-away sources, provided they have a fresh round-the-clock
local source: actual behavior of the Jewish state and its Jewish
citizens. It is much more convincing than old tales.
However, the Protocols are still with us and still entertain minds.
Recently, the leading Italian novelist and thinker Umberto Eco
contributed his opinion on the subject to the Guardian
"explains" the popular feelings towards the Jews: "They engaged in
trade and lent money - hence the resentment towards them as
In my limited knowledge, it is not the intellectuals who lend money,
but bankers and loan sharks, while true intellectuals find their
behavior repulsive. Probably Eco has a different definition of
’intellectual’ up his sleeve.
"The ill-famed Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion were a rehash of serialized fictional
material, and prove their own unreliability, since it is hardly
credible that "the baddies" would reveal their fell purposes so
blatantly" - concludes Eco.
One can forgive a business consultant from Ramallah, but Umberto Eco
could notice that his definition would fit some other books, for
instance, Gargantua and Pantagruel, an even older forgery,
pretending to be a real chronicle of the Giants family, and built on
’serialised fictional material’. Don Quixote, Pickwick’s Club, 1984
of Orwell - all these books "pretend" to describe real events to the
same extent. They are ’forgeries’, as they are ascribed to somebody
else: Don Quixote to Sid Ahmed Benengeli
, and Gargantua to Maitre
Alcofribas Nasier .
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are best described as
rather than ’fake’. They belong to the same category as Tomas
Friedman’s Letter of President Clinton to Mubarak. After all,
pseudo-epigraphic genre is an old and venerable one. It is even
better to consider the Protocols, ’a political pamphlet’.
In this essay, we shall attempt to find out why the Protocols refuse
to lie down and die. We shall stay clear from the usual question,
"who wrote it". Its real author remains unknown, and it is difficult
to imagine this person, for the Protocols are a literary palimpsest.
In the days of yore, a scribe would write his composition on a piece
of old parchment, previously removing an older text. The erasure was
rarely total, and a reader was treated to an integrated version of
the Golden Ass and Fioretti of St Francis. In the Protocols, there
are layers of old and even older stories, and it precludes
meaningful quest for ultimate creator.
Every text should be treated
on its own merits, disregarding the question of authorship.
Although, Jorge Luis Borges wrote that the author is an important
part of a text. Indeed, if we would know the Protocols contain real
blueprint of some Jewish elites, we would have our answer ready in
minutes. But Protocols were published in the end of 19th-beginning
of 20th century "as found", as apocrypha. They became a great
bestseller and still stay there, though in some countries (notably
the Soviet Union), mere possession of the text was punishable by
The Anonymous author of the Protocols describes a master-plan for
vast restructuring of society, creation of a new oligarchy and
subjugation of millions. The final product is not too different from
the one described in a contemporary piece of writing, The Iron Heel
by Jack London, the great radical from Oakland, California. However,
London expected harsh cracking down, while Anonym’s way to
subjugation leads through Machiavellian manipulations and mind
control a la Orwell’s 1984. (Orwell’s homage to the Protocols is
even more striking as it is rarely noticed).
The difficulty of the Protocols is in an uncanny dissonance between
its uncouth language and deep social and religious thought. It is a
rude parody-like rendering of a satanic, subtle and well-thought out
plan, wrote the Nobel Prize winning novelist Alexander
 in his (written in 1966 and published in 2001)
analysis of the Protocols.
"The Protocols, show a blueprint of
a social system. Its design is well above abilities of an
ordinary mind, including that of its publisher. It is a dynamic
process of two stages, of destabilization, increasing freedom
and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm, and on
the second stage, new hierarchical restructuring of society
takes place. It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb. It
could be a stolen and distorted plan designed by a mind of
genius. Its putrid style of an anti-Semitic grubby brochure
[intentionally] obscures the great strength of thought and
Solzhenitsyn is aware of faults of
"Its style is that of a filthy leaflet, the powerful line
of thought is broken and fragmented, mixed up with ill-smelling
incantations and psychological blunders. The system described is not
necessarily connected with the Jews; it could be purely Masonic or
whatever; while its strongly anti-Semitic current is not an organic
part of the design".
Solzhenitsyn makes a textual experiment, removes words "Jews",
"Goyim" and "conspiracy" and finds many disturbing ideas. He
"The text demonstrates impressive foresight on the two
systems of society, the Western and the Soviet one. While a strong
thinker could possibly predict the development of the West in 1901,
how could he grasp the Soviet future?"
