| 
			  
			  
			
			
  by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
 
			March 9, 2003 
			from
			
			Cassiopaea Website 
			recovered through
			
			WayBackMachine Website
 
				
					
						| 
						
						
						Signs of the Times Article   
						Even 
						though we were very careful to avoid publishing any real 
						names in our French Connection series which was a 
						daily blog about our experiences with certain agents of
						
						COINTELPRO, we came 
						under such serious attack, including physical acts 
						against us, that we decided to remove the series from 
						the web. In fact, we were told in no uncertain terms 
						that our lives would be a lot "healthier" if we did so, 
						and this came from individuals with the authority to 
						make it so.
 At the point that this occurred, we actually didn't have 
						all the details, we were just reporting observations. 
						Apparently, it was feared that we would put 2 and 2 
						together and figure out what was really going on and 
						worse, that we would make it public.
 
 Well, we didn't figure out what was going on until AFTER 
						we removed the series of articles and now, knowing what 
						we do, we do, indeed, understand why there was so much 
						effort to silence us. Evil people and evil deeds love 
						the darkness.
 
 And generally, psychopaths rise to positions of power.
 |  
			  
			 
			  
			
			Part 1 
			March 9, 2003:  
			  
			Those of you who have been reading the Signs of the 
			Times articles for the past year probably have a good idea as to WHY 
			we made the decision to leave the United States. The simplest way to 
			put it is this: The Cassiopaeans have indicated that the events of 
			Nazi Germany were a "dress rehearsal" for 
			
			the NWO, and have numerous 
			times pointed out that the United States is the "Capital of Service 
			to Self" in the world today.  
			  
			They have encouraged us to do the 
			research to determine just "who is on first" and what the "cyclic 
			events" may be, and all of this has led to the conclusion that the 
			United States is the reincarnation of Nazi Germany according to one 
			sub-cycle, and that it is also the reincarnation of the Evil Empire 
			of Atlantis in a larger cycle.  
				
				Q: (L) Okay, we have the 3600 
				year comet cluster cycle, the Sun twin is another cycle 
				altogether, and then we have 
				
				the wave, which is a Grand Cycle. 
				So, we have three things causing a transition in nature?A: Like "biorhythms."
 
				Q: (T) And we have a triple bad day coming up! Or a good 
				day, depending on which way you look at it.
 A: Bad day if you are John D. Rockefeller, good day if 
				you are Mahatma Ghandi.
 
			Until our household goods arrive (they 
			are on a ship crossing the ocean to arrive in Marseille shortly), I 
			don’t have access to my library for quoting passages from the books 
			that have provided the clues. But, suffice it to say that, in 
			Fulcanelli’s "Dwellings of the Philosophers," he gives a formula for 
			figuring out where the fire and deluge will occur - and it does not 
			look good for the Western Hemisphere. I have put together other 
			material in my article 
			
			The Beast, and this contributes to the 
			overall picture, and finally, as the C’s pointed out so succinctly:
			 
				
				Q: (AM) Is it vital to my 
				physical existence to move to another country in the near 
				future? A: It is not "vital" to be in the body at all. But for 
				those with missions in this realm, it is quite useful to 
				preserve the physical vehicle. Thus, if one accepts the mantle 
				of responsibility to humanity, it is not a selfish thing to seek 
				preservation until the mission is accomplished. In the present 
				situation, that will be enhanced outside of the USA.
 
			The next question is, of course, why 
			Gers? Why did we pick this particular spot? And why, after we had 
			followed the clues and selected it, did so many wonderful miracles 
			occur to bring us here? Those of you who have read my book 
			
			Ancient Science will recall the following passage: 
				
				Orion, Arthur, Arca, 
				Arcadia (Ark of 
				God), Ark are all clues to the mythology of Fall and Redemption: 
				The Once and Future King. He is the symbol of the Lost Eden and 
				the New Jerusalem, the antediluvian world and the passage to the 
				post-flood reality. His story has branches that reach out to 
				embrace all the ideas of cyclical changes and all attempts to 
				exert power over the environment as opposed to interacting with 
				Nature.   
				There are two books out of all this 
				morass, that are outstanding in terms of scholarship and 
				thinking "out of the box." The first one is From Scythia to 
				Camelot: A Radical Reassessment of the Legends of King Arthur, 
				etc., by C. Scott Littleton and Linda A. Malcor, and 
				The Keys to 
				Avalon: The True Location of Arthur’s Kingdom Revealed, by Steve 
				Blake and Scott Lloyd.
 Scott Littleton and Linda Malcor made the serendipitous 
				discovery of the parallels between the stories of King Arthur 
				and the Ossetian saga of Batraz which has enabled a major leap 
				in understanding the origins of the themes, and we hope to 
				develop it further here. According to Littleton and Malcor, they 
				were told by a fellow scholar, J. P. Mallory, that at the end of 
				the Marcomannian War in the year 175 AD, the Roman emperor 
				Marcus Aurelius sent a contingent of 5,500 Sarmatian cataphracti 
				from Pannonia to Britain. Their descendants survived as an 
				identifiable ethnic group into the fourth century and, possibly 
				longer. It was, as Littleton and Malcor put it, just an 
				"interesting bit of trivia" gleaned from Tadeusz Sulimirski’s 
				book The Sarmatians.
 
 Sarmatians are a sub-group of Scythians, and the term "Scythian" 
				can mean either the ancient Scythian tribes described by 
				Herodotus, but in the larger sense, it applies to all of the 
				Northeast Iranian steppe peoples. The Scythians of antiquity, 
				and their cousins, the Sarmatians and Alans, were nomads of the 
				Central Asian steppes. At the time of their greatest 
				manifestation on the stage of history, the tribes extended from 
				Hungary to China. These Scythians were big, blond and blue-eyed, 
				and based on the accounts that have come down to us, and 
				archaeological findings, their nomadic culture has sharp 
				parallels with the most ancient occupants of Europe.
 
 At the end of the classical period, these steppe dwellers had 
				been driven to the edges of their homeland by the Altaic 
				speakers, the Huns and Turks. Some migrated to Afghanistan, 
				eastern Iran, western India, and others invaded the roman empire 
				as either conquerors or supporting mercenaries. Many of them 
				migrated into Britain, Italy, France, Spain and North Africa. 
				Others retreated into Poland, European Russia and the Caucasus. 
				The assumption has been that the Scythians, the sub-tribes of Iazyge Sarmatians, Alans, etc, vanished without a trace. But 
				that is not, apparently, the case. It seems clear, upon 
				reviewing the evidence, that the steppe dwellers became the 
				aristocracy of Europe. According to Littleton and Malcor, 
				another group of the Alani retreated into the Caucasus and 
				survived as an ethnic group called the Ossetes, or Ossetians in 
				what is now known as the Republic of Georgia.
 
 The Holy Grail was the chief concern of the Alans who settled in 
				Gaul and Spain in the fifth century. They were tall blonde and 
				good looking, and lived a nomadic life in wagons. Their main 
				claim to fame was their skill as horsemen. The Scythians 
				(including the Alans) were referred to as Goths, and the one 
				thing they all had in common was their extraordinary art. They 
				assimilated into the territories they finally settled in, 
				intermarrying with the Romans and other indigenous people. The 
				name "Alan" and "Goar" are common among these groups, being 
				passed down from generation to generation.
 
 In addition to becoming the root stock of most of the nobility 
				of Europe, the Alans introduced the steppe pony and the Alan 
				hunting dog. They introduced chain mail and the customs that 
				were later to become Norman and Breton chivalry, and above all, 
				let it be repeated, their natural home was on the back of a 
				horse. Alienor of Aquitaine was undoubtedly a descendant of the Alani and the Nart sagas were a natural part of her heritage, 
				becoming the foundation for the Grail stories written and 
				promulgated through her "courts of love" after Geoffrey of 
				Monmouth created the "history of Arthur. [...]
 
 Littleton and Malcor discovered the link between the stories of 
				Arthur and the Sword in the Stone and the Sarmatian sagas of 
				Batraz and the Narts. But their research did not end there. They 
				point out that the earlier opinions of scholars that there may 
				have been ancient contact between the ancestors of the Ossetians 
				and the ancestors of the Celts does not answer all of the issues 
				of the Scythian origin of the Grail stories. For example, it 
				does not explain the Lancelot problem.
   
				Many Arthurian scholars accept 
				tacitly that Lancelot is derived from Lance a Lot, or
				Lanz a 
				Lot, and refers to the spear or lance of the Celtic god Lug. 
				Some of the present day "alternative scholars" have bizarre 
				etymologies, including references to Lazarus, the man raised 
				from the dead by Jesus (a function of the Cauldron of 
				regeneration if ever there was one!), most of which are more 
				silly than serious. As Littleton and Malcor demonstrate, 
				Lancelot comes from "Alanus-a-Lot," or "The Alan of Lot," a 
				reference to their lands in the Lot River Valley.
 The Alans were first cousins to the Iazyges who, along with the 
				Visigoths, Vandals, and other Germanic tribes, had settled in 
				small enclaves in Gaul and the Iberian Peninsula in the early 
				years of the fifth century. It seems that the Alans had brought 
				with them a variation on the Grail stories that had evolved 
				after the Iazyges had left the region. In short, Lancelot was 
				also derived from the same prototype as Arthur and Batraz. He 
				was the local variation of the original prototype, and when the 
				stories were combined, since it was not known to the scribes 
				that they were talking about the same individual who had been 
				given a different name relating to some favored hero or ancestor 
				of the particular tribe, they wrote the two individuals into the 
				same story, and rearranged the relationships to accommodate this 
				maneuver. Again and again we will see this treatment of ancient 
				legends in action.
 
 One of the items Littleton and Malcor discussed stuck in my mind 
				as significant: it was that one of Lancelot’s early magic items 
				was a mirror. This is a Sarmatian element in the story with Alanic correspondences. The Sarmatian practice of carrying 
				mirrors is discussed by many experts, and many Sarmatians, 
				especially the warrior women, were buried with mirrors. 
				Littleton and Malcor note that Sulimirski argues for the 
				Sarmatian rather than Visigothic ethnicity of an occupant of a 
				grave based on whether or not a mirror is found there.
   
				Sulimirski feels that many brooches 
				found from Troyes to Carthage, including the Saone Valley, the 
				Department of the Aube, and Albaci, Spain, that are currently 
				identified as Gothic may actually be Alanic. If that is the 
				case, then we cannot understand Gothic in any way at all without 
				understanding the Sarmatian-Scythian origins in the Northeast 
				Iranian traditions that constitute its foundation.
 One of the more fascinating discoveries of this intrepid team of 
				Grail questors was Linda Malcor’s elucidation of the fact that 
				one group of Alanic Sarmatians allied with Alaric’s Visigoths, 
				seems to have been responsible for a famous theft of some 
				vessels of great value from the Basilica of St. Peter’s during 
				the sack of Rome in 410 AD. Whether or not one of these vessels 
				was a sacred chalice associated with the Last Supper is not 
				definitively known, but the fact is that the pagan marauders 
				carried the treasure to southern Gaul, to the very region 
				traditionally associated with the Grail legends.
   
