by Phillip S. Duke Ph.D.
The AIDS-ET Connection Hypothesis is a
new, unifying scientific concept, which logically and simply
explains and unifies the known facts relating to HIV/AIDS and Ufology (the study of Unidentified flying objects). Like any
hypothesis, it is in the least well established stage of scientific
knowledge, and provides a guideline for further study,
investigation, and possible modification.
HIVs are Human Immuno Deficiency Viruses. After infection they
replicate primarily in specific cells of the human immune system,
especially T-4 lymphocytes, and by eventually killing these cells
thereby weaken the immune system. When the immune system is weakened
enough multiple opportunistic infections occur, due to attack by a
variety of otherwise medically uncommon microorganisms. The
resultant disease conditions are collectively termed Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome or AIDS. Although appropriate medical treatment
may be very helpful concerning delaying the onset of and reducing
the severity of AIDS, AIDS is commonly considered an eventually
HIV is present in all the body fluids of infected persons. Infection
is commonly spread by transfer of virus in body fluids, especially
blood and semen. After infection there is a variable latent
asymptomatic period of about on average 10 years, during which in
the absence of laboratory tests infected persons will not know they
are both infected and infectious. Infection can occur in utero, by
passage through the birth canal or by nursing. Infected newborns
usually die of AIDS within a few years.
HIVs are retroviruses employing RNA transcriptase for replication.
This enzyme is notoriously prone to transcription errors in
replication, so that the viruses rapidly change genetically
(mutate). This rapid mutation rate works to make production of a
generally effective preventive vaccine virtually impossible. It also
insures that in time strains will arise resistant to all chemical
At this time world wide epidemics (pandemics) of HIVs are in
progress. The number of HIV infected persons and AIDS cases world
wide is unknown but believed to be rapidly increasing.
(4). A noted
authority states the epidemicís spread is exponential, justifying
cataclysmic expectations (1 p. 195).(2)
The geographical and general time origin of HIVs.AIDS was first
seen in America when otherwise healthy young homosexual (gay) men
presented to a San Francisco (west coast) physician in 1979. Several
months other such cases in gay men were recognized in New York (on
the east coast) (1).
An African physician near Zimbabwe (central Africa), reading about
AIDS in an American Medical Journal, recognized the same syndrome in
Africa, but affecting heterosexuals of both sexes, and newborns
HIV appears to have emerged in Africa about the same time as in the
United States. (2 p. 367). In 1984 Drs. Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier jointly received credit for the discovery of a new virus,
infection with which caused AIDS. The virus was named HIV. In 1983
Dr. Montagnier isolated a HIV from the blood of a west African who,
though dying of AIDS, repeatedly tested negative for HIV. This
HIV is genetically quite different from all the African and American
strains of HIV. It is believed to have been present initially in
western Africa and western India (6).
The jointly discovered virus is now
termed HIV-1, the Montagnier discovered virus HIV-2. The strain of
HIV-1 discovered in America was originally homosexually but not
heterosexually infectious. The HIV-1 and HIV-2 discovered in Africa
were and are heterosexually infective (1,2). All HIVs are readily
transmissible through blood and blood products. All HIVs may be
transmissible in utero, by passage through the birth canal, or by
nursing. All HIVís can cause AIDS.
Accepted research on the origin of the different HIV pandemics
indicates that they all evidently originated at close to the same
time (around 1950) in five different widely distant locations;
central and western Africa, both coasts of America, and western
the central African strain was a heterosexually infective
the east and west coast American strains were homosexually
the western Africa and western India strains
were heterosexually infective HIV-2
This is what authorities such
as Dr. Mirko Grmek and others who have studied the situation believe
According to the above, HIVs all originated as a minimum in at least
three genetically distinctly different strains (two of HIV-1 and one
of HIV-2), two of which (HIV-1s and HIV-2) are so extremely
different genetically that one could not have arisen from the other.
These HIVs then infected susceptible gay and non-gay subjects in
five different locations, on two distant continents, all at close to
the same time. Note that each human infection would have had to
occur shortly after each (unique) viral origination, because HIVs
are rapidly inactivated outside the human body
The foregoing established, scientifically accepted circumstances
concerning the originations of the different strains of HIV-1 and
HIV-2 and their resultant pandemics, indicate clearly that the
origination of the HIVs and the resultant pandemics evidently cannot
have occurred naturally. (1 p. 153).