Solzhenitsyn braved the Soviet regime, dared to write and publish
the mammoth Archipelago Gulag, an indictment of the Soviet
repression, but even he stalled and did not publish his research of
the Protocols. He asked it to be published after his death only, and
it was printed against his will in a very small number of copies in
2001. Let us follow Solzhenitsyn’s line of thought and gaze into the
crystal ball of the Protocols, while temporarily discounting its
"Jewish line" and paying heed to the idea of creating a new system,
not necessarily a Jewish-dominated one.
The master-plan begins with
reshaping of human mind:
"People’s minds should be diverted
(away from contemplation) towards industry and trade, and then
they will have no time to think. The people will be consumed by
the pursuit of gain. It will be vain pursuit, for we shall put
industry on a speculative basis: what is withdrawn from the land
by industry will slip through the hands of workers and
industrialists and pass into the hands of financiers.
The intensified struggle for survival and superiority,
accompanied by crises and shocks will create cold and heartless
communities with strong aversion towards religion. Their only
guide is gain that is Mammon, which they will erect into a
Foresight of Anonym is amazing: in the
days of the Protocols’ publication, Man was still the measure of
things, and full eighty years would pass, until Milton Friedman and
Chicago School would proclaim Market and Profit as the only guiding
The tool for enslavement of minds is the media, writes Anonym.
"There is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the
people, and that is the media. It is in the media that the triumph
of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. Through the Press we
have gained the power to influence minds while remaining unobserved.
We shall erase from the memory of men the historical facts we do not
want them to know, and leave only those we wish".
Years will pass since the publication until a small group of people
who control our discourse while remaining unobserved, the media
lords, would rise. The free discussion of the media barons,
Berlusconi and Black, Maxwell and Sulzberger,
Gusinsky and Zuckerman
is banned from the media they own, while their cooperative affinity
remains impressive. The freedom of discourse survives wherever
independent (from media barons) media still exists. Hundred years
ago, this force was much weaker than it is now, and it is amazing
the Anonym recognized its potential.
Century before the rise of World Bank and IMF,
the Protocols noticed
the foreign loans are the best tools to rob countries of their
"While the loans were internal, money remained in the land,
but with externalization of loans, all nations pay tribute of their
subjects to the oligarchy".
Indeed, the bigger loans poor countries
get, the poorer they become.
Concentration of capital in the hands of financiers, concentration
of media in few hands, extra-judicial killings of unyielding
leaders, stock market with its derivatives sucks out wealth and it
accumulates in the hands of the priesthood of Mammon, gain (or
"market forces") as the only measure of successful strategy. Yes,
the interest to the Protocols does not disappear because the
described plan of creating oligarchic (not necessarily Jewish) rule
is being implemented in real time and it is called the New World
are described as extreme-right-wing
anti-utopian piece of writing. However, it spans both left and
right-wing discourse. A right-wing writer would bless strengthening
of Law and Order, but the following prediction of Anonym could be
written today by a leftist libertarian, say, Noam Chomsky,
witnessing the present transition to the New World Order:
of armaments and the increase of police force will bring forth
society where are only the masses of the proletariat, a few
millionaires, police and soldiers".
However, the deepest thought of Anonym remains in the spiritual
"Freedom might be harmless and have
its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being
of the people if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God,
upon the Brotherhood of humanity. This is the reason why it is
indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the
people’s mind the very principle of God and the Spirit, and to
put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs".
Anonym connects the Faith and the idea
of Brotherhood of humanity. Undermining of Faith ruins the
Brotherhood. Freedom, instead of desirable and beautiful state of
mind, turns into destructive drive when unhinged from the Faith.
Instead of Faith, the Enemy offers pursuit of Mammon.
While reading in today’s (16.11.02) IH Tribune philippics against
gay priests and nuns, one notes the following lines in the
"We have taken care to discredit the Christian priesthood
and ruin their mission which might still hinder our plans. Day by
day, their influence on the people is falling lower. Collapse of
Christianity is nigh".
We witness implementation of this plan: religion is removed from
consideration, neo-liberalism or Mammon worship takes its place,
while with disestablishment of socialism, this brave attempt of a
non-faith-based brotherhood collapsed, leaving ideological vacuum.