				The treasure disappeared shortly 
				thereafter, and it seems that the stories of these stolen "holy 
				vessels" were combined with the stories of the Holy Cup of the Narts, the 
				Nartamongae, which was hidden from all but the 
				bravest and purest warriors. And so, a cup stolen from a church 
				became the object of a sacred quest, obscuring the true history 
				and meaning of the stories.
 The genealogies given for the Grail knights, Perceval, Galahad, 
				and Bors, are extensive, and they are all related to Lancelot -
				Alanus-a-Lot - a specific tribe or family of Alans from the 
				region around the Lot river in France. In the Perlesvaus, 
				Perceval’s father is Alain le Gros de la Vales. Littleton and
				Malcor present a fascinating etymology of many of the names 
				involved in the stories, showing their connection to the Nart 
				Sagas, and the reader is encouraged to dig more deeply into 
				these matters there. For the moment, let us just mention that 
				the prenomen "Pant," as in "Pantdragon," evolving to "Pendragon," 
				in what now seems to be the most likely Scythian-Steppe culture 
				etymology, was a word meaning "king" or "ruler over" whatever 
				followed.
   
				Thus, the family of "Pendragon," 
				rather than being "sons of the dragon," become "rulers over the 
				dragon," or Dragon Slayers. The title, Ban, Pant, and Pen was 
				very likely an original Scythian word, carried to Britain by the Iazyges and to Gaul by the Alans. Thus, the banners of the 
				Sarmatians emblazoned with dragons signify their function as 
				rulers over, and slayers of dragons, in the same way that 
				warriors collect trophies of their victories to display and 
				advertise their prowess in a particular famous battle. [...]
 At this point, we have a very good idea where Chretien got the 
				inspiration for his story and the reader will soon see how 
				fruitful this discovery of Littleton and Malcor will turn out to 
				be. But what we notice is that the later writers of sequels and 
				prequels, and alternative versions all claimed to have access to 
				some original, secret documents, described variously as direct 
				transcriptions from Christ himself, from an angel, from a 
				mysterious alchemical work that came either from Britain, Spain 
				or the Far East. We then look back at Chretien’s story, and see 
				that his imagery has obvious and traceable elements with 
				precedents in Celtic-Scythian traditions and we realize that 
				what we are observing, post facto, is a huge cover-up going into 
				operation. The astonishing variations of the later Christian and 
				alchemical versions, written by individuals who were practiced 
				in the art of Jewish Kabbala, seem to exactly fit the criteria 
				for disinformation. [...]
 
 After considering all of these issues, we still come back again 
				to that most annoying of simple-minded questions: Why Perceval? 
				Why was the hero named Perceval in Chretien’s original story, 
				and was this based on some particular meaning known to those who 
				guided his hand in the construction of the tale? As Littleton 
				and Malcor point out, the notion that the figure of Perceval was 
				derived from an Iranian source was discussed amongst Arthurian 
				scholars in the early part of the 20th century. It was even 
				suggested that Wofram’s Parzival was a free translation from the 
				Persian stories. Unfortunately, most of this scholarship has 
				been ignored in favor of the Celtic hypothesis advanced by 
				Loomis. [...]
 
 As it happens, the very name "Perceval" does connect us to these 
				Eastern sources. The Iranian words gohr, gohar and 
				djauhar, 
				which form the root of the Alanic name Goar, translate into 
				German as Perle, with, as Littleton notes, the semantic field of 
				a jewel, gem, or stone. When we consider the etymology for Perlesvaux, we find that 
				vaux is well established as "valley," 
				and thus "Perles-vaux" is Perle’s valley, or "Gohar’s valley" or 
				"Valley of the Stone-gem."
   
				We find in this etymology the 
				subtext of the association of Perceval with a grail that is a 
				"stone" as opposed to a chalice or cauldron. The fifteenth 
				century German poem Lorengel describes the grail as a "stone of 
				victory" with which Parsifal drove back Attila and his troops a 
				the moment they were going to destroy Christianity. In this 
				clue, we find a curious shadow of the Ark of the Covenant which 
				ensured military might and victory for its possessors. The most 
				interesting fact of this matter is that it was the Alans of 
				Orleans who, in 451 AD, actually held the line against Attila. 
				These Alans were originally commanded by the fifth-century 
				leader Goar. [Laura Knight-Jadczyk, 2002] 
			 
			And in the name "Gers," we find the 
			shadow of Goar. What is even more interesting is that the house that 
			was so miraculously "found" for us by the Bogdanov Brothers - and 
			here I should note that in Slavic languages, "Danov" means "gift of" 
			or "gift to" - is not only in "Goar’s Valley," it is adjacent to the 
			famous Pilgrimage route of St. James of Compostella.  
				
				The Camino de Santiago de Compostella is, since the middle ages, one of the most famous 
				mystical-religious pilgrimages in Europe, performed to worship 
				the tomb of the apostle James, the Major. The Camino de Santiago 
				refers to several routes that start from France, Spain and 
				Portugal linking cities and countries towards Santiago de Compostella in Galicia, not unlike the pilgrimage of Candelaria. 
				Galicia has the same root as Gaul.
 The better known and more frequented Camino de Santiago, begins 
				in southwestern France on the slopes of the Pyrenees overlooking 
				the Gulf of Biscay, in the small town of St.Jean pied de port. 
				It crosses all the northern provinces of Spain until it reaches 
				Santiago, for a total of 400 km, to cover on foot the tradition 
				of carrying only a staff, a gourd, as a container for water and 
				a knapsack. (The Fool).
 
 The word Compostella, is akin to ’campus stellae’ (field of the 
				star), with reference to the manifestation of light where the 
				alleged tomb of the Saint was found. The whole Camino de 
				Santiago, is spread with villages, and mountain passes that are 
				named after stars or trail of light, as if the road were a 
				stellar route, a route that leads to a special point: the field 
				of the star, as mentioned by Fulcanelli,
 
					
					"The Route of Saint 
				James is also called the Milky Way. Greek mythology tells us 
				that the gods followed this route to go to the palace of Zeus 
				and the heroes as well followed it to enter Olympus. The Route 
				of Saint James is the stellar route, accessible to the chosen 
				ones, to the courageous, persevering and wise mortals."
					 
				We also have the term, "compost" or the appearance of a white 
				star on the surface of the compost - the first part of the Great 
				Work (alabastrum or white star, the vase of alabaster filled 
				with perfume). 
 The Milky Way describes a stellar route that leads to the 
				constellation of the Greater Dog and thus to the star Sirius 
				though we think this is a blind. As it happens, the most 
				northern constellation, right in the middle of the Milky Way, is 
				Cassiopeia - known to the ancients as Tuatha De Danaan - the 
				court of Don. Fulcanelli writes:
 
					
					"The ’road’ is the earthly 
				reflection of the sacred stellar way that leads to the dwelling 
				of the gods. 
 "It leads the pilgrims to the sacred field of the star that 
				represents the victorious sign of light, the return that has 
				taken place to the divine origin represented by the star Sirius, 
				that keeps secrets of our forgotten Origin".
   
					This element is 
				reproduced in the sacred iconography of Saint James who is 
				preceded by a dog while he reaches the sacred hillock of the 
				Star." 
				The Celtic and Basque populations that lived in Galicia believed 
				that the Milky Way was the Arch of Iris of the God Lug. 
				Lug is a 
				dark god, black like the coat of a wolf in the night or like the 
				feathers of a raven, a bird that brings messages. When Lug is on 
				earth and follows the Camino de Compostela he is a wolf or a 
				dog; when it flies along the Route of the Sky, Lug is a
				raven. 
				In Europe there are at least two other great routes of ancient 
				origin, one in France and another in England, both oriented from 
				east to west, (the Camino de Compostela has an orientation 
				east-west on the 42nd parallel). Both are marked by an enormous 
				number of dolmen like structures where there are very frequent 
				references to dogs or wolves, felt to be places of energy and 
				power, where sacred temples were built. 
 Accurate studies demonstrate that the cromlechs of this road 
				represent stars reflected on the earth from the vault of the 
				sky; if they are grouped they reveal the precise configuration 
				of present constellations.
 
 On the cromlechs,
 
					
					"names of the sites in the Basque language is 
				underlined. They often help establish the astronomical 
				significance for more than a group of stone circles or to find 
				again the vernacular name of more than one constellation and to 
				prove the sacred nature of these groups at the time in 
				question." 
 "It has been considered that the groups of stone circles follow 
				a series of topographical alignments linked to those of the 
				mountains that are found in the same area. This contention does 
				not reveal anything new as Alfred Watkins, in 1925 had already 
				mentioned the existence of alignments between prehistorical 
					monuments which he called ’ley lines’ "
 
				The multidisciplinary studies of de Zabalegi indicate that it 
				is possible to date without any doubts the stone circles in the 
				Pyrenees to the first millennium before Christ. During a 
				conference held in 1999 at the University of Salamanca, he 
				presented the hypothesis that the original pilgrimage towards 
				the west that, in later centuries, became the pilgrimage to 
				Santiago, had its true origins and its mysterious cult in the 
				stone circles of the Pyrenees.
 When in the 9th century AD the pilgrimages to Santiago began, 
				this route already existed and all the cities and the villages 
				along its path already bore the names of stars, of wolf, of 
				goose or raven. It is evident that the Pilgrimage coincides to 
				the southern gate or the gate of the gods. These beliefs proved 
				to be impossible to obliterate, so they were systematically 
				Christianized by the religious orders of Cluny and Knights 
				Templar, and then deformed.
 
			All of this, of course, brings to mind 
			several related remarks made by the Cassiopaeans in a number of 
			sessions: 
				
				Q: Back in 1995 when we did a 
				session with Roxanne present, I was re-reading this yesterday 
				because Ark is in Dijon where this guy Moshe is, and the night 
				of that session was when I had the vision of his face, and also 
				when I mentioned the dream where I was getting married and this 
				was so bizarre an idea to me at that time. Roxanne was focused 
				on her agenda about female gods and the Elohim, and it seems 
				that she simply shut off any ability for you to communicate to 
				her at all. So, in re-reading this session, it seems that you 
				were talking on a completely different level, to me alone, and 
				that it was almost in code. She wanted to talk about the French 
				Revolution, and you were talking about my past life in 
				Germany... and now Ark is in France... and there was the 
				vision... and that was when you brought up Moshe... and Moshe is 
				in France... is there a connection? A: Maybe.
 
