1. Please explain Tesla's "Death Ray" machine he 
			spoke about in the 1930's. Was it a laser or a particle beam 
			accelerator? 
			
Tesla's work on particle beam weapons can be traced all the way 
			back to 1893 with his invention of a button lamp, and again to 1896 
			when he replicated the work of William Roentgen, discoverer 
			of X-rays. At that time, Tesla was "shooting" X-rays over 
			considerable distances, creating photographs of skeletons sometimes 
			as far away as 40 feet from the source of the gun. Tesla was 
			also involved in experiments with shooting cathode rays at targets. 
			This and similar work from one of Tesla's British colleagues, J.J. Thompson, led to the discovery, by 
          	Thompson, of the electron. During that period in the 
			mid-1890's, 
          Tesla 
          conversed often with Thompson, particularly in the electrical 
			journals.
At about the year 1918, Tesla apparently had a laser-like 
			apparatus that he shot at the moon. From studying his great 1893 
			work THE INVENTIONS, RESEARCHES AND WRITINGS OF NIKOLA TESLA, 
			it is apparent that the button lamp discussed above had all of the 
			components necessary to create a laser beam.
This lamp was so constructed so as to place a piece of matter such as 
			carbon, or a diamond or a ruby, in the center, and bombard this 
			"button" with electrical energy that would bounce off the button 
			onto the inside of the globe and bounce back onto the button. If 
			this were a ruby, and Tesla specifically worked with rubies, 
			then is exactly how a ruby laser is created. Tesla refers in 
			INVENTIONS to a "pencil-thin" line of light that was created with 
			this device. It is my belief that 
          Tesla not only invented the ruby laser in 1893, but he also 
			demonstrated it and published it's results. The problem with the 
			device was that it was set up so as to "vaporize," or destroy, the 
			button, so that the laser effects were probably short-lived.
However, if we jump ahead to the 1918 story, which was told to me by 
          	Coleman Czito's grandson's wife, it is very possible that Tesla
          	used the same or similar kind of apparatus to send laser pulses 
			to the moon.
Now, to get to the particle beam weapon, this is an entirely separate 
			invention and evolved from, all things, a pop gun that he used as a 
			boy. The pop gun works by pumping air into the barrel and causing 
			the cork to come barreling out. This gun could be used to shoot 
			targets and small animals, and Tesla discusses this gun in 
			his autobiography.
What Tesla realized was that a "ray" would not have the energy 
			requirement to be destructive. Also, even if he had a laser, or 
			laser-like ray, it would still disperse somewhat, over long 
			distances. So Tesla 
          came to the conclusion that instead of shooting a ray of light, he 
			would shoot microscopic pellets. The stream could not disperse 
			because, theoretically, it would be one pellet thick.
After studying the 
			Van de Graaff electrostatic generator, 
			which used a cardboard belt to generate the high voltages, Tesla 
			came to utilize the same essential set-up to generate tremendous 
			charges, but he replaced the belt with an ionized stream of air and 
			then used this electrified stream to "repel" the small pellets which 
			were made out of tungsten. These pellets were shot out of an 
			open-ended vacuum tube which was shaped in the form of a cannon.
			 
			
			 It is my belief that this device, which was presented to the 
          	International Tesla Society by the late Dr. Andrija Puharich 
			at the 1984 Tesla Centennial Symposium (and published in that 
			proceedings as, essentially, Tesla's 1937 top secret patent 
			application), was designed to be as large as the tower at 
			Wardenclyffe. The shaft, which could have been as tall as 
			100 feet, would contain the "belt" of ionized stream of air.
It is my belief that this device, which was presented to the 
          	International Tesla Society by the late Dr. Andrija Puharich 
			at the 1984 Tesla Centennial Symposium (and published in that 
			proceedings as, essentially, Tesla's 1937 top secret patent 
			application), was designed to be as large as the tower at 
			Wardenclyffe. The shaft, which could have been as tall as 
			100 feet, would contain the "belt" of ionized stream of air. 
			
