Former MI5 Agent Says
9/11 An Inside Job
Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle on
the British government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out
political assassinations, has gone on the record with his conviction
that 9/11 was an inside job meant to bring about a permanent state
of emergency in America and pave the way for the invasions of
Afghanistan, Iraq and ultimately Iran and Syria.
David Shayler joined MI5 in October 1991 and worked there for five
years. He started at F Branch (counter-subversion) in January 1992,
and worked in T Branch (Irish terrorism) from August 1992 until
October 1994. He left the organization in 1996.
Shayler appeared on the Alex Jones show to kick off what will be a
wider public campaign to educate the public on 9/11 issues and
Shayler again risked jail by speaking out. The British government
has a legal gag preventing him from speaking about his work during
his MI5 tenure. Since what Shayler discussed was already on the
public record (a consequence of which was his imprisonment on two
separate occasions), he now feels safer in stepping back out into
Shayler delved into his past investigations and the evidence that
led some within MI5 to conclude that the Israelis bombed their own
London embassy in July 1994. Shayler said that the Israelis framed
two Palestinians who remain in jail to this day.
"The same thing has happened with two Palestinians who were
convicted of conspiracy to cause the attack on the Israeli Embassy
in Britain in 1994 but MI5 didn't disclose two documents which
indicated their innocence. One document indicated another group had
carried out the attack and the other document was the belief of an
MI5 officer that the Israelis had actually bombed their own embassy
and allowed a controlled explosion to try and get better security
and these documents were never shown to the trial judge let alone
Shayler said that his suspicions were first aroused about 9/11 when
the usual route of crime scene investigation was impeded when the
debris was immediately seized and shipped off to China.
"It is in fact a criminal offence to interfere with a crime scene
and yet in the case of 9/11 all the metal from the buildings is
shipped out to China, there are no forensications done on that
metal. Now that to me suggests they never wanted anybody to look at
that metal because it was not going to provide the evidence they
wanted to show people that it was Al-Qaeda."
Shayler then went on to dismiss the incompetence theory.
"The more I look at it, you realize that it's not incompetence.
There were FBI officers all over the country, Colleen Rowley is
obviously the one who managed to get a congressional hearing, but
there was plenty of evidence certainly."
"There are so many questions that need to be answered, protocols
being overridden within national defense, people actively being
stopped from carrying out investigations. This wasn't an accident,
they were aware there was intelligence indicating those kind of
attacks, there were FBI intercepts saying it in the days before the
attacks. When you look at it all, that is a big big intelligence
picture and yet these people were crucially stopped from doing their
jobs, stopped from trying to protect the American people."
Shayler elaborated by saying the evidence suggests the attack was
originally meant to be much wider in scope and was an attempt at a
violent coup intended to decapitate the entire government as a
pretext for martial law.
"So you're looking at a situation in which you almost have a coup
d'état because you've got to bear in mind that there were weapons
discovered on planes that didn't take off on 9/11. Now people have
obviously postulated that they were going perhaps to attack the
White House, Capitol Hill. That looks to me like an attempt to
destroy the American government and declare a state of emergency, in
fact a coup d'état, a violent coup d'état."
"There are so very many questions about this and you realize again
that none of the enquiries ever get to the bottom of any of these
things, they don't take all the evidence, they don't often take any
evidence under oath when they should be taking it under oath."
Shayler was forthright in his assertion that the attack was planned
and executed within the jurisdiction of the military-industrial
"They let it happen, they made it happen to create a trigger to be
able to allow the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq and
of course what they're trying to do now is the same thing with the
invasion of Iran and Syria."
Shayler ended by questioning the highly suspicious nature of the
collapse of the twin towers and Building 7, the first buildings in
history, all in the same day, to collapse from so-called fire damage
"I've seen the results of terroristic explosions and so on and no
terrorist explosion has ever brought down a building. When the IRA
put something like a thousands tonnes of home-made explosives in
front of the Baltic Exchange building in Bishopsgate and let off the
bomb, all the glass came out, the building shook a bit but there was
no question about the building falling down and it doesn't obey the
laws of physics for buildings to fall down in the way the World
Trade Center came down. So you have the comparison of the two,
Building 7 compared with the north and south towers coming down and
those two things are exactly the same, they were demolished."
David Shayler joins a spate of recent credible whistleblowers who
share the same sentiments about the real story behind 9/11. Former
Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George
W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds publicly questioned the
unexplained collapse of WTC Building 7 earlier this month.
addition, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under
President Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, shared his concerns last week
when he said the Bush Administration were making the same mistakes
as the Nazis when they invaded Russia in the dead of winter. Roberts
seriously doubts the official explanation behind 9/11.