				Q: Am I correct that you were talking to me on a level that I 
				was not even aware of at the time?
 A: Could be!
 
				Q: Can you help me out here? I would like to know about this 
				Moshe thing. You not only brought up the name, but you brought 
				up a lot of other things. And it seems that this was the opening 
				of a door of moving me in a certain direction. I don’t even know 
				how to ask about this because it is so strange...
 A: Then it should be shelved.
 
				Q: Is this one of those things you are going to avoid?
 A: Alfalfa fields in Rhineland yield as of yet undreamed of 
				treasures.
 
				Q: Where are these alfalfa fields?
 A: Near tracks well worn.
 
				Q: Another clue, please?
 A: Nope, that is enough for now!!
 
				Q: You guys are gonna drive me crazy! Do you mean Rhineland as 
				in Germany proper?
 A: We do not mean Rhinelander, Wisconsin... Or do we?!? Who is 
				to tell?
 
				Q: Who?
 A: The searcher, the sepulcher, the one who carries the staff in 
				constant search for greener pastures. [...] Last clue for 
				tonight: Look for the vibratory frequency light. Good Night.
 
 Q: You previously talked about ’undreamed of treasure in alfalfa 
				fields of Rhineland.’ Is this a physical, spiritual or knowledge 
				based treasure?
 A: It is all three.
 
				Q: Who put this treasure in the alfalfa fields of Rhineland?
 A: Discover.
 
 Q: For openers, I noticed on our astronomy program that the 
				spelling of Cassiopaea differs when referring to the remains of 
				the supernovae as opposed to the constellation; and, in fact, 
				the spelling of the deep sky object is very much like the 
				spelling you use. I wonder if there is a relation to the fact 
				that you spell it as the deep sky object is spelled?
 A: Not really.
 
				Q: Well, while we are on the subject of spelling, you DO use 
				unusual spelling from time to time, though normally you are very 
				good spellers. What rules direct your spelling since it is not 
				always according to modern usage?
 A: No rules, just clues, as always.
 
				Q: Does this refer also to the way you spell ’germain’? When you 
				say ’it is not germain,’ you spell it differently from the way 
				someone would spell it if just saying that something is not 
				relevant.
 A: Tis French, as in clue to be.
 
 Q: [...] Now, when the Templars were arrested, they were accused 
				of worshipping a head, or skull, and also the god Baphomet. Were 
				these spurious accusations designed to defame them?
 A: Skull was of pure crystal.
 
				Q: What is the definition of the god ’Baphomet,’ if they did, 
				indeed, worship such?
 A: The holder of the Trent.
 
				Q: What is THAT?
 A: Seek.
 
				Q: What is the meaning of ’The Widow’s Son?’ The implication?
 A: Stalks path of wisdom incarnate.
 
				Q: Why is this described as a Widow’s son? This was the 
				appellation of Perceval...
 A: Perceval was knighted in the court of seven.
 
				Q: The court of seven what?
 A: Swords points signify crystal transmitter of truth beholden.
 
				Q: What is the relationship between Perceval, Paran Sikarios, 
				the Assassini, and Ishmael, the son of Hagar, at the well of the 
				mirror?
 A: Spear of Destiny.
 
				Q: Are the Ishmaelis the carriers of the true bloodline, and the 
				line of Isaac and Jacob, the Supplanter, the carriers of the 
				monotheistic covenant, are the false line?
 A: Close.
 
				Q: Are the Ishmaelis also the carriers of the knowledge of 
				levitation, the cult of the head or the skull...
 A: Try to connect to the Templars.
 
				Q: Did the Templars discover the secrets of the Ishmaelis, the 
				Assassini, and is this what they carried into Europe, and then 
				underground?
 A: Buried in Galle. [...] Look for clues, and do not have 
				expectations!
 
 Q: (L) You once said that Perceval was ’knighted in the Court of 
				Seven’ and that the sword’s points signify ’crystal transmitter 
				of truth beholden.’ Do these seven sages relate to this ’Court 
				of Seven’ that you mentioned?
 A: Close.
 
				Q: (L) When you said ’swords points signify crystal transmitter 
				of truth beholden,’ could you elaborate on that remark?
 
 Q: (L) What is the difference between Galle and Gaul?
 A: Clue.
 
				Q: (L) Do they both refer to France?
 A: No.
 
				Q: (L) Does Galle refer to Rhineland?
 A: Close.
 
				Q: (L) I discovered today that one of the Maltese islands, the 
				one that is now called Gozo, was once called "Gaul." Is that 
				getting closer?
 
			  
			
			
			Part 2 
			
			March 14, 2003
 Before I give my impressions of France, I think it is important to 
			understand my perspective on the United States. After all, readers 
			who have perused my genealogy pages will be fully aware of the 
			history of the various branches of my family in the U.S., and that 
			if anybody is a "full-blooded American," that person is me. Among 
			the earliest of my ancestors in America was Barent Jacobzen Kool, a 
			Dutchman who lived in New Amsterdam - now New York - and died there 
			in 1684, almost a hundred years before the American Revolution.
 
 On the other side of the family, my ancestor, Richard Pearce, 
			emigrated to America on on 5 Mar 1630, and died in Portsmouth, Rhode 
			Island in 1677 - again, almost a hundred years before the American 
			Revolution. My Knight ancestors were in America at about the same 
			time and the story is that they arrived with William Penn.
 
 On my mother’s side, the first records of the Meadows family are in 
			the headright grants by the Governor of the Jamestown Colony. John "Meades" 
			died in Virginia in 1658. Again on my mother’s side of the family, 
			the progenitors of the Mizell family in the United States were three 
			French Huguenot brothers who came to this country prior to the 
			Revolutionary War, landing at Charleston, and settling first on the 
			eastern shore of North Carolina. The name was then spelled Mazel and 
			it is believed that they were related to the famous French Camisard, 
			Abraham Mazel. On March 2, 1773, William Mizell - a descendant of 
			one of these brothers - received a land grant in Screven County, GA, 
			from King George III.
 
 I mention all of these things for the simple reason that I want to 
			make it clear that my loyalties as an American are deep - hundreds 
			of years old. My family history stretches from "sea to shining sea," 
			across the "amber waves of grain," and beyond the "purple mountain 
			majesties." My ancestors came from probably every country in "Old 
			Europe," and a truer "melting pot" American than I am simply doesn’t 
			exist. The blood that runs in my veins was liberally given for the 
			ideals that America stood for and no one has grieved more than I 
			have over the death of the illusion that those ideals might still be 
			truth for all Americans.
 
 Yet, here I am: I have left the land of my birth to return to "Old 
			Europe," the land of my ancestors.
 
 When I first conceived this series of pages, I thought about titling 
			it "Letters From Exile." There was only one problem with this idea: 
			leaving America and moving to France did not feel like "going into 
			exile"; it felt like "coming home."
 
 And so we come to the point where impressions of France juxtaposed 
			against impressions of America will serve to highlight this 
			phenomenon.
 
 Those of you who are regular readers of the site, especially the 
			Signs of the Times, will have a good idea of my impressions of the 
			United States over the past year and a half. Those of you who have 
			read the Quantum Future School research on Secret Government 
			activities will also have a deeper understanding of our decision to 
			relocate outside of the U.S. The question is, of course, is there 
			any place in the world that is not subjected to that sort of 
			activity: mass mind control?
 
 On September 25, 1999, the Cassiopaeans made the following comment:
 
				
				A: There is much going on, yes. But it is cyclical. And will not 
			spell it out for you. The past, if carefully and accurately charted, 
			holds all the answers for you. How do you think the prophets do it?
				 
			At a later point in time, the following exchange occurred: 
				
				Q: ...I don’t even know if the path 
				I am following in researching the history and the other things 
				is even worthwhile or useful. A: Oh, you bet it is!!!!!
 
			The Cassiopaeans have also commented on 
			history in the following way: 
				
				A: Many stories stemming from your 
				history or antiquity are confused or corrupted. [...] History is 
				a bit muddied by design.  
			In Fulcanelli’s 
			
			Le Mystère des 
			Cathédrales, a most mysterious chapter was inserted in the second 
			edition which discusses an architectural monument found at Hendaye, 
			"a small frontier town in the Basque country." Fulcanelli tells us:
			 
				
				…[I]t is the strangest monument of 
				primitive millenarism, the rarest symbolical translation of 
				chiliasm, which I have ever met. It is known that this doctrine, 
				first accepted and then refuted by Origen, St. Denis of 
				Alexandria and St. Jerome although it had not been condemned by 
				the Church, was part of the esoteric tradition of the ancient 
				hermetic philosophy. […] We must recognize that the unknown 
				workman, who made these images, possessed real and profound 
				knowledge of the universe.  
			Here we have found that the core of 
			hermeticism, alchemy, is the doctrine of "primitive chiliasm." Note 
			the term "primitive." In my book, Ascension: The True Quest for the 
			Holy Grail, I have examined "primitive chiliasm" in some detail and 
			concluded:
 So what we see is that "primitive chiliasm," most likely related to 
			Catharism, was probably closer to the real teachings of Great 
			Teacher - around whom the Jesus Myth was shaped by the church - and 
			that somehow this Chiliasm and Catharism is closely connected to the 
			Grail stories - stories that emphasize "romance" and battles with 
			dark forces, great struggles of a physical and emotional nature.
 
			  
			What we also can hypothesize, based on 
			the evidence, is that these teachings included the idea of 
			hyperdimensional realities and literal Time Loops culminating in 
			cataclysm, with a restoration of a Para-physical earth - the Edenic 
			State of the Golden Age - on the other side of the dissolution. 
			This, of course, leads us to the Mother of all Grail Stories: Noah 
			and the Ark.
 The story of Noah and the Ark is the primordial story of salvation; 
			the original Quest for the Holy Grail; - the building of the Ark; 
			and - the Great Work of Alchemy. The Flood has other connotations 
			such as the occlusion of the Sun being the "Dying God," sacrificed 
			for the sins of mankind. In this sense, the Ark is the symbol of the 
			Cosmic Hieros Gamos, or the mode of passage to the realm of the 
			"Once and Future King," Arthur/Arca and the Shepherds of Arcadia.
 