I mention that for a microorganism strain to arise which was
previously entirely unknown, because harmless or non-existent, and
produce major human pandemics, is an occurrence previously unknown
to both medical science and human history.
For all this to have occurred naturally is essentially impossible.
Nature simply does not work this way. Again, this troubling
conclusion is the opinion of the world authority on the history of
HIV/AIDS Mirko Grmek M.D. Ph.D. and others
of HIV and pandemic originations
Due to the fact that numerous investigators have come to the
conclusion that HIVs and their pandemics cannot have originated
naturally, several hypotheses involving purposeful creation and
origination have been proposed to explain what happened. Prior to my
hypothesis these were all iatrogenic (physician caused) or human
conspiratorial theories. (2 p. 380). My hypothesis is a non-human
All the conspiratorial theories are politically undesirable. As a
consequence a politically correct, but scientifically incorrect and
indefensible concept, has arisen and is supported and nurtured by
the authorities of the western world, especially by the USA and its
At this time the politically correct concept is simply that HIVs
originated in Africa by an unusual, unique isolated case of
transmission from a simian to humans. This simple concept is
contrary to all the facts concerning the nature of HIVs and the
origin of their pandemics... To name just a few,
Viruses (SIVs), like other animal SIVs, are essentially harmless
passenger viruses which do not cause an AIDS-like disease
genetically very different from HIV-1
HIVs do not cause AIDS in
simians including chimpanzees (despite many attempts)
no HIV has
ever been found in any animal, etc.
At least 5 different simians with 3
different HIV strains at 5 distantly different locations, three in
Africa and two in America, all at close to the same time, would have
to be involved, etc. These and other such facts result in the simian
origin concept being maintained publicly only by those with
dependent funding. Authority Betty Korber working at Los Alamos
recently communicated publicly about her important genetic work on
HIV-1ís time origin. Her communication included a comment about the
mystery of HIVís origin. (5).
The origin of HIVs remains a mystery to human science. Meanwhile HIVs continue to do what they do best, infect and kill humans.
purposeful creation of HIVs impossible
Human iatrogenic concepts generally presuppose the HIV multiple
pandemics originated in accidental or purposeful contamination of
vaccines. Human conspiratorial concepts propose that HIVs are
purposefully created Biological Warfare agents. I maintain all
concepts that HIV came into existence by human origination are
invalid, for five different reasons:
(1). All attempts to reproduce the
supposed accident which originated HIV have failed. It is
extremely unlikely that an accidental occurrence could have
produced HIV from non-HIV, when all such attempts by skilled
researchers have not succeeded in doing so.
(2). Human science was quite incapable of creating HIVs in the
time frame of HIV-1 origination, now placed between 1930 and
1940. The necessary knowledge of virology simply was not
available then, and still is not now.
(3). The history of the HIV pandemics indicates against human
involvement. The required vaccination programs did not exist in
Africa and America during the required time frame of 1930 -
(4). There is no record or evidence of any Biological Warfare
research program relating to HIV. What government would attempt
to produce such a genocidal agent? What government would release
it knowing there is no cure?
(5). The evidence from Ufology strongly suggests non-human
involvement. The concept of non-human involvement logically and
simply explains all the relevant facts from both Biomedicine and
Ufology. The concept of human involvement is repeatedly in
conflict with the same facts.
(medical) concept not possible
Iatrogenic concepts rely upon accidental creations for the different
HIV strains, and mass needle inoculations for the early initiation
of the HIV pandemics. Inoculations by mouth, such as for example via
the Sabin oral polio live virus, commonly given orally by sugar
cube, are excluded, as HIVs are believed not infectious by
consumption of food .
(4). To my knowledge human science has not, despite many attempts,
ever succeeded in creating HIVs from non-HIVís
(3). It is very improbable that where many purposeful skilled
attempts have failed, an accident many years earlier could have
achieved this result. Note that several purposeful linked events
would have been necessary. As a minimum it would be necessary for
two different strains of HIV-1 and one strain of HIV-2 to
accidentally originate at the same time. And for the gay infecting
virus to be given to gays by inoculation in America. While the
non-gay infecting HIV-1 was given by inoculation to non-gays in
central Africa. And the different non-gay infecting HIV-1 virus was
given by inoculations to non-gays in western Africa and India. All
at close to the same time. That all these events could have occurred
accidentally and/or purposefully by human means appears so unlikely,
that I consider them essentially impossible.