This observation caused some reviewers to exclaim, "The true
designer of the Master-plan is our old foe, the Prince of the World,
whose ultimate aim is elimination of Divine Presence and ruination
of Man". True, but the Prince of the World can’t act directly. He
needs free agents that choose to accept his plan. These chief agents
and possible allies, according to the pamphlet, are financial
capitalists and Masters of Discourse, ’the Mind’.
They promote to the highest positions,
"politicians who, in case of
disobedience to our instructions, must face criminal charges or
disappear. We shall arrange elections in favor of candidates with
some dark, undiscovered stain in their past. They will be our
trustworthy agents out of fear of revelations"
contemporaries of Watergate and Lewinsky, it sounds familiar.
The shift from Stage One (liberalism and freedom) to
(tyranny) took place in our lifetime. If in 1968 the NY Times
promoted the Freedom Riders, in 2002 it supports Patriot Act. An
important American lawyer, Alan Dershovitz of Harvard made a U-turn
from Human rights to Right to torture. This U-turn was predicted by
the Protocols, as the purpose beyond the struggle against the old
"The aristocracy enjoyed the labour
of the workers, and it was interested in seeing that the workers
were well fed, healthy, and strong. The people have annihilated
the aristocracy, and have fallen into the grips of merciless
In less emotional terms, the new
bourgeoisie removed the old elites with support of people, while
promising freedom and objecting to their privilege. After its
victory, it took the privilege to itself, and turned out to be as
bad (or worse) as the feudal lord. Marx referred to this complaint
of aristocracy in one of the numerous additions to the Communist
Manifesto, and considered it futile if partly justified. However, he
did not live to witness a similar process which took place in the
last days of the Soviet Union. The rising new bourgeoisie took
control over the discourse, convinced people to fight the privilege
of Nomenclature for the sake of equality and freedom, and after
their victory, it assumed and multiplied the privilege, and rejected
equality and freedom.
The Protocols predict rise of New Bourgeoisie,
Mammon-worshippers, who are inherently hostile to Old Elites, to
spirit, to religion, to the ordinary people. For a long while, they
were the engine of the left, democracy-seeking movements, until
their purpose was completed, and then they made the U-turn towards
This U-turn can be quantified by the inheritance and land tax rate
in England: while the financial bourgeoisie and Masters of Discourse
fought against the old ruling classes, the rates were high and
eventually dismantled their power base; after their victory, the
rate decreased allowing consolidation of the new ruling classes. It
is possible that the Old Order had had some advantages. It is almost
certain that a transition from the Old Order could be different if
the people would understand the intentions of the enemy. But history
can’t be reversed, and it is quite futile to dream of return of the
good lords and benevolent Party bosses.
Thus, the Protocols (purified of references to the Jews and
conspiracies) are useful as they describe a blueprint of the New
World Order, and help its adversaries to form a defensive strategy
against the designs of Enemy. But the references to the Jews
constitute large and important part of the text.
The Jews and the Protocols
The Protocols identify the moving force of the
New World Order with
a powerful group of extremely chauvinist, manipulative and
domination-obsessed Jewish leaders. The leaders, according to the
Protocols, despise ordinary community members; they utilize and
support anti-Semitism as the means to keep their "lesser brethren",
innocent ordinary folk of Jewish origin, in thrall to their rule.
The leaders are described as pathological goy haters, bent on
destroying culture and traditions of other nations while preserving
their own. Their goal is to create world government and rule the
homogenized and globalized world.
Their aims and intentions are stated in extremely contrarian and
obnoxious way. Solzhenitsyn concluded that no sane person would
deliver his favorite ideas in such self-demeaning and
"We extract gold from their blood and tears",
"our power is based on workers’ hunger",
"revolutionaries are our
"brutish minds of Goyim",
are, in his opinion, words
ascribed to the Jews by their enemies. A Jew would rather put such
ideas in an oblique way, he felt.
It is not a water-tight argument. Some people speak in oblique way,
others prefer a direct one. An Armenian from the Azeri capital, Baku
told me in long gone 1988, "The Azeris are our cattle, without our
Armenian mind their country would collapse in course of days, as
they are silly donkeys". (A few months later, an explosion of native
violence expelled the clever Armenians from Azerbaijan, and since
then the Azeris manage their own land quite all right.) David Ben Gurion, the first ruler of the Jewish state, coined an equally
arrogant maxim: "Who cares what Goyim say? What matters is what the
Jews do!" This sentence is an almost direct quote from the
The Protocols ascribe to the Elders a saying,
"Each Jewish victim is
worth in the sight of God a thousand goyim".
