The best reports, to date, indicate that humans have interacted with
aliens affiliated with aggregations and alignments that touch upon a
variety of galaxies. So, our awareness begins on an inter-galactic
scale, right from the start. In order to better understand such
populations and compete where and if necessary, we must know more
In every suitable galaxy, we can expect to find mega-populations
that occupy dozens, if not thousands of planets. The Verdants
are but one example. Some mega-populations originally expanded for
reasons of need, while others likely grew to compete with neighbors.
Diplomatic and material relations
between mega-populations can be tricky— from the human perspective.
The best way to make sense of them is to probe and investigate
entire categories, rather than one mere case, or another. To limit
our scrutiny to one single mega-complex is to fall in their hole, in
a sense. Their singular peculiarities shouldn’t define our larger
understanding because there are billions of galaxies. Within
mega-populations, independent critique is sometimes lacking,
hence we now join the ranks of myriad others who must look for
needed improvements both on and off-world, despite our current
Again, within the alternate-cycle structuring of space-time and the
universe are trace aspects of the near-whole’s information (and
sentience). Although it may, at first, appear to have a faded,
seemingly remote quality, it is “here,” nonetheless, for those who
begin with the requisite science and insight. The non-locality of
quantum physics is an artifact of a universal no-boundary condition,
which is reportedly due to negative-cycling of all mass/matter/and
energy back into itself---on a universal scale. All quanta loop back
in upon themselves due to vastly larger cycles, hence they are
discrete, in a sense (seemingly tucked behind a moving membrane, or
quantum horizon). They are all clocked, in the most basic delta
t/alt t sense (elastic time), on a universal scale. So,
although gravity appears to be very weak, compared to
electromagnetism (light waves), gravity shapes the entire
universe, while electromagnetism pales in comparison, on the cosmic
Humans who linger on the cusp of such understandings tend to do so
because they assume that the universe is basically
three-dimensional but with inexplicable ironies (black
gravity and weird quantum
mysteries). However, if we suspend such thinking and contour our
models to account for the better science of aliens, the
faster-than-light ironies of their technology AND negative energy
(i.e. condensed state physics), we quickly see that the universe
isn’t three-dimensional. Instead, negative cycles connect “mass”
down through the nucleus and far out into space-time AT THE SAME
So, it isn’t three-dimensional. It
plunges inward, into a kind of negative space (from the old-world
perspective) while it fluctuates far outward into a greater
dimension, in the most basic sense of the word. It does so
precisely, like clockwork. Once our world begins to experiment with
electrogravity and negative energy technologies, we
appear on the larger energy map of the universe. Different
mega-populations will try to tell us that they are the guardians
of the delta t conservation. Some will use that excuse to take
advantage of a vulnerable population.
As long as you know that, you can foresee the larger, sometimes
independent implications of ecological responsibility. Various
materially-uninterested aliens have explained this to humans, over
and over again. Their advice and insights are of epic significance.
Meanwhile, mega-populations will tell you that all worlds
need to accord, all peoples must collectively interact to some
extent. That much is true, however, some megas grew essentially
uncorrected, going from one kind of imperialism to a larger kind of
presumption without learning to treat others as equals, without
opening their governments to independent critique and binding rules
against destructive interventions. Meanwhile, of course, there are
nearly instantaneous consequences for having abused lesser
populations, however faint and distant they may seem at a given
The best aliens suggest that the all-of-time consequences for
wrongdoing may seem subtle, if not elusive, yet are inescapable.
The most highly advanced societies both look for, and constrain
offenders in ways that aren’t always explicit because offenders tend
to ignore finer cautions and guidance. Awkward situations arise in
which offenders excluded from higher-order involvement rationalize
ill-gotten gains in strictly material terms. Detached from their
victims AND higher order understandings, they don’t anticipate the
almost tao-like re-cycling of all being and implications.
Some of the ugliest consequences may lie within an offending
mega-population: the stifling of dissent, a rigidly presumed
“oneness” of group mindform (policed by
psychotronics), plus any threat
that such may pose to various neighbors.