Therefore I consider the above considerations effectively exclude
human iatrogenic theories of HIV origin.
(6).Human conspiratorial concept not possible. Briefly, human
purposeful creation of HIVs is not possible because at the time HIVs
originated, in the first half of the last century or earlier, human
science was quite incapable of creating HIVs, even if it wanted to.
The evidence is as follows.
When the human body becomes HIV infected its immune system
eventually recognizes the infection and produces detectable
antibodies to the HIVs, usually within weeks or months. This is
termed seroconversion. Attempts to determine when HIVs originated
include the study of frozen dated African and American blood samples
to determine the earliest dates for seroconversion. To my knowledge
nothing earlier than 1950 has been found. This indicates HIVs and
their pandemics originated as early as 1950.
A time for HIV-1 origin can also be arrived at, by comparing the
number of existent mutations with the viral mutation rate. In the
hands of Wolinsky et al (6) this resulted in a time frame of 1930 to
1950. In the hands of Korber et al this resulted in a time frame of
1920 to 1940 (5).
The above indicates conclusively
that HIVs originated no more recently than 1950. Most likely in
the time frame of 1930 to 1940.
I maintain that it was impossible
for human science to purposefully create HIVs (and infect people
with them) even at the time of 1950, because virology in general
and viral genetics in particular was not nearly knowledgeable
enough. For example
The key research enzyme Reverse
Transcriptase, detection of which in the suspected AIDS virus
provided the discovery that they were retroviruses, was
discovered in 1970
Retroviruses in humans were not
discovered until 1978
The polymerase chain reaction,
central to retroviral research, was not discovered until 1983
Without any knowledge of or use of these
tools, purposeful creation of HIVs would be technically impossible.
In addition, what human agency would fund the development of such
destructive agents? And after development purposefully release them,
in the knowledge there was no generally effective prevention or
treatment? And why in the time frame of 1930 to 1940? At this time
America was still recovering from a great economic depression. These
are not the circumstances under which an immensely and generally
destructive new viral disease is developed and released.
The above considerations effectively exclude all human
conspiratorial theories of HIV origin.
A non-human conspiratorial theory.
The conspiratorial theory
can be saved by the concept that HIVs were originated and initially
spread into humans by means of purposeful intelligence, that
intelligence not being human. This concept is in good agreement with
all the known facts, and to my knowledge is the only way they can be
logically and simply explained.
Supporting evidence from Ufology.
Before proceeding further I
immediately state that all the foregoing, though on the surface
convincing regarding a non-human conspiratorial theory, is in fact
far from convincing to the experienced scientist. If I had nothing
more than the foregoing, I would never have sought publication of my
hypothesis. In fact, however, there is a massive and convincing body
of supportive evidence, from the independent source of Ufology. It
is this evidence from Ufology, which in addition to the evidence
from Biomedicine, encouraged me to formulate and publish the
The evidence from Biomedicine and Ufology is complementary and
mutually supportive, and the hypothesis which results from combining
the two simply and logically explains otherwise incomprehensible
phenomena from both disciplines.
For example, the incomprehensible (high technology) origins of HIVs,
the essentially simultaneous initiation of the different strains and
their pandemics, the missing AIDS cases between 1945 and 1979, all
become readily understandable by simply employing the concept that
advanced extraterrestrial (ET) technology is involved. The
incomprehensible phenomena of cattle mutilations become readily
understandable with the understanding that the mutilations in fact
occur at locations of HIV transmission in humans, and are in fact
probably not mutilations but tissue samplings related to HIV
The (harvested) cattle blood is
genetically very similar to human blood(8),
and may be taken in relation to HIV replication. The
incomprehensible phenomena of human abduction with medical type
examinations become understandable with the realization that the
examinations emphasize locations of HIV transmission in humans
The evidence from Ufology comes mostly from the two apparently
different, but we shall see evidently related, subjects of Cattle
Mutilations and Human Abductions. It is beyond this workís scope to
treat either of these subjects in any kind of detail. For more
information see the voluminous literature under the heading of Ufology. As many scientists are not familiar with these subjects
brief descriptions are in order.