 In our present time, the Christian religion, (and its New Age 
			offshoots), is the chief proponent of the many End of the World 
			scenarios with which we are most familiar. However, they do not seem 
			to note that the most important point is that Jesus connected the so 
			called End of the World with the story of Noah, thereby affirming 
			the "Primitive Chiliasm" view. In Matthew, chapter 24, verses 37 and 
			38:
 
				
				As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of man. 
			For just as in those days before the flood they were eating and 
			drinking, marrying and being given in marriage, until the day when 
			Noah went into the ark, and they did not know or understand until 
			the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the 
			Son of man. 
			In the story of Noah, to which Jesus has directly related the "End 
			of Time," a man had a dream, a prophecy (who knows how God spoke to 
			him), and he acted upon this revelation in a positive way to the 
			saving of himself and his family.
 The most important part of the story of Noah is that it was NOT the 
			end of the world in the sense that the physical earth ceases to 
			exist. Nor did Noah transit through the Flood to become a "light 
			being." He built the Ark and survived the Flood and emerged into a 
			different world. It was the End of Time, in the sense that the world 
			before was altogether different from the world after the Flood. The 
			Earth continued to exist, and Noah and his metaphorical family , 
			(there were apparently quite a number of Noah’s all over the globe) 
			, came out of the ark into a world so different that the existence 
			of a rainbow is noted here for the first time as evidence of this 
			extreme, fundamental change of reality.
 
 Over and over again, for a thousand years or more, this group of 
			people, or that one, have decided that the end is coming. They will 
			sell all they own, move out to the woods or gather on a mountain, or 
			huddle in jungle huts, waiting for God - or nowadays, the ETs - 
			and when the sun finally rises on the glorious morn of redemption, 
			well, some are so disappointed, or so determined to be right, that 
			they will sink to any level to prove that their interpretation was 
			the correct one. The People’s Temple, the Solar Cult, and
			
			the 
			Heaven’s Gate group are just three cases of recent note. Such 
			prognosticators obviously went wrong - terribly and disastrously 
			wrong. And they were only the latest in a long line of similar 
			groups. It is a pattern that repeats over and over again. So, again 
			we ask, is there anything to any of it at all, and if so, what?
 
 Carefully considered, the story of Noah is highly informative. The 
			story does not tell us that some supernatural force prepared a place 
			for Noah. On the contrary, Noah was told to perform certain tasks to 
			ensure his survival as well as that of his family and certain 
			animals. Had Noah chosen not to exert these tremendous efforts, we 
			would never have heard of him, whoever he might have been, in 
			whatever culture or context he existed.
 
 Do we have any way of knowing that we are presently in the so-called 
			"End Times?" Of course, there is no way to say so with absolute 
			certainty. However, we do have what I call the "Noah Syndrome" to 
			guide us.
 
 A "syndrome" is a constellation of signs and symptoms that, taken 
			together, characterize or indicate a particular disease or abnormal 
			condition. "As it was in the days of Noah" can be interpreted on 
			several levels. What, precisely, might have been meant by this clue? 
			In Genesis, Chapter six, we read about the first "symptom".
 
 When men began to multiply on the face of the earth, the sons of God 
			saw that the daughters of men were fair, and they took wives of all 
			they desired and chose.
 
 That is certainly a loaded statement! There have been endless 
			speculations on the identity of these "sons of God," or "Nephilim." 
			But before we even approach that, let’s look at the first curious 
			part of the statement is that referring to men "multiplying on the 
			face of the earth," as though it was a singularly significant 
			factor. "As it was in the days of Noah" seems to suggest a 
			tremendous population growth.
 
			  
			Could it be at all possible that a 
			certain population figure - as suggested by this remark - was a 
			sort of "critical mass" that precipitated the interaction with these 
			"sons of God?" The Cassiopaeans have told us that, at the time of 
			the prior high civilization, the population of the world was right 
			around the same figure we have on the planet at present: six 
			billion. The series of remarks get even more impossible, I am sorry 
			to say, because it goes on to declare: 
				
				There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, 
			when the sons of God lived with the daughters of men, and they bore 
			children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, men of 
			renown. 
			What in the world are we going to do with something like that if we 
			claim to be rational and serious thinkers? Nevertheless, it seems to 
			be the crux of the matter. In the many myths and legends, it was the 
			offspring of these unions mentioned above that brought destruction 
			on the Earth. As we have already noted, a the present time, there 
			seems to be a veritable invasion of "otherworldly" visitors 
			masquerading as "aliens." This was recorded in the ancient legends 
			as invasion by "the souls of the dead." There is a curious "sexual 
			interest" in humanity expressed by these visitors concomitant with 
			sexual excess of mankind at large. Could the two be related? And 
			this leads us to the next symptom: 
				
				The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was very great in the earth, 
			and that every imagination and intention of all human thinking was 
			only evil continually. 
			The passage comes back to this further on saying:  
				
				The earth was depraved and putrid in 
				God’s sight, and the land was filled with violence (desecration, 
				infringement, outrage, assault, and lust for power). And God 
				looked upon the world and saw how degenerate, debased and 
				vicious it was; for all humanity had corrupted their way upon 
				the earth and lost their true direction. 
			Those are harsh words. Do they apply to 
			us in this day and time? Fulcanelli writes: 
				
				Already, because of the multiplicity 
				of scientific acquisitions, man cannot live without tremendous 
				energy and endurance, in an atmosphere of hectic, feverish and 
				unhealthy activity. He created the machine that increased his 
				means and his power of action a hundred fold, but he has become 
				its slave and its victim. […]  
				  
				[O]n the other hand, what does he 
				know of himself, that is, of his origin, his essence, and his 
				destiny? […]  
				  
				Carried away by his passions, his desires, and his 
				phobias, the horizon of his hopes recedes indefinitely. It is 
				the frantic race towards the abyss. […]  
			Finally, we will reveal nothing by 
			saying that the greatest part of discoveries, first oriented towards 
			the increase of human well-being, were rapidly diverted from their 
			goal and specifically applied to destruction. Instruments of peace 
			are turned into machines of war and we already know too well the 
			dominating role science played in modern cataclysms. Such is, 
			unfortunately, the final goal, the outcome of scientific 
			investigation; and such is also the reason why many who pursued it 
			with criminal intent, called divine justice upon him and finds 
			himself bound to be condemned by it.
 But, there is hope: Noah found favor in God’s eyes. He was, 
			undoubtedly, the one who was thought to be "sick" by all of the 
			other people around him. He didn’t fit, he was an anomaly - a man of 
			faith and discernment and circumspection in a time and place where 
			everything that mankind had ever thought was good had been 
			corrupted, perverted, turned upside down and twisted out of 
			recognition. But Noah "found grace in the eyes of the Lord." We are 
			told in the Pauline Letter to the Hebrews that:
 
				
				Prompted by faith Noah, being forewarned of 
				God concerning events of 
			which as yet there was no visible sign, took heed and diligently and 
			reverently constructed and prepared an ark for the deliverance of 
			his own family. By this he passed judgment and sentence on the 
			world’s unbelief and became an heir and possessor of righteousness. 
			That’s a big one: being forewarned concerning events of which as yet 
			there was no visible sign. And the Cassiopaeans have said:  
				
				The past, 
			if carefully and accurately charted, holds all the answers for you. 
			How do you think the prophets do it?  
			Looking at our idea of a Syndrome from another direction, acting in 
			response to a consciousness of impending disaster might be seen as a 
			form of mental aberration, a syndrome not common to all of humanity, 
			but defining in very specific terms the "Noë of the Elect," and "the 
			Chosen"-, those moved to see the End as a beginning of a new order. 
			And, as in the time of Noah, those not afflicted with this 
			particular cast of consciousness will react to it with derision and 
			ridicule. 
 So we find that the Noah Syndrome describes both a condition of the 
			planet in terms of its sickness-unto-death, as well as the condition 
			of certain individuals who are sickened by the sickness. And just as 
			an animal will sniff out the proper herb for its cure, such people 
			begin to feel a restlessness, a questing spirit, a drive to seek out 
			and discover the thing that will bring relief to this nagging ache 
			in their soul. Such a quest can only be undertaken with faith that 
			is open and adventurous; following the nose, so to say, and finally, 
			ingesting that which is of true benefit when it is finally 
			discovered. Looking at our constellation of symptoms, it does seem 
			to be that we are in a time period "as it was in the days of Noah."
 
 The comparison between the Noachian Flood and the Destruction of the 
			fabled Atlantis is obvious. Fulcanelli writes:
 
				
				Atlantis. Did this mysterious island, of which Plato left the 
			enigmatic description, ever exist? A question difficult to solve, 
			give the weakness of the means which science possesses to penetrate 
			the secret of the abysses. Nevertheless, some observations seem to 
			support the partisans of the existence of Atlantis. […] 
			Faith in the truthfulness of Plato’s works results in believing the 
			reality of the periodical upheavals of which the Mosaic Flood, we 
			said it, remains the written symbol and the sacred prototype. To 
			those who negate what the priests of Egypt entrusted to Solon, we 
			would only ask to explain to us what Aristotle’s master wanted to 
			reveal by this fiction of a sinister nature. For we indeed believe 
			that beyond doubt, Plato became the propagator of very ancient 
			truths, and that consequently his books contain a set, a body of 
			hidden knowledge. His Geometric Number, and Cave have their 
			signification; why should the myth of Atlantis not have its own?
 Atlantis must have undergone the same fate as the others, and the 
			catastrophe which submerged it falls obviously into the same cause 
			as that which buried, forty-eight centuries later, under a profound 
			sheet of water, Egypt, the Sahara, and the countries of Northern 
			Africa. But more favored than the land of the Atlantean, Egypt 
			gained from a raising of the bottom of the ocean and came back to 
			the light of day, after a certain time of immersion. For Algeria and 
			Tunisia with their dry "chotts" covered with a thick layer of salt, 
			the Sahara and Egypt with their soils constituted for a large part 
			of sea sand show that the waters invaded and covered vast expanses 
			of the African continent.
 
			  
			The columns of the Pharaohs’ temples 
			bear on them undeniable traces of immersion; in the hypostyle 
			chambers, the slabs, still extant, which form the ceilings have been 
			raised and moved by the oscillating motion of the waves; the 
			disappearance of the outer coating of the pyramids and in general 
			that of the stone joins (the Colosses of Memnon who used to sing) 
			the evident traces of corrosion by water that can be noticed on the 
			sphinx of Giza, as well as on many other works of Egyptian statuary 
			have no other origin.
 One of the oft reiterated themes of Fulcanelli is that the "ancient 
			Greeks"  - not the Egyptians - were the source of the Hermetic 
			science. Fulcanelli has directed us to have "faith in the 
			truthfulness of Plato’s works" results in believing the reality of 
			regarding the periodical upheavals of which the Mosaic Flood remains 
			the written symbol and the sacred prototype."
 
 Timaeus and Critias, written by Plato some time around 360 BC are 
			the only existing written records which specifically refer to 
			Atlantis. The dialogues are conversations between Socrates, Hermocrates, Timaeus, and Critias. Apparently in response to a prior 
			talk by Socrates about ideal societies, Timaeus and Critias agree to 
			entertain Socrates with a tale that is "not a fiction but a true 
			story."
 