In other words, apathy and failure to criticize a
given regime can become a singular hell-hole of a sort---trapped
within a kind of event horizon that may be hard to discern, from
within the offending presumption. So, the message for those content
to merely feather their own, small nest in the United States or
elsewhere on this planet is that you can’t possibly live safely,
you won’t preserve your freedoms and resources unless you do more to
share with all others on this planet. Failure to do so will
result in catastrophe: rising violence and sea levels, disease and
depletion of resources---all of which leads to dependency on
You can’t hide behind weak-minded ideas
about 3-D anonymity within
elite economy and then expect your
children to live safely when you’re gone. Your very thoughts and
observations affect all that you see, however faintly. The “new”
physics now upon us leap out of the old Cartesian box, hence you
must plan for the future of ALL on this planet. If you don’t, no
matter how richly you live now, your children will suffer and will
condemn your generation for weak-kneed obedience, an epic failure to
act when necessary.
There are no elite excuses. There is no escape from universal
precision of the sort. Planets that don’t rise up against elite
incompetency either die, or become the lesser servants
of cold, often ruthless alien controllers. There is no second
chance if we fail. We will never again be entrusted with a
biological beauty like Earth.
The pre-noted hyperversal alien’s remark about how some
hyperversals may not want a population like ours to endure over
“the long term” can be interpreted to mean that they would prefer to
see us absorbed by a larger, controlling collective. Such a
perspective assumes that new populations are best grown like grapes:
suffering drought and hardship or even manipulated planetary death
in order to produce the sweetest end product, the least offensive
As if to underscore such an attitude, on
a previous occasion one of the “three ellipticals”
hyperversals (ghosted by a more advanced hyperversal)
showed us a graphic about a recurrent, if not prototypical alien
situation. In the graphic was a highly technological,
interstellar-capable current-cycle alien with dark, wrap-around eyes
standing next to his planet just as the planet, or home star, is
going critical---which will require a move to another planet.
The hyperversal said something
like “and what do you do when…(that)?” In other words, from the
hyperversal’s perspective, situations of the sort pose a conundrum.
Do aliens in such a situation
choose to accommodate themselves on their own, or must they
make arrangements with larger collectives?
Essentially, the hyperversal’s
attitude was that if a role within a large mega-population
collective is (or was) good enough during his own past, then
why should humans presume to go it alone, for now?
Why should we be any different?
If it seems as though I drone on and on
about the “new” physics of aliens, it is for good reason.
Different explanations and metaphors help the beginner understand
such basics. There are a mixed variety of fantastic, yet precise
ironies in the new physics of the universe. Although black holes
may, at first, seem to be coldly unforgiving traps and dead-ends, of
a sort, aliens suggest that they are deeply dimensioned with a kind
of genius—in the best of mind(s), yet can also serve as a limitation
upon the worst minds, more locally speaking.
Clearly, some mega-populations have been cultivated by
more advanced, precursor aliens (hyperversals) for purposes of
population control and basic ecology. Mega-population growth may
seem wasteful and disproportionate to humans, yet some
mega-populations have actually been encouraged to exceed normal
bounds. Hyperversal aliens deriving from what were once
large, aggressive mega-populations may be biased to think in terms
of their own evolution and thus favor the growth of at least one
larger, more extensive population in each galaxy for a
variety of reasons. Numerous ongoing discussions with “the three
ellipticals” hyperversals have elucidated their thinking on the
subject. I’ve discussed such reasoning with some of them at numerous
junctures, while seemingly more independent hyperversals watched
The following are some of the reasons
the “three ellipticals” section says they encourage certain
a) a large mega limits
the growth of competitors in a given galaxy
b) a large mega can act
as the spine of galaxy-wide treaties and conventions
c) a large mega can
monitor an entire galaxy’s ecology and both report on, and
organize others to ward off encroaching megas (like the
Verdants) from surrounding galaxies
d) a large mega can be
cultivated to take over the burdensome responsibilities of
hyperversals from a previous cycle, allowing for a
succession, of sorts
e) a large mega is both
culturally and organizationally compatible with the larger,
pre-existing doings of some hyperversal populations (i.e.
breeding programs to upgrade emerging populations, peaceful
conventions regarding trade, travel, minimization of
f) due to the simple
animal nature of certain impulses, large megas will
invariably arise, hence it’s better to both channel and
ecologically manage them than to pretend that they
shouldn’t exist, in the first place
Meanwhile, more modest, competing
populations are always extant and sometimes argue to the contrary.