			 
			
			The 
			round bulbous part of the tower would continue to circulate the 
			ionized stream and hold the charge, and out the top of the tower 
			there would be the long barrel of the gun. Such a machine, which Tesla tried to sell during World War II to the United States, 
			England, the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, would be able to shoot 
			down incoming planes at distances of about 300 miles.
 
			
			Proof that this device was given to the Soviets has been 
			established by such individuals as Colonel Tom Bearden, who 
			points out that the May 2, 1977 issue of AVIATION WEEK, displays a 
			picture of a Soviet particle beam weapon, (along with the 
			accompanying 7000 word article) that is almost a carbon copy of the 
			picture in Tesla's 1937 patent application, which, as stated 
			above has been published in the ITS 1984 proceedings.
A question remains as to whether or not 
			Tesla actually 
			constructed a particle beam weapon. I believe that when looks at 
			this question from a historical standpoint, we see that he had been 
			working on this and similar devices for over 30 years. Thus, it is 
			my opinion that Tesla 
          did, indeed, construct a working model. At the age of 81, at a 
			luncheon in his honor, concerning the Death Ray, Tesla 
			stated, 
          
			
				
				"But it is not an 
			experiment.... I have built, demonstrated and used it. Only a little 
			time will pass before I can give it to the world."
          
			
			
			2. Was Tesla actually killed, or did he die of natural 
			causes? How can we know either way for sure? 
			
Tesla was always a very thin man, and even as far back as the 
			1890's, he drove himself to exhaustion on many occasions. In 1893, 
			speaking at the Chicago World's Fair, the dignitaries attending were 
			so concerned about him that he said the following: 
			
				
				"A number of 
			scientific men asked a group of electricians to deliver a lecture. A 
			great many promised that they would come [but] when the program was 
			sifted down, I was the only healthy man left, and so I have managed 
			to take some of my apparatus and give you a brief outline of some of 
			my work."
			
			
			Katharine Johnson also, on many occasions, worried about 
			Tesla's health and refusal to eat a substantial meal.
Through the years, Tesla began to give up meat, and eventually some 
			time in the 1930's, he just about gave up solid foods altogether. He 
			drank bowls of warm milk and a combination potion made from the 
			hearts of numerous vegetables such as artichokes and celery. He also 
			ate honey.
By the time he was in his 80's he was cadaverously thin. The last 
			published photo of him when he was 86 is clear that he was close to 
			death. It is such a scary picture that I have refused to display it 
			at any of the lectures. He is much thinner in this picture than the 
			famous one taken just a few months before when he met with his 
			nephew, 
          Sava Kosanovic, ambassador from Yugoslavia, and the exiled King Peter, of Serbia. It is my belief that 
			Tesla simply 
			died of old age. He was 86. But I also think that he hastened his 
			death through his anorexic eating style. 
 
			
			3. Did Nikola Tesla cause the explosion in 
			Tunguska, Siberia in 1908?
          
According to Tesla's recollection in the Leland Anderson edition of 
			Tesla's testimony to his lawyer in 1916 (Nikola Tesla and His 
			Work in Alternating Currents), the tower was used in some 
			fashion until 1907. However, its larger functions actually became 
			disoperational in 1903 when the Westinghouse company came in to 
			remove vital equipment. Therefore Tesla did not have the 
			equipment to create such an explosion five years later. Further, 
			according to Dr. James Corum, in a recent phone interview, 
			(June 5, 1997), the tower had the capability of producing only about 
			300 kilowatts (six times what many radio stations produce) and 
			delivering 10 kilowatts of power to the opposite side of the earth. 
			This would be approximately enough energy to light a light bulb.  
          	
			 
			
			 A tremendous feat in its own right, however, nowhere near the 
			amount of power required to create the 
			
			Tunguska explosion.
          Corum 
          stated that the problem in transmitting the kind of tremendous power 
			required is that the air around the transmitter breaks down thereby 
			rendering the machine inoperable.
A tremendous feat in its own right, however, nowhere near the 
			amount of power required to create the 
			
			Tunguska explosion.
          Corum 
          stated that the problem in transmitting the kind of tremendous power 
			required is that the air around the transmitter breaks down thereby 
			rendering the machine inoperable. 
          