Cattle Mutilations and HIVs.
A member of the family Bovidae
domesticated Bos Taurus (plural cattle), usually a top grade animal,
is in good health one day, and dead the next. It is found that body
parts were taken from regions not good to eat, by means of
laser-like very sharp cuts. The animalís blood is not present, and
there is little or no blood on the animal or ground. There are no
tracks of any kind, predators, humans or vehicles, even with very
soft ground. Sometimes animals have injuries or are found in
conditions consistent with being dropped from a height. Large
animals have been found in trees (9). It is not uncommon for UFO
sightings to be reported in the general vicinity. These phenomena
have been reported throughout the world, and widely investigated in
America. There is no doubt that such cattle mutes occur. They are
valid widespread phenomena and are also not just extremely isolated,
very uncommon events.
The politically correct explanation, in America supplied by the
county agent to angry, baffled cattlemen, is animal predators,
probably coyotes. In reply one cattleman said, If the coyotes can do
this then we are in deep trouble. In addition to animal predators it
has been suggested that a cult, or the military, is responsible. The
authorities publicly maintain the politically correct animal
predator explanation, but due to investigations by their civilian
and military assets know otherwise (9).
Animal predators are excluded for several reasons. There is the
absence of predator tracks, the absence of animal blood, and the
laser-like cuts. The mutilations are of meat not good to eat. The
meat good to eat is left to rot. It is reported predators will not
eat cattle mutes, nor will rendering facilities accept them
The bizarre nature and circumstances of cattle mutes resulted in the
concept that a cult was responsible. However this explanation is
easily refuted. No cult is nearly large enough to create these
widespread cattle mute phenomena. And even if they could, why would
they? Without anyone ever hearing anything from them? No cult has
ever claimed responsibility for even one cattle mute.
Although in theory the military is possibly large enough, and could
lift cattle into helicopters, mutilate, and then drop them, why
would they operate like this-? If desired cattle could be bought
openly and mutilated/disposed of in secret.
It has been suggested that cattle at specific locations downwind
from nuclear power plants were sampled for radioactivity. However
many cattle mutes occur very distant from nuclear plants. And some
occur in countries without nuclear energy. The body areas sampled do
not include testing for the common isotopes of concern, such as
I-131 (thyroid) or Sr-90 (bone).
Therefore the above proposed explanations for cattle mutes all fail.
Evidently predators, cults, and the military are not responsible.
The key to understanding cattle mutilation phenomena is found in the
fact I discovered that mutilations occur at body sites corresponding
to HIV transmission sites in humans (except for the piece of skin
and one ear). The genitals, anus, udder part of the mouth/jaw, a
piece of skin, one eye, and one ear, usually the left, is commonly
taken. Cattle mutes can be readily and logically explained as
samplings of body materials from regions corresponding to HIV
transmission in humans. Much has been made for example of the
ubiquitous incomprehensible anal coring. Of course this body region
is an important route of human HIV transmission
I suggest the ear is taken because it contained the necessary
locator implant (13). The skin is taken perhaps to study the
possibility of HIV transmission via viral shedding from this route.
Possibly the cattle blood is taken because cattle blood is
genetically closer to human blood than the blood of any other
animal. It might be that cattle blood is harvested in relation to
HIV antibodies. We employ large animals for the purpose of antibody
production; one example is the use of horses to produce tetanus
The following recent scientific investigation of a cattle mute is
A N. E. Utah pregnant cow mutilation
case in good condition was thoroughly investigated by Ph.D. and
Ph.D./D.V.M. personnel from the well funded National Institute
of Discovery Science (NIDS) headquartered in Las Vegas Nevada
USA. NIDS had a complete professional necropsy made with proper
samples taken for detailed laboratory analysis. The usual
mutilation and blood findings were present; the left ear was
missing. At autopsy the heart was found to be the consistency of
pudding inside an intact pericardial membrane.
In addition to more usual findings
there was also a mysterious light blue biocida gel not seen
before by any of the investigators. This gel was found on cut
body surfaces and at the animalís rear. A similar appearing blue biocidal gel was personally seen many years earlier and reported
on in writing by USAF
Col. Philip Corso deceased. Evidently its
use was to preserve a dead grey ET alien, who Corso saw immersed
in it (10).