They say the following:
a) large mega-populations
can, themselves, become the ecological nightmare that is
b) the best and most
internally rigorous interactions on a galactic scale are
always diverse, hence a variety of inter-communicating
societies can monitor and collectively enforce a galaxy-wide
ecology, even if there are times when planets dispute over
replacement terra and resources
themselves, and the larger universe are vastly diverse,
hence a more balanced diversity within a given galaxy is
d) it’s better to
practice moderation and cultivate large-scale diversity and
interactions than to wallow in a mono-culture of grandiose
pretensions premised upon specious domination
Of course, we both observe and can
expect to encounter galaxies of breathtaking variety. Mindful of
such diversity, it’s better to suffer some uncertainty and wariness
rather than smugly rationalize one peculiarity over another.
Populations of various sorts must keep others in check all across
the universe. There must be constraints on specious excess.
Collectively, within one organizing strategy or another, we’re all
responsible for the long-term ecology.
* In our case, the die
is already cast: there’s no room for us to grow disproportionately.
There are megas here, already, and we’re due to merge with
Hyperversals say that a multiplicity of independent
populations within a galaxy can sometimes be collectively expansive,
if not disorganized (this argument comes from hyperversals of a
mega-population origin). Some say nature runs a certain course, a
statement that partly rationalizes their own ancient history. In
some galaxies a given population will have expanded for reasons of
greed or to “secure” future resources. In every case, surrounding
populations must judge whether a given mega-population respects
“wild” uninhabited terra that must be preserved for unspecified
future evolution. Empty planets don’t strain the larger delta t
As you can see, once we begin to interact on a galactic scale, the
entire universal ecology comes into focus.
How do we encourage interactions
and accords, plus the exchange of ideas and controls between
Does it trickle across, or does
it arise through supercluster conventions mediated by
Must reluctant populations be
provoked and herded to moderate themselves, or is it all
just “laissez faire” (an attitude that predatory aliens
occasionally propagate in order to weaken and deplete a
Ever present in such discussions, in
which some humans participate, is the hyperversal concern
that independent aggregations of current-cycle aliens may organize
on a larger scale than some hyperversals are prepared for, at a
given time. Yet another discomforting wariness that we must live
with. There are no easy answers in collective reckonings of the
Due to internal contradictions, aliens from some mega-populations
(i.e. the Verdants) will demean and chastise humans for
striving to piece together a larger overview of alien relations.
They suggest that humans are merely small-scale, if not incompetent
to judge the complexities of their larger interactions. So we
encounter coldly disdainful attitudes, duplicity and deception, in
some quarters. Meanwhile, disdain of the sort can degrade into
thinly veiled contempt, at times—which can be dangerous. An
ecologically irresponsible people is extremely vulnerable.
Let’s look at further aliens’ statements about mega-populations.
When touching upon the Verdant case, hyperversals in
the “three ellipticals” section often ask how will you spread
necessary ecological conventions (genetics, miscellaneous controls,
inclusion of megas in planning for the next universe cycle, basic
negative energy standards, de-weaponization, etc.) if you don’t
cultivate certain mega-populations who can impose such controls in
various neighborhoods and compel upstarts to change?
Sometimes the question is asked only
rhetorically, with little or no intention of considering
alternatives to the scheme. Meanwhile, there’s further hyperversal
perspective that rationalizes both megas and independent
populations, assuming that they must work out such responsibilities
among themselves, rather than rely on hyperversals to do the
At times, we see vast, universal implications in such discussions.
Sometimes, hyperversals stress the fact that you can’t simply
withdraw into a physical sense of yourself and your environs.
Instead, you must remember that the convergence of larger
communities require at least some faded measure of humility and
forebearance. No one can endure without changing, neither
hyperversals nor the most physically presumptuous of current cycle
When a people deplete their original sun or planet, they must
judge whether they have matured with their star. Like humans, they
may have been brash and conflicted, hence limited during early
phases yet are usually challenged and humbled later.
Did they linger within animal
sentience or move out into community awareness?
Did they mature into fainter,
larger involvements or linger, retardedly, as run-on
Do outsiders see them as crude
and lower-brain impulsive—too intent on their own
physicality (a singular looking out, rather than feeling
beyond themselves while looking in) or have they matured
into the larger fade beyond such pretensions?
Now, as they ponder a move to
another system, are they known for cynical manipulations, or
are they seen as living inspiration?