			 
			
			Recent estimates in the 
			book
          The Day The Sky Split Apart by Roy Gallant, (1995, Simon 
			& Schuster), state that the Tunguska explosion created 
			devastation in an area which approximated the size of Rhode Island, 
			and released energy 2,000 times greater than the atom bomb that was 
			dropped at Hiroshima. 
			(watch video about Tunguska´s Explosion, "click" 
			
                
            
            
			
			HERE).
			
			
 
			According to
          Corum, it would be essentially impossible to transmit energy to 
			achieve this result.  
          
			
 
			
			However, Corum went 
			on, if Tesla had the capability to release merely 1% of the 
			earth's magnetic charge, that could create the amount of energy to 
			achieve a Tunguska-like explosion. He did not think 
			that Tesla did this, however.
			 
			
			
			Photos taken from the site 
			of the Siberian explosion reveal numerous trees flattened, much like 
			the trees looked after the volcanic eruption of Mt. St. Helens, 
			which occurred recently in Washington. I do not believe that Tesla had the technology or the inclination to use 
			Wardenclyffe to deliver the kind of energy necessary to 
			create such a disaster. 
			
 
			Tesla certainly discussed the idea of using 
			a Wardenclyffe like tower to shoot down incoming 
			aircraft, via a particle beam weapon, and as a completely separate 
			concept, he also discussed the idea of creating earthquakes, which 
			could be engendered in a variety of ways, e.g., by bringing 
			buildings down by placing oscillators on their main support beams, 
			or by setting off gigantic dynamite charges timed to a resonant 
			earth frequency.
 
			
			So where did the idea that 
			Tesla caused the explosion in Tunguska 
          originate? (His name is not mentioned in the highly credible Gallant 
			book.) The answer is probably threefold: 
          
			
				
				(1) Through 
				Tesla's own writings whereby he says on May 3, 1907, in the New 
			York World, just one year before the Tunguska explosion, that his "magnifying transmitter" has already produced 25 
			million horse power, and that "a similar and much improved machine 
			now under construction, will make it possible to attain maximum 
			explosive rates of over 800 million horse power." Tesla also 
			states in this article and in an article the following year in Wireless Telegraphy & Telephone, 1908, pp. 67-71, that he will 
			be able to direct electrical energy "with great precision" to any 
			point of the globe
				
				(2) Through 
				Col. 
			Tom Bearden's writings and through the speculations of Bearden's 
			associate
				
				(3) through the 
			statements of the late Dr. Andrija Puharich. It is Bearden's 
			contention that a so called "Tesla wave" disturbs the very fabric of 
			space-time. Therefore, it could, potentially, create an 
			instantaneous disaster at some distant point. Bearden has 
			also suggested that the Russians during the cold war, experimented 
			along these lines. Realistically, I would think that it would still 
			be highly unlikely for such a weapon to presently exist. Rather, a 
			large Wardenclyffe type tower might be able to disrupt the 
			electrical grid at some prescribed target causing a blackout, or 
			some similar phenomena. And even that technology is probably still 
			decades or generations away
			