 The story is about the conflict between the ancient Athenians and 
			the Atlanteans 9000 years before Plato’s time. Knowledge of the 
			ancient times was apparently forgotten by the Athenians of Plato’s 
			day, and the form the story of Atlantis took in Plato’s account was 
			that it was conveyed to Solon by Egyptian priests. Solon passed the 
			tale to Dropides, the great-grandfather of Critias. Critias learned 
			of it from his grandfather also named Critias, son of Dropides. 
			Let’s take a careful look at the main section of the story, omitting 
			the introduction that describes Solon going to Egypt and chatting up 
			the priests.
 
 Thereupon one of the priests, who was of a very great age, said: O 
			Solon, Solon, you Hellenes are never anything but children, and 
			there is not an old man among you. Solon in return asked him what he 
			meant. I mean to say, he replied, that in mind you are all young; 
			there is no old opinion handed down among you by ancient tradition, 
			nor any science which is hoary with age. And I will tell you why.
 
 There have been, and will be again, many destructions of mankind 
			arising out of many causes; the greatest have been brought about by 
			the agencies of fire and water, and other lesser ones by innumerable 
			other causes. There is a story, which even you have preserved, that 
			once upon a time Phaeton, the son of Helios, having yoked the steeds 
			in his father’s chariot, because he was not able to drive them in 
			the path of his father, burnt up all that was upon the earth, and 
			was himself destroyed by a thunderbolt.
 
			  
			Now this has the form of a myth, but 
			really signifies a declination of the bodies moving in the heavens 
			around the earth, and a great conflagration of things upon the 
			earth, which recurs after long intervals; at such times those who 
			live upon the mountains and in dry and lofty places are more liable 
			to destruction than those who dwell by rivers or on the seashore. 
			And from this calamity the Nile, who is our never-failing saviour, 
			delivers and preserves us.
 When, on the other hand, the gods purge the earth with a deluge of 
			water, the survivors in your country are herdsmen and shepherds who 
			dwell on the mountains, but those who, like you, live in cities are 
			carried by the rivers into the sea. Whereas in this land, neither 
			then nor at any other time, does the water come down from above on 
			the fields, having always a tendency to come up from below; for 
			which reason the traditions preserved here are the most ancient.
 
			  
			The fact is, that wherever the extremity 
			of winter frost or of summer does not prevent, mankind exist, 
			sometimes in greater, sometimes in lesser numbers. And whatever 
			happened either in your country or in ours, or in any other region 
			of which we are informed-if there were any actions noble or great or 
			in any other way remarkable, they have all been written down by us 
			of old, and are preserved in our temples.
 We want to here make note of the fact that present day evidence 
			suggests that it is not true that Egypt has never been inundated, 
			nor that it has never experienced a rainy climate. This leads us to 
			question whether or not this story actually came from the mouth of a 
			true Egyptian priest with the full knowledge of the ancient 
			cataclysms. If so, he would have known of the period of heavy rain 
			and shallow seas in Egypt, by which the Sphinx and other monuments 
			were eroded, and which deposited a layer of salt on the interior of 
			the pyramids and other monuments.
 
			  
			And so we suggest, to reconcile this 
			difficulty, not that the story is false - because Fulcanelli has 
			told us to "have faith in the account of Plato" - but rather that 
			the speaker was not aware of certain ideas specifically relating to 
			Egypt, and that the dialogue has been put into the mouth of an 
			Egyptian priest in order to preserve it in the context of the then 
			current "Egyptian craze." It might even be thought that this was a 
			deliberate exoteric "blind."
 Whereas just when you and other nations are beginning to be provided 
			with letters and the other requisites of civilized life, after the 
			usual interval, the stream from heaven, like a pestilence, comes 
			pouring down, and leaves only those of you who are destitute of 
			letters and education; and so you have to begin all over again like 
			children, and know nothing of what happened in ancient times, either 
			among us or among yourselves. As for those genealogies of yours 
			which you just now recounted to us, Solon, they are no better than 
			the tales of children.
 
 In the first place you remember a single deluge only, but there were 
			many previous ones; in the next place, you do not know that there 
			formerly dwelt in your land the fairest and noblest race of men 
			which ever lived, and that you and your whole city are descended 
			from a small seed or remnant of them which survived. And this was 
			unknown to you, because, for many generations, the survivors of that 
			destruction died, leaving no written word. For there was a time, 
			Solon, before the great deluge of all, when the city which now is 
			Athens was first in war and in every way the best governed of all 
			cities, is said to have performed the noblest deeds and to have had 
			the fairest constitution of any of which tradition tells, under the 
			face of heaven.
 
 Again, let’s interrupt the dialogue to point out that it is hardly 
			likely that a priest of Egypt would have declared the Athenians to 
			be "the fairest and noblest race of men," nor that they "performed 
			the noblest deeds" and had the "fairest constitution … under the 
			face of heaven!" Another clue that the speaker is giving us that it 
			is NOT Egypt that is the source of this information.
 
 Solon marveled at his words, and earnestly requested the priests to 
			inform him exactly and in order about these former citizens. You are 
			welcome to hear about them, Solon, said the priest, both for your 
			own sake and for that of your city, and above all, for the sake of 
			the goddess who is the common patron and parent and educator of both 
			our cities. She founded your city a thousand years before ours, 
			receiving from the Earth and Hephaestus the seed of your race, and 
			afterwards she founded ours, of which the constitution is recorded 
			in our sacred registers to be eight thousand years old.
 
 Yet again, the Egyptian priest is giving greater antiquity to the 
			Greeks than to the Egyptians! Another clue for the reader to 
			understand that this is NOT an Egyptian story! But, that doesn’t 
			mean that much of what is being said is not fairly accurate, even if 
			it is being put in the mouth of an Egyptian priest to "conceal." 
			Indeed, the worship of Isis, the goddess, is evidently the older 
			form of worship in Egypt. But all of that came to an end, probably 
			with the conquest of Narmer, the building of the temple to 
			Hephaestus, the demoting of the goddess and the Moon calendar, and 
			the instituting of the Solar worship and the solar calendar of 365 
			days..[1]
 
				
				As touching your citizens of nine thousand years ago, I will briefly 
			inform you of their laws and of their most famous action; the exact 
			particulars of the whole we will hereafter go through at our leisure 
			in the sacred registers themselves. If you compare these very laws 
			with ours you will find that many of ours are the counterpart of 
			yours as they were in the olden time. 
			Here, of course, we come to the idea that there was an ancient 
			connection and communication between the truly "old Egyptians" and 
			the Northern peoples. Georges Gurdjieff once remarked that 
			Christianity was taken from Egypt, a statement which might suggest 
			that he agreed with the Pan-Egyptian school. But no: Christianity, 
			he hastened to explain, was not taken from the Egypt of history, but 
			from a "far older Egypt" which is unrecorded.[2]  
				
				In the first place, there is the caste of priests, which is 
			separated from all the others; next, there are the artificers, who 
			ply their several crafts by themselves and do not intermix; and also 
			there is the class of shepherds and of hunters, as well as that of 
			husbandmen; and you will observe, too, that the warriors in Egypt 
			are distinct from all the other classes, and are commanded by the 
			law to devote themselves solely to military pursuits; moreover, the 
			weapons which they carry are shields and spears, a style of 
			equipment which the goddess taught of Asiatics first to us, as in 
			your part of the world first to you. 
			But, returning to Plato, the remark that the right function of 
			society was "first taught to the Asiatics" is most interesting. The 
			reference to "Asiatics" in this context from an historical "Egyptian 
			Priest" is extremely questionable because, in the many Egyptian 
			inscriptions of historical times, the Asiatics are always referred 
			to as "Vile." Nevertheless, even in historical times, it is indeed 
			true that the Egyptians borrowed their military equipment and war 
			strategies from the Asiatics, but that was a much later development 
			than the above story would suggest.  
			  
			The issue of who the "vile Asiatics" 
			were is an ongoing debate, but it seems to devolve on such as the 
			Hittites, Hyksos, and other Indo-European tribes that came down from 
			the Steppes in various waves. We will discuss further on the 
			evidence that the Steppe peoples were the worshippers of the goddess 
			in the most ancient times, that they came from Europe to the East, 
			and that the war god, the god of fire and the mountains, was 
			introduced later from the South. But do note that the "arts of war" 
			are attributed to the Egyptians first, and only second to the 
			Greeks! A most telling remark, indeed. 
			
			Fulcanelli suggests that the 
			ancient science, first oriented towards the increase of human 
			well-being, was rapidly diverted to be used for destruction. 
			Instruments of peace were turned into machines of war in the South! 
				
				Then as to wisdom, do you observe how our law from the very first 
			made a study of the whole order of things, extending even to 
			prophecy and medicine which gives health, out of these divine 
			elements deriving what was needful for human life, and adding every 
			sort of knowledge which was akin to them. All this order and 
			arrangement the goddess first imparted to you when establishing your 
			city; and she chose the spot of earth in which you were born, 
			because she saw that the happy temperament of the seasons in that 
			land would produce the wisest of men.  
				
				Wherefore the goddess, who was a lover 
			both of war and of wisdom, selected and first of all settled that 
			spot which was the most likely to produce men likest herself. And 
			there you dwelt, having such laws as these and still better ones, 
			and excelled all mankind in all virtue, as became the children and 
			disciples of the gods. 
			Again and again, this very strange "Egyptian" priest is saying 
			things that completely contradict the Egyptian view that they are 
			the most "ancient and noble race." In the above remarks, he has said 
			that the goddess imparted to the Greeks FIRST all of the laws of 
			health and those things needed to preserve and prolong life. The 
			Greeks are pronounced to have been the "wisest of men," and those 
			"most like the goddess" herself. And again "excelled all mankind in 
			all virtue," which is not very likely to have been said by an 
			Egyptian priest, though we will discover that it is very likely the 
			truth. 
				
				Many great and wonderful deeds are recorded of your state in our 
			histories. But one of them exceeds all the rest in greatness and 
			valour. For these histories tell of a mighty power which unprovoked 
			made an expedition against the whole of Europe and Asia, and to 
			which your city put an end. This power came forth out of the 
			Atlantic Ocean, for in those days the Atlantic was navigable; and 
			there was an island situated in front of the straits which are by 
			you called the Pillars of Heracles; the island was larger than Libya 
			and Asia put together, and was the way to other islands, and from 
			these you might pass to the whole of the opposite continent which 
			surrounded the true ocean; for this sea which is within the Straits 
			of Heracles is only a harbour, having a narrow entrance, but that 
			other is a real sea, and the surrounding land may be most truly 
			called a boundless continent.
 Now in this island of Atlantis there was a great and wonderful 
			empire which had rule over the whole island and several others, and 
			over parts of the continent, and, furthermore, the men of Atlantis 
			had subjected the parts of Libya within the columns of Heracles as 
			far as Egypt, and of Europe as far as Tyrrhenia. This vast power, 
			gathered into one, endeavoured to subdue at a blow our country and 
			yours and the whole of the region within the straits; and then, 
			Solon, your country shone forth, in the excellence of her virtue and 
			strength, among all mankind.
   