No doubt there are various gradations of
involvement with mega-populations. Some planets simply trade
with them, which deepens their involvement. Others prefer to remain
self-sustaining and distant in order to develop a more mature second
or third-depth consciousness globally so they can better judge the
risks and implications of larger interactions before dundering into
them. Some mega-populations may be exemplary, of course. However, as
is obvious on Earth, premature concession of bases to a questionable
mega-population can be treacherous. Before the target people even
know about it, they can lose control to a resource-hungry predator.
Manipulated conflicts then follow—a “pacification program.”
In the Verdant case, we see a kind of browning UP to
hard-line hyperversals in order to gain favor. At times, the
routine seems most pretentious. Many times we’ve seen Verdants
plunge into a human situation with an “Are you important?” kind of
attitude that’s shamelessly elitist. The same applies to some
of the IFSP’s direct operatives, who inflate their personal
significance in order to drill fear into others. Sometimes it seems
as though they are but stimulus-seeking patients on a universal
psych ward, in a sense. Indications suggest that behavior of the
sort is associated with inordinate use of energy and resources.
Meanwhile, the most “important” distinctions to be made lie within
more basic considerations. For example,
how does the universe even
derive, to begin with, and if it recycles, how do all kinds
interdimension within a more timeless continuity?
how can a universe possibly
exist (in the best way)?
Although such questions sound extraneous
to some, their implications permeate every aspect of all existence.
Mega-populations who know no bounds soon butt up against
obstacles that can only be resolved through deeper, more advanced
consideration (and humility). Ironically, it is the most
basic questions that continually revolutionize human thought, not
the most distended. No doubt this is true elsewhere. In other words,
the only sustainable regard for others is anything, if not
everything BUT self-importance.
And what are the internal
dynamics of any given mega-population?
Do they ally with other megas,
then seek to divide lesser domains in order to expand within
them, or must they accord within a more advanced ecology and
minimize their take in order to help new populations upgrade
themselves through better example?
On a galactic scale, there are
large-scale systems specifications (due to delta t/alt t, for
example), and questions about how various networks interdimension.
Whose standards will prevail?
And when there is competition
due to the death or depletion of old planets, then who will
Who solves cases of predation
And how do we enforce the
necessary conventions: collectively, or through
Again, we’re talking about more advanced
societies, not environmentally ruinous human precepts.
Within a mega-population, the individual dilemma is to
judge whether the community behaves correctly and whether it needs
to be changed. Imagine being a Verdant, for example: the
pointless brinkmanship in knowing that your population is late for
necessary, collective reckonings. Some 229 million years after first
contact, they still take too much in order to enjoy themselves (some
are stimulus-seeking sexuals).
Within their ranks,
Aliens of the sort need to see
beyond their limited, internal conventions and reassess the whole,
then fade it down to a more modest state. Then, and only then, will
they be able to help others do similarly. In order to evolve into
hyper-community, they must ask whether the best ecology is a
stasis of pretended greatness, or does it lie within a receding,
greater kind of out-of-body identity? Steady-state ideas about
empire degrade into defensive, lying propaganda mills and resource
Meanwhile, more mature populations are humbler, hence more
capable within hyper-community. They can interact as mixed
communities where the question of species isn’t so important. As
such, they’re capable of a higher, finer aesthetic---more faintly on
a larger scale (yet may encounter awkward, disturbing situations,
When pondering the nature of mega-populations across the universe,
it helps to remember that some large populations (and
hyperversals) will risk the sacrifice of entire planets
in order to cobble together de-sensitized, obedient aggregates
because they’re easier to control. There are structural ironies in
doing so---mega-population operatives who know that they’re watched
and may succumb to numb, psychotronically-stimulated group
rationalizations, in the process.
We’ve even seen hyperversals who play as many ideas as
possible into a given situation and, due to their larger brains or a
game-like juvenile reminiscence, seem to vaguely play at mastery and
try to lose you behind the scheme of their objectives. Depending on
a given hyperversal’s age and cumulative psychological conditioning,
he or she may fade into desensitized withdrawal and rationalize the
suffering of new-cycle aliens.