			
			Bearden, however, 
			is not alone in these kind of speculations. A September 14, 1973 
			article in Nature by A.A. Jackson and M.P. Ryan 
          speculates that the Tunguska event might have been 
			due the earth's interaction with a mini black hole.
Influenced by 
			Bearden's writings and similar theories, and also 
			influenced by Tesla's own assertion that a Wardenclyffe 
			like tower 
          could be used as a death ray, apparently Puharich was the first 
			to suggest that Tesla caused the Tunguska explosion. 
			At least, that is the contention of Tad Wise, author of the 
			recent novelized Tesla biography. Wise told me last 
			year, that he was greatly intrigued by
          Puharich's suggestion and therefore placed it in his Tesla 
			book. As Wise's book is part fiction, this was completely 
			acceptable. However, it was taken as fact, particularly when Wise 
			had the same story aired on FOX TV on a show on Tesla. See also, Oliver Nichelson quoted in 
          	The Fantastic Inventions of Nikola Tesla by D.H. Childress, 
			pp. 255-257.
It is my belief that the explosion at Tunguska was 
			probably caused by a meteor or small comet. This view takes into 
			account the eye-witness reports by local tribesmen of a fiery object 
			with a long tail hitting or passing by the area in June of 1908. In 
			1986, Louis Frank from the University of Iowa, theorized that 
			the oceans that make up the planet were caused by comets that 
			bombard the earth over tens of millions of years. Comets are mostly 
			ice, and they would melt when entering the earth's atmosphere. 
			Although the theory was initially laughed at, according to the June 
			9, 1997 issue of US News & World Report, 
          NASA 
          has been able to photograph "between five and 30 comets [some as large 
			as a house] hitting the upper atmosphere every minute." They then 
			break up and eventually reach the earth as rain.
Nickolai Vasiliev, in his introduction to the 
			Gallant book, 
			hypothesizes that the Tunguska comet, actually skipped 
			along the atmosphere like a rock on a lake, which created an 
			explosion two or three miles above ground, and that the object never 
			actually hit the earth. He notes that in 1989, an asteroid traveling 
			at 40,000 mph, missed the earth by a mere four hundred thousand 
			miles. The moon is 240,000 miles from the earth. As no meteor or 
			comet fragment has been found at the Tunguska site, Vasiliev's theory holds merit, although it may have been an 
			asteroid instead of a comet. 
			
			
			4.  I have heard that 
			Tesla was working on the 
          Philadelphia Experiment. To what extent did he participate? 
			
As you probably know, there is a lot of controversy about the 
          	Philadelphia Experiment, and what really occurred. There 
			is one theory that an entire ship was made to disappear and then 
			reappear someplace else. One explanation is that this was done by 
			dematerializing and then rematerializing the ship. A more likely 
			scenario is that the ship disappeared on the radar screen and then 
			reappeared later. This can be done in a variety of ways, by either 
			creating a special electrical field that is hard to detect, or by 
			making the skin of the ship out of some material, such as Kevlar, which is a polyurethane fiber that absorbs the 
			electromagnetic energy thereby preventing the radar beams from 
			bouncing off the hull, and thus giving the position of the ship 
			away. The stealth bomber has a skin made up of a compound that 
			absorbs radar beams.
Tesla's link to the 
			
			Philadelphia Experiment 
			is often tied to his supposed association with Albert Einstein. 
			I have completed an exhaustive study of Tesla's relationship 
			to Albert Einstein and found out that there is no 
			correspondence between them other than the famous letter Einstein 
			sent to Tesla on Tesla's 75th birthday. There are no letters in 
			either the Tesla Museum in Belgrade or the Einstein archives which 
			are in Israel at the University of Jerusalem.
Tesla has been linked to 
			Einstein because of a famous 
			photo which was taken on April 23, 1921 in New Brunswick, New Jersey 
			in celebration of a new RCA transatlantic broadcasting station that 
			was being put in operation. Present at the event were scientists and 
			corporate heads from RCA, GE and AT&T including Charles Steinmetz, 
			Irving Langmuir, David Sarnoff and Albert Einstein. Standing in 
			between Steinmetz and Einstein was a man who resembled Nikola 
			Tesla. I, myself, thought it was Tesla, and wrote an 
			article which included this assumption for the 1986 ITS Symposium. 
			Margaret Cheney and also R.G. Williams in their 
			respective biographies also did the same thing.
After conferring with 
			Leland Anderson and searching back to 
			original sources which included the an article in the New York 
			Herald, and the original caption for the photo, it has been 
			determined that the man standing between Einsten and Steinmetz was one 
			John Carson, who was an engineer 
			for AT&T. This photo has also been doctored to air-brush out all 
			individuals except for Einstein and Steinmetz by the GE people who 
			use it to imply a special relationship between Steinmetz and 
			Einstein.
The real reason why Einstein wrote Tesla was because of 
			Kenneth 
			Swezey, who was helping care for Tesla in the 1920's, 
			30's and early 40's, and who was writing a series of articles on the 
			great inventor. Swezey had befriended Einsten in the 
			early 1920's after writing a treatise on relativity, and Einsten 
			essentially wrote the letter as a favor to Swezey. Please also see 
			my recent article Taking on Einstein in the Jan/Feb/March 
			issue of Extraordinary Science.
So Tesla never really had a personal relationship with 
			Einstein, nor is it likely that he worked on the Philadelphia Experiment.
			Tesla, however, did work on radar inventions about 1903 and 
			later around the time of WWI, which were outcroppings from his work 
			at Wardenclyffe.
          