This line, a pinnacle
of arrogance, is not a vain invention of an anti-Semite. Two
ministers of Sharon’s government, Uri Landau and Ivet Lieberman
demanded to kill one thousand Palestinian goyim for each Jewish
victim. A Jewish extremist at a demo for the Jewish Temple Mount
(18.11.02) called each Jew to kill one thousand Palestinian goyim.
Apparently, some ideas of the Protocols are not foreign to some
The late Israeli scholar Israel Shahak and an American Jewish writer
Norton Mezvinsky present in their Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel
a plethora of sayings by Jewish Rabbis that wouldn’t be out of place
in the Protocols.
"The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of
non-Jews is greater and deeper than the difference between a human
soul and the souls of cattle" (p. ix).
Shahak and Mezvinsky proved
the rage of the Jewish chauvinists does not differentiate between
Palestinians, Arabs and Goyim in general. In other words, whatever
happened to Palestinians could happen to any Gentile community
standing on the way of the Jews.
Indeed, if the Protocols would have no relation to reality, they
probably wouldn’t be as popular as they are. The Jews are
sufficiently powerful to dream of domination, and some do.
Apparently some Jewish ideas found their way into the text. Other
thoughts are ascribed to the Jews on the basis of "qui bono".
The least acceptable idea of
is the presumption of an
extremely ancient conspiracy of the Jews aiming to take over the
world. The extreme philo-Semitic view denies the Jews their ability
to act together and presents them as separate individuals united by
prayer only. This view is not accepted by the Jews, and it does not
agree with the common sense.
Solzhenitsyn does not believe in existence of the Elders of Zion,
though "the togetherness and coordination of Jewish activity for the
sake of their advancement caused many writers (beginning from
Cicero) to imagine there is a single commanding centre to direct
their attacks". "Without such a world centre, without conspiring,
the Jews understand each other and are able to coordinate their
The Jews are perfectly able to coordinate their actions, but I doubt
human beings, Jews or English, Russians or Chinese are able to form
long-standing plans spanning centuries and continents. Nobody was
able to prove such a plot exists. Usually, ’anti-Semites’ (the
people who doubt or deny inherent benevolence of the Jews to Gentile
society) argue for its authenticity as Henry Ford did. The car king
"the only statement I care to make about
the Protocols is
that they fit in with what is going on."
Indeed they do, exclaims
Victor Marsden, the English translator of the Protocols.
However, it is not a proof of Jewish plot. We can reach similar
results rejecting the conspiracy line altogether, by applying the
concept of self-interest to the real Jewish community as it was
aptly described by Shahak-Mezvinsky. We shall prove that the
troublesome concept of the Hidden Hand or the Elders of Zion is
superfluous and unnecessary.
Traditional Jewish community had a structure of "upturned pyramid",
in words of Zionist theoreticians: it contained many persons of
wealth, learning and management, and very few workers. It appears an
odd thing, until one understands that the Zionists artificially view
the Jews in divorce of the society they live in. The Jewish
’upturned pyramid’ couldn’t exist without a real down-turned pyramid
of Gentile low classes. The Jews compete with the native elites of
the Gentile society for the right to exploit the Gentile worker and
peasant. The modus operandi of the two competitors differs. While
native elites shared some values with their lower classes and
usually provided for some upward mobility, the Jewish community had
its own structure and values.
Economically it stood for capitalist or quasi-capitalist
exploitation of the natives, while ideologically the community
declared loyalty to its leaders, rejection of common humanity with
the natives, extreme ethnocentrism, feeling of racial and religious
superiority towards the natives. It was a marginal community,
forming no bonds of marriage and friendship with the natives. As a
marginal community, it was free of long-standing considerations the
native elites had had.
For instance, the Jewish community of 17th century Ukraine has been
a collective tax-farmer and leaseholder, extracting from the natives
SIX times more taxes and dues per person than a gentile landlord
did, wrote a prominent Jewish Ukrainian historian Saul Borovoy in a
recently published in Jerusalem book. The Jewish communities of
Maghreb supported the colonial power against their gentile
neighbors, etc. Their traditions forbade normal relations with the
Let us presume that such a community acts in its egoistic interests.