Among mega-populations and independents alike,
hyperversals try to cultivate hyper-community and universal
citizenship, rather than insular withdrawal. However, depending on
the alien who speaks to you, you may not hear about this, in some
cases. Further confounding the situation are hyperversal pressures
to busy certain mega-populations or cut them off, in some respects,
while also moving them toward hyper-assimilation. Major snafus can
arise: “butterfly wing” distortions that magnify a given foul-up, or
In the worst cases, a healthy, independent biome may be seen as a
direct challenge to a mega-population’s control. Why? Because a
healthy, biologically diverse biome allows for long-term
micro-evolution of a given people, instead of the cascading crises
and manipulations preferred by an aggressive mega. There may be
Big Brother pressures in such cases, a compulsion to foul, if
not kill numerous species in order to expand a mega-population’s
sphere of influence. Common sense suggests that manipulated planet
death is the worst possible outcome, but an overgrown, aggressive
colonial may want to play God, instead. We’ve heard
(Verdant-related) talk about imposing non-physical social identities
through mass extinctions, leaving but a shell of the old
identity. Fawning acolytes of the IFSP - Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets - call this “the Earth Changes”
strategy, in our case. Destruction of the sort weakens a people,
making it easier to control them.
Within a mega-population, we sometimes note a trance-like,
resonant quality in those who insist that they aren’t “individuals”
but are, instead, solely composed of group mind. Meanwhile, some
individuals of the sort are middling characters who hide within the
most amorphous of qualities and try define themselves only in
spatial terms, a non— in the group sense. Dogmatic rigidity
can creep into the equation, a smothering of critique within a given
mega-population. Aging characters sometimes assume that they ALREADY
DID all of the necessary thinking long ago, hence they need merely
resonate and observe coldly, thereafter.
Some mega-population aliens may
try to obliterate their own multiply-sourced history, and then
pretend not to notice that their own, most specious rationalizations
presume a mastery of insight on others’ pasts.
Some aliens within a mega-population may not be as thoughtful or
insightful as were their elders of previous generations. So, when
doubts and inadequacies arise, they may feel as though relatively
immobilized, in a larger sense, given their shortcomings. Meanwhile,
more thoughtful communities far exceed them. In one sense, the
singular failings of some aliens are strangely gravitic, as though
trapped and slowed—way down near an event horizon. We have literally
observed this, as was noted previously. But how do we explain the
slowed, seemingly trapped quality?
George Chapline of Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, and Nobel laureate
Robert Laughlin, have a new
model of the universe that may offer insights. They suggest that
black holes could, instead, be dark energy stars. Because objects
falling into a
black hole should stretch out so
extremely that outside observers would note a freeze of time—which
causes the object to appear to linger at the event horizon forever,
physicists have searched for alternatives to the standard quantum
model. Chapline and Laughlin note that when
superconducting crystals go through “quantum critical phase
transition,” electron spin doesn’t fluctuate wildly, as the standard
model predicts it should. Instead, electron fluctuations slow
down—as though time were literally slowed! So, Chapline and
Laughlin came up with a startling, new explanation.
Working with colleagues, Chapline and Laughlin posit
that instead of a black hole, a phase transition (a sudden
change of state) creates a thin “quantum critical shell,” the
size of which depends on a star’s mass. A
New Scientist article on the subject
says the shell doesn’t contain a space-time singularity….
“Instead, the shell contains a
vacuum, just like the energy-containing vacuum of free space….
The team’s calculations show that the vacuum inside the shell
has a powerful anti-gravity effect, just like the dark energy
that appears to be causing the expansion of the universe to
accelerate…. Quantum critical shells are a two-way street,” says
He suggests that the energies involved
match those of the expected dark energy of the entire universe. In
other words, the universe could be a large, tendentious dark energy
object (or object/non-object cycle), of sorts. It’s a useful model,
and seems to agree with alien statements about negative energy
and hyperspace (plus aspects of
Bearden’s delta t).
So, how does that relate to the slowed and seemingly trapped quality
of mistaken alien mindform? Aliens whose thoughts and
deeds collapse in upon narrowly-construed, illusory self-assumptions
may linger within a shell, of sorts, due to a failure of construct.
Hence we observe a slowed quality, a redundancy that’s perhaps best
modeled as a destructive enumeration (not so finely and fractionally
universal). Ideally, more advanced hyperversals would know
how to enter into such moments in order to warn such individuals
about potentially ghastly ironies at the end of a universe cycle,
should they fail to integrate more finely.
Meanwhile, in the best or most advanced of human cases, it’s normal
to fade in and out of hyper-community, due to human tiredness and
the need to rest. It isn’t so easy to maintain the requisite
hyper-attentiveness while attending to daily routines.
Given our various interactions with mega-populations, to
date, it is fairly easy to derive the basic implications of life
within such communities. However, we’re relatively new to such
interactions and still have much to learn, over time.