 
			
			5. Did Tesla ever marry or have a serious relationship which 
			may have precluded marriage? 
			
In the mid 1920's, Tesla told 
			Dragislav Petkovich, a 
			Serbian reporter for Politika (Beograd, April 27, 1927), that he had 
			never touched a woman, but that he had also fallen in love once in 
			his life while he was student. The girl's name was apparently Anna, 
			and Tesla probably met her in Gospic on one of his trips back to his 
			home town. Tesla kept in touch with Anna, and she eventually had a son who 
			Tesla looked after when he came to New York City at the turn of the 
			century. Unfortunately, this boy was interested in boxing, and died 
			in his first boxing match.
Later, of course, Tesla was captivated by a number of women 
			such as playwright and musical composer Marguerite Merrington (who never married) and also Robert Johnson's wife Katharine. Tesla 
			essentially took a vow of celibacy because he had devoted himself to 
			science and felt that he would not have the time to pursue his 
			interests if he had a wife and family to care for. Tesla was 
			also friendly with many other women, many of whom were married to 
			wealthy financiers. These included 
          Anne Morgan (who never married), daughter of J. Pierpont 
			Morgan,
          Ava Astor, wife of John Jacob Astor, and Mrs. 
			Corine Robinson, who was 
          Teddy Roosevelt's sister.
Tesla's sexuality, however, has always remained a mystery. 
			Margaret 
			Cheney suggests in her biography that Tesla may have been 
			a homosexual, and this is repeated in Paul Baker's book on 
			Stanford White. I have discovered no evidence to support this 
			theory. I believe, essentially, that Tesla was more 
			interested in inventing than in complicated heterosexual liaisons. 
			Later in life he showered his affection on the city pigeons, and 
			clearly transferred some of his romantic inclinations onto one 
			particular white pigeon with brown tipped wings, which he told John O'Neill that he loved like a man would love a women.
			
Tesla was also influenced by such Buddhists as Swami 
			Vivekananda, and thus believed that if he could transform his 
			sexual energy through celibacy, he would raise his brain output to a 
			higher level. A strong proponent of self-denial, and, essentially a 
			spiritual man, it is likely that much of his passion was simply 
			redirected into his work.
          
 
			
			6. How did Tesla handle adverse situations like 
			losing his financing for the Wardenclyffe project. 
			
As discussed in my article on Wardenclyffe in the last 
			issue of 
          Extraordinary Science, (April/May/June 1996), Tesla lost 
			his financing for Wardenclyffe because he ran out of money, in part, 
			because he decided to build a larger tower than was contracted for 
			with J.Pierpont Morgan. Tesla's first major falling out with Morgan 
			occurred in August of 1901, shortly after Morgan's return from 
			Europe, and this was during the Wall Street Panic of 1901. A few 
			months later, 
          Marconi sent the first ever recorded transatlantic message, and 
			was thereby perceived as the new king of wireless. Tesla tried to 
			interest such financiers as Thomas Fortune Ryan (corporate 
			head), Jacob Schiff 
          (stock broker), Henry Clay Frick (Andrew Carnegie's former 
			partner) or 
          Col. Oliver Payne (John D. Rockefeller's partner), in helping 
			put in the additional funding, but Morgan blocked all efforts. 
			Essentially, 
          Morgan feared that a new wireless system of power distribution 
			might threaten such companies that he had control over as General 
			Electric or AT & T.
			 