				She was pre-eminent in courage and 
			military skill, and was the leader of the Hellenes. And when the 
			rest fell off from her, being compelled to stand alone, after having 
			undergone the very extremity of danger, she defeated and triumphed 
			over the invaders, and preserved from slavery those who were not yet 
			subjugated, and generously liberated all the rest of us who dwell 
			within the pillars. 
			Of ALL the things the "Egyptian priest" has said, the above is the 
			most astonishing and the most telling. Again he is giving 
			pre-eminence to the Greeks, that they performed the most heroic deed 
			of all times, which was to defeat the Atlantean Empire! And this is 
			the point that is so often just simply overlooked by all the 
			Atlantis lovers! Atlantis was the original "evil empire of the 
			Borg!"  
			  
			And what is more, in this passage, the 
			clue is given that the ancient Egyptian civilization - the building 
			of the pyramids and other monumental architecture upon which so much 
			of the current Egyptian craze is based - the work of , etc - claimed to be the offshoot of Atlantis, that part of 
			it that is so admired by the current day flock of Egypto-philes - 
			was very likely an attempt to re-construct the EVIL EMPIRE OF 
			ATLANTIS! In other words, the "priestly science" of the Egyptians, 
			referred to by Fulcanelli, antedated the material so diligently 
			studied by Schwaller and others for "clues" to alchemical secrets. 
				
				But afterwards there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in 
			a single day and night of misfortune all your warlike men in a body 
			sank into the earth, and the island of Atlantis in like manner 
			disappeared in the depths of the sea. For which reason the sea in 
			those parts is impassable and impenetrable, because there is a shoal 
			of mud in the way; and this was caused by the subsidence of the 
			island.
 I have told you briefly, Socrates, what the aged Critias heard from 
			Solon and related to us. And when you were speaking yesterday about 
			your city and citizens, the tale which I have just been repeating to 
			you came into my mind, and I remarked with astonishment how, by some 
			mysterious coincidence, you agreed in almost every particular with 
			the narrative of Solon; but I did not like to speak at the moment. 
			For a long time had elapsed, and I had forgotten too much; I thought 
			that I must first of all run over the narrative in my own mind, and 
			then I would speak.
 
			Here we find another interesting clue. 
			Critias has just told us that 
			Socrates was discussing the very things that are included in this 
			story - that everything Socrates had been saying the previous day 
			"agreed in almost every particular with the narrative of Solon." 
			Apparently, this story had been handed down via another line of 
			transmission. 
				
				And so I readily assented to your request yesterday, considering 
			that in all such cases the chief difficulty is to find a tale 
			suitable to our purpose, and that with such a tale we should be 
			fairly well provided. And therefore, as Hermocrates has told you, on 
			my way home yesterday I at once communicated the tale to my 
			companions as I remembered it; and after I left them, during the 
			night by thinking I recovered nearly the whole it. Truly, as is 
			often said, the lessons of our childhood make wonderful impression 
			on our memories; for I am not sure that I could remember all the 
			discourse of yesterday, but I should be much surprised if I forgot 
			any of these things which I have heard very long ago. I listened at 
			the time with childlike interest to the old man’s narrative; he was 
			very ready to teach me, and I asked him again and again to repeat 
			his words, so that like an indelible picture they were branded into 
			my mind.
 As soon as the day broke, I rehearsed them as he spoke them to my 
			companions, that they, as well as myself, might have something to 
			say. And now, Socrates, to make an end my preface, I am ready to 
			tell you the whole tale. I will give you not only the general heads, 
			but the particulars, as they were told to me.
 
 The city and citizens, which you yesterday described to us in 
			fiction, we will now transfer to the world of reality. It shall be 
			the ancient city of Athens, and we will suppose that the citizens 
			whom you imagined, were our veritable ancestors, of whom the priest 
			spoke; they will perfectly harmonize, and there will be no 
			inconsistency in saying that the citizens of your republic are these 
			ancient Athenians. Let us divide the subject among us, and all 
			endeavour according to our ability gracefully to execute the task 
			which you have imposed upon us. Consider then, Socrates, if this 
			narrative is suited to the purpose, or whether we should seek for 
			some other instead.[3]
 
 
			  
			And we come to the final understanding that conveys to us 
			the secret 
			of the story of Atlantis: that it did not actually come from an 
			Egyptian priest, but that this was a story that was created to 
			"execute the task which you [Socrates] have imposed upon us," which 
			was to veil in fiction something that was Truth. Does this mean that 
			they were "making it up?" No, indeed. It means that they were 
			attempting to find a vehicle for the history that would insure its 
			preservation.
 Thus we come to the conclusion that it is entirely possible that the 
			story was not given to Solon by an Egyptian priest, but that it was 
			attributed to same because, at the time everyone was convinced of 
			the antiquity of the Egyptians. It was as much a fad then as now, 
			due to the presence of the pyramids and other monuments.
 
			  
			If Fulcanelli is correct about the cult of the dead of the Egyptians 
			being a distortion of this knowledge, and this cult was encouraged, 
			supported, and furthered by the Egyptian elite of the past several 
			thousand years, then it is almost a certainty that they were not in 
			possession of the knowledge that was conveyed to Solon. But it seems 
			apparent that he did, indeed, get it from somewhere. And he tells us 
			that the Greeks were instructed by the Arabs which certainly makes 
			us wonder who were the original "Arabs."
 Well, we certainly have a clue:
 
				
				Q: According to the Bible, Abraham 
				was the father of Ishmael who was the ’father of the Arabs’ 
				according to the Hebrew texts. Hermes was supposed to have been 
				the father of Arabus who was also called the ’father of the 
				Arabs.’ This Arabus was the legendary father of Cassiopeia, 
				which is almost a parallel development with just some name 
				changes. It seems as though Arabus and Ishmael were 
				comparatively the same in type and function and there are 
				further comparisons to be made. But, the essential thing here is 
				that Cassiopeia would then have been a granddaughter of Hermes 
				and daughter of Ishmael, and we have talked before about the 
				bloodline of the Ishmaelis as the true ’royal line.’ Can you 
				comment on this? A: You are doing well in your analysis. [...]
 
 Q: Is the story of David [in the Bible] a gloss of the Perseus 
				legend?
 A: Yes. More than that though.
 
 Q: Okay, can you tell me what it is more than that?
 A: A Tale of 4th Density.
 
 Q: So it’s interactive in the sense of groups, not individuals?
 A: Yes.
 
 Q: Where is the Ethiopia of the Cassiopeia story? Where it is 
				today?
 A: 4th Density.
 
 Q: Okay, what people did it refer to, in a larger group sense, 
				if it was an archetypal expression?
 A: Gaul.
 
			Now, let’s look again at what Plato has 
			written, keeping in mind the fact that Fulcanelli has described a 
			deep connection between the Greeks and France: 
				
				Now in this island of Atlantis there was a great and wonderful 
			empire which had rule over the whole island and several others, and 
			over parts of the continent, and, furthermore, the men of Atlantis 
			had subjected the parts of Libya within the columns of Heracles as 
			far as Egypt, and of Europe as far as Tyrrhenia. This vast power, 
			gathered into one, endeavoured to subdue at a blow our country and 
			yours and the whole of the region within the straits; and then, 
			Solon, your country shone forth, in the excellence of her virtue and 
			strength, among all mankind.  
				
				She was pre-eminent in courage and 
			military skill, and was the leader of the Hellenes. And when the 
			rest fell off from her, being compelled to stand alone, after having 
			undergone the very extremity of danger, she defeated and triumphed 
			over the invaders, and preserved from slavery those who were not yet 
			subjugated, and generously liberated all the rest of us who dwell 
			within the pillars. 
			Fulcanelli in the first pages of his book 
			Dwellings of the 
			Philosophers, tells us in his first sentences that there is a gross 
			misconception about the Middle Ages common among scholars and 
			laymen, produced by a written history that is not supported by the 
			evidence. History tells us that the Dark Ages were a time of 
			invasions, wars, famines, epidemics, and a host of disruptions to 
			life and culture; yet the very same period was the time of the 
			building of great cathedrals, monuments, houses, cities, and so 
			forth; none of which bear the marks of such scourges. He then goes 
			on to point out that art is entirely reflective of a culture, and 
			generally only thrives during times of peace.  
			  
			The Gothic buildings - cathedrals and 
			others - all undeniably reflect peace, serenity, prosperity, and a 
			flourishing, happy society. The statuary, obviously having used live 
			models, show us plump, well-fed people, with jovial expressions, 
			fond of good living and satire. Even gargoyles are more comical than 
			frightening, and the suffering Christs are generally depicted as 
			"resting" rather than actually in torment. As Fulcanelli points out, 
			if that period of history had been as "dark" as it is depicted, had 
			the people been suffering and moaning in misery of human affliction, 
			the art would have depicted it. But it didn’t. Something is, indeed, 
			inexplicably amiss here. And, as Fulcanelli points out: 
				
				...it is easy to fabricate texts and 
				documents out of nothing.[…] Falsification and counterfeiting 
				are as old as the hills, and history, which abhors chronological 
				vacuums, sometimes had to call [counterfeiters] to the rescue. 
			In the seventeenth century, a Jesuit 
			Father Jean Hardouin uncovered a fraud wherein locals were creating 
			ancient Greek and Roman coins and medals and burying them about the 
			countryside to "fill in the gaps" of history as well as make money 
			by selling such "finds." In 1639, a certain Jacques de Bie published 
			The Families of France, Illustrated by the Monuments of Ancient and 
			Modern Medals, which, according to Anatole de Montaiglon contained 
			more "invented medals than real ones." Fulcanelli goes on to cite 
			more instances in which the possibility - probability - that our 
			history has been largely fabricated looms as an ever growing specter 
			of confusion. We will discover, as we go along, that this problem of 
			falsification of history is not just an idea, but a FACT.
 As it happens, there are some eminent experts in the present day who 
			have smelled the rat and who propose the exact same thing that 
			Fulcanelli has suggested. When we investigate the matter, we 
			discover that the chronology of ancient and medieval history in its 
			present form was created and completed to a considerable extent in a 
			series of works during the 16th and 18th centuries, beginning with 
			J. Scaliger (1540-1609), the "founder of modern chronological 
			science." and D. Petavius (1583-1652).
 