NIDS photographed and analyzed the blue gel. It contained
(volatile) formaldehyde at low concentration and was evidently a
biocidal agent. Why was a biocidal agent employed under these
circumstances? To protect against surface infection from what?
One possibility is that the gel was employed to protect the
unborn near term calf against infection through the birth canal.
The cowís former pregnancy was confirmed by two independent lab
tests. The uterus was intact but empty, the calf was not found;
there were no signs whatsoever of predators, or of it. Probably
the calf was abducted.
Lab tests of the cow revealed a very abnormally low level of
liver vitamin A and copper, and an imbalance in the extracellular sodium/potassium ratio favoring potassium. These
results were published well before my studies reporting the same
physiologic abnormalities in human abductees, believed related
to the implantís anti- vitamin A action. The evidence indicating
the same biochemical abnormalities are found in humans as were
found in this cattle mute (11), and also that the abnormalities
in humans are due to the implant, also suggests such an implant
was present in the cow before mutilation
Both common and uncommon cattle pathogens were tested for with
negative test results. Although I repeatedly urged NIDS to also
determine cattle mute sample HIV test status, and offered to pay
for the testing, no such test results were ever reported.
In its final, detailed report NIDS stated the animalís death may
not have been due to natural causes
The facts of HIV/AIDS and cattle mutes
become logically and simply explainable only by the concept that ET
phenomena are involved.
Human Abductions and HIVs. (9)
Briefly- a human or small number of
humans see little grey ETs with big all black eyes and despite being
terrified cannot resist being taken to a secure private location,
frequently aboard a disk shaped craft. They are compelled to undress
and lie down nude on medical type (cold) metal examining tables, and
are then subjected to various medical type examinations and
sometimes surgical procedures, all under direction of the hairless
small grey beings with very large all black eyes. Although conscious
there is generally little or no pain, though there are exceptions to
this. First time abductees found suitable are implanted and will
become multiple abductees. Young people are preferred- there is a
belief among abductees that if you have not been taken by age 30 you
will not be.
On completion of the procedures
information may be obtained by questioning, being shown scenes and
their responses noted, etc. Occasionally such abductees are given a
guided tour, brief general instructions, shown abnormal appearing
children, etc. Then they are usually returned close to where they
were abducted from. Memories of the abduction are consciously
absent. So called screen memories are generally present to cover
over events (12). The experience is usually emotionally traumatic.
Despite the absence of conscious memory abductees are generally
somewhat emotionally disturbed, without knowing why.
There are objective indicators of such abductions. One is missing
time; since conscious memories of the traumatic events are
suppressed/screened over, there is no conscious explanation for the
missing time, which can amount to hours or even days. Another is the
peculiar small scoop shaped scar resulting from implantation.
Implants are small solid objects placed into abductees bodies.
Whatever the location implants are found on removal to be in contact
with nervous cells. Being radio opaque implants show up readily on
x-ray, where they are routinely reported as small foreign bodies of
unknown origin. Some implants have been removed and then analyzed by
advanced methods. The shape and composition is unlike anything ever
seen previously (13). Objective evidence is also presented by the
physiologic abnormalities such as the non-dietary vitamin A
deficiency generally common to abductees, and believed due to the
Repression of the traumatic abduction event(s) understandably
results in lasting stress which can result in mental/emotional
disturbance. Sleep disturbance is common. The abduction events can
be recalled under hypnosis. Much of our knowledge concerning
abduction events comes from hypnosis of abductees. Successful
hypnotherapy very much reduces possible psychological disturbance. A
diet rich in carrots has helped combat abduction related vitamin A
deficiency usually with hormonal disturbances
removal of implants has resulted in lasting beneficial results
Based on my detailed personal and email interviews with many so
called alleged abductees, my examinations of scoop marks, study of
abductee physiologic abnormalities, the fact of and nature of
removed implants, etc. I believe the abduction phenomena are valid.
Then what is going on here?