			
			 After the last possible deal was squashed by 
			Morgan in 1906, I 
			have hypothesized that Tesla suffered an emotional collapse. 
			For about 6 months, Tesla was incapacitated, but in 1907-08 he began 
			to form a new plan to resurrect the ailing world telegraphy 
			enterprise.
After the last possible deal was squashed by 
			Morgan in 1906, I 
			have hypothesized that Tesla suffered an emotional collapse. 
			For about 6 months, Tesla was incapacitated, but in 1907-08 he began 
			to form a new plan to resurrect the ailing world telegraphy 
			enterprise.
          
			 
			
			He would invent a highly efficient 
			steam turbine 
                to replace the gasoline engine in the automobile. Profits, if 
			realized, would have been in the neighborhood of a hundred million 
			dollars. Thus began Tesla's work on the bladeless turbine and also 
			the reverse of this invention which was a bladeless pump.
 
			
			As with any new invention, it takes many years of hard work to perfect 
			it. For instance, Tesla invented his AC polyphase 
			system in 1883, but it was not successfully demonstrated on 
			any large scale until 1891 when C.E.L. Brown and Michael 
			Dobrolowsky used it to transmit energy over 100 miles from 
			Lauffen to Frankfurt Germany. Two years later it was displayed at 
			the Chicago World's Fair, and two years after that it was put in at 
			Niagara Falls. So it took at least 10 years to get it to the point 
			where it could truly be ready for market. (A modern example of a 
			long delay would be the Concorde plane which flies at Mach II. This 
			plane was designed in the mid-1950's but did not get off the ground 
			for nearly a quarter of a century.)
Tesla worked on various forms of his bladeless turbine from 
			about 1910-1913 with John Hayes Hammond Jr. at Thomas 
			Edison's Warterside station in New York. As World War I began, 
			Tesla was sidetracked from this endeavor in part because of legal 
			disputes with Marconi over the invention of the wireless, and 
			in part because he was helping Telefunken, the German concern, 
			perfect their wireless transmitters which were put in at Tuckertown 
			New Jersey and Sayville, Long Island, New York. In 1917, after 
			Wardenclyffe was destroyed, Tesla moved to Chicago to work 
			for Pyle National to again work on the turbine, and then on to 
			Milwaukee from 1919-1922 for Allis Chalmers, and finally to 
			Philadelphia, from 1925-1926 where he worked for Budd National.
			
Thus, it is clear that Tesla put in 18 years of intense effort 
			to perfect the bladeless turbine as he negotiated with Japan and 
			Germany before WWI to place the turbines in torpedoes and tanks, and 
			then later with ship building and airplane companies and also Ford 
			and General Motors. The turbine, however, never reached the state of 
			perfection that was required for them to scrap their existing 
			engines and replace them with his. Thus, he never received large 
			amounts of compensation for the engine, although he did recoup in 
			the neighborhood of $50,000 from Pyle National, Allis Chalmers and 
			Budd National for work completed.
Tesla's goal was initially to resurrect Wardenclyffe by paying 
			off his debts, and then to build a new, and more efficient Wardenclyffe in the 1920's or 1930's, but he never received 
			the great funds necessary. Interestingly enough, Tesla did 
			complete Wardenclyffe in fancy drawings and on paper through his 
			many writings for Hugo Gernsback in his magazine Electrical Experimenter. Thus, one could say that 
          	Tesla 
          coped with the loss of Wardenclyffe but continuing to produce new 
			inventions and by devoting his life to realize the dream. 
			Unfortunately, he ultimately never succeeded in making operational 
			any world telegraphy center. 
For more information 
			about the inventions of Nicola Tesla, "click" 
			
			HERE