Forget conspiracy; forget the Elders of Zion, learned or otherwise.
The community’s only aim is to promote its own well-being. For a
marginal group it means to make the social gap between its members
and the native population as broad as possible, while minimizing the
The group would naturally, for its self-interest, support every
movement against native elites, whether initiated by the King (as
the Jews did before the French Revolution) or by the rebelling low
classes. It would not be done for the Jewish love of democracy or
rebellious nature, but for improvement of their own positions. Ideal
situation would be created by massacre or expulsion of the native
elites, as the group members would be able to appropriate their
positions. Indeed, it happened in Soviet Russia and Soviet Hungary
in the aftermath of World War One. Massacre and exile of the native
elites made the positions of power and influence available to the
Self-interest explains the Jewish involvement with the dreaded
the Soviet security services. Until 1937, the Jews occupied the top
echelon of the KGB predecessor body, while millions of Russians lost
their life or liberty. Objectively, these executioners made jobs and
houses available for their fellow Jews. After the massacre and exile
of Russian elites, the Jews were ready for equality, as a son of a
Rabbi could easily compete with a son of Russian worker or peasant,
though he wouldn’t be able to compete with a son of Russian noble.
In a similar way, the Jews in Israel granted limited equality to the
Palestinians in 1966, after confiscation of 90% of native lands and
expulsion of 90% of natives. Now, the settlers promise to extend
equality to the rest of Palestinians, after they will expel the
majority of them elsewhere. In the light of great Jewish support for
Israel, there is no reason to presume that the Jewish modus operandi
in Palestine is intrinsically different from the Jewish intentions
"Executed during the revolution army officers
were Russians, the noblemen, priests, monks, deputies were Russians.
In 1920s, the pre-revolutionary engineers and scientists were exiled
or killed. They were Russians, while their place was taken by Jews.
The best Russian Psychiatric institute in Moscow, its Russian
members were arrested or exiled, while their place was taken by the
Jews. Important Jewish doctors blocked the advancement of Russian
medical scientists. The best intellectual and artistic elites of
Russian people were killed, while the Jews grew and flourished in
these (deadly for Russians) years".
The new Jewish elite did not fully identify with Russia but carried
out separate policy. It had a fateful effect in 1991, when over 50% of Jews (as opposed to 13% of Russians) supported
pro-Western coup of President Yeltsin. In 1995, 81% of Jews voted
for pro-Western parties, and only 3% for the Communists (as opposed
to 46% of Russians), according to the publication by the Jewish
sociologist Dr Ryvkina in her book Jews in Post-Soviet Russia
In ever-expanding America, the Jews did not have to kill or remove
the native elites; they became its important part, controlling
discourse and wielding considerable financial clout. They still do
not identify with the goyish America: every year, they force the
Congress and the Administration to send five billion dollars to
their Israeli offshoot and now try to let America fight their war in
Iraq. They do discriminate other Americans, otherwise 60% of the
leading positions in the media would not become Jewish
Jews of France do not identify with France, either.
identification with Israel is so strong; it overshadows their ties
to the country they live in". - writes Daniel Ben Simon in
"This dual loyalty was made very clear to me by a Jewish doctor in
Nice. "If the choice is between Israel and France, there’s no
question I feel closer to Israel," he said, without a moment’s
hesitation. He was born and bred in France; he went to medical
school in France; his patients are French; he speaks French with his
wife and children. But in the depths of his heart, he feels a
greater affinity with the Jewish state".
In Palestine, the Jews have no compassion for the natives. They
travel by segregated roads, study in segregated schools, while a Jew
consumes ten times more water resources than a goy, and has seven
times higher income. Thus, the Jewish separateness remains a fact of
life for many Jewish communities.
For their own well-being the Jews have to obscure their unique
position, wealth and power by the following means:
- Holocaust discourse helps to fight
- In a mono-ethnic society, the Jews as the only foreign body do
stick out and attract attention, while in multicultural society
they are hardly seen. For this purpose, the Jews support
immigration from non-European countries, as their presence would
remove the stamp of Jewish exclusiveness.
- The Political Correctness is another device forbidding the
discussion of Jewish influence.
- Fight against Christianity and the Church makes sense for a
non-Christian community: if the Church would be strong, the
Christians would prefer their own, Christian elite.
- Globalization is a natural development for the people spread
all over the globe, if they attach but little importance to the
- Impoverishment of the natives is but another side of growing
wealth of the Jewish community.