The medical type examination given abductees is in fact very
different from a routine physical. The major organ systems we
usually examine for disease are superficially checked, but evidently
a careful examination is made of body regions involved in HIV
transmission. For example, thorough time consuming uncomfortable
anal probing is routinely given to males. Vaginas are also carefully
The eyes and mouth are examined. If nursing a sample of milk is
taken. Blood but not urine, sputum, saliva or fecal matter samples
are taken. The skin is repeatedly gently scraped (possibly to
evaluate for possible HIV transmission). And there is examination
for generalized lymphadenopathy (common in AIDS), by lifting both
arms or one arm (8, Secret Life) and checking the lymph nodes. Eggs
and sperm are taken. Pregnant women have their foetuses taken (note
correlation with the reports of abnormal appearing children, and the
missing unborn calf).
Based on the above I suggest multiple abductees serve the following
(1) Provide monitoring
concerning HIV infections in the human population
(2) Provide human eggs,
sperm and foetuses for study and use
(3) Provide information
on human reactions and society
It is not clear to what degree
implantation may allow direct/indirect behavioral control.
I have attempted to evaluate the incidence of HIV infection among
abductees. As far as I can tell it is abnormally low. Despite over
500 answered inquiries I never met or was told of any living
abductee who was HIV positive. This suggests that abduction may
indicate against HIV infection.
There is a case documented in writing by a living investigator, and
confirmed by phone to me by another, where an abductee tested HIV
positive until his implant was removed. After implant removal he
tested and continues to test HIV negative. The implant was hollow
and secreted a potassium like substance. No further information is
available (4 p. 33).
If this abductee had been HIV infected, he would remain so after
implant removal. The circumstances indicate the implant caused a
positive HIV test without active virus being present. The HIV tests
commonly employed clinically detect antibodies to HIV, not the
virus. So this personís implant either released such antibodies, or
resulted in their production. Such antibodies would in theory be
protective against viral infection.
The positive correlation between HIV test result and implant
presence in this case indicates a connection between HIV and the
implant. Human science does not have implants that can do this.
Assuming the implants are ET phenomena, and I believe the overall
evidence strongly suggests this, then a connection between HIVs and
ETs is shown.
After reading my book The AIDS-ET Connection which presents
essentially the above information in more detail, a number of people
told me you havenít proven anything. In a way this is true; the
information presented is mostly circumstantial. In fact the strength
of the hypothesis lies not so much in the evidence, but in the fact
that it simply and logically explains so much. Like the Heliocentric
theory of Copernicus, it simply and logically explains otherwise
incomprehensible phenomena. By employing the AIDS-ET Connection
concept diverse appearing and otherwise incomprehensible phenomena
from Biomedicine and Ufology are explained in terms of each other.
Everything seems to fit simply, easily and logically. No accessory
hypothesis or condition is necessary.
The reaction of the authorities towards my work has been all
negative. This suggests there is at least something valid there. For
Why is it that well-funded NIDS has not published HIV test status
results on any of the cattle mute cases they investigated, despite
my repeatedly corresponding with them and urging this, offering to
pay the testing cost, etc? And despite their marked interest in my
work? (they bought the first copy of my book). I suggest the answer
is simple- they are a governmental asset, and like all such their
policy is to collect and suppress important UFO related findings.
This concept also explains why after
being severely personally criticized in its pages by MUFON columnist
Richard Hall, who has no scientific training, my resignation from
MUFON was accepted by MUFONís former president Walt Andrus Jr.,
without its ever being offered. It is public knowledge that the
present President of MUFON Mr. John Schuessler is a member of NIDSís
Board of Directors, and that MUFONís former Director of Abduction
Studies John Carpenter recently sold MUFONís confidential abductee
information to NIDSís Col. John Alexander CIA for $14,000. Carpenter
publicly apologized for doing this, stating he needed the money for
I have recently repeatedly applied again to MUFON for permission to
submit research material for possible publication, and this has been
repeatedly refused by Dwight Connelly MUFONís Editor. I have
repeatedly appealed this refusal to Mr. John Schuessler. Evidently
he can do nothing. MUFONís Editor Dwight Connelly continues to
refuse consideration of my research for possible publication
regardless of its subject. MUFON is Americaís largest UFO
organization. Its ongoing policy since 1998 of refusing to consider
my research for possible publication, along with the policy of
Western scientific journals not to publish anything even touching on
Ufology, has effectively hindered awareness that the AIDS-ET
Connection hypothesis exists. Such policy is the antithesis of the
scientific method, which requires open publication with peer review,
followed by testing with publication of the test results.