			  
			Chronology is what tells us 
			how much time has elapsed between some historical event and the 
			present. To determine real chronology, one must be able to translate 
			the data in the ancient documents into the terminology and units of 
			modern time reckoning. Many historical conclusions and 
			interpretations depend upon what dates we ascribe to the events in a 
			given ancient document.
 The accepted traditional chronology of ancient and medieval world 
			rests on a foundation of quicksand. For example, between different 
			versions of the dating of such important event as the foundation of 
			Rome, there exists a divergence of 500 years. What is more, 
			"falsification" of numbers was carried out down even to contemporary 
			history. Alexander Polyhistor took the first steps towards filling 
			up the five hundred years, which were wanting to bring the 
			destruction of Troy and the origin of Rome into the chronological 
			connection. But, was he helping, or further confusing the matter? As 
			it happens, according to another chronology, Troy had fallen at the 
			same time as the foundation of Rome, and not 500 years before it.
 
 Isaac Newton, as we will see, devoted many years to historical and 
			chronological studies. He made up his own tables that came to be the 
			generally accepted timeline. A lot of people are not aware that some 
			of the important events of Greek history were arbitrarily moved 
			forward by him as much as 300 years, and those of the Egyptian were 
			moved forward up to a thousand years. Naturally, penetrating minds 
			were able to discern the problems and as early as the sixteenth 
			century. A.D., Professor of Salamanca University de Arcilla 
			published two papers in which he stated that the whole of history 
			earlier than the 4th c. AD, had been falsified.
 
 In more modern times, the first serious attempt to systematize the 
			considerable critical material, and to analyze historical paradoxes 
			and duplicates from the standpoint of natural science was undertaken 
			by a Russian scientist and academician, N. A. Morozov (1854-1946). 
			In 1994, A. T. Fomenko, a Russian Mathematician, published Empirico-statistical 
			analysis of narrative materials and its applications to historical 
			dating. The abstract of this book says:
 
				
				These two volumes represent a major, 
				unique work which is the first of its kind published in the 
				English language. A comprehensive set of new statistical 
				technique is presented for the analysis of historical and 
				chronological data. These technique constitute a new important 
				trend in applied statistics. The first volume concentrates 
				mainly of the development of mathematical statistical tools and 
				their applications to astronomical data: dating of ancient 
				eclipses, dating of Almagest etc. The problems of correct dating 
				for ancient and medieval events are discussed. The second volume 
				concentrates on the analysis of ancient and medieval chronicles 
				and records (such as Egyptian, Byzantine, Roman, Greek, 
				Babylonian, European etc.).    
				An astonishing wealth of historical 
				data is considered. The conclusions which are drawn concerning 
				the accepted chronological dating of events in ancient history 
				will certainly provoke controversy and serious debate. The 
				author suggested a new chronology which is dramatically 
				different from the traditional one. For example, new short 
				chronology place ancient Rome and Greece in medieval epoch. The 
				main result is as follows: the modern "textbook" of traditional 
				ancient and medieval history is the fibred chronicle derived by 
				gluing together the four practically identical replicas A,B,C,D 
				of the shorter chronicle A.    
				Three chronicle B,C,D are obtained 
				from A by shifting it as a rigid block backwards by 333, 1053, 
				and 1778 years (approximately). In other words, the entire 
				"modern textbook" can be completely restored from its lesser 
				part A wholly placed to the right of A.D.960, i.e. each epoch of 
				history, placed today to the left (below) of A.D.960, is a 
				reflection of a certain real historical events from the interval 
				A.D.960 - A.D.1600. For example "the ancient Greece" is dated in 
				10-14 centuries A.D. The book provides the necessary background 
				and material for intelligent participation in such debates.
 [...]
 
			If Fomenko is correct, the ancient 
			histories of Byzantium were carried to Europe, and because many of 
			the local legends also arrived from that region of the world, i.e. 
			the Nart sagas, it was assumed that this was the real history of 
			Britain and even Europe. In short, Fomenko’s idea connects events 
			from the time of Jesus, and the area of the world in which Jesus was 
			said to live, to the general area of the world from which the Nart 
			Sagas originated, the roots of the Grail Legends, and they may all 
			be a mythicized history, and historicized myth of actual seed events 
			of real history that has been, until the present time, incompletely 
			understood.
 Again and again we are finding the threads leading off to the east - 
			to Russia, Siberia - which happens to be the land of Colchis. ’Apollodorus 
			tells us about Hercules:
 
				
				When the labours had been performed 
				in eight years and a month, Eurystheus ordered Hercules, as an 
				eleventh labour, to fetch golden apples from the Hesperides, for 
				he did not acknowledge the labour of the cattle of Augeas nor 
				that of the hydra. These apples were not, as some have said, in 
				Libya, but on Atlas among the Hyperboreans. They were presented 
				(by Earth) to Zeus after his marriage with Hera, and guarded by 
				an immortal dragon with a hundred heads, offspring of Typhon and 
				Echidna, which spoke with many and divers sorts of voices. With 
				it the Hesperides also were on guard, to wit, Aegle, Erythia, 
				Hesperia, and Arethusa. […]   
				Now Prometheus had told Hercules not to 
			go himself after the apples but to send Atlas, first relieving him 
			of the burden of the sphere; so when he was come to Atlas in the 
			land of the Hyperboreans, he took the advice and relieved Atlas. But 
			when Atlas had received three apples from the Hesperides, he came to 
			Hercules, and not wishing to support the sphere, he said that he 
			would himself carry the apples to Eurystheus, and bade Hercules hold 
			up the sky in his stead. Hercules promised to do so, but succeeded 
			by craft in putting it on Atlas instead.    
				For at the advice of Prometheus he 
				begged Atlas to hold up the sky till he should, put a pad on his 
				head. When Atlas heard that, he laid the apples down on the 
				ground and took the sphere from Hercules. And so Hercules picked 
				up the apples and departed. But some say that he did not get 
				them from Atlas, but that he plucked the apples himself after 
				killing the guardian snake. And having brought the apples he 
				gave them to Eurystheus. But he, on receiving them, bestowed 
				them on Hercules, from whom Athena got them and conveyed them 
				back again; for it was not lawful that they should be laid down 
				anywhere.’ 
			It is extremely interesting to note the similarity between 
			the hydra 
			- a hundred headed snake - and the gorgon slain by Perseus. We also 
			note the connections to the Hyperboreans, and the fact that the 
			Golden Apples were given to Athena, who was also gifted with the 
			head of Medusa by Perseus. Another interesting note is that the area 
			where these apples were located was the Hesperides. We also want to 
			note that the same general story is told about the Quest for the 
			Golden Fleece: 
				
				No sooner did Pelias hear that than 
				he bade him go in quest of the fleece. Now it was at Colchis in 
				a grove of Ares, hanging on an oak and guarded by a sleepless 
				dragon.’
 Medea guided Jason to the fleece by night and 
				used her drugs to send the guardian dragon to sleep, and then, 
				carrying the fleece with her, made her way back to the Argos 
				with Jason.’
 
			Curiously, the name "Pelleas" occurs in a number of Grail Stories. 
			The important thing is, however, that we have a sneaking suspicion 
			that this Colchis is also the Hesperides. We also wonder about the 
			possible relationship between "Arcadia" and Colchis. If the ancient 
			"Athenians" of Plato’s tale were not actually from Athens as we know 
			it, then it is also possible that a far more ancient "Arcadia" 
			existed as well.  
			  
			[Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Ancient Science, 2002]
 
 
			
			And that brings us, of course, back to the Nart Sagas described by 
			Littleton and Malcor as the root of the Grail legends, that 
			the Sarmatians are the "Dragon Slayers," and the root stock of France. 
			The details of all these connections and discoveries will be 
			presented in a forthcoming book. For the moment, it is important to 
			understand the cyclical nature of time, the "replay" of the Atlantean/Noachian deluge saga, and just who is who here.
 
 It is glaringly obvious from the description recorded in Plato’s 
			story that the United States is the reincarnation of Atlantis - the 
			"evil empire" - or the replay, if you prefer that term. Following 
			the connections demonstrates that France is "ancient Athens" in the 
			story, the country that,
 
				
				"shone forth, in the excellence of her 
			virtue and strength, among all mankind. She was pre-eminent in 
			courage and military skill, and was the leader of the Hellenes. And 
			when the rest fell off from her, being compelled to stand alone, 
			after having undergone the very extremity of danger, she defeated 
			and triumphed over the invaders, and preserved from slavery those 
			who were not yet subjugated, and generously liberated all the rest 
			of us who dwell within the pillars." 
			
			And now, the reader will better understand the macrocosmic view of 
			my Impressions of France as I write them. It is the home of the 
			future of humanity, the hope of the New World to come. Tearing the 
			veil away, the actual "art cot" or Art of Light, is the Quest for 
			the Holy Grail, the building of the Ark, through which the human 
			being may "pass through the conflagration" at the End of Time.
			Fulcanelli tells us: 
				
				The obelisk of Dommartin-sur-Tigeaus 
				is the tangible, expressive image, absolutely conforming to 
				tradition, of the double terrestrial calamity, of the 
				conflagration and of the flood, on the terrible Judgment Day. 
				[…] This monument seems to be erected on the plane of the 
				ancient hexagram; a figure composed of the water and fire 
				triangles, which is used as the signature of the physical Great 
				Work and of its result, the Philosopher’s Stone. […]
 Two sides of the pyramid are exactly aligned on the highway’s 
				North-South axis. On the Southern side, one can notice the image 
				of an old oak sculpted in bas-relief. […] If we question the oak 
				of stone, it can answer us that times are near, because it is 
				its figurative foreboding. It is the revealing symbol of our 
				times of decadence and perversion; and the initiate to whom we 
				owe the obelisk, carefully chose the oak tree as a frontispiece 
				for his work, in the fashion of a cabalistic prologue, in charge 
				of pinpointing in time the ill-omened period of the end of the 
				world. The characteristics of this period, which is ours, are 
				clearly indicated in the twenty-fourth chapter of the Gospel of 
				St. Matthew. […]
 
 These frequent geological tremors, accompanied with unexplained 
				climatic changes […] are symbolically expressed by the oak. This 
				word, whose French pronunciation ("chêne") is lisped, 
				phonetically corresponds to the Greek word (Khen), and 
				designates the common goose. The old oak tree, because of this 
				fact, takes on the same value as the expression the old goose 
				and the secret meaning of the old law, heralding the return of 
				the Ancient Covenant or the Reign of God […] Saturnalia, 
				Paradise and of the Golden Age.
 