Summing it up, a big share (though not
all) of the ideas ascribed to the Jews by the Protocols are indeed
the ideas useful or necessary for the Jewish communal well-being,
without any need for great hatred towards Gentiles and/or the
guidance of mythic Elders of Zion. That is the reason of
Protocols’ long life. Paradoxically, without Israeli apartheid these
facts would remain invisible for the host communities.
From Founders’ America
Re: "The Elders Of Zion And The Masters Of Discourse"
On the question of authenticity, if it quacks like a duck . . .
Here are some paragraphs which relate to the matter, from my
collection of thoughts on America’s steep moral/cultural
decline, "Paleoconservative Thoughts To Ponder":
14) Who controls the news rules the mind; who controls
entertainment rules the heart; who controls both rules the
194) A CONSPIRACY BY CONSENSUS requires no secret plans or
meetings, only an idea around which disconnected "conspirators"
can rally. Such a conspiracy is often begun by actual
conspirators planting an idea in "fresh soil," such as youthful
minds, then cultivating the field with carefully placed
propaganda and events. Such a conspiracy was begun in America by
Bolshevik-minded Jews working as (or for) Stalinist agents in
the 40s and 50s, after they had infiltrated our entertainment
industries, college campuses and federal agencies. Read the news
releases about Soviet infiltration of federal agencies before
and during the McCarthy era, reporting on transcripts from
intercepted KGB cables in ’44 and ’45 (the "Venona Project"
files). From Scripps Howard News Service: "U.S. cryptanalysts
indicate that more than 100 Soviet agents had infiltrated the
State Department, Justice Department, War Department, Treasury
Department and even the Office of Strategic Services, the
precursor of the CIA." And you wonder why our federal agencies
have always seemed to be on the brink of traitorous actions
against America’s best interest, such as the State Department’s
current program to recruit "under-represented" Third World races
and cultures for relocation into white communities across
America, which purpose is to dilute white voters’ strength and
influence, in order to destroy the founding race and culture of
white Western civilization--emasculating once-strong communities
of white males who might otherwise have stopped installation of
One-World Government and Global Economic Socialism. Those
Stalinist/Jewish spies never were routed from Washington,
because progressive Jews in media and entertainment had
effectively silenced Commie-hunters with charges of "red
baiting" and "searching for communists under every bed. "
1389) The endgame of multiculturalism for Marxian Jews is racial
mongrelization of whites, to destroy white Western civilization
and build worldwide socialism/communism.
1393) Marxian Jews’ sexual revolution had had as its purpose two
outcomes: the destruction of the nuclear family and the
destruction of the white race. They had sought to destroy the
family because it is inimical to the idea COMMUNISM. They had
sought to destroy the white race and the idea "race" - because
it is inimical to building a perfectly egalitarian UNIVERSALIST
COMMUNISM (Note: If races exist, and if there are heritable
differences between them, then UTOPIA is impossible to achieve).
Multiracialism (a k a multiculturalism) is sign of civilization
in decline, as history starkly teaches.
1414) A message from Marxian Jews to WHITE MALES: "We’re
overrunning your race and civilization with people of color from
diverse cultures, and you’ll shut up about it because our
hate-speech laws will make it so!
1426) America has not been a democracy from the time Abraham
Lincoln savaged the South. And it’s barely a republic today.
Actually, this is an OLIGARCHY, directed by powerful and corrupt
men in Congress and Big Business. Recall what Thomas
said about majority rule: "The first principle of republicanism
is, that the lex-majoris partis [the law of the majority]...
is the first of all lessons in importance, yet the last which is
thoroughly learnt. This law once disregarded, no other remains
but that of force, which ends necessarily in military
1427) If you do not know the history of Marxian Jews’
revolutionary bent, then you do not know why the West is in
steep moral/cultural decline.
 A HORSELESS RIDER, THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION &
IMPORTED BIGOTRY By Qais S. Saleh, CounterPunch November 13,
see more on
The poisonous Protocols by Umberto Eco
 CIDE HAMETE BENENGELI, in Cervantes’ spelling
Nom de plume of François Rabelais.
 Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Evrei v SSSR i v budushei Rossii,
2001 (in Russian)
 Pluto Press, 1999
 in an interview published in the New York World, February
The data provided by Kevin MacDonald of California