The reaction of the authorities towards my work has evidently been
to take it very seriously. Again, this suggests there is at least
something valid there.
For several years now I have asked persons working in the cattle
mute field to either determine HIV test status of authentic mute
cases, or provide me with samples for testing. My hypothesis
predicts such cattle mutes will test positive. To date no such test
results are available. In the absence of such test results I am
attempting to look for objective evidence elsewhere.
The AIDS-ET Connection hypothesis is either essentially wrong or
right. If it is wrong little is lost. Many scientists have proposed
hypotheses which turned out to be invalid. If this should be the
case, I have worked in good faith, and will be happy to stand
But if it is correct all will be lost, unless steps are taken to
avoid that loss. This is the crux of the matter. We plan to be
voyaging to other planets, and then to other star systems. We know
what will happen should we find an attractive earth-like planet
inhabited by intelligent but technologically inferior beings. The
same thing will happen to those beings as happened to the natives in
Africa, in the new world discovered by Columbus, etc. Their
civilization will be destroyed, to make room for colonists. I
suggest there is only one form of cosmic wealth, and that is real
We have it, the grey ETs evidently want
it. We are the only obstacle that stands in the way. They are taking
steps to eliminate that obstacle. This is what my hypothesis
indicates. To ignore this possibility is completely irresponsible. I
ask every responsible human being to consider the possibility that
my hypothesis is valid. If it is valid then we must take steps to
defend ourselves against HIV/AIDS. And against the originators of
What needs to
The HIV/AIDS pandemics
threaten the deaths of billions. Combating this scourge should be
given the highest priority. It appears to me that in the long term
all research efforts towards creating a generally preventive vaccine
or treatment will fail. Because we are dealing with purposefully
changing Biological Warfare agent situations, not a natural
phenomena. Therefore I suggest efforts should be concentrated on
preventing infection. Chastity outside marriage, and monogamy within
marriage, are highly effective. Educate concerning protection
against infection during sexual relations. Making HIV infection
reportable is the only way to obtain reliable information on its
New infections could be very much reduced by socially quarantining
infected persons. A possible method of social quarantining would be
mandatory HIV testing plus the tattooing of HIV test results visible
only under UV viewing.
The present policy of concealing the truth about UFOs
outdated. It may have been helpful at one time but at present is
evidently only harmful. This policy must be changed to one of free
open inquiry. Let the word go out from the authorities that Ufology
related research subjects will be considered for publication, and
even funding. Doing this will result in the truth becoming known
My AIDS-ET Connection hypothesis is presented for what it may be
worth. Let us hope that the hypothesis is wrong.
Interested persons can contact me by email firstname.lastname@example.org backup
Grmek, Mirko The History of AIDS 1990
Princeton University Press.
(2). Garrett, Laurie The
Coming Plague 1994 Penguin books.
(3). Lever, A.
Editor The Molecular Biology of HIV/AIDS 1996 John Wiley.
(4). Duke, Phillip
The AIDS-ET Connection 1999 Cosmos Press.
(5). Korber, Bette
Los Alamos National Lab 2-1-2000 Press Release.
(6). Wolinsky et
al., Limitations of a Molecular Clock... Science June 19,
(7). Blandford and
Cosell. In UFOs and Ufology by Devereaux and Brookesmith
(8). Womack, James
Texas A& M University Report 1984.
(9). Marrs Jim.
Alien Agenda 1997 Harper Collins.
(10). Corso, Philip
After Roswell Simon & Schuster 1997 Pocketbooks 1998.
(11). Duke, Phillip RIAP
Bulletin Vol 5, Number 4 Oct.-Dec. 2000.
(12). Kelleher et al.,
Investigation of the unexplained death of a cow in N.E. Utah
Oct. 16, 1998 Final Report NIDS Las Vegas NE June 1999.
(13). Leir, Roger The Aliens
and the Scalpel Granite Press 1998. See also
Wilson, Katharina The Alien Jigsaw, Puzzle Publishing 1995.
(15). Jacobs, David Secret Life
1995 and The Threat 1998 Simon and Schuster.