 In the time of the Golden Age, the regenerated man knows no 
				religion. […] He respects, honors and venerated God in this 
				radiating globe which is the heart and brain of Nature and the 
				dispenser of earthly goods. […] In the midst of the radiating 
				celestial body, under the pure sky of a rejuvenated earth, man 
				admires the divine works, without outer manifestations, without 
				rites, without veils. […]
 
 The Golden Age, a solar age par excellence, has for cyclic 
				symbol the very image of the celestial body, the hieroglyph that 
				has always been used by the old alchemists, in order to express 
				the metallic gold or mineral sun. On the spiritual level, the 
				Golden Age is personified by the evangelist Saint-Luke. The 
				Greek (Luchas, from (Luchnos), light, lamp, torch, (lux, lucis 
				in Latin), brings us to consider the Gospel according to Luke, as 
				the Gospel according to the Light. It is the Solar Gospel 
				esoterically conveying the journey of the celestial body and 
				that of its rays, back to their primary state of splendor. It 
				marks the dawn of a new era, the exaltation of the radiating 
				power over the regenerated earth and the return of the yearly 
				and cyclical orb. […]
   
				[W]e consider accurate all the 
				descriptions that have been made of the earthly Paradise, or, if 
				you prefer, of the golden age; but we are not going to dwell on 
				the various theses aimed at proving that the refuge, inhabited 
				by our ancestors, was located in one well defined country. If we 
				deliberately don’t specify where it was located, it is only 
				because, during each cyclic revolution, there is only one thin 
				belt left, that is respected and which remains fit for 
				habitation on its earthly soil. However we emphasize it, the 
				zone of salvation and mercifulness is located sometimes in the 
				Northern Hemisphere, in the beginning of the cycle, sometimes n 
				the Southern hemisphere at the beginning of the next cycle. 
			And in the mysterious Hendaye chapter of 
			
			Le Mystere des Cathedrales, Fulcanelli further says: 
				
				[W]e learn that a country exists, 
				where death cannot reach man at the terrible time of the double 
				cataclysm. As for the geographical location of this promised 
				land, from which the elite will take part in the return of the 
				golden age, it is up to us to find it. For the elite, the 
				children of Elias, will be saved according to the word of 
				Scripture, because their profound faith, their untiring 
				perseverance in effort, will have earned for them the right to 
				be promoted to the rank of disciples of the Christ-Light. They 
				will bear his sign and will receive from him the mission of 
				renewing for regenerated humanity the chain of tradition of the 
				humanity which has disappeared. […] For it is by fire and in 
				fire that our hemisphere will soon be tried. […]
 The age of iron has no other seal than that of Death. Its 
				hieroglyph is the skeleton, bearing the attributes of Saturn: 
				the empty hour-glass, symbol of time run out, and the scythe, 
				reproduced in the figure seven, which is the number of 
				transformation, of destruction, of annihilation. The Gospel of 
				this fatal age is the one written under the inspiration of St. 
				Matthew. […] Matthaeus […] means science. This word has given 
				study, knowledge, to learn. It is the Gospel according to 
				Science, the last of all, but for us the first, because it 
				teaches us that, save for a small number of the elite, we must 
				all perish. For this reason the angel was made the attribute of 
				St. Matthew, because science, which alone is capable of 
				penetrating the mystery of things, of beings and their destiny, 
				can give man wings to raise him to knowledge of the highest 
				truths and finally to God.
 
			Over and over again we have seen our 
			tracks of the Grail/Ark lead us to Russia, to Central Asia, to 
			the 
			Scythians, the Tribe of Dan. It is interesting to note at this point 
			a prophecy of Edgar Cayce about Russia and China. In 1944, he 
			prophesied that China would one day be "the cradle of Christianity 
			as applied in the lives of men." Through Russia, he said  
				
				"comes the hope of the world. Not in 
				respect to what is sometimes termed Communism or Bolshevism - 
				no! But freedom - freedom! That each man will live for his 
				fellow man. The principle has been born there. It will take 
				years for it to be crystallized; yet out of Russia comes again 
				the hope of the world."  
			In reference to this, and the many other 
			"Russian references," Geoffrey Ashe writes in The Ancient Wisdom:
			 
				
				From Greece to the Indus Valley, we 
				find people holding Ursa Major in reverence almost as far back 
				as we can document… In various ways they introduce the Bear into 
				beliefs that connect the centers Above and Below. […] 
 We have enough to reconstruct a common myth that might underlie 
				all primary versions of the seven-mystique […] from which the 
				rest follow. In the far north there is a high and paradisal 
				place, peopled by an assembly of beings of superhuman longevity 
				and wisdom. They have associates and contacts at lower levels. 
				[…]
 
 [B]iblical editing never quite censored out the northern 
				mountain and Zion’s mystical identity with it. […] The prophet’s 
				imagery is baffling, and rabbis in later ages claimed that it 
				concealed a great secret, an occult wisdom. Only the wisest and 
				holiest could expound the Work of the Chariot. Robert Graves has 
				maintained that the God of the Chariot actually is Apollo.[…]
 
 Is there reason to believe that the northern Something was 
				literally there […] that a cosmic system was actually taught by 
				the Rishis on a real Meru, and carried south and west along 
				several routes? […]
 
 The inquiry has […] led to what no one ever identified before - 
				an arguable locale, to which the search can be narrowed down. [W]e 
				are justified in reverting to Guthrie’s theory of Apollo. If 
				this god was brought to Asia Minor and thence to Greece from a 
				Siberian birthplace, a real Land of the Hyperboreans, then he 
				implies a northern Something which actually was there: a center 
				of an influential species of shamanism, with Hyperborean Apollo 
				as one of its gods. […]
 
			If Apollo did make this journey from 
			Siberia, the bear-goddess Artemis was probably paired with him at an 
			early stage. The story of Apollo and his twin sister Artemis is 
			interesting and connect us in an odd way back to Orion. Some sources 
			say that Artemis fell in love with Orion and was going to give up 
			her avowed virginity to marry him. Apollo, her brother, did not 
			approve and tricked Artemis into shooting Orion who was swimming in 
			the sea. In her grief, Artemis placed Orion in the sky to honor him.
			 
			  
			Other sources say that Orion had raped 
			one of Artemis’ female followers, and so Artemis killed him as 
			punishment. She sent a scorpion after him, which stung him and 
			poisoned him. When Orion and the scorpion were placed among the 
			stars, they were given places opposite each other, so that Orion 
			would be out of danger. When Scorpius is just rising, chasing after 
			Orion, the hunter is just starting to disappear behind the western 
			horizon. 
 The veneration of the bear is ancient and its most archaic 
			exposition is in the famous French caves - art of almost unspeakable 
			antiquity. The symbolism is deep here. A bear is supposedly born as 
			a tiny shapeless lump and "licked into shape. His winter sleep 
			symbolizes death-and-rebirth - or, more significantly, "survival in 
			an Ark". The bear stands on his legs and is an omnivore, like 
			humans.
 
 The point is that the bear, Arca, Arthur, takes us back to his 
			origins in Western Europe from whence he traveled to Siberia, and 
			finally around in a circle of the Mediterranean, to bring us back to 
			France. Not only does Time run in loops, so do peoples.
 
 The Siberian shamans tell that in former ages all men had access to 
			the gods, whereas now, only shamans have it. Shamanism presents 
			itself as the remnant of an Ancient Wisdom teaching which once 
			flourished across the Northern Hemisphere, originating in France.
 
 The main feature of the Shaman’s universe is the cosmic center, an 
			axis connecting earth with both heaven and hell. It is often 
			represented as a tree, a ladder, or a pole. The shaman can utilize 
			this tree to travel upward to commune with the gods, or downward to 
			battle demons. Numbers are important: there are a fixed number of 
			steps, or celestial stages. The cosmic tree can also be represented 
			as a mountain with seven stories. The mountain is made of gold and 
			the name "Altai" itself actually means "gold." And we note that 
			the 
			Scythians were famous goldsmiths. What is more, even the most 
			untrained eye can see that the art of the Scythians is identical to 
			the art of the French caves and the art of the Celts of Europe.
 
 It is clear that shamanism, as it is known, has declined from its 
			original unified and coherent system. One reason for thinking so is 
			that, while there are many local terms for a male shaman, there is 
			only one for a female shaman. Shamanism, it seems, was formerly a 
			woman’s activity. In one Tartar dialect, utygan, the word for a 
			woman-shaman, also means "bear."
 
 There is a place called Mal’ta, fifty-five miles north-west of 
			Irkutsk, in country where the remnants of Altaic shamanism are still 
			active. Carvings have been discovered there which include an oblong 
			panel of mammoth ivory with designs on it. The dominant design is a 
			spiral of dots which goes around seven times, and winds into or out 
			of a central hole - a spiral maze. This is the oldest known heptad 
			in the world - almost 30,000 years old.
 
 There are claims that the Ancient Wisdom survives in Central Asia to 
			this very day. We cannot confirm that. The only thing we do know is 
			that, out of Russia came the work of Georges Gurdjieff mainly 
			through the efforts of another Russian, P. D. Ouspensky. The Third 
			Man: Boris Mouravieff, has expounded on the Fourth Way material of
			Gurdjieff in significant ways that relate directly to the Grail 
			Issue. Gurdjieff and Mouravieff have called this Tradition "Esoteric 
			Christianity." But we now suspect that what was originally taught by 
			an obscure man in the area of the Middle East over 2000 years ago 
			was a revival of a far more ancient Tradition - a Tradition that 
			extends back into the mists of pre-history to a time when man 
			interacted with his environment in an altogether different way - a 
			Way that seems magical and mysterious to us in our present state of 
			reduced capacities.
 
 
 
			
			When we look at Ursa major, the stars that point to the Pole star, 
			if we follow them just a bit further, we find that they direct us to
			Cassiopaea, at the extreme northern end of the Milky Way.
 
				
				Q: Is the story of David a gloss of 
				the Perseus legend? A: Yes. More than that though.
 
				Q: Okay, can you tell me what it is more than that?
 A: A Tale of 4th Density.
 
				Q: So it’s interactive in the sense of groups, not individuals?
 A: Yes.
 
				Q: Where is the Ethiopia of the Cassiopeia story? Where it is 
				today?
 A: 4th Density.
 
				Q: Okay, what people did it refer to, in a larger group sense, 
				if it was an archetypal expression?
 A: Gaul.
 
			Again let us note what Geoffrey Ashe 
			discovered: 
				
				We have enough to reconstruct a common myth that might underlie all 
			primary versions of the seven-mystique […] from which the rest 
			follow. In the far north there is a high and paradisal place, 
			peopled by an assembly of beings of superhuman longevity and wisdom. 
			They have associates and contacts at lower levels. […]  
			Cassiopaea: The Court of the Children of the Goddess Danae... 
			The Perseids...  
				
				[1] Which event may have been merely 
				another of the cyclic events assimilated to an even earlier 
				archetype.[2] Ashe, Geoffrey, The Ancient Wisdom, 1979, Sphere, London.
 [3] Plato, Timaeus, translated by B. Jowett.
 
			Continue
			
			HERE ..... 
			